Create 2021-07-07-The-Whole-Stock-Market-is-Being-Propped-Up-by-the-RRP-Market.md

- Created Banks directory

00-Getting-Started/2021-05-27-GME-Explained-for-New-Apes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+GME explained for new apes
+==========================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/lawrgood](https://www.reddit.com/user/lawrgood/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/nm40vh/gme_explained_for_new_apes/) | 
+
+---
+
+[🔬 DD 📊](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/search?q=flair_name%3A%22%F0%9F%94%AC%20DD%20%F0%9F%93%8A%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+If you are new to the sub or have been struggling to wrap your head around the DD (due diligence), hopefully this can make things clearer.
+
+Why is GME's price changing?
+
+Short hedge funds (SHF) sold shares that they didn't own because they thought GME would go bankrupt.
+
+Think of it like an airline. There's only so many seats on the flight. The hedgies thought the flight was going to be cancelled so they printed some fake tickets and sold those too. Then the flight didn't get cancelled. Now, because there are only so many seats available, they need to stand at the gate and buy back the extra tickets, then rip them up so no-one tries to use them. It doesn't matter if that ticket was a real one or the fake one. They need to buy it and destroy it until only the original number remains.
+
+The problem is, everyone is really excited for the trip, so no-one wants to sell. So the price of the tickets is too high for the hedgies. Short term, they are printing even more tickets to give them cash to deal with the people at the front of the queue, but all that does is make the line longer. And there is still only the original number of seats on the plane.
+
+How can they sell shares that they don't own?
+
+If SHF think a stock will go down in price, they are allowed to locate and borrow shares from other people, sell them and try to buy them back later. To keep the metaphor going, they can give you a few bucks to hold your ticket and promise to sell it to me at today's price. Then if the price goes down they can buy it from you at the cheaper price to deliver to me.
+
+What we think has happened is, they didn't just borrow your ticket, they photocopied it and lent it to someone else at the same time as they sold it to me. As in, they lent out the shares they had borrowed. Because they have a few days to sort that out before anyone notices, they usually get away with it. Normally people buy and sell all the time so it gets lost in the noise.
+
+Isn't relending shares you've borrowed illegal?
+
+Yes. You aren't allowed to sell shares that don't exist. If you see the term "naked short selling" this is what they mean. There may be some misreporting going on to cover up the fact but punishments are relatively lean historically such as a proportionally small fine. There's been a lot of regulation changes in a short period of time which may be gearing up to deal with that.
+
+What's with the massive price spikes every so often?
+
+This is probably cyclical. If you see T+21 or T+35 mentioned this is referring to the time after a trade that they have to find that share they promised to give you. Market Makers get a little longer than your standard HF. Because shares are so hard to find, it could be that SHF have to keep kicking the can down the road. In our airline metaphor, this is them printing extra tickets. T+21 and T+35 would be the day that people are arriving to collect their tickets so the SHF needs to order more from the printers. The last week of May was when these two dates overlapped so lots of pressure to find shares to deliver.
+
+If the price keeps going up, who will pay?
+
+First the SHF has to buy back what they can from the market. If they run out of cash, the clearing house auction off all their stuff and buy back with that. If that's not enough, the clearing house is on the hook because they rubber stamped the trades. They can use the cash they have but, if they run out, they can ask for cash from their members.
+
+If that isn't enough, the DTCC is on the hook for failing to keep the records straight. If they run out of cash, it's down to the government for not intervening in the fraud soon enough. When it gets to this point, trillions will have been spent buying back shares.
+
+How long can they keep this going?
+
+No-one knows for sure. It seems that SHF are running low on money already. There have been massive sell offs across all their other holdings. This is why, when the market tanks, it's usually at the same time GME is doing well.
+
+There have been lots of rule changes too. The clearing houses are asking for more collateral (the money or assets that needs to be put up as assurance in order to keep or establish these short positions). They can also ask for reports more often and can force members to close their positions sooner.
+
+How do we know the SHF haven't bought back enough shares?
+
+There may be some misreporting going on. SHF's may be mislabeling short positions as long, not reporting them at all, or putting out press releases of how they have covered their positions. The fines for doing so are relatively minor, and if it means the difference between going bankrupt or getting another day to dig themselves out of a hole, there's a lot of incentive to cheat.
+
+There's been a large increase in whistleblower awards handed out by the SEC this year for information that leads to a penalty.
+
+The push to vote will shine a light on this. There is a shareholder meeting on June 9th and many have already voted. The vote count will give an insight into how many fake shares have been sold. Even this number will be lower than the true number. Remember that not all holders can/will vote.
+
+There are also other indicators that shares are hard to get hold of. Volumes traded each day have been declining meaning fewer shares are flying back and forth between traders. Shares have been harder to borrow than they were before.
+
+What's the company like?
+
+GME have had some great news lately. The incoming chairman is an e-commerce legend (Ryan Cohen) who is putting together a team to take the company into the future. He's already built a successful e-com company (Chewy) and is very customer focused with an eye for quality.
+
+The latest news is that they are developing an NFT to be built using Ethereum. This will allow for digital games to be traded in and resold. An NFT is an encrypted record of who owns a specific digital asset. When you buy a game download, a corresponding digital coin would be minted that says it belongs to you. If you want to sell it on, you could transfer ownership of that coin just like you do with bitcoin or Ethereum now.
+
+They also have no debt and $500+ million dollars in the bank.
+
+None of this is investment advice. Do not take advice from internet strangers. I am in no way qualified to give it. If you think I've got any part wrong, call me out in the comments. If you think I need to add something, ask. If you have more questions, I will try to answer but, I repeat, I know almost nothing.

00-Getting-Started/2021-06-30-Anatomy-of-Parabolic-Movement.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+Anatomy of parabolic moves and how GME is heading to 1000$ a share.
+===================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/eoneqeip](https://www.reddit.com/user/eoneqeip/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/oaqqry/anatomy_of_parabolic_moves_and_how_gme_is_heading/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Good day apes ~~and apettes~~ (thanks [u/kibblepigeon](https://www.reddit.com/u/kibblepigeon/) for teaching me that "ape" is already a gender inclusive term), just wanted to jacque your tettitas a lil more if I can.
+
+Here's the dissection of a parabolic move on an x security, movement to 1 is parabolic but is also a little parabolic move inside a bigger parabolic move (5). What is interesting is price behaviour: after first big move up (1), usually there's a circa 50% retracement of that move (2) then sellers come back until price close above 2 (3), then at (4) the last small dip before (5) meaning the sellers capitulated.
+
+Small dip move from (3) to (4) is KEY because here happens the shift of power from sellers, which were in control of price since (1) finished, to buyers.
+
+Move (5) as now went to about 3X the price of move (1).
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Anatomy of parabolic moves and how GME is heading to 1000$ a share.](https://preview.redd.it/95jyxija8c871.jpg?width=1035&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=870ec16616f570db7a4b9868e549539569919d3c)](https://preview.redd.it/95jyxija8c871.jpg?width=1035&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=870ec16616f570db7a4b9868e549539569919d3c)
+
+a common graph of a common parabolic move
+
+Now let's get straight to the jacque part of my kindergarten analysis
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Anatomy of parabolic moves and how GME is heading to 1000$ a share.](https://preview.redd.it/snfq6cue8c871.jpg?width=1035&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=12b0f550b2f3d169e548710ea24135c74ad4719a)](https://preview.redd.it/snfq6cue8c871.jpg?width=1035&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=12b0f550b2f3d169e548710ea24135c74ad4719a)
+
+a graph of a well known idiosyncratic stock
+
+To me the situation seem pretty darn parabolic and I see the same behaviour described above...
+
+Only differences are related to time scales (first case was weekly, second was daily) and move 1 retracement (2) which in 1st case was 50% while on GME is >50% (meaning buying was more aggressive in this case).
+
+I don't want to hype dates or anything but I think we are in (4) now, that small but very important dip where power shift happens and up up up the parabolic flight begins.
+
+So buckle up and enjoy the flight.
+
+EDIT1: more evidence of this pattern in a fairly known movie theaters stock which recently exihibited a parabolic move (here as well as now price in (5) has tripled maximum price of move (1)).
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Anatomy of parabolic moves and how GME is heading to 1000$ a share.](https://preview.redd.it/nxqb21ej8c871.jpg?width=1034&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6d59e58c01981a10312b3c3361ad1724241a5220)](https://preview.redd.it/nxqb21ej8c871.jpg?width=1034&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6d59e58c01981a10312b3c3361ad1724241a5220)
+
+EDIT2: another one, this is interesting because move (5) almost 3X move (1) but had a more bumpy development (lower timeframe here with more noise maybe?)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Anatomy of parabolic moves and how GME is heading to 1000$ a share.](https://preview.redd.it/8w3i4a5m8c871.jpg?width=1037&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=215999c3c075d3417c64dba5ab72e06906c964cf)](https://preview.redd.it/8w3i4a5m8c871.jpg?width=1037&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=215999c3c075d3417c64dba5ab72e06906c964cf)
+
+EDIT3: another one in which move (5) max price triples parabolic move (1) max price.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Anatomy of parabolic moves and how GME is heading to 1000$ a share.](https://preview.redd.it/dnw5eg2p8c871.jpg?width=1039&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d311db539deca12a117e584c0ea8d766bd649385)](https://preview.redd.it/dnw5eg2p8c871.jpg?width=1039&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d311db539deca12a117e584c0ea8d766bd649385)
+
+EDIT4: a famous e-commerce giant which GME is going to replace, here move 5 did 33X the max price of move 1 (obviously fundamentals here helped)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Anatomy of parabolic moves and how GME is heading to 1000$ a share.](https://preview.redd.it/hcp8j0ur8c871.jpg?width=1040&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fe3b05a176aeedff20023e0a3d93b3dcf8e7b377)](https://preview.redd.it/hcp8j0ur8c871.jpg?width=1040&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fe3b05a176aeedff20023e0a3d93b3dcf8e7b377)
+
+EDIT5: another big weekly case on a big tech, from max price of 1 (37$) to price to date in 5 (799$) it 23X. Notice how sometimes these parabolic moves requires years (move 5 started in the end of 2012).
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Anatomy of parabolic moves and how GME is heading to 1000$ a share.](https://preview.redd.it/sr4lt1su8c871.jpg?width=1037&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a1edf81b6795e1d8b4ec5248f294fffe3f31c667)](https://preview.redd.it/sr4lt1su8c871.jpg?width=1037&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a1edf81b6795e1d8b4ec5248f294fffe3f31c667)
+
+Based on these examples I think we are set on GME for a move 5 which will at least triple the max price of move 1 of january (345x3=1035$), notice I'm using the price of line graph and not candlestick price of january pick (482,55$), this doesn't mean GME won't go past 1000$, we saw before that with strong fundamentals and time move 5 can easily go 20X and beyond move 1.
+
+I don't know about other securities but GME is a unique case for short interest and for retail interest in it so it is very possible that it will set an unprecendent, idiosynchratic, to the moon move 5.
+
+Prepare to see your most liked stock at least at 1000$, I'm preparing for this and zenfully reminding myself that at 1k we still trading sideways. I just want you to be prepared as well for what is coming (I predict future fud at 1k stating HF have covered and so on...(yeah like they covered in january! - we own the float x times bitch! - when in doubt bath yourself with the DDs)).
+
+Buckle up.

00-Getting-Started/Basic-Education/2021-05-21-Cost-Basis-and-Trade-Price-Issues.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+Cost basis and trade price issues
+=================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/dlauer](https://www.reddit.com/user/dlauer/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhtt04/cost_basis_and_trade_price_issues/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Hi everyone,
+
+There have been a lot of posts recently on these two subjects - crazy cost basis reports when transferring out of Robinhood, and some anecdotal reports (or maybe just a single report?) about some fractional share executions outside of the NBBO. I've made some comments on those threads but I thought it might be helpful to put everything together in one place.
+
+First, I don't mean to throw cold water on these theories all the time, or to constantly be talking about technical glitches. But I have seen how many of these systems work, and it's also common sense to think about incentives - firms invest in technology that makes them money (like trading), and they don't invest in technology for cost centers (like record keeping and compliance). Front office trading systems are sophisticated and high-performance. Back office record keeping systems are often ancient, and always under-invested in. This is especially true when regulatory fines are little more than a cost of doing business / slap on the wrist.
+
+If you want to see this in action, just go to [FINRA BrokerCheck](https://brokercheck.finra.org/) and search for a broker. As I explained in another comment: " Lookup a broker and start looking at their violations (I've done this systematically in the past when evaluating broker dark pool enforcement action risk for institutional asset managers). It's a constant stream of OATS violations (the Order Audit Trail System is a record of all orders and trades that a broker reports to FINRA, being replaced by the CAT), order marking violations, failure to produce trade records, mistakes with order flag records, etc. A constant stream of technology problems. I even [presented](https://www.sec.gov/comments/4-652/4652-32.pdf) to the SEC on this after the Knight Capital incident 9 years ago." This is not meant, in any way, to excuse the behavior. Record keeping mistakes should honestly be criminal - without accurate records, regulators can't do their jobs. So under-investment in compliance and record keeping systems makes sense in both ways for these firms - the fines are paltry, and if they're trying to avoid detection, shitty record quality is a feature, not a bug.
+
+Now, all of that being said - for those of you who have gotten these insane cost bases when transferring out of Robinhood - [file a whistleblower complaint](https://www.sec.gov/whistleblower). Seriously, this is your best course of action. If there is, in fact, a systematic problem with Robinhood back office systems, and the SEC goes in and fines them, you could get a cut of that. You might think it's just GME, but it's very likely that it affects other stocks too. And keep good records of your trades for filing taxes so that these mistakes by RH don't affect you.
+
+Next, on the topic - I have no idea why you're seeing insane fractional share cost bases when transferring, especially when you didn't buy fractional shares. I have no good explanation for it. My assumption is that it's a result of under-investment in back office technology. I can't possibly see how it is a reflection of any actual trading though. Keep in mind that these are tax records - they are not trade reports. There's a big difference. And even though these records appear to be all messed up, it doesn't really mean that any trades were executed at that price. For those of you who did transact in fractional shares, you have to also know that there is very little regulation around fractional shares. Fractions are not reported to the tape/market, and while firms are under a best execution obligation, that obligation is hardly enforced at all. So most of the rules I talk about are kind of thrown out the door when dealing with fractional shares, because they are not really considered within the current regulatory structure. I would also caution that any fractional shares traded outside of regular trading hours (9:30am ET - 4pm ET) can likely trade at any price, and I would never execute a trade like that.
+
+Ok, finally let's talk about the NBBO and tradethroughs. As I've explained before, the National Best Bid and Offer is the best price in the market, and is protected during regular trading hours. This means that brokers, off-exchange trading systems, and exchanges have safeguards in place to ensure that trades are not executed outside the NBBO. This system is not perfect. A while back there was an effort to have more disclosure for retail brokers and internalizers by the FIF. That has mostly stopped since the new Rule 606 was passed, but I found that Fidelity is [still disclosing](https://www.fidelity.com/bin-public/060_www_fidelity_com/documents/FIF-FBS-retail-execution-quality-stats.pdf) these extra stats. You can see that for most orders, 98% - 99% of the shares get executed at or better than the NBBO:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Cost basis and trade price issues](https://preview.redd.it/dxc1kgm6eh071.png?width=744&format=png&auto=webp&s=ec0406b878fc475b756bc9328618b6c9f8142940)](https://preview.redd.it/dxc1kgm6eh071.png?width=744&format=png&auto=webp&s=ec0406b878fc475b756bc9328618b6c9f8142940)
+
+Why isn't it 100%? Generally speaking, it's because there aren't enough shares available at that price. If there's only 100 shares on the best offer, and you want to buy 200 shares, you're not guaranteed to get them all executed at the offer (although wholesalers like Citadel talk a lot about size improvement along with price improvement, but that's an entirely different conversation about how they goose and manipulate those metrics). Citadel stopped providing these reports in 2019, but you can see that back then [theirs looked similar](https://s3.amazonaws.com/citadel-wordpress-prd101/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/09/09175131/FIF-Rule-605-606-WG-CitadelSecurities_Retail-Execution-Quality-Stats_Q1_2019.pdf).
+
+Now, I cannot speak to anecdotes - I can only deal with data. I know there are claims about some crazy execution prices out there. I can assure you that these are not systematic issues, but it's always possible that there are crazy trades. That's why FINRA and the exchanges have [Clearly Erroneous rules](https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/11892). This rule would not exist if it wasn't needed, and when I traded we had to invoke it at times. Sometimes crazy trades happen. When they do, alerts go off, and you get them busted. Remember that for every trade there's someone on the other side of it, and if you got to sell some GME at $2600, that means someone is on the hook to pay that. That person would be incentivized to have that trade busted, and has recourse to do so.
+
+Ok, finally some have questioned why I generally assume Hanlon's Razor - don't ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence. I'm not as quick to accuse anyone of criminality as others. I'm comfortable with that. I'm a scientist, and I need to see data. When I see it, and it's convincing, then I'm comfortable making serious accusations. If that's naive, I'm ok with that. It doesn't make me fight any less to improve markets, and to improve transparency and access to data, so that we can have informed conversations and debates. And as you'll see in an article I have coming out soon, it doesn't make me hesitant to fight Big Tech when there's a serious fight to be had (you have to keep in mind that most of my day job is focused on tech and AI these days). But it does drive me to wait on convincing data before making such accusations. That's my style, and it's not for everyone.
+
+I hope this is helpful. I'll keep trying to answer questions when I can. Market structure is extremely complex, and even when trying to explain it, it's tough to distill it into something understandable when you haven't been immersed in it.

00-Getting-Started/Basic-Education/2021-05-21-Margin-Calls-vs-Forced-Liquidation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+MARGIN CALL VS. FORCED LIQUIDATION
+==================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Dwellerofthecrags](https://www.reddit.com/user/Dwellerofthecrags/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ni0xmw/margin_call_vs_forced_liquidation/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Over the past several weeks I've noticed several posts or comments that lead me to believe there may be a bit of a misunderstanding about what a MARGIN CALL is. Because I love all of my fellow HODLers, I am not going to single out any of the posts or comments.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - MARGIN CALL VS. FORCED LIQUIDATION](https://preview.redd.it/x6wbwddgzi071.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b65d44ff3b998ee4f2dcd65212a83312771ac210)](https://preview.redd.it/x6wbwddgzi071.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b65d44ff3b998ee4f2dcd65212a83312771ac210)
+
+https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ERNu7C-W4AAleb4.jpg
+
+I know that I, like many of you, have added a bunch a wrinkles since January thanks to many of the brilliant Apes writing DD and the Silverbacks coming and doing AMAs and I'm hoping that you, like me, never get tired of adding more. Since there seems to be a little bit of a misunderstanding about what a margin call actually is, I thought it would be good to provide some clarification and add a few more wrinkles to all of our smooth brains.
+
+Also, if you're looking for a way to pass the time while waiting for the MOASS, I suggest reading through <https://www.investopedia.com/>. There's seriously a ton of ELIA information about investing and the market. This is of course after you catch-up on any of the [AMAs](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCI4EET9NJPWxUuXGlG6fxPA), [Dr. T's book](https://www.amazon.com/Naked-Short-Greedy-Streets-Failure-ebook/dp/B08XXXRH7T/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=), and the essential market related movies (MARGIN CALL, The Big Short, The Wall Street Conspiracy, Boiler Room, Wolf of Wall Street, etc.)
+
+Now for what you came here for:
+
+What is a margin call?
+
+Generic definition: ["A margin call is a request for additional collateral when a trader's position or investment drops in value."](https://qz.com/1991073/how-many-funds-are-a-margin-call-away-from-failing-like-archegos/)
+
+This is more of a description of how it works between a retail investor and broker but the principle is the same:
+
+["A margin call occurs when the value of a margin account falls below the account's maintenance margin requirement. It is a demand by a brokerage firm (lender/Bank) to bring the margin account's balance up to the minimum maintenance margin requirement. To satisfy a margin call, the investor (Borrower/Hedge Fund/Institution) of the margin account must either deposit additional funds, deposit unmargined securities, or sell (close) current positions."](https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/trading-investing/margin-call/)
+
+More in depth description about what a margin call is here: <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/margincall.asp>
+
+TL;DR: A margin call is the notice that a borrower's collateral has become inadequate for their current investment position. They must either deposit more collateral or close a portion of their "at risk" positions. It is not a forced closeout. A forced closeout is what happens if the borrower is unable to satisfy the margin call. As long as a borrower is continually able to satisfy the requirements of the margin call(s), they are able to keep their position.
+
+> *SPECULATION: This explains why we are seeing so many "Pump & Dumps" of securities that Citadel & Friends have positions in. They're printing money off of these other SCAMS in order to satisfy the margin requirements for the positions they currently hold while they string them out to try to slowly unwind them over time.*
+
+DO NOT DAY TRADE GME! DO NOT FALL FOR ANY OF THESE OTHER PUMPED SECURITIES/CRYPTO! DON'T FEED THE BEARS, THEY'LL EAT YOU!
+
+[![r/Superstonk - MARGIN CALL VS. FORCED LIQUIDATION](https://preview.redd.it/msscs7u5ij071.jpg?width=960&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0b0bc230858c6cce5120bc04910073938c0d0528)](https://preview.redd.it/msscs7u5ij071.jpg?width=960&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0b0bc230858c6cce5120bc04910073938c0d0528)
+
+https://i.redd.it/9llkyh6lvo141.jpg
+
+[What is Forced Liquidation?](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/forcedliquidation.asp)
+
+Basic Definition:
+
+"Forced selling or forced liquidation usually entails the involuntary sale of assets or securities to create liquidity in the event of an uncontrollable or unforeseen situation."
+
+"Within the investing world, if a margin call is issued and the investor is unable to bring their investment up to the minimum requirements, the broker has the right to sell off the positions."
+
+THIS IS THE SPECIFIC TYPE OF LIQUIDATION WE ARE WAITING FOR:
+
+"The opposite of forced selling in a margin account is a forced buy-in. This occurs in a short seller's account when the original lender of the shares recalls them or when the broker is no longer able to borrow shares for the shorted position. When a forced buy-in is triggered, shares are bought back to close the short position. The account holder might not be given notice prior to the act."
+
+[![r/Superstonk - MARGIN CALL VS. FORCED LIQUIDATION](https://preview.redd.it/k7xbxtn60j071.jpg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=39079ad5c8e5f5054c711212c0045fa5ba28b747)](https://preview.redd.it/k7xbxtn60j071.jpg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=39079ad5c8e5f5054c711212c0045fa5ba28b747)
+
+https://news.ewingirrigation.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/MISC-Ice-Melting1.jpg
+
+TL;DR: Margin Calls are merely steps towards what we really want...a forced buy-in! As long as the shorts continue to meet margin requirements, they will be able to continue to kick the can down the road. A price spike that pushes them beyond their ability to meet the margin requirements, a massive depreciation of their other positions, or regulatory action is needed to trigger the forced selling.
+
+This is the way to MOASS:
+
+1.  BUY & HODL GME
+
+2.  STOP BUYING OTHER GIMICKS/DAY-TRADING/ETC. (Don't feed the bears)
+
+3.  WAIT PATIENTLY FOR FORCED BUY-IN, MARGIN CALLS ARE JUST STEPS TOWARDS THAT END. WHEN SHORTS CAN NO LONGER MEET THE CALL...
+
+🚀🚀 🚀🚀 🚀🚀 🚀🚀
+
+*Let me know if I missed anything...*
+
+Edit: added #DontFeedTheBears
+
+Edit 2: [u/InvincibearREAL](https://www.reddit.com/u/InvincibearREAL/) pointed out that I forgot to include the most obvious movie to be watched (especially considering the post topic): Margin Call ... so I added it to the list
+
+Edit 3: The best TL;DR in ape language courtesy of [u/cryptocached](https://www.reddit.com/u/cryptocached/)
+
+"Margin call is a shart. It stinks and can be a little messy, but it's really just a warning. If you don't heed that warning and take care of your business in a timely fashion, you'll shit your pants in a forced liquidation."
+
+Edit 4: Created [visual TL;DR Post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ni9oc1/margin_call_vs_forced_liquidation_in_ape_ape/)

00-Getting-Started/Explain-with-Crayons-series-by-AaronJamesArq/2021-05-24-What-is-Naked-Shorting.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Explain w/ Crayons Series: What is Naked Shorting? Indicators GME is Being Naked Short
+======================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/AaronJamesArq](https://www.reddit.com/user/AaronJamesArq/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nk40b6/explain_w_crayons_series_what_is_naked_shorting/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Discussion 🦍](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Discussion%20%F0%9F%A6%8D%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514720-579d5580-d662-11eb-82f1-8f6094375a05.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514724-5cfaa000-d662-11eb-8a3c-f3995878af2b.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514728-608e2700-d662-11eb-9fd5-5583011f712a.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514738-63891780-d662-11eb-8996-4472d50c5a94.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514741-66840800-d662-11eb-889d-1c7c34f5b977.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514746-6a178f00-d662-11eb-93fc-8d839161dc8b.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514749-6d127f80-d662-11eb-96c4-35cabf514d4e.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514751-6f74d980-d662-11eb-8ace-953e43984450.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514753-726fca00-d662-11eb-8ad7-236cdd510d0e.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514757-74d22400-d662-11eb-9a24-847fae400cc2.png)

00-Getting-Started/Explain-with-Crayons-series-by-AaronJamesArq/2021-05-25-Fundamentals-of-GME.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+🖍 Explain w/ Crayons Series: Fundamentals of $GME! Why $GME Should Be Trading Higher
+=====================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/AaronJamesArq](https://www.reddit.com/user/AaronJamesArq/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nkouqs/explain_w_crayons_series_fundamentals_of_gme_why/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514470-34be7180-d661-11eb-94ea-58c3a5d20cc6.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514474-38ea8f00-d661-11eb-9dce-c23a80e8ba2e.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514480-3e47d980-d661-11eb-950f-80286c4c88b4.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514483-4273f700-d661-11eb-95ab-5b3eb02822fb.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514487-4869d800-d661-11eb-922d-03ac54defe45.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514491-4c95f580-d661-11eb-9b44-5c6ac54d01fa.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514496-50c21300-d661-11eb-8aeb-3ca6689514d1.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514498-54ee3080-d661-11eb-8013-ae338306a829.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514502-59b2e480-d661-11eb-8890-836c287613e9.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514507-5ddf0200-d661-11eb-9760-9b4eac6b8034.png)
+

00-Getting-Started/Explain-with-Crayons-series-by-AaronJamesArq/2021-05-26-GME-and-NFTs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+Crayon Explanation 💬🖍 GME and NFTs: Bullish Thesis + Possible Catalyst for MOASS
+==================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/AaronJamesArq](https://www.reddit.com/user/AaronJamesArq/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nlgnnj/crayon_explanation_gme_and_nfts_bullish_thesis/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514554-98489f00-d661-11eb-9638-35a2564e97c8.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514562-9c74bc80-d661-11eb-9b04-62e9f353e8db.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514565-9f6fad00-d661-11eb-9ca2-04cb3bc3f5ae.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514568-a4ccf780-d661-11eb-8aac-033111989efd.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514571-a72f5180-d661-11eb-8dca-4bce5a8c3dc0.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514572-aac2d880-d661-11eb-98b8-2454afe97c10.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514574-ae565f80-d661-11eb-89d3-c881ad6590cc.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514577-b1515000-d661-11eb-9b23-3df13cf62418.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514580-b44c4080-d661-11eb-80b7-111a0b1e51f5.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514583-b7473100-d661-11eb-97ea-69abc669ca79.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514587-badab800-d661-11eb-8c12-771ae4b4be8c.png)

00-Getting-Started/Explain-with-Crayons-series-by-AaronJamesArq/2021-05-27-Exit-Strategy-Refresher.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+Crayon Explanation 💬🖍 Exit Strategy Vocabulary Refresher Lesson For Apes
+==========================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/AaronJamesArq](https://www.reddit.com/user/AaronJamesArq/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nm5jvp/crayon_explanation_exit_strategy_vocabulary/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514626-ed84b080-d661-11eb-9625-fcd8fbb3eb2d.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514629-f1183780-d661-11eb-8df9-fd2827b5de40.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514630-f4abbe80-d661-11eb-8916-82fc5526a7df.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514632-f7a6af00-d661-11eb-8539-1751d49d3934.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514637-fc6b6300-d661-11eb-95e1-0cac4498d06a.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514638-fffeea00-d661-11eb-8340-faf14f32e009.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514643-02f9da80-d662-11eb-8d4b-b65c4a91867f.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514646-068d6180-d662-11eb-91fe-f268ff63b336.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514651-09885200-d662-11eb-9c23-16bb70bda60a.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514655-0c834280-d662-11eb-93fd-9344f509f05a.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514660-1016c980-d662-11eb-8e63-94ff57decb8d.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514664-12792380-d662-11eb-9e07-de8d990ad661.png)
+
+![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123514667-15741400-d662-11eb-8a14-88e4ae2ab77e.png)

01-Must-Read/2021-04-30-I-Am-Not-A-Financial-Advisor-v14.md

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# I Am Not a Financial Advisor PDF
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [@iamnotafinadv](https://www.twitter.com/iamnotafinadv) | [Source](https://iamnotafinancialadvisor.com/) | 
+
+---
+
+[GMEv14.zip](https://github.com/verymeticulous/wikAPEdia/files/6764891/GMEv14.zip)

01-Must-Read/2021-05-23-We-Are-All-Fucked.md

@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+We're All Fucked
+================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/CoffeeLaxative](https://www.reddit.com/user/CoffeeLaxative/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nj1guf/were_all_fucked/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+I have no background in macroeconomics. In fact, I'm in healthcare. However, this is what I've gathered in all of my 3 months of investing, learning more about econ and finance than my own field. You tell me what you think and where we stand. The title of my post... pretty much sums up my thoughts. If I made any mistakes, please let me know. After all, I'm a smooth 🧠.
+
+1\. S&P 500 inflation-adjusted earnings yield 🔥
+
+You may have seen this picture from this [post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/niem73/sp_500_inflationadjusted_earnings_yield_falls/). It's the S&P 500 inflation-adjusted earnings yield that's now falling below zero, setting a 40-year low. The last times it fell below 0 were in 2008 (housing bubble), 2000 (dotcom bubble), 1987 (Black Monday), 1973 (recession). And it's going under again. Here's [another post about it, with Crescat Capital's letter.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nil0ww/sp_500_negative_yield_crescat_capital_letter_may/) Essentially, impending boom ?
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/jgvo3ctrpb171.png?width=721&format=png&auto=webp&s=6417c2f97f4dbbdfb4c114fff9abfa1b0fe034f8)](https://preview.redd.it/jgvo3ctrpb171.png?width=721&format=png&auto=webp&s=6417c2f97f4dbbdfb4c114fff9abfa1b0fe034f8)
+
+2\. The Repo Market 💣
+
+It's been all the talk lately. Lately, the Fed has been conducting reverse repo operations at higher and higher amounts. On May 20th, we hit the 5th highest ever with $351B and 48 participating counterparties.
+
+Then on May 21st, reverse repos reached $369B with 52 participants! Compare this to two weeks ago where we had less than half that amount, $155B on May 6th. Here's a chart showing reverse repos from January til today. Notice the exponential increase ? Ya, shit is fucked.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/cf707nbxpb171.png?width=793&format=png&auto=webp&s=a804fd59f761970edd40cf1a76b2ca4e8fb5ac65)](https://preview.redd.it/cf707nbxpb171.png?width=793&format=png&auto=webp&s=a804fd59f761970edd40cf1a76b2ca4e8fb5ac65)
+
+Data from: <https://apps.newyorkfed.org/markets/autorates/temp>
+
+Edit: 05/25: reverse repo @ $432.96 billion.
+
+If you are not familiar with the repo market, I recommend reading this: [The Imminent Liquidity Crisis & Reverse Repos Usage](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhepn1/the_imminent_liquidity_crisis_reverse_repos_usage/) or watching George Gammon's YouTube video (Repo Market Rates Turn Negative).
+
+Wat mean? Means there is too much cash in the system and not enough collateral (like treasury bonds). It means there's an imbalance between dollars (which are essentially IOUs) and whatever is backing the dollar's worth.
+
+Why imbalance ?
+
+-   Quantitative easing (money printer go BRRRR)
+
+-   Rehypothecation (the same treasury bond being lent to A for 10k, who lent it to B for 10k, who lent it to C for 10k, ... but there is only 1 treasury bond and now 30k was lent.)
+
+-   Probably more reasons
+
+So now, nobody wants $ (except you and I) and all of these institutions want treasury bonds. And as of May 21, treasury bonds have a negative interest rate! Source: <https://www.dtcc.com/charts/dtcc-gcf-repo-index>
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/fbzehm75rb171.png?width=474&format=png&auto=webp&s=860034b8555e891462abedd4753be32043dfece4)](https://preview.redd.it/fbzehm75rb171.png?width=474&format=png&auto=webp&s=860034b8555e891462abedd4753be32043dfece4)
+
+U. S. Treasury < 30-year maturity (371487AE9).
+
+In other words, banks and institutions want these treasury bonds so bad, they're ready to pay (lend) what it's worth and pay some more cash to get their hands on it.
+
+3\. Crypto Correction / Crash ⚡
+
+The crypto market dropped $1 trillion in the past 2 weeks ($700 billion last week and ~$300 billion the week before if I got my facts right). The leading coin went from ~$59k to ~$30k and all other coins followed.
+
+So there's a LOT of differing opinions on this matter, on why it happened... Elon Musk, China, etc. Let's agree that it was probably a combination of everything. It also seems that the leading coin followed a textbook Wyckoff distribution, essentially a method to fleece retail investors (yet again!).
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/hynaaywmrb171.png?width=1759&format=png&auto=webp&s=d70c230eed55df463d46d74b763ae978fe064896)](https://preview.redd.it/hynaaywmrb171.png?width=1759&format=png&auto=webp&s=d70c230eed55df463d46d74b763ae978fe064896)
+
+Huge volume spike on May 19th. Very sus
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/kmksmruzrb171.png?width=738&format=png&auto=webp&s=3ce95a840845a0178cd303acf4acef3b938192bc)](https://preview.redd.it/kmksmruzrb171.png?width=738&format=png&auto=webp&s=3ce95a840845a0178cd303acf4acef3b938192bc)
+
+The sell off occurred mostly between 8:50 - 8:55 AM EST and continued til 9:10 AM on May 19th.
+
+What happened on May 19th ? Oh, right! OCC had previously issued a letter to members notifying them of temporary increase in deposits for clearing fund size totaling [$588M due at 9:00 AM on 5/19/2021](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nftyg4/occ_has_issued_a_statement_to_all_clearing/). So, let's all agree the crash was caused by a combination of everything.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/n8lb7266sb171.png?width=1048&format=png&auto=webp&s=d2400092f719b7759f880782309592d56db1f66f)](https://preview.redd.it/n8lb7266sb171.png?width=1048&format=png&auto=webp&s=d2400092f719b7759f880782309592d56db1f66f)
+
+Many coins were affected 6 days ago. Screenshot by u/incandescent-leaf
+
+Edit:
+
+-   Here's an interesting DD that could shed some light on these crypto whales: <https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nkde38/bitcoin_address_activity_appear_to_mirror_gme/>
+
+-   It's also interesting how Goldman Sachs now considers the leading coin as an asset class. The timing is what's most intriguing. Last weekend, crypto had another big sell off. <https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-is-officially-a-new-asset-class-goldman-sachs-103540636.html>
+
+4\. Commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS) 🏬
+
+According to Fitch Ratings, US CMBS delinquencies ticked up in April for the first time since October 2020, mostly from hotels and regional malls.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/9uq512i9sb171.png?width=991&format=png&auto=webp&s=eda234c027d79eb6d1318e5036dde2b2aa7f1538)](https://preview.redd.it/9uq512i9sb171.png?width=991&format=png&auto=webp&s=eda234c027d79eb6d1318e5036dde2b2aa7f1538)
+
+Source: <https://www.fitchratings.com/research/structured-finance/us-cmbs-delinquencies-tick-up-in-april-for-first-time-since-october-2020-07-05-2021>
+
+I don't know about you, but this suuure reminds me of something... and this don't look good.
+
+🚀🚀 Edit 🚀🚀
+
+*Thank you to* [u/Due-Mountain-9044](https://www.reddit.com/u/Due-Mountain-9044/) *for this:*
+
+In his interview and in his new article, Ryan Grim calls CMBS a BIGGER problem than the 2008 housing crisis:
+
+-   Article: <https://theintercept.com/2021/04/20/wall-street-cmbs-dollar-general-ladder-capital/>
+
+-   YouTube: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRHwhvUc54A>
+
+-   Podcast: <https://theintercept.com/2021/04/23/deconstructed-whistleblower-financial-crisis/>
+
+4.1 Mortgages 🏠
+
+*Thank you to* [u/plasticbiner](https://www.reddit.com/u/plasticbiner/) *for also pointing this out:*
+
+New Report From Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Finds Over 11 Million Families At Risk Of Losing Housing (March 1, 2021)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/jvx7x1an3b171.png?width=1015&format=png&auto=webp&s=1574c782f2610c6712f6605be9bc02cade2d0bd9)](https://preview.redd.it/jvx7x1an3b171.png?width=1015&format=png&auto=webp&s=1574c782f2610c6712f6605be9bc02cade2d0bd9)
+
+Source: https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/new-report-from-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-finds-over-11-million-families-at-risk-of-losing-housing/
+
+🚀🚀End of edit 🚀🚀
+
+5\. Banks, hedge funds, and the Fed working 24/7 🏦
+
+We've seen the night pics and enjoyed them. Quite the norm nowadays, but quite unusual still.
+
+<https://preview.redd.it/tw0ubnrays071.png?width=1902&format=png&auto=webp&s=f7fae2895a00a4292eb6c22b3cf92fbbb9d6cccb>
+
+But wait! There's more. Not only do they have to deal with the stock market, the repo market, CMBS, paying their employees for overtime... they're also losing money with fines.
+
+-   UBS, Nomura fined $452 million by the EU. Bank of America, Credit Suisse Group AG and Credit Agricole were fined about 28.5 million euros last month. Source: <https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ubs-nomura-unicredit-fined-452-100701721.html>
+
+-   Since January 2021 up until today, the SEC has awarded ~$163.2 million to whistleblowers. Whistleblowers get 10-30% of the money collected, which means someone is bleeding from $544 million to $1.632B.
+
+-   And then the petty fines by the SEC that I won't list. Chump change for them.
+
+There's also weird or bad news every week :
+
+-   The European Bank Issues Financial Stability Warning. [Reddit post on this](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nh913m/the_european_bank_issues_financial_stability/)
+
+-   In Mexico, [BBVA closes 867 branches and 1 million credit cards.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhgrt5/closing_867_bank_branches_and_a_million_credit/) In Spain, they closed 530 branches.
+
+-   Banks are planning on launching a pilot program where they will issue credit cards to people with no credit scores: <https://www.wsj.com/articles/jpmorgan-others-plan-to-issue-credit-cards-to-people-with-no-credit-scores-11620898206>
+
+-   Not to mention the margin calls already happening on [Wall Street as reported by European financial news](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nb9pon/european_financial_news_is_reporting_major_margin/)
+
+-   Much more... won't dig further. It's 1:30 am lol
+
+🚀🚀 Edit 🚀🚀 I'm back at it 3 days later
+
+Here are a few more articles to make you go "Hmmmm 🤔"
+
+-   Right after supposedly great earnings, Morgan Stanley sells $6 billion worth of bonds, following JP Morgan which sold $13 billion of bonds. Goldman Sachs also issued $6 billion of bonds. Source: <https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/morgan-stanley-joins-bank-bond-bonanza-with-three-part-sale-1.1592121>
+
+-   Over-leveraged Archegos Capital Management cost Credit Suisse $4.7+ billion in losses. Morgan Stanley dumped $5 billion in shares in Archegos' stocks before fire sale. Nomura losses could be as much as $2 billion. Source: <https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/06/morgan-stanley-dumped-5-billion-in-archegos-stocks-before-fire-sale.html> and <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/29/investing/wall-street-hedge-fund-archegos/index.html>. Keep in mind Archegos was just a small family firm. How many more are there ?
+
+-   Italian bank collapses on exposure to Greensill and GFG. Source : <https://www.ft.com/content/c02a6e97-5505-4d4a-933f-a0e934ca6eda>
+
+🚀🚀 End of edit 🚀🚀
+
+On top of that, the CEOs of all major US banks have to testify before Congress this week on May 26th and 27th. Source : <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-15/wall-street-bank-ceos-called-to-testify-before-congress-in-may>
+
+How often does this happen ? Since 2008, they were called twice to testify before Congress according to above article.
+
+6\. The rich divorcing and/or selling stocks 💔
+
+So Bill Gates divorced and Gabe Plotkin divorced ? Huh. Weird...
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/npk8r7sisb171.png?width=1843&format=png&auto=webp&s=4d0027e7f8aff470b5261852c4c9d77eca4e3380)](https://preview.redd.it/npk8r7sisb171.png?width=1843&format=png&auto=webp&s=4d0027e7f8aff470b5261852c4c9d77eca4e3380)
+
+Wow. That's a lotta shares. A week before the tech sector dumped.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/zaru329qsb171.png?width=1851&format=png&auto=webp&s=e454d39dc0c95a2b9774b013d988be25ff038d3f)](https://preview.redd.it/zaru329qsb171.png?width=1851&format=png&auto=webp&s=e454d39dc0c95a2b9774b013d988be25ff038d3f)
+
+Mark Zuckerberg selling his FB shares. Goes all the way back to February.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/f2ouo5l4tb171.png?width=1852&format=png&auto=webp&s=ab00893677a8db4726d740bef4520169e1e5896e)](https://preview.redd.it/f2ouo5l4tb171.png?width=1852&format=png&auto=webp&s=ab00893677a8db4726d740bef4520169e1e5896e)
+
+Google too?
+
+Source: [finviz.com](https://finviz.com/)
+
+Edit:
+
+-   Let's not forget Warren Buffett and his company Berkshire Hathaway sold most of their bank shares (Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, M&T Bank, PNC Financial, Synchrony Financial, Wells Fargo, US Bancorp, and BNY Mellon) during the past 5 quarters. Source : <https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/warren-buffett-dumped-goldman-sachs-jpmorgan-and-other-bank-stocks-last-year-they-ve-now-surged-to-record-highs-meaning-the-investor-left-billions-on-the-table/ar-AAKc7Dr>
+
+7\. The domestic market and the international markets 📉
+
+Let's look back at the past 2 weeks.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/duhmxe5itb171.png?width=1284&format=png&auto=webp&s=9c6bfde6a2be1b567cdb1452511b99cc9bfc9872)](https://preview.redd.it/duhmxe5itb171.png?width=1284&format=png&auto=webp&s=9c6bfde6a2be1b567cdb1452511b99cc9bfc9872)
+
+05/19 by u/CryptoFX1
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/geupg0nmtb171.png?width=1136&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f07d1be7f95801e2515e780313342ce1d5e2d6f)](https://preview.redd.it/geupg0nmtb171.png?width=1136&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f07d1be7f95801e2515e780313342ce1d5e2d6f)
+
+On May 12, Nikkei Bled. Only 1% Away From the Low of Jan 28. by u/incandescent-leaf
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/yylsva8stb171.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=d60431874a4b4df632980e526b9af812ada31d7f)](https://preview.redd.it/yylsva8stb171.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=d60431874a4b4df632980e526b9af812ada31d7f)
+
+"Taiwan Stock Exchange Index just wiped out YTD gains. This is abnormal. Very likely that it will also affect the US markets (though many can argue that this is actually a reflection of the US markets, and I would agree)" by u/_atworkdontsendnudes
+
+-   [Asian markets](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nahhak/asian_markets_are_tanking_once_again_following/) and [other international markets](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nafv9y/international_markets_are_doing_super_well_honest/) are tanking, following another day of decline in the US markets (May 12-13)
+
+Ok, the market has had its green days here and there. But overall, it's been pretty unusually red, right ? Yeah, also, all of this could be unrelated. Could be a coincidence. What do I know ? You be the judge.
+
+8\. The media 📰
+
+Usually very biased or bought out, but there are some exceptions like this article: [Are we on the verge of a new financial crisis?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ncgojw/are_we_on_the_verge_of_a_new_financial_crisis_the/) The GameStop case, the signals of Hedge Funds and the rise of crypto.
+
+What's concerning is that even "biased media" is warning of inflation, hyperinflation and an impending crash. No links, just go on YouTube. If they're talking about it, we know shit's about to hit the fan soon...
+
+Edit:
+
+-   Ever doubted media manipulation ? Remember this video ["Independent" media using the EXACT same words](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nbpusp/if_you_ever_doubted_media_manipulation_remember/) and this video of the 2008 crash: [Not a single expert/spokesperson mentioned the true cause of the crash; Mortgage Bonds.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nbrl8h/watch_this_video_of_cnbc_during_the_2008_crash/)
+
+-   Remember "Bear Stearns is fine" back in 2008 ? Cramer says he's confident inflation will not end up crushing US economy. Source : <https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/cramer-says-hes-confident-inflation-will-not-end-up-crushing-us-economy/ar-AAKl951>
+
+-   Motley Fool agrees, as per their "38 reasons you don't have to fear a stock market crash" article: <https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/23/38-reason-you-dont-have-to-fear-stock-market-crash/>
+
+9\. GameStop 🎮
+
+I think you know what I'm thinking of. Let me just repeat this. We have played the game while following the rules. We played against players that had cheat codes in an unfair game, designed for us to lose. Yet, here we are.
+
+Buy, hodl, and vote fellow 🐈 & 🦍& 🐜. I appreciate you all. The rest can fuck right off.
+
+🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
+
+```
+Edit: alright, who the f reported me ? Seems like the shills don't like this. To everyone else, I am perfectly happy with my life 😉🤑
+
+Edit 2: I guess I was too subtle. I was reported for self-harm and potential suicide. Let me make it clear, I have absolutely zero thoughts about this. I love my life, even if it's a mess.
+
+Also, thank you all for the awards and kind feedback! Was not expecting to gain so much traction. "Controversial" title is a reference to the movie The Big Short. Some of you (superstonkers) caught on.
+
+Lots of great input and good discussion in the comments.
+
+A few people questioning my sources and my background. Listen... forget it.
+
+```
+
+🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
+
+10\. The flurry of new rules and regulations 📝
+
+-   Let's not forget Gary Gensler, Chairman of the SEC, was sworn in on a Saturday (April 17, 2021). [Why the Weekend Swear in Ceremony for Gary Gensler is of Significance](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mtikm9/why_the_weekend_swear_in_ceremony_for_gary/)
+
+-   Also interesting how the DTCC, OCC, ICC, and NSCC have been implementing new rules and regulations like crazy in such a short time-span. Below is an overview of them (credits to [u/MATTATI2005](https://www.reddit.com/u/MATTATI2005/)). And here's [another great DD](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ngru15/the_flurry_of_rules_before_the_storm_dtc_icc_occ/) tying them in with the FTD cycles of GME.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/hdabo7p6vc171.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=d089ca7c3e1d9cf27bfdb9ed0762f9b036c4b643)](https://preview.redd.it/hdabo7p6vc171.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=d089ca7c3e1d9cf27bfdb9ed0762f9b036c4b643)
+
+-   Michael J. Burry, famous for seeing the early signs of the 2008 crash and making bank, also got shushed a few months ago, deleting his Twitter account. In his profile, he linked this, only to remove it 1 day later: <https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/ins-and-outs-of-collateral-re-use-20181221.htm>. Here's a great DD explaining how Michael Burry Handed us the Missing Piece on a Silver Plate, [How Financial Institutions Using US Treasury Securities Nearly Caused the Market to Collapse and What Does it Mean for Us](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mil875/michael_burry_handed_us_the_missing_piece_on_a/)
+
+11\. Margin debt 💵
+
+FINRA Margin Debt is at a current level of 822.55B, up from 813.68B last month and up from 479.29B one year ago. This is a change of 1.09% from last month and 71.62% from one year ago. Source: <https://ycharts.com/indicators/finra_margin_debt>. Thank you to [u/CapoeiraCharles](https://www.reddit.com/u/CapoeiraCharles/) who reminded me of this.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/szaksdemvb171.png?width=1154&format=png&auto=webp&s=b8b26435ab2e534370f322600c2a7ffa1098ce13)](https://preview.redd.it/szaksdemvb171.png?width=1154&format=png&auto=webp&s=b8b26435ab2e534370f322600c2a7ffa1098ce13)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/9ot4jz0nqb171.png?width=910&format=png&auto=webp&s=1fe3c5cad336c78e6aa3846438430e3f4d94a8ff)](https://preview.redd.it/9ot4jz0nqb171.png?width=910&format=png&auto=webp&s=1fe3c5cad336c78e6aa3846438430e3f4d94a8ff)
+
+12\. More charts 📉
+
+I'm just going to leave this here. You be the judge of what this all means. Credits to [u/peruvian_bull](https://www.reddit.com/u/peruvian_bull/).
+
+[![r/Superstonk - We're All Fucked](https://preview.redd.it/b5k88sr7pb171.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=76a3b153b728898635c81fa78de60d775554210b)](https://preview.redd.it/b5k88sr7pb171.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=76a3b153b728898635c81fa78de60d775554210b)
+
+13\. Final words 💎
+
+My goal is not to incite panic but to share data and encourage discussion. Without knowledge, where would we even begin, let alone be prepared ? Imo, this is what makes [r/superstonk](https://www.reddit.com/r/superstonk/) great. It's like a hive mind of 300k+ people sharing info.
+
+To those who are panicking, I believe US banks insure up to $250k for each account. The comment section below is quite informative as well.
+
+Are all the points in my post correlated ? Maybe, maybe not. Saying they are would be speculation. However, each point was based on facts and I think that's what matters. The rest is up for you to decide.
+
+This is not financial advice. If I missed anything, please let me know.
+
+🚀🚀🚀

01-Must-Read/2021-05-26-Mother-of-All-Short-Squeezes-Thesis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,470 @@
+I. IMPORTANT LINKS FOR NEW MEMBERS TO [r/superstonk](https://old.reddit.com/r/superstonk)
+=========================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/HCMF_MaceFace](https://old.reddit.com/user/HCMF_MaceFace) | [Reddit](https://old.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nletnn/gme_the_mother_of_all_short_squeezes_moass_thesis/) | 
+
+---
+
+-   [APE Security Protocol (how to secure and protect yourself online)](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nsgv3d/ape_security_protocols/)
+-   [DD Beginners Guide Page](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/njwv6n/the_gme_masters_guide_a_dd_campaign_for_apes/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
+-   [Wiki](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index)
+
+II. INTRO / INTENTION OF POST
+=============================
+
+The core intention of this post was to frame the MOASS Thesis in a way that was understandable to individuals inside and outside of the community (especially those who are relatively new to the market). It also is intended to serve as a reference to leverage if you are ever trying to explain to someone why you think it is a good investment option.
+
+This post will give a *relatively* simplistic breakdown of the current situation and landscape of GameStop Stock (GME). It will summarize the theory that GME's price will soon reach astronomical levels during a massive short squeeze, AKA "The Mother of all Short Squeezes (MOASS) Thesis". The bulk of this post is a breakdown of the market terms and concepts that will need to be understood in order to fully comprehend the who-what-when-where-why-how.
+
+III. Personal note
+==================
+
+Feel free to use the contents of this post however you want. Don't worry about asking for permission to copy it, cross-post it, translate it, refine and use it in your own posts, etc.
+
+Leave a comment if you have any questions. If you prefer Chat or do not meet karma requirements, you can hit me up on chat as well
+
+> Note that, while I may have a good grasp on the concepts broken down in this post, my background is not in finance, investing, or trading, so there may be some questions I do not have the answer do (especially if they are not called out in this post)
+
+I have found myself more active on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=HCMF_MaceFace) than I ever really expected to be, so feel free to [follow me](https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=HCMF_MaceFace) if you want things like the below:
+
+-   Antagonizing Market Adversaries, MSM Shills, etc.
+-   Meme-ing with SuperStonk and the other Apes in the community
+-   Getting Notifications for Future DD I post
+
+Disclaimer
+
+> This writeup is NOT intended to serve as a source of proof/evidence behind this theory, and it operates under the assumption that the theory is valid and that the conditions it is built on are valid. Credit for the DD this Thesis is based on belongs to the broader retail community inside and outside of [r/superstonk](https://old.reddit.com/r/superstonk). I personally contributed very little beyond synthesizing and summarizing the thesis and mechanics in a digestible way to help enable others to get the word out, and I am not an expert on really any of these topics despite having some knowledge in them.
+
+IV. TL;DR (Also at Bottom)
+==========================
+
+1.  Toxic Market Participants have built up massive [short positions](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/short.asp) made through [Naked Shorting](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nakedshorting.asp)
+2.  Retail caught on to this strategy and discovered it can backfire if the company being shorted does not go bankrupt, especially if shares are bought and held indefinitely
+3.  Rules and regulations have implemented by the DTCC and its subsidiaries have been geared towards preventing market collapse, as well as to minimize the ability to perform illegal trades (naked shorting)
+4.  The SEC is also doing more to enforce compliance with the "rules"
+5.  The manipulators are at the mercy of a vicious trade cycle (t+21 FTD Cycle) that is forcing those with naked short positions to perform actions to [cover](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shortcovering.asp) (buy back shares that are short), or risk regulatory consequences
+6.  This act of rapid covering drives up the price, making it more expensive to cover during the next cycle if the share price continues to increase week over week
+7.  Eventually, the prices of GME will get so high that prime brokers/clearing houses will have no choice but to [Margin Call](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/margincall.asp) these participants which most likely will not be affordable due to the nature of [Short Squeezes](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shortsqueeze.asp), causing them to default
+8.  The [Prime-Brokers](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/primebrokerage.asp) will then take on the position, and if the Prime Brokers cannot cover them and also defaults, the NSCC will be next to attempt to settle all positions left over based on their [Recovery and Wind-down Plan (p42)](https://www.dtcc.com/~/media/Files/Downloads/legal/policy-and-compliance/NSCC_Disclosure_Framework.pdf)
+9.  If NSCC cannot afford to close everything with the money reserved for this type of situation, they the Fed must navigate the remaining positions (potentially via printing money/bailout)
+
+V. KEY CONCEPTS
+===============
+
+These terms are key to understanding the theory and speculated value of a GME investment. Hyperlinks to [Investopedia](https://www.investopedia.com/), "the world's leading source of financial content on the web", have been included for most market terms and concepts and it is recommended to check them out if they are not clear. We will be breaking down some of the more complex terms and concepts within the post and framing them within the context of GME.
+
+Table of Contents for Key Concepts
+
+1.  Stocks Concepts
+    1.  Share/Stock
+    2.  Synthetic Shares
+    3.  Outstanding Shares
+    4.  Restricted Shares
+    5.  The Float
+    6.  Annual General Meeting
+    7.  Shareholder Votes
+2.  Trade Positions
+    1.  Long Position - Buying/Selling Stock
+    2.  Short Position - Shorting/Covering Stock
+    3.  Naked Short Position - Naked Shorting/Covering Stock
+3.  Market Participants
+    1.  Retail Investors
+    2.  Institutional Investors
+    3.  Market Makers
+    4.  Prime Brokers
+    5.  Clearinghouses
+    6.  MSM
+4.  IMPORTANT MARKET/TRADE MECHANICS (MOASS)
+    1.  Fails to Deliver (FTD)
+    2.  Margin
+    3.  Margin Calls
+    4.  Margin Calls Who Calls Who
+    5.  Short Squeeze
+
+1 - STOCKS CONCEPTS
+===================
+
+1.1 - Shares/Stock
+------------------
+
+[Shares](https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/difference-between-shares-and-stocks/#shares) are the smallest unit of a Companies [Stock](https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/difference-between-shares-and-stocks/#stocks)
+
+-   Stocks and Shares are often used interchangeably
+-   Technically "shares" would represent how many of a specific company's stock, where buying multiple "stocks" would main that shares of multiple company's were bought
+    -   ex. I bought 2 stocks; 10 shares of GME, and 60 shares of AMC
+-   There are different [classes of shares](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/class.asp) that are distinguished on their voting rights, sales charges, and other factors
+    -   Classes of shares have relatively complex dynamics, but I will not go further into them here, as it is not as relevant to GME/AMC
+
+1\. 2 - Synthetic Shares
+------------------------
+
+[Synthetic Shares](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/synthetic.asp) are the financial instruments that get produced through [Naked Shorting](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nakedshorting.asp)
+
+-   Not to be confused with [synthetic options](https://www.investopedia.com/articles/optioninvestor/08/synthetic-options.asp) positions, which are legal/legitimate trade strategies that "simulate" the profits/losses as if the trader actually held those shares
+-   Synthetic shares entitle the owner to all of the same rights as an investor owning a non-synthetic share
+-   Cases where there is an excessive amount of synthetic shares point to the possibility that a stock is being abused or manipulated
+-   Cannot be easily measured due to limited public transparency at the Market Maker and Prime Broker level
+
+1.3 - Outstanding Shares
+------------------------
+
+The number of [Outstanding shares](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/outstandingshares.asp) encompasses the amount of issued shares held by all shareholders (both private and public)
+
+-   It is possible for there to be more shares outstanding through Naked shorting, which produces Synthetic shares
+-   The number of issued AND synthetic shares outstanding is very difficult to measure, as they are only recorded on the books of the market makers generating synthetic shares and the prime-brokers they trade through
+    -   These parties are not incentivized to be transparent and actively obscure these numbers, as the practice of naked shorting excessively is fraudulent and illegal
+
+1.4 - Restricted Shares
+-----------------------
+
+[Restricted shares](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/restrictedstock.asp) include the number of issued shares held by insiders of the company
+
+-   These shares are not publicly traded on the stock market
+
+1.5 - The Float
+---------------
+
+[The Float](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/floating-stock.asp), or Floating Stock is the number of shares of stock that are available to be publicly traded (the number of [Outstanding shares](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/outstandingshares.asp) minus the amount of [Restricted shares](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/restrictedstock.asp) that are owned by insiders).
+
+-   In theory, the number of shares owned by [retail investors](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/retailinvestor.asp) and [institutional investors](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/institutionalinvestor.asp) should not exceed the float
+-   GME's float total is currently ~[56.89 Million](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GME/key-statistics/) shares (as of 6/10/21)
+
+1.6 - Shareholder Votes
+-----------------------
+
+[Annual General Meetings](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/agm.asp) basically is an annual meeting that allows shareholders to vote
+
+-   Votes are cast for things like
+    -   Appointment of directors
+    -   Executive compensation
+    -   Dividend adjustments
+
+1.7 - Shareholder Votes
+=======================
+
+[Shareholder Voting](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/votingright.asp) is a right extended to shareholders holding shares in the stock that entitle the owner to vote on cooperate policies
+
+-   Examples of what votes are cast for
+    -   Appointment of directors
+    -   Executive compensation
+    -   Dividend adjustments
+-   [Overvoting (info in the middle of this page)](https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/proxyprocess/proxyvotingbrief.htm)
+    -   When there is an overvote (like GME on 6/9), the votes will be normalized to a number based on the amount of shares that are held by DTC
+    -   The official 8K form cannot be officially submitted with an overvote
+        -   When this happens, the SEC and Company are notified
+
+2 - TRADE POSITIONS
+===================
+
+2.1 - Long Position - Buying/Selling Stock
+------------------------------------------
+
+When an investor buys a stock they are considered [long](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/long.asp) on it (this is the type of position most people associate with trading stocks)
+
+-   Not to be confused with a [long-term](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/longterminvestments.asp) investment
+-   In other words, holders of long positions have a positive number of shares
+-   To [close](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/closeposition.asp) a long position the owner would sell their shares on the stock market
+
+Basic flow of obtaining/closing a long position is:
+
+1.  Buy the stock
+2.  Hold it until the price of it increases to a desired amount
+3.  Sell it for a profit
+
+2.2 - Short Position - Shorting/Covering Stock
+----------------------------------------------
+
+When a short seller shorts a stock they hold a [short position](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/short.asp) on the stock, or owe the party they borrowed from however many shares they shorted
+
+-   Not to be confused with a [short-term](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shorterminvestments.asp) investment
+-   Investors with short positions effectively are *in debt* or *owe* the number of shares that they have shorted and can be considered *negative* on the stock
+-   To close that position, short-sellers must buy a number of shares equal to the size of their short position (buying to close a short position is known as [covering](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shortcovering.asp))
+-   Short positions must be reported to regulators (unlike naked short sales)
+
+Basic flow of obtaining/closing a short position:
+
+1.  Borrow a share owned by a lender
+2.  Sell the stock that was borrowed
+3.  Gaining the cash based on the price it was at the time it was "shorted"
+4.  Pay interest as a percentage of the stock's value
+5.  Since this is a percentage the cost of interest increases if the stock's value increases
+6.  Hold the position until the price has dropped to a desired price
+7.  Buy the stock on the open market
+8.  Ideally the stock is bought back at a lower price than originally borrowed for so the investor can pocket the difference
+9.  Return the share back to the lender
+
+2.3 - Naked Short Position - Naked Shorting/Covering Stock
+----------------------------------------------------------
+
+[Naked Shorting](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nakedshorting.asp) effectively allows a Short Seller, working with a market maker, to short a stock using a without having a borrowed share like normal short selling
+
+-   Naked short sales do NOT have to be reported the same way as normal "Short Sales" and can be "hidden"
+    -   Failures to Deliver the shares that were "fake-borrowed" to the buyer are on of the main ways to find evidence of naked shorting
+-   Due to a loophole and lack of oversight by regulation, Naked short selling can be used to manipulate the price of certain stocks
+    -   This type of trade illegal outside of specific situations involving Market Makers
+-   Naked shorting was targeted for tighter regulation during the financial crisis of 2008 but enforcement has unfortunately not been effective in preventing it from manipulating the market
+
+Basic flow of obtaining/closing a naked short position (kind of complex and involves two specific parties for 2 initial trades called a married put)
+
+1.  A Short Seller "A" buys 100 shares from a Market Maker "Z" who can technically sell them without locating them
+    1.  Market Maker is Naked Shorting the stock, and the Short Seller is receiving 100 synthetic shares
+2.  Short Seller "A" now buys a [Put Option](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/putoption.asp) (1 options contract is worth 100 shares) from Market Maker "Z" who is the [writer](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/writing-an-option.asp) of the put
+    1.  Writing/selling a put nets +100 shares to the Market Maker, which results in the -100 shares that were naked shorted to be neutralized, so the Market Maker no is at a neutral position (Market Makers generally try to remain net 0 on trades
+    2.  Short Seller "A" now has 100 shares that can be short sold (they "borrowing" the synthetic shares the Market Maker effectively printed out of thin air), and one put contract that they can make money on as long as the price goes down
+3.  The steps or the short seller are basically the same as a normal short sale now (2.2 steps 2-8), however, interest from the Short seller does not need to be paid to a lender (no one is formally lending it)
+    1.  The premium from the put being purchased from the Market Maker is how they benefit
+    2.  Short Seller "A" now has a short position that they can cover simply by buying 100 shares, which would cancel out the synthetic short position
+
+3 - MARKET PARTICIPANTS
+=======================
+
+3.1 - Retail Investors
+----------------------
+
+-   Retail Investors, also known as individual investors, are your average investors (not a company or organization)
+-   Referred to as the "Dumb Money" by Wall Street and the "professional" financial community
+-   Reddit communities
+    -   Notable subreddits
+        -   [r/Superstonk](https://old.reddit.com/r/Superstonk)
+        -   [r/gme](https://old.reddit.com/r/gme)
+        -   [r/amcstock](https://old.reddit.com/r/amcstock)
+        -   [r/wallstreetbets](https://old.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets)
+
+3.2 - Institutional Investors
+-----------------------------
+
+[Institutional Investors](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/institutionalinvestor.asp) are organizations that invest on individuals' behalf
+
+-   Examples of Institutional Investors
+    -   Endowment Funds
+    -   Commercial Banks
+    -   Mutual Funds
+    -   Hedge funds
+    -   Pension funds
+    -   Insurance companies
+
+3.3 - Market Makers
+-------------------
+
+-   [Market Makers](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketmaker.asp) are very different from "Investors" and are a bit harder to explain but basically are there to increase [liquidity](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/liquidity.asp) in the market
+-   When you buy and sell stock those trades are often going between you and a market maker
+-   Market makers get "special rules" that enable them to keep liquidity in the market when there is low liquidity
+-   Naked shorting is one of the options Market Makers have when navigating a trade that other investors do not have
+
+3.4 - Prime Brokers
+-------------------
+
+-   A [Prime-Broker](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/primebrokerage.asp) is a bundled group of services that investment banks and other financial institutions offer to hedge funds and other large investment clients that need to be able to borrow securities or cash in order to engage in [netting](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/netting.asp) to achieve [absolute returns](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/absolutereturn.asp)
+-   [Broker](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/broker.asp) vs [Prime-Broker](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/primebrokerage.asp)
+    -   A broker is an individual or entity that facilitates the purchase or sale of securities, such as the buying or selling of stocks and bonds for an investment account. A prime broker is a large institution that provides a multitude of services, from cash management to securities lending to risk management for other large institutions.
+-   [Market Makers](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketmaker.asp) like go through Prime Brokers
+    -   The Prime Broker is who would Margin Call Shitadel if their short position gets too large or they bleed too much capital
+
+3.5 - Clearinghouses
+====================
+
+[Clearinghouses](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/clearinghouse.asp) are intermediaries between buyers and sellers
+
+-   Finalize transactions
+-   Regulates delivery of assets
+-   Reports on trading data
+
+3.6* - MSM (Mainstream Media)
+=============================
+
+Though not a traditional market participant (as in they are not trade/financial entities) the [MSM](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/media_effect.asp) is worth noting due to its role in influencing the financial atmosphere and landscape
+
+4 - IMPORTANT MARKET/TRADE MECHANICS (MOASS)
+============================================
+
+4.1 - Failures to Deliver (FTD)
+-------------------------------
+
+-   [FTDs](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/failuretodeliver.asp) occur when a buyer of a stock ends up not having the money to purchase the stock that they traded for OR, when a short seller does not own the stock at the time of settlement
+-   FTDs are one of the main check-balances to naked shorting, so very high amounts of Failures to Deliver are indicative of this
+    -   Spoiler: GME and AMC have tons of FTDs reported
+
+4.2 - Margin
+------------
+
+-   [Margin](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/margin.asp) is basically credit that that an investor can use to buy more stock
+-   When you buy on margin you must stake the assets you have already purchased with your own cash as collateral
+-   The amount of Margin you can have depends on the value of your collateral
+-   The value of your collateral and cash but meet the margin requirements in order to continue to buy on margin
+-   Keep in mind the value of your collateral can change if the price goes up or down and if the value of your collateral/cash drops below the margin requirement you will received a [Margin Call](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/margincall.asp) Another way to think about it:
+
+1.  Imagine I have $1,000 in stock
+2.  You obtain a personal loan for another $1000
+3.  To get the credit you stake your $1000 in stock (if you default it goes to the lender to cover your debt)
+4.  You buy $1000 more stock with that loan (you now own $2000 in stocks, half in cash half on margin)
+5.  You will pay interest on the $1000 on margin but if your investment makes more money than the interest then you are still profiting
+6.  If your investment turns bad (lets say the price of your stock falls 50% and you are left with $1000) your lender can forcibly close out your positions (everything you bought in cash and staked as collateral along with what you bought on margin so that they can get the $1000 they loaned you back)
+
+4.3 - Margin Call
+-----------------
+
+-   A Margin Call is a notice indicating you have a specific amount of time to deposit enough of your own funds to meet your margin requirement (if you cannot meet the requirement the lender is entitled to sell all of your holdings to recover what you borrowed
+
+Margin Examples:
+
+> This is a slightly complicated scenario that can be a little hard to follow. Give it a few reads if it doesn't make sense the first time, but basically, Margin is a credit line that you can use to buy more assets (effectively a loan backed by collateral and cash in your own account). If you buy assets with it, you have to pay back what you borrowed, whether the value of your investment goes up or down (if the investment goes up in value, you make more than you normally would, but if the investment goes down in value, you lose more than you otherwise would have without margin).
+>
+> This gets even more (or less maybe) complicated when you have short positions AND long positions, like most institutional investors. To have short positions, I still need to have margin, but I do not need to use it to buy stocks, It can act as a buffer if I have a short position on a stock that is increasing in value (with a short position, if the price of something I short goes up, I am losing money), and if it gets too high, it can run against my margin line, causing a margin call.
+
+GAIN: Long Positions
+
+1.  Imagine I have $1000 in stock XXX (let's say 10 shares worth $100 each)
+2.  My broker may lend me margin credit line equal to the value of my assets (so $1000 in margin), and let's say they give me a margin requirement of $800, meaning that the value of my non-margin assets (the ones I bought with my money) must be above $800 in order to keep using margin (so as long as stock XXX stays above $80 a share, then I will not get a margin call for being below the requirement)
+3.  I then choose to use the margin, buying 10 more shares of stock XXX for $100 each, so I now have 20 shares of stock XXX, valued at 100$ a piece
+4.  If the price of stock XXX goes up to %25 per share, and I sell all 20 shares, I just profited $500 (+$25 on 20 shares)
+    1.  In this case, closing the position clears me from the margin debt, as I am no longer using it in an open position
+    2.  If I had not used margin, I would have only walked away with $250 in profit ($25 per share on 10 shares), but instead I made $500, and paid back the credit, plus a little bit of interest.
+5.  Yay.
+
+LOSS: Long Positions
+
+1.  Imagine I have $1000 in stock XXX (let's say 10 shares worth $100 each)
+2.  My broker may lend me margin credit line equal to the value of my assets (so $1000 in margin), and let's say they give me a margin requirement of $800, meaning that the value of my non-margin assets (the ones I bought with my money) must be above $800 in order to keep using margin (so as long as stock XXX stays above $80 a share, then I will not get a margin call for being below the requirement)
+3.  I then choose to use the margin, buying 10 more shares of stock XXX for $100 each, so I now have 20 shares of stock XXX, valued at 100$ a piece
+4.  If the price of stock XXX goes down %25, bringing the value per share down to $75 a share, the value of my total position is now $1500, and the value of my non-margin assets is $750, which is below the margin requirement (keep in mind, I borrowed $1000, so that is still the amount I have to pay back)
+5.  My lender will give me a margin call, indicating I have two business days to deposit 50$ into my account in order to meet the margin requirement
+    1.  If I have the cash to deposit the extra $50 would take my assets to $800 ($750 in stock XXX + 50$ cash)
+        1.  If the price of stock XXX recovered to above $80 per share, it could also satisfy the requirement
+    2.  If I do not have the cash to deposit, then I am in trouble, as after two days, they are allowed to liquidate (sell) the assets I bought with my own money, as well as the assets I bought on margin
+        1.  Let's say this happens, all my borrowed assets are sold first to cover my $1000 loan (since the price of stock XXX was only $750, it only covers $750 of my $1000 margin line
+        2.  I now have $750 left in assets of Stock X, but I still owe money from margin, so my lender is entitled to sell $250 work of my shares in order to get their full $1000 back
+        3.  I am now left with $500 total ($750 in 10 shares of stock XXX - $250)
+6.  Not Yay
+
+LOSS: Short and Long Positions
+
+THIS IS THE RELEVANT ONE TO GME/AMC
+
+1.  Imagine I have $1000 in stock XXX (let's say 10 shares worth $100 each)
+2.  My broker may lend me margin credit line equal to the value of my assets (so $1000 in margin), and let's say they give me a margin requirement of $800, meaning that the value of my non-margin assets (the ones I bought with my money) must be above $800 in order to keep using margin
+3.  Instead of using the margin to buy more, I instead short 10 shares of stock YYY which is at $50 a share currently (giving me $500 in extra cash), which I use to buy 5 more shares of stock X
+    1.  I am now long 15 shares of stock XXX valued at $1500 and short 10 shares of stock YYY valued at -$500 (negative $500) for a net value of $1000
+    2.  No margin is actively committed to open positions, and I am still using my $1000
+4.  Now, lets say a short squeeze happens involving stock Y, causing the price to skyrocket to $200 per share
+    1.  My short position is now -$2000 (10 shares of -$200 each)
+5.  My net account value is now $-500 ($1500 - $2000) which is now using my margin, and because my account's value is no longer above $800, I no longer meet margin requirements so I get a margin call
+6.  If I cannot balance my account, the lender will liquidate my $1500 in stock XXX in order to pay the -$2000 I owe, leaving me with -$500 left in debt
+    1.  I have now defaulted, as I cannot pay the $500
+7.  Now that I have defaulted, the lender who gave me margin owns my short positions, meaning they are now short whatever was left
+    1.  The lender can now navigate the short positions however they want (they can hold them and hope the price goes down, and cover to close them, or they can close them immediately, costing them the whole $500 I still owed)
+8.  GUH! (Translation if you are not WSB: Ah @#$%)
+
+4.4 - Margin Calls Who Calls Who
+--------------------------------
+
+-   Margin calls happen at levels 1-4 when the cell to the left cannot meet margin requirements
+    -   Broker Margin Calls Retail Traders
+    -   Prime Brokers Margin Call Brokers, Hedge Funds, and Market Makers
+    -   The NSCC Margin Calls Prime Brokers
+-   Defaults roll up left to right
+    -   If Retail Trader defaults, Broker must take on their leftover positions
+    -   If Broker, Hedge Fund, or Market Maker defaults, the Prime Broker must take on their leftover positions
+    -   If Prime Broker Defaults, the NSCC must take on Position
+    -   If the NSCC Defaults, the Fed must take on the position
+
+| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 4 |
+| :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- |
+| Retail Trader | Broker | Prime Broker | NSCC (DTCC) | Fed (JPOW) |
+| x | Market Maker | Prime Broker | NSCC (DTCC) | Fed (JPOW) |
+| x | Hedge Fund | Prime Broker | NSCC (DTCC) | Fed (JPOW) |
+
+4.5 - Short Squeeze
+-------------------
+
+-   A [Short Squeeze](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shortsqueeze.asp) is a market event that occurs when there is a large short position on a stock whose price rapidly increases higher than expected, normally due to a catalyst
+-   During the short squeeze, the losses of those who have short positions continue to increase higher it goes
+    -   Since they owe shares, the cost to cover their position increases depending on how high the price goes (there is theoretically no limit on how high a stock can go)
+-   As market participants who are short on the stock buy to cover, supply decreases and demand increases, causing the price to increase even more rapidly
+-   While short sellers are scrambling to cover their positions, the rapid price change may entice investors who are not short on the stock to buy it in order to make a quick profit
+    -   Again, lowering supply and increasing demand
+
+VI. The Mother of All Short Squeezes (MOASS)
+============================================
+
+Explanation
+===========
+
+Now that we have gone through the many important terms, we can get to the theory behind MOASS.
+
+Due excessive short-selling and naked shorting of GME by certain market participants (primarily large hedge funds and market makers), retail investors and long institutional investors collectively own a number of shares that exceeds the the float. The amount of shares that are currently owned is theorized to range roughly between 200%-400% of the float if not more, meaning that 100%-300% of the float has a corresponding short position (mostly naked shorts). For context, most stocks generally have around 1% Short Interest, and 10%-20% short interest is considered to be excessive, let alone over 100% of it.
+
+Short sellers must eventually close, or cover, their short position
+
+-   The only way to do that is to buy the shares owned by the investors who are long
+    -   in the meantime Short-sellers are paying interest on that short position until it is closed proportional to the cost of the shares, which bleeds their capital over time
+-   Unfortunately for the short sellers, the owners of the shares ARE NOT obligated to sell their shares.
+    -   The short-sellers, however, ARE obligated to buy in order to close their position (or else keep paying interest)
+
+So what happens if no one is selling the shares they are "long" on, but short sellers need to buy them?
+
+-   Supply and Demand
+    -   With very little supply and high demand, the price of a stock can increase far beyond its fundamental value
+    -   If short sellers receive a margin call due to no longer meeting their margin requirement and are unable to meet it in time, their assets will be forcibly liquidated by their lender in order to pay back the margin, as well as close out the position if the borrower defaults
+
+If you are wondering why an organization would abusively short a stock like this if they eventually have to cover their positions:
+
+-   If a company goes bankrupt or gets delisted from the stock market:
+    -   The short sellers DO NOT have to close the position
+    -   All of the proceeds from the short sale effectively disappear from their books
+    -   They do not even have to pay taxes on this profit
+
+Short positions amount to the total number of long positions minus the float, meaning (based on the theorized range) that somewhere between ~56-170 Million shares will need to be bought in order to close all short positions
+
+-   It is expected that the members with short positions (hedge funds and market makers who have been naked shorting the stock) will be unable to cover their short positions, resulting in a situation where their lenders, all the way up to the clearinghouse (DTCC) will have to sort out the positions
+-   If the DTCC/NSCC is forced to unwind the positions, it is widely believed that they will rapidly cover short positions at whatever price they are available for (this is how their systems are said to handle a member default), liquidating whatever assets are necessary from the defaulting member
+
+Consideration
+=============
+
+This is a totally unprecedented situation, so, in truth, there is a lot of uncertainty around what wind-down will look like once this gets to the Prime Brokers (major banks) and NSCC, as well as around how high the price peak will reach. There is a real risk of broad negative impact across the entire market because of this and the current Repo Rates and margin debt.
+
+A few things I think are safe to assume are:
+
+-   Before anything happens that will cap or negatively affect the MOASS, all of the Hedge Funds and Market Makers who conspired to manipulate the market will likely have been bankrupted and eliminated from the market landscape by then
+-   Prime Brokers will have been dealt a massive blow (like Credit Suisse after Archegos Collapse by way worse) that should hopefully ensure regulators tie up every loophole that was exploited to manipulate the market and harm it
+-   The peak will reach higher than any other short squeeze in history and will likely never be beaten in the future (EVER)
+
+VII. Final thoughts...
+======================
+
+This is the GME MOASS thesis. GME is a stock that stands to hit an unprecedented price point due to the fact that manipulators of the market have failed to bankrupt GameStop thanks in huge part to [the Legendary Keith Gill AKA u/DeepFuckingValue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Gill), [Ryan Cohen](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Cohen), [Michael Burry](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Burry), and all of the GME investors who took part in this saga. It may not be today, this week, or even this month, but one day soon, these toxic participants have no choice but to buy the stock to close out their short positions.
+
+In some schools of thought, it is thought that these participants over-estimated how "reasonable" retail investors can be (who could be dumb enough to hold a stock as it fell from almost $500 to $40?). In truth, these manipulators didn't understand the demographic they were fighting with. Gamers are some of the most stubborn people on the planet. These are individuals who will sink tens of thousands of hours into the same video game because "they just like it". Well, "we like the stock", and to us, the adversaries on Wall Street just are just another "boss". We may have needed to retry a couple times, but we always win eventually. On top of that, they pissed off reddit, and under no circumstances, should you ever piss off reddit.
+
+At this point, if you are still reading this, know that it is up to you to decide your next move, whether that is to do some due diligence of your own, walk away, or say screw it and buy a few (or a lot of) shares just in case we are right. Many of us have set our floor (minimum amount of acceptable gains) at $20,000,000 per share, and you might think that is crazy, but in truth, we know we can pick our own price if we hold long enough. We don't care if anyone else buys or not, because we know the outcome is inevitable. Time is running out for the toxic market participants involved, and even the news can't hide that we are on the brink of a massive market event that will ripple through the entire global financial system, and we will probably never see an event like this again in our lifetime.
+
+This is a fight Wall Street, Shitadel, Melvin Capital, and ever other toxic party is not going to win against the "dumb money". Chances are this will truly be "THE MOASS", meaning there will never be another like it in our lifetime (or ever). While the conditions in play (the ability for big money to brutally manipulate the market) enabled what may end up being the greatest transfer of wealth in history, actual reformation to prevent a landscape like this from forming again is probably best long term (I say this as a pragmatist, and am honestly very far from an idealist). If you want to influence reform, Buy, Hold, Vote. If you are just here for the tendies, Buy, Hold, Vote.
+
+VIII. TL;DR
+===========
+
+1.  Toxic Market Participants have built up massive [short positions](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/short.asp) made through [Naked Shorting](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nakedshorting.asp)
+2.  Retail caught on to this strategy and discovered it can backfire if the company being shorted does not go bankrupt, especially if shares are bought and held indefinitely
+3.  Rules and regulations have implemented by the DTCC and its subsidiaries have been geared towards preventing market collapse, as well as to minimize the ability to perform illegal trades (naked shorting)
+4.  The SEC is also doing more to enforce compliance with the "rules"
+5.  The manipulators are at the mercy of a vicious trade cycle (t+21 FTD Cycle) that is forcing those with naked short positions to perform actions to [cover](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shortcovering.asp) (buy back shares that are short), or risk regulatory consequences
+6.  This act of rapid covering drives up the price, making it more expensive to cover during the next cycle if the share price continues to increase week over week
+7.  Eventually, the prices of GME will get so high that prime brokers/clearing houses will have no choice but to [Margin Call](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/margincall.asp) these participants which most likely will not be affordable due to the nature of [Short Squeezes](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shortsqueeze.asp), causing them to default
+8.  The [Prime-Brokers](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/primebrokerage.asp) will then take on the position, and if the Prime Brokers cannot cover them and also defaults, the NSCC will be next to attempt to settle all positions left over based on their [Recovery and Wind-down Plan (p42)](https://www.dtcc.com/~/media/Files/Downloads/legal/policy-and-compliance/NSCC_Disclosure_Framework.pdf)
+9.  If NSCC cannot afford to close everything with the money reserved for this type of situation, they the Fed must navigate the remaining positions (potentially via printing money/bailout)
+
+IX. STILL TL;DR
+===============
+
+Margin Calls happen across the market and force all market participants with short positions in GME to cover or go bankrupt if they cannot afford to. The NSCC's systems that will settle positions after mass defaults liquidates all short hedge funds and covers as much GME as it can. If the NSCC cannot pay everything, it fails up to the Fed and JPOW to print money to settle the trades.
+
+X. Hedgies, velkommen til helvete. Vi kommer for tårene dine.
+=============================================================
+
+PDF Link - I recommend accessing through an incognito browser so that no one else is able to see your email address if you are logged into google (I initially had this on OneDrive, which did not do this, however, shills seem to have gotten my Microsoft account blacklisted so I cannot access OneDrive now lol):
+
+<https://drive.google.com/file/d/18SDUrEd-wNjKDwblo3ykoIxn627Vni0G/view?usp=sharing>
+
+EDIT: updated on 6/13/2021 to version 2.0 (kept the same post since it is referenced in a few places).

01-Must-Read/2021-06-12-Revisiting-Net-Capital-and-T+21-Loops.md

@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+A revisit to Net Capital. What is truly driving these T+21 loops, the March and June gamma runs, and how skyrocketing ETF FTDs might cause big price movements in the coming weeks.
+===================================================================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/user/Criand/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ny2ov4/a_revisit_to_net_capital_what_is_truly_driving/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+0\. Preface
+
+Well well, I think it's time to revisit an old topic. Net Capital. I posted about this in the past and for some reason gave up on it. I can now provide counter DD to my own T+21/T+35 theory.
+
+Remember - I am not a financial advisor and I do not provide financial advice! Everything in here is based on research and discussion with others on the topics. As always, do your own research and criticize. Take my opinions with a grain of salt.
+
+Wanting to revisit the Net Capital topic was a few things. There were posts about ETF FTDs spiking severely as of May 12th - even more than the highest peaks of January. I had my own doubts over time of how we could possibly have multiple cycles overlapping, when it felt more like there would be only a single cycle. And of course, some people commented and/or posted counter DD! Which I think is awesome, it's always good to provide counter DD.
+
+Kenny and his gang love to continue digging a hole for themselves - while the whole financial world tries desperately to contain this potential market crash from coming to fruition.
+
+GME shorts and Reverse Repo Market go brrrrrrrr.
+
+TLDR: Sorry I'm too lazy right now. About to post this and go to sleep. 😎
+
+[![r/Superstonk - A revisit to Net Capital. What is truly driving these T+21 loops, the March and June gamma runs, and how skyrocketing ETF FTDs might cause big price movements in the coming weeks.](https://preview.redd.it/p9ruup81br471.png?width=1016&format=png&auto=webp&s=459845688e21d10000f45ba7e81c9de8a6839321)](https://preview.redd.it/p9ruup81br471.png?width=1016&format=png&auto=webp&s=459845688e21d10000f45ba7e81c9de8a6839321)
+
+Kenny And The Boys
+
+My previous post about [Net Capital](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n4h832/major_deep_itm_call_option_dates_a_massive_net/) was thinking that we'd see significant price movement T+14 days after April 16th options expirations. That didn't happen, so I tossed it out of the window. (Criand, you dumb bitch)
+
+Which then led me down the path of the [T+21 Loop Missing Link](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nf22qz/theory_on_the_ftd_loop_missing_link_a_t35_surge/). It got pretty popular. It's the whole T+21/T+35 conjunction theory that occurred May 24th and May 25th. While it definitely appears to be right, I have been doubting it ever since May 24th. Especially after a courageous ape [u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/) posted the [Counter DD to T+21](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nsady3/t21_is_not_actually_a_thing_counter_dd/) theory. T+35 (May 24th) didn't have significant enough price movement. If it truly was a new T+35 initiating a loop, then it should have exploded up in price on May\
+24th. And for that, I think it's time to put that theory to bed.
+
+The counter DD that [/u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/) posted is excellent and you should definitely take a look. If my post is wrong, [/u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/) still proposes another possibility: that T+35 from the FTD spike could initiate buy pressure around June 17th.
+
+Ever since the counter DD, I decided to revisit Net Capital since that is what [/u/keijikage](https://www.reddit.com/u/keijikage/) brought to my attention so many weeks ago. Very smart guy by the way! Always very knowledgeable and provides amazing discussion!
+
+Looking back on Net Capital now, especially with the ETF FTD spike that occurred on May 12th, it might finally paint the picture as to what has been going on this whole time with the "T+21 cycle", the March Gamma Ramp, and the June Gamma Ramp.
+
+1\. GME FTDs, ETF FTDs, Massive Resurgence Started May 12
+
+First, I want to discuss ETF FTDs, as something absolutely wild occurred in May. Note that we do not have the full months FTD data yet. The SEC releases the data in first half and second half of the month reports. So, it cuts off quite conveniently when FTDs began to go haywire.
+
+For a while now it's been theorized ([with some pretty damn good evidence](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nrpjle/almost_1b_ftd_on_may_14th_between_gme_and/)) that ETFs containing GME have been heavily shorted. Supposedly they will short the ETF, buy up all of the other stocks in the ETF that were shorted, but leave GME alone. There's a net 0 effect on the other stocks but a net short on GME. This then starts to cause ETF FTD anomalies which they also try to suppress, but they can't hide forever. Because it appears that as of May 12th, these FTDs have begun to spill out of hiding.
+
+[u/basketas87](https://www.reddit.com/u/basketas87/) posted about this surge of ETF FTDs in "[New data shows a large increase of ETF FTDs](https://www.reddit.com/r/DDintoGME/comments/nx013v/new_data_shows_a_large_increase_of_etf_ftds/)":
+
+[![r/Superstonk - A revisit to Net Capital. What is truly driving these T+21 loops, the March and June gamma runs, and how skyrocketing ETF FTDs might cause big price movements in the coming weeks.](https://preview.redd.it/h7iq2v4njq471.png?width=1122&format=png&auto=webp&s=b4fbbca80002197058a20c5d8654e08ba8b4dbae)](https://preview.redd.it/h7iq2v4njq471.png?width=1122&format=png&auto=webp&s=b4fbbca80002197058a20c5d8654e08ba8b4dbae)
+
+GME Price Vs. GME FTDs and ETF FTDs (which contain GME); Source: /u/basketas87
+
+You can immediately see the ETF FTDs absolutely SKYROCKETED just before the cutoff of the SEC FTD bi-monthly report. We don't even know how high this has gone in the following days or if its come crashing back down. Remember - these are aggregate. We don't sum up the FTDs between dates. Whatever the number is upon a date is the current total of FTDs reported.
+
+For a date-by-date tracking for these FTDs between January and the end of March, [/u/broccaaa](https://www.reddit.com/u/broccaaa/) provided an excellent chart in "[The naked shorting scam using ETFs: mass shifting of FTDs from GME to 20+ ETFs & 27+ billion dollars still owed in remaining SI](https://www.reddit.com/r/DDintoGME/comments/n1x75w/the_naked_shorting_scam_using_etfs_mass_shifting/)". This gives us an easier look at the exact dates when FTDs spiked earlier in the year.
+
+> I selected GME and 19 ETFs containing GME. I chose to only look at the ETFs that contain the most GME shares and had large numbers of FTDs in 2021. - [/u/broccaaa](https://www.reddit.com/u/broccaaa/)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - A revisit to Net Capital. What is truly driving these T+21 loops, the March and June gamma runs, and how skyrocketing ETF FTDs might cause big price movements in the coming weeks.](https://preview.redd.it/choe9jjris471.png?width=1709&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e907654b1e054734098c010839ec5ad07ab0633)](https://preview.redd.it/choe9jjris471.png?width=1709&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e907654b1e054734098c010839ec5ad07ab0633)
+
+Aggregate FTDs for GME; GME and ETFs; Source: /u/broccaaa
+
+Some notable aggregate FTD dates from this chart:
+
+1.  January 29th
+
+2.  February 2nd
+
+3.  February 18th
+
+And of course, the latest absolutely insane May 12th. Once again, we don't even know what the FTD numbers are for the second half of May. It could very well be much higher.
+
+2\. Net Capital And Market Makers; Citadel's Can-Kicked Bag
+
+Net Capital is detailed out [in this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n4h832/major_deep_itm_call_option_dates_a_massive_net/) but I will do a quick summary. It revolves around [Net Capital Requirements For Brokers or Dealers - 240.15c3-1](https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/240.15c3-1):
+
+> ...is designed to ensure that a broker-dealer holds, at all times, more than one dollar of highly liquid assets for each dollar of liabilities (e.g., money owed to customers and counterparties), excluding liabilities that are subordinated to all other creditors by contractual agreement. The premise underlying the net capital rule is that if a broker-dealer fails, it should be in a position to meet all unsubordinated obligations to customers and counterparties and generate resources sufficient to wind down its operations in an orderly manner without the need of a formal proceeding...\
+> ...A broker-dealer must ensure that its actual net capital exceeds its required minimum net capital at all times. - [Source](https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/peirce_reframing_ch6.pdf)
+
+Or in other words, you must have enough capital to not be "margin-called". In this case, Citadel is a prime victim to this rule as they are a Market Maker and must sustain enough net capital to not go bust. If they do not, they're a risk to their customers and counterparties. This rule tries to ensure that they have enough money to pay up in the event of a default.
+
+The very interesting part of this rule comes down to how they're calculating Net Capital in regards to short securities:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - A revisit to Net Capital. What is truly driving these T+21 loops, the March and June gamma runs, and how skyrocketing ETF FTDs might cause big price movements in the coming weeks.](https://preview.redd.it/jzzkxo2qsq471.png?width=1311&format=png&auto=webp&s=9b26ce9297defa1c10492f9d1e2b2c6a1bc07252)](https://preview.redd.it/jzzkxo2qsq471.png?width=1311&format=png&auto=webp&s=9b26ce9297defa1c10492f9d1e2b2c6a1bc07252)
+
+Net Capital Rule; Short Securities Deduction From Net Capital Per "Days After Discovery"
+
+What this basically means is that after the short security difference is found to be unresolved after discovery (think FTD popping up is the "discovery"), then it's going to slowly start eating away at their net capital the longer it remains unresolved/undelivered:
+
+-   Day 0 after discovery = 0% of the unresolved short security is calculated into their net capital
+
+-   Day 7 after discovery = 25% of the unresolved short security is calculated into their net capital
+
+-   Day 14 after discovery = 50% of the unresolved short security is calculated into their net capital
+
+-   Day 21 after discovery = 75% of the unresolved short security is calculated into their net capital
+
+-   Day 28 after discovery = 100% of the unresolved short security is calculated into their net capital
+
+When you have these debts accounted for into your net capital, it is taking away that value, because it is a short difference you owe. As the days go by, net capital starts chunking down. So, if you have a rather large short security difference discovered one day (such as May 12th) then you want to resolve it quickly or risk defaulting.
+
+Do you find a way to stuff the unresolved shorts back under the rug? Do you deliver and force buy-ins? Both? That appears to be the loop they've been stuck in, which slowly bumps the price floor upward.
+
+You'll notice that there's a familiar number in there. Day 21. T+21? Oooh. Tasty. Here we go.
+
+The total timeframe for Net Capital is [28 days](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST2H8FWDvEA), but Citadel most likely cannot allow the Net Capital threshold to go past 75%. They must kick-the-can and force buy-ins on or before T+7, T+14, T+21 but complete the entire process by the net 75% threshold of T+21. They can't risk it going to 100% or else they'll most likely default.
+
+Wham, bam, the T+21 loop ignites itself continuously.
+
+3\. Plotting The Net Capital Loop - The Counter of T+21 and T+35
+
+The major option dates still play a big role. But I don't think T+35 theory is what's really applying here.
+
+What are "major options"? These are the only options that were available for the year 2021 back in early 2020. These are the option dates that were most likely opened up initially by shorters at the start of COVID. Perfect time to place bets and start their kill shot on GameStop:
+
+-   January 15, 2021
+
+-   April 16, 2021
+
+-   July 16, 2021
+
+Upon expiration, unrealized losses now became realized losses, and their overall capital receives a dent. It most likely gets harder to hide FTDs and hide them under the rug.
+
+You know the most curious thing?
+
+Posts about Citadel working the night-shift started just after April 16th options expirations.
+
+That's also right around when Bank of America shut down a bunch of their locations. I won't buy their excuses. Bank of America looks like they're a bag holder and is freaking out too.
+
+Something big had to of happened as of April 16th, and it's most likely that they had a huge dent in their capital that is now causing a slow bleed-out of FTDs that they've hidden, which then must be satisfied within the Net Capital timeframe of T+7, T+14, T+21, T+28, or else they can go net negative and default.
+
+And of course, following April 16 options expirations, the ETF FTDs start to skyrocket on May 12th. My main intuition is that they were unable to hide these any more and they have started to spill out. Ruh-roh.
+
+First, I'll plot out the T+21 Net Capital loop so that it isn't too cluttered:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - A revisit to Net Capital. What is truly driving these T+21 loops, the March and June gamma runs, and how skyrocketing ETF FTDs might cause big price movements in the coming weeks.](https://preview.redd.it/xh4u2ugmfs471.png?width=1438&format=png&auto=webp&s=85188eccc2bf3841bb98e37e5be98b8badcc01c7)](https://preview.redd.it/xh4u2ugmfs471.png?width=1438&format=png&auto=webp&s=85188eccc2bf3841bb98e37e5be98b8badcc01c7)
+
+Plotted Net Capital "T+21" Cycle, December 22 to July 26
+
+Upon December 22, the clock starts ticking. It's possible that at this point the price was too high for them to NOT worry about Net Capital any more, and they had to start can-kicking and forced buy-ins.
+
+Each loop is separated T+21 because it appears that they cannot sustain higher than the 75% threshold each time. You can see the T+21 loop we're familiar with, starting December 22, and then traveling through January 25, February 24, March 25, April 26, May 25. And potentially continuing on to June 24 and July 26. [The next two dates if any apes are curious].
+
+To get a closer look of the potential effects of the various Threshold amounts (T+7 (25%), T+14 (50%), T+21 (75%)) I've zoomed in on March 25th to May 25th. ENHANCE!
+
+[![r/Superstonk - A revisit to Net Capital. What is truly driving these T+21 loops, the March and June gamma runs, and how skyrocketing ETF FTDs might cause big price movements in the coming weeks.](https://preview.redd.it/p6q5gox9fs471.png?width=1438&format=png&auto=webp&s=4da6c3ed2e8547ccd755b95ee895be235cbf9d44)](https://preview.redd.it/p6q5gox9fs471.png?width=1438&format=png&auto=webp&s=4da6c3ed2e8547ccd755b95ee895be235cbf9d44)
+
+Plotted Net Capital "T+21" Cycle, March 25 to May 25, Price Spikes Prior to Each Threshold (T+7, T+14) Date
+
+In the above it's unlikely but there is a chance that they have too many FTDs to shuffle around by the time Net Capital 25% (T+7) Threshold hits. This could initiate some buy-in pressure on or before that date, typically the day before, as outlined in the light green circle. The day before because they don't want those positions to be 50% upon the next day. They must be resolved BEFORE.
+
+It is also unlikely but a greater chance that they have too many FTDs to shuffle around by the time Net Capital 50% (T+14) Threshold hits. This again could initiate some buy-in pressure on or before that date, typically the day before, as outlined in the blue circle.
+
+And of course upon Net Capital 75% (T+21) Threshold, they must complete their rug-hiding and/or buy-ins to avoid going Net Negative. It is possible that the rug-hiding and buy-ins are in conjunction with one another, slowly increasing the price floor, and that between each threshold they try to short the stock more to push down the price.
+
+Looping back to Section 1 when we identified the major FTD dates:
+
+1.  January 29th
+
+2.  February 2nd
+
+3.  February 18th
+
+4.  May 12th
+
+There's a potential relationship to be seen with these insane FTD dates. Now this chart I'm about to show is highly speculative. I'm unsure if the Net Capital loop initiates upon the FTD spikes (though it certainly should, per Net Capital rule, because that would be when they are "discovered").
+
+I say I'm unsure because I only see one data point here so far and somewhat of a second data point from the price run-up we've been seeing the past few days.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - A revisit to Net Capital. What is truly driving these T+21 loops, the March and June gamma runs, and how skyrocketing ETF FTDs might cause big price movements in the coming weeks.](https://preview.redd.it/424mtt66sq471.png?width=1433&format=png&auto=webp&s=7b11bb6a0a8f06bafb2471e7dfc0b64c90f1cb1a)](https://preview.redd.it/424mtt66sq471.png?width=1433&format=png&auto=webp&s=7b11bb6a0a8f06bafb2471e7dfc0b64c90f1cb1a)
+
+Plotted Net Capital "T+21" Cycle, December 22 to July 26, and FTD Spike Relationship
+
+In the above picture, look at January 29th's FTD spike. Plotting the full 28 days of Net Capital out where 100% of the debts would be accounted for, that lands it on March 11th. They want to resolve this before March 11th, while the debts are still 75% accounted for. Remember that date? March 10th? I sure do. This could be why we saw the price spike, and why T+35 is incorrect in theory. But, it appears the major option dates still play a role, because of the May 12th FTD spike that just occurred, which followed April 16th options. Likewise, the January 15th options may have initiated the FTD spikes around January 29th and February 2nd.
+
+If the same situation occurs due to the May 12th FTDs, then plotting out the full 28 days of Net Capital lands us on June 22nd. If these FTDs initiated Net Capital T+0 upon May 12th, then things could get crazy on or before June 22nd.
+
+It is very possible that the run-up from May 25th to June 8th was all due to this new set of FTDs, and they had to start buy-ins on or before T+14 and T+21 from May 12th due to the sheer amount of unresolved shorts that were eating away at their Net Capital. If the FTDs aren't fully hidden again or all the buy-ins aren't complete, there's still T+28 to look towards, which lands on June 22nd. They would need to hide these FTDs again and/or buy-in on or before June 22nd. This would keep in line with the March 10th squeeze.
+
+This could also very well explain what was going on with AMC. (Don't freak out on me yet, I love looking at AMC because it's very good analysis to track. It's been following the same exact T+21 pattern as GME)
+
+4\. AMC Behavior - Given Up On By Shorts? Too Expensive To Juggle With GME?
+
+AMC has gone on an absolute RUN. It increased nearly 70% in one day. Take a look at the following chart now that you know about Net Capital and the different T+7, T+14, T+21, T+28 Thresholds:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - A revisit to Net Capital. What is truly driving these T+21 loops, the March and June gamma runs, and how skyrocketing ETF FTDs might cause big price movements in the coming weeks.](https://preview.redd.it/xn0tukmw4r471.png?width=1434&format=png&auto=webp&s=a679b5628fd370944ba680b6de0bf5e6dcadd35a)](https://preview.redd.it/xn0tukmw4r471.png?width=1434&format=png&auto=webp&s=a679b5628fd370944ba680b6de0bf5e6dcadd35a)
+
+AMC Behavior from May 12th to June 24th
+
+Damn. Did they just GIVE UP on AMC and decide that it's too much to deal with? Do they not have enough capital to deal with both GME and AMC (and possibly other short meme stocks)? I think so, because this lines up quite well. They had to fix Net Capital for AMC by T+7 (25%) Threshold on June 4th probably because it was too expensive to handle alongside GME, and GME is the one they really need to keep their ammo for.
+
+Between T+7 and T+14, they of course short some more, trying to pull the price down in preparation of the next Threshold cycle of T+14, which will probably cause an equivalent or greater amount of buy-ins. This lands on... June 15th. And if it's like previous cycles, that would imply that they want to do the buy-ins by June 14th (next Monday) to avoid those unresolved shorts hitting the next threshold amount. Big price spike coming again?
+
+Even then, the current T+21 cycle isn't over. The threshold of 75% doesn't land until June 24th, where things very likely will continue to spike upward with an equivalent or greater spike of the run before T+7 (25%) Threshold.
+
+I truly think that they've put all of their effort into containing GME and have more or less "given up" on AMC because it's not as big of a deal to them. That's why it's mooning like crazy while GME is taking a little time to wake up.
+
+5\. GME Behavior - Shorts Holding On As Long As They Can
+
+With the same exact timeframe of AMC, let's finally look at GME and the current cycle going on. The ETF FTDs from May 12th line up T+28 (100% Net Capital Threshold) on June 22nd. Again, if the Net Capital loop initiated upon that FTD spike, then things could get absolutely wild on or just before June 22nd.
+
+Otherwise, it might just be the standard T+21 Net Capital loop, which has that extra pressure from the ETF FTDs, where the Net Capital loop initiated on May 25th, and ends on June 24th.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - A revisit to Net Capital. What is truly driving these T+21 loops, the March and June gamma runs, and how skyrocketing ETF FTDs might cause big price movements in the coming weeks.](https://preview.redd.it/p3yueytz4r471.png?width=1441&format=png&auto=webp&s=48a0f3e70ac922a345e5b58c0219bd1470dff2ab)](https://preview.redd.it/p3yueytz4r471.png?width=1441&format=png&auto=webp&s=48a0f3e70ac922a345e5b58c0219bd1470dff2ab)
+
+GME Behavior from May 12th to June 24th
+
+By the time of T+7 (25% Threshold), it appears that they really needed to apply some buy-ins, and the price started to rise quite significantly. Just like AMC, but not as extreme, because they want to put all of their energy into keeping this bad boy from popping off.
+
+Once again... take a look when T+14 (50% Threshold) will hit. June 15th. From the above analysis, the buy-ins would occur on or before this threshold date, typically right before. Know where that lands? Next Monday. June 14th.
+
+It's possible that they won't be able to sustain to the 75% threshold any more, but now must sustain the 50% threshold of T+14 where they need to resolve their unresolved shorts by.
+
+Maybe there will be a big price spike next Monday. Otherwise, keep an eye out for the T+28 date of the ETF FTDs, landing June 22nd, or the original T+21 date, landing June 24th.
+
+I believe we're also waiting for the Russell 1000 change the week of June 24th. ;)

01-Must-Read/2021-06-15-Death-by-1000-Cuts-and-Shorting-Hedge-Funds-just-Received-their-999th-Cut.md

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+In death by 1000 cuts, SHF just received their 999 cut
+======================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/No1Important_4real](https://www.reddit.com/user/No1Important_4real/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o0mn0y/in_death_by_1000_cuts_shf_just_received_their_999/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+EDIT: Love you apes. Sorry again for the crass language and the tone. It was part frustration, part trying an alternate strategy to reach people. I will try and fix my typos and errors as I find them but this took me like three hours to write and I really need to get some work done.
+
+EDIT 2: I updated the percentages on the numbers chart, as people correctly pointed out the implied increase negated the need for the 100% base. Thank you so much for everyone taking the time to understand. I do want to mention that I'm not saying the MOASS is on a date. I just wanted to get attention drawn to a point of data that, to me at least, seems urgent and critical for apes to see, especially while the price dips. I always reserve the right to be wrong. Thank you all so much for your comments, I appreciate them all and read them as I can.
+
+PREFACE
+
+I am screaming from the rooftops about this to any apes who will listen. The bells are tolling for hedgies and no one is noticing or caring. I've made two other posts trying to draw attention to this and both got downvoted into obscurity or spammed with cries of "Shill!"
+
+I try to make every post respectful, concise, and as clear as possible but that isn't working and this needs to be heard, so I'm going to go crass. Prepare for a meandering, poorly edited, train of though addled wall of text! I'm going to worry less about citing and more about getting this out there. I'll edit in citations later if anyone fucking pays attention and this doesn't get downvoted to hell.
+
+I love all you apes, but the hedgies are bleeding out right in front of us and you dense mother fuckers are busy upvoting cat videos and low effort memes to the front page instead of useful discussion. You aren't all diamond hands, you're diamond skull too. If I need to make a puppet show I will, you're going to understand how important today is.
+
+TOPIC
+
+Today is the settlement date for the short interest reports due to FINRA twice a month. These dates are as important as FTD cycle dates but no one ever fucking pays any attention to them. Every single time these dates come around the price will bump UP by 25% to 35%. What did we see this cycle? A DROP OF 40%!
+
+This is the first time in a year that the price fell for a SI report cycle. It has always risen by as much as 500% during the Jan squeeze or as little as 22% in April while the stock was running flat but it ALWAYS GOES UP!
+
+Pay the fuck attention here. The price goes up when these dates come around, not down. There is a very simple reason why, if you give two shits about it you can read my first DD:
+
+<https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nztx4l/finra_short_interest_reporting_the_current_price/>
+
+GRADE SCHOOL LEVEL EXPLANATION
+
+I'm going to use an analogy and then a real world example with numbers to try and hold as many people's hands here and explain what's happening.
+
+Let's say you get a small cut and it bleeds a little bit. You're not going to die. You get cut again and again and again and you're still not going to die but every cut makes the bleeding come faster and faster. Eventually so many cuts will accumulate that the bleeding will kill you.
+
+Now imagine you're getting these cuts but don't want anyone to know you're bleeding, so you cover the cuts up with bandages. You're still fucking bleeding, you're still going to die, but at least nobody knows it. People can see you're a little cut, but no one can clearly tell you're fucking hamburger and being held together by duct tape and stubbornness.
+
+Now what happens when you run out of bandages and you get a new cut. That cut is going to show, people are going to see it. Worst, your old bandages need to be changed from time to time. You're now not just fucked, but everyone is going to start realizing you're fucked and they're going to go after your weak ass.
+
+That's the hedge funds right now, they're out of bandages.
+
+These pieces of shit have been creating synthetic shares of GME for months now, since before the Jan squeeze. In Jan they were over 100% short, so what happens when someone buys a share of a stock that has no shares to sell? The price goes up. It goes WAY the fuck up. To counter, the hedge funds have been creating synthetic shares.
+
+There are piles and piles of DD on this topic, please use the DD search button and read some of them if you're lost.
+
+So, let's say it's April 16th. You have synthetically created MILLIONS of shares of GME and apes keep buying. You create more shares every time they want to buy more so that the price doesn't climb. But every time you create shares you have to balance your books. Luckily, the SEC is shit at their jobs and you can fudge 10% or so of the shares you create out of thin air, but there is still just way too many shares getting created day after day.
+
+Then, here comes a settlement date on April 30th. In that time you've synthetically created 20 million shares and fucked the stock price in the process, only letting sell pressure materialize. You even got super sneaky and only marked half the shares you created out of thin air as short. You're still holding your dick and 10 million fucking shares that have to be balanced before your system creates an automated report and sends it to FINRA. Fuck. OK, so you start buying up deep in the money calls and shoving hundreds of thousands of shares into them, but there's only so many of those in a day. Here you are three days before the report is due and you've still got 7 million shares to fucking deal with. No option, you're going to cover 6 million of them, let the stock price concentrate a few percent, and then short the fuck out of it in a couple days. The report you send in, which is completely fucked and not even close to accurate, only shows you have 20% of the stock shorted, because you managed to lie about half of them, shove a quarter of them into options, juggled the rest into the share price for a couple days. April 30th hits and the report fires, you now can start the stupid fucking cycle all over again!
+
+MIDDLE SCHOOL LEVEL
+
+If you're with me so far, then I'm proud of you and you get a star.
+
+The hedgies are trapped in this cycle, it is married to the FTD cycle that everyone focuses on, but both of these cycles feed each other and compound on each other.
+
+Every time a report is due they have to cover whatever amount of shares they can't hide into options. If you want to know more about how hedge funds hide their shit in options, please use the DD button, there are a lot of VERY deep dives into that topic.
+
+Every time there is a settlement date looming, the shorts cover any open excessive shares they haven't yet hidden. Every time. Without exception.
+
+Now, half you retards skimming here read this as 'the shorts have covered'. THE SHORTS HAVE NOT COVERED! They are not closing the hundreds of millions of short positions they have open every settlement cycle, what they are closing is a fraction of the shares they created. Their strategy is to balance their bullshit between "accounting errors" and not marking synthetic shares as being short, shoving shares into options, and covering the remained. They cannot over do any one of the three. If they pump too many shares into options, the next FTD cycle will hit too hard. If they fuck up their report too much, it will cross the line from a fine and end up with jail time. If they cover too much it will send the share price too high. They use ALL THREE!
+
+WHAT HAPPENED
+
+I hope you're still with me, we're almost there....
+
+[![r/Superstonk - In death by 1000 cuts, SHF just received their 999 cut](https://preview.redd.it/g49n3z9peh571.png?width=1866&format=png&auto=webp&s=45312c14e7656455d6791d0e765be717c4eed00e)](https://preview.redd.it/g49n3z9peh571.png?width=1866&format=png&auto=webp&s=45312c14e7656455d6791d0e765be717c4eed00e)
+
+Pretty pictures
+
+[![r/Superstonk - In death by 1000 cuts, SHF just received their 999 cut](https://preview.redd.it/zlu198bxvh571.png?width=308&format=png&auto=webp&s=b1b91ba7bd00b5f164716d4d5390fd666b18dd7b)](https://preview.redd.it/zlu198bxvh571.png?width=308&format=png&auto=webp&s=b1b91ba7bd00b5f164716d4d5390fd666b18dd7b)
+
+Scary numbers!
+
+Here is a chart of settlement dates, the high that resulted from the date, and the low a day or two previous to the high. The highs are always (except for in 2 exceptions) the day BEFORE settlement. For the two exceptions, the high was two days before settlement. The lows occur before the high within a day or two. Lastly is the percent increase.
+
+You can ignore everything the Jan and Feb squeezes, their behavior is not typical for reasons I really shouldn't have to explain. You can see that before settlement the price always goes up. Always.
+
+This settlement cycle, for the first time ever the price went down, it went down 40 god damn percent.
+
+That's not a weird fluke, that's a fucking alarm bell ringing and everyone is ignoring it to watch anchors on CNBC yell at each other.
+
+EXPLANATIONS
+
+There are three possible solutions to why the price went down but only one of them makes any logical sense. Now, deep breath, you have to apply deductive reasoning. I will now attempt to make my case for the three arguments and why only one of them can be true. Hold onto your butts.
+
+ARGUMENT 1: *SHF managed to hide their short positions using their usual tactics, and sell pressure was so high they never needed to cover the shares they typically have to.*
+
+I want to point your attention to everyone's favorite datapoint, OBV:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - In death by 1000 cuts, SHF just received their 999 cut](https://preview.redd.it/evzz891m7h571.png?width=1298&format=png&auto=webp&s=e1385a64ef72920fb447d91a2019252dd8244008)](https://preview.redd.it/evzz891m7h571.png?width=1298&format=png&auto=webp&s=e1385a64ef72920fb447d91a2019252dd8244008)
+
+OBV is not the answer to all questions, but it can show us with a good enough clarity that no one is selling. After April 12 the OBV has only increased. This flat out tells you people are buying and not selling. Notice at the end there, the last few days, that dip is fucking pathetic. Even the paper hand bitches that joined in the last two weeks haven't sold.
+
+So the sell pressure didn't deflate shit, what about options, maybe they just shoved so many god damned shares into options this week...
+
+<https://www.optionsonar.com/unusual-option-activity/GME/latest-trades>
+
+Well, nope, according the optionsonar this week isn't exceptional. No more deep ITM buys then we'd expect to see. So they didn't hide the shares and they didn't cover the shares. This argument is fucked.
+
+ARGUMENT 2: *Hedge funds lie, they're just going to lie on this report.*
+
+This argument is slightly more plausible but still doesn't cover it. I want to emphasis, these dates are married to the FTD cycle. The FTD cycle is the noose around the hedgies necks. The cycle is strangling their stupid asses out. If they could just cheat away their short positions, they'd have been doing that YEARS ago.
+
+What's that I hear you saying over you bowl of cheerios with no milk? "Oh, but they're desperate now and trying desperate measures" They've been desperate since Feb when the dick parked behind them started inching into their asses. They've been doing everything they possibly can since at least Feb with no way out. If it was as simple as lying don't you think they would have tried that by now?
+
+I don't want to tell you jack shit about me, who I am or what I do in the real world, but I do have personal experience on this front, I do know what I'm talking about. The SEC may have their thumbs up their asses but if you fuck the dog too much, they will have no choice but to prosecute you. You can stick a finger or two in, but when you go balls deep there will be consequences.
+
+<https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/quick-facts/Securities_Fraud_FY19.pdf>
+
+Fraud, actual fucking fraud, not the stupid ass bullshit people on here like to call fraud, but REAL fucking fraud gets the government wet. USDAs will jump on them, it's a slam dunk easy case, the government gets to collect a bunch of sweet cash from their restitution payments, probation offices get to toss them onto the low risk caseload and check in with them a couple times a year. Everyone on the federal side wins. Again, I don't want to say too much but I know what I'm talking about on this topic, these assholes get prosecuted, they get years of probation and sometimes small stints in prison. Worst of all, you lose your ability to EVER practice finance again. Scarlett letter, they're fucked.
+
+So, they might push the envelope, they might fudge the numbers egregiously, but they wont erase 100 million shares and expect it not to get found.
+
+Reports like those sent the FINRA are created with automated workflows. In order for them to fraudulently mark all of their synthetic shares as long a worker at the bottom of the barrel would have to have gone in and done it. Some programmer, trader, or middle manger would have knowingly put his career, his freedom, his family's security on the line. For what? So his job lasts a couple weeks longer? So his boss will give him a thumbs up? Fucking no, no one is that stupid. No one is going to gamble away their entire life for a couple more weeks at a paycheck or a good performance review.
+
+If it were that simple, if cheating at that level were an option, they would already be doing it.
+
+I'm running in circles here but this is the first time the price dropped from a settlement, not just didn't go up, fucking dropped by 40%. It was shorted to shit. This isn't Ken going in with some whiteout and a pen, there are dozens of people involved with this action and they aren't all going to sacrifice themselves for no god damned reason, especially when they could get a sweet whistleblower reward for reporting it.
+
+ARGUMENT 3: They aren't going to cover.
+
+When you rule out all the other possibilities, what you're left with is the only logical argument. These assholes are unable to or unwilling to cover the shares they need to.
+
+Maybe the number of them is so egregious there is no point.
+
+Maybe the move to the Russell 1000 on the 25th will make the entire exercise pointless.
+
+Maybe there's too much scrutiny on them with the SEC finally investigating.
+
+Who the fuck knows, all I know is, they didn't cover.
+
+They didn't hide them all, they didn't sell them all, they aren't going to willingly go to jail, THEY'RE SURRENDERING whether intentional or not.
+
+When the report gets published on the 25th, it will show all the shares they couldn't fudge or hide. It will show tens of thousands of shares. Not just 20%, it'll be 60% minimum, and it'll be just the tip of the iceberg. That number will only represent a couple weeks of shorting.
+
+Blood in the water, the sharks will circle. This is massive.
+
+Apes need to fucking see this. Everyone is crying over a little price dip while the god damned final blows are being struck.
+
+You may downvote this again, spam accusations of Shill, but I'm not going to stop trying to get this topic to people's attention.
+
+I'm done for now and will go back to a polite demeanor.
+
+To all the apes who took the time to read, thank you!

01-Must-Read/2021-06-15-The-Bigger-Short.md

@@ -0,0 +1,430 @@
+The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.
+===========================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/user/Criand/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o0scoy/the_bigger_short_how_2008_is_repeating_at_a_much/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+0\. Preface
+
+I am not a financial advisor, and I do not provide financial advice. Many thoughts here are my opinion, and others can be speculative.
+
+TL;DR - (Though I think you REALLY should consider reading because it is important to understand what is going on):
+
+-   The market crash of 2008 never finished. It was can-kicked and the same people who caused the crash have still been running rampant doing the same bullshit in the derivatives market as that market continues to be unregulated. They're profiting off of short-term gains at the risk of killing their institutions and potentially the global economy. Only this time it is much, much worse.
+
+-   The bankers abused smaller amounts of leverage for the 2008 bubble and have since abused much higher amounts of leverage - creating an even larger speculative bubble. Not just in the stock market and derivatives market, but also in the crypt0 market, upwards of 100x leverage.
+
+-   COVID came in and rocked the economy to the point where the Fed is now pinned between a rock and a hard place. In order to buy more time, the government triggered a flurry of protective measures, such as mortgage forbearance, expiring end of Q2 on June 30th, 2021, and SLR exemptions, which expired March 31, 2021. The market was going to crash regardless. GME was and never will be the reason for the market crashing.
+
+-   The rich made a fatal error in way overshorting stocks. There is a potential for their decades of sucking money out of taxpayers to be taken back. The derivatives market is potentially a $1 Quadrillion market. "Meme prices" are not meme prices. There is so much money in the world, and you are just accustomed to thinking the "meme prices" are too high to feasibly reach.
+
+-   The DTC, ICC, OCC have been passing rules and regulations (auction and wind-down plans) so that they can easily eat up competition and consolidate power once again like in 2008. The people in charge, including Gary Gensler, are not your friends.
+
+-   The DTC, ICC, OCC are also passing rules to make sure that retail will never be able to to do this again. These rules are for the future market (post market crash) and they never want anyone to have a chance to take their game away from them again. These rules are not to start the MOASS. They are indirectly regulating retail so that a short squeeze condition can never occur after GME.
+
+-   The COVID pandemic exposed a lot of banks through the Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) where mass borrowing (leverage) almost made many banks default. Banks have account 'blocks' on the Fed's balance sheet which holds their treasuries and deposits. The SLR exemption made it so that these treasuries and deposits of the banks 'accounts' on the Fed's balance sheet were not calculated into SLR, which allowed them to boost their SLR until March 31, 2021 and avoid defaulting. Now, they must extract treasuries from the Fed in reverse repo to avoid defaulting from SLR requirements. This results in the reverse repo market explosion as they are scrambling to survive due to their mass leverage.
+
+-   This is not a "retail vs. Melvin/Point72/Citadel" issue. This is a "retail vs. Mega Banks" issue. The rich, and I mean all of Wall Street, are trying desperately to shut GameStop down because it has the chance to suck out trillions if not hundreds of trillions from the game they've played for decades. They've rigged this game since the 1990's when derivatives were first introduced. Do you really think they, including the Fed, wouldn't pull all the stops now to try to get you to sell?
+
+End TL;DR
+
+A ton of the information provided in this post is from the movie Inside Job (2010). I am paraphrasing from the movie as well as taking direct quotes, so please understand that a bunch of this information is a summary of that film.
+
+I understand that The Big Short (2015) is much more popular here, due to it being a more Hollywood style movie, but it does not go into such great detail of the conditions that led to the crash - and how things haven't even changed. But in fact, got worse, and led us to where we are now.
+
+Seriously. Go. Watch. Inside Job. It is a documentary with interviews of many people, including those who were involved in the Ponzi Scheme of the derivative market bomb that led to the crash of 2008, and their continued lobbying to influence the Government to keep regulations at bay.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/vvdd32qkei571.png?width=776&format=png&auto=webp&s=982445a99f17af054bd351990017e364b137cf02)](https://preview.redd.it/vvdd32qkei571.png?width=776&format=png&auto=webp&s=982445a99f17af054bd351990017e364b137cf02)
+
+Inside Job (2010) Promotional
+
+1\. The Market Crash Of 2008
+
+1.1 The Casino Of The Financial World: The Derivatives Market
+
+It all started back in the 1990's when the Derivative Market was created. This was the opening of the literal Casino in the financial world. These are bets placed upon an underlying asset, index, or entity, and are very risky. Derivatives are contracts between two or more parties that derives its value from the performance of the underlying asset, index, or entity.
+
+One such derivative many are familiar with are options (CALLs and PUTs). Other examples of derivatives are fowards, futures, swaps, and variations of those such as Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), and Credit Default Swaps (CDS).
+
+The potential to make money off of these trades is insane. Take your regular CALL option for example. You no longer take home a 1:1 return when the underlying stock rises or falls $1. Your returns can be amplified by magnitudes more. Sometimes you might make a 10:1 return on your investment, or 20:1, and so forth.
+
+Not only this, you can grab leverage by borrowing cash from some other entity. This allows your bets to potentially return that much more money. You can see how this gets out of hand really fast, because the amount of cash that can be gained absolutely skyrockets versus traditional investments.
+
+Attempts were made to regulate the derivatives market, but due to mass lobbying from Wall Street, regulations were continuously shut down. People continued to try to pass regulations, until in 2000, the [Commodity Futures Modernization Act](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_Futures_Modernization_Act_of_2000) banned the regulation of derivatives outright.
+
+And of course, once the Derivatives Market was left unchecked, it was off to the races for Wall Street to begin making tons of risky bets and surging their profits.
+
+The Derivative Market exploded in size once regulation was banned and de-regulation of the financial world continued. You can see as of 2000, the cumulative derivatives market was already out of control.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/9igfmi69di571.png?width=578&format=png&auto=webp&s=27fefbf3443e8be528849221f2eadeb1a5c10833)](https://preview.redd.it/9igfmi69di571.png?width=578&format=png&auto=webp&s=27fefbf3443e8be528849221f2eadeb1a5c10833)
+
+https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/investment-banks-and-credit-institutions-the-ignored-and-unregulateddiversity-2151-6219-1000224.pdf
+
+The Derivatives Market is big. Insanely big. Look at how it compares to Global Wealth.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/s22atssgdi571.png?width=1029&format=png&auto=webp&s=086dcebf3e710052f78b7490150203d0f8376b89)](https://preview.redd.it/s22atssgdi571.png?width=1029&format=png&auto=webp&s=086dcebf3e710052f78b7490150203d0f8376b89)
+
+https://www.visualcapitalist.com/all-of-the-worlds-money-and-markets-in-one-visualization-2020/
+
+At the bottom of the list are three derivatives entries, with "Market Value" and "Notional Value" called out.
+
+The "Market Value" is the value of the derivative at its current trading price.
+
+The "Notional Value" is the value of the derivative if it was at the strike price.
+
+E.g. A CALL option (a derivative) represents 100 shares of ABC stock with a strike of $50. Perhaps it is trading in the market at $1 per contract right now.
+
+-   Market Value = 100 shares * $1.00 per contract = $100
+
+-   Notional Value = 100 shares * $50 strike price = $5,000
+
+Visual Capitalist estimates that the cumulative Notional Value of derivatives is between $558 Trillion and $1 Quadrillion. So yeah. You are not going to cause a market crash if GME sells for millions per share. The rich are already priming the market crash through the Derivatives Market.
+
+1.2 CDOs And Mortgage Backed Securities
+
+Decades ago, the system of paying mortgages used to be between two parties. The buyer, and the loaner. Since the movement of money was between the buyer and the loaner, the loaner was very careful to ensure that the buyer would be able to pay off their loan and not miss payments.
+
+But now, it's a chain.
+
+1.  Home buyers will buy a loan from the lenders.
+
+2.  The lenders will then sell those loans to Investment Banks.
+
+3.  The Investment Banks then combine thousands of mortgages and other loans, including car loans, student loans, and credit card debt to create complex derivatives called "Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO's)".
+
+4.  The Investment Banks then pay Rating Agencies to rate their CDO's. This can be on a scale of "AAA", the best possible rating, equivalent to government-backed securities, all the way down to C/D, which are junk bonds and very risky. Many of these CDO's were given AAA ratings despite being filled with junk.
+
+5.  The Investment Banks then take these CDO's and sell them to investors, including retirement funds, because that was the rating required for retirement funds as they would only purchase highly rated securities.
+
+6.  Now when the homeowner pays their mortgage, the money flows directly into the investors. The investors are the main ones who will be hurt if the CDO's containing the mortgages begin to fail.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/0xtaww3ydi571.png?width=1493&format=png&auto=webp&s=f448a113043b043243efd879f174493bd33423fe)](https://preview.redd.it/0xtaww3ydi571.png?width=1493&format=png&auto=webp&s=f448a113043b043243efd879f174493bd33423fe)
+
+Inside Job (2010) - Flow Of Money For Mortgage Payments
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/uyk9ms4fei571.png?width=756&format=png&auto=webp&s=d61e9a0754b676e64a1f6c97277ba877e946fcb6)](https://preview.redd.it/uyk9ms4fei571.png?width=756&format=png&auto=webp&s=d61e9a0754b676e64a1f6c97277ba877e946fcb6)
+
+https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/09/bond-rating.asp
+
+1.3 The Bubble of Subprime Loans Packed In CDOs
+
+This system became a ticking timebomb due to this potential of free short-term gain cash. Lenders didn't care if a borrower could repay, so they would start handing out riskier loans. The investment banks didn't care if there were riskier loans, because the more CDO's sold to investors resulted in more profit. And the Rating Agencies didn't care because there were no regulatory constraints and there was no liability if their ratings of the CDO's proved to be wrong.
+
+So they went wild and pumped out more and more loans, and more and more CDOs. Between 2000 and 2003, the number of mortgage loans made each year nearly quadrupled. They didn't care about the quality of the mortgage - they cared about maximizing the volume and getting profit out of it.
+
+In the early 2000s there was a huge increase in the riskiest loans - "Subprime Loans". These are loans given to people who have low income, limited credit history, poor credit, etc. They are very at risk to not pay their mortgages. It was predatory lending, because it hunted for potential home buyers who would never be able to pay back their mortgages so that they could continue to pack these up into CDO's.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/wsr30iorei571.png?width=1447&format=png&auto=webp&s=59cf72f6eb8209d69e0a13ccf2f0127e69a45142)](https://preview.redd.it/wsr30iorei571.png?width=1447&format=png&auto=webp&s=59cf72f6eb8209d69e0a13ccf2f0127e69a45142)
+
+Inside Job (2010) - % Of Subprime Loans
+
+In fact, the investment banks preferred subprime loans, because they carried higher interest rates and more profit for them.
+
+So the Investment Banks took these subprime loans, packaged the subprime loans up into CDO's, and many of them still received AAA ratings. These can be considered "toxic CDO's" because of their high ability to default and fail despite their ratings.
+
+Pretty much anyone could get a home now. Purchases of homes and housing prices skyrocketed. It didn't matter because everyone in the chain was making money in an unregulated market.
+
+1.4 Short Term Greed At The Risk Of Institutional And Economic Failure
+
+In Wall Street, annual cash bonuses started to spike. Traders and CEOs became extremely wealthy in this bubble as they continued to pump more toxic CDO's into the market. Lehman Bros. was one of the top underwriters of subprime lending and their CEO alone took home over $485 million in bonuses.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/io87r9vxei571.png?width=1494&format=png&auto=webp&s=944300df8faf8da35d75de6f10fb951a6d230154)](https://preview.redd.it/io87r9vxei571.png?width=1494&format=png&auto=webp&s=944300df8faf8da35d75de6f10fb951a6d230154)
+
+Inside Job (2010) Wall Street Bonuses
+
+And it was all short-term gain, high risk, with no worries about the potential failure of your institution or the economy. When things collapsed, they would not need to pay back their bonuses and gains. They were literally risking the entire world economy for the sake of short-term profits.
+
+AND THEY EVEN TOOK IT FURTHER WITH LEVERAGE TO MAXIMIZE PROFITS.
+
+During the bubble from 2000 to 2007, the investment banks were borrowing heavily to buy more loans and to create more CDO's. The ratio of banks borrowed money and their own money was their leverage. The more they borrowed, the higher their leverage. They abused leverage to continue churning profits. And are still abusing massive leverage to this day. It might even be much higher leverage today than what it was back in the Housing Market Bubble.
+
+In 2004, Henry Paulson, the CEO of Goldman Sachs, helped lobby the SEC to relax limits on leverage, allowing the banks to sharply increase their borrowing. Basically, the SEC allowed investment banks to gamble a lot more. Investment banks would go up to about 33-to-1 leverage at the time of the 2008 crash. Which means if a 3% decrease occurred in their asset base, it would leave them insolvent. Henry Paulson would later become the Secretary Of The Treasury from 2006 to 2009. He was just one of many Wall Street executives to eventually make it into Government positions. Including the infamous Gary Gensler, the current SEC chairman, who helped block derivative market regulations.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/k87x53h7fi571.png?width=1619&format=png&auto=webp&s=b12004d6bb3e70643516ef0477303f4652ccd348)](https://preview.redd.it/k87x53h7fi571.png?width=1619&format=png&auto=webp&s=b12004d6bb3e70643516ef0477303f4652ccd348)
+
+Inside Job (2010) Leverage Abuse of 2008
+
+The borrowing exploded, the profits exploded, and it was all at the risk of obliterating their institutions and possibly the global economy. Some of these banks knew that they were "too big to fail" and could push for bailouts at the expense of taxpayers. Especially when they began planting their own executives in positions of power.
+
+1.5 Credit Default Swaps (CDS)
+
+To add another ticking bomb to the system, AIG, the worlds largest insurance company, got into the game with another type of derivative. They began selling Credit Default Swaps (CDS).
+
+For investors who owned CDO's, CDS's worked like an insurance policy. An investor who purchased a CDS paid AIG a quarterly premium. If the CDO went bad, AIG promised to pay the investor for their losses. Think of it like insuring a car. You're paying premiums, but if you get into an accident, the insurance will pay up (some of the time at least).
+
+But unlike regular insurance, where you can only insure your car once, speculators could also purchase CDS's from AIG in order to bet against CDO's they didn't own. You could suddenly have a sense of rehypothecation where fifty, one hundred entities might now have insurance against a CDO.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/7xoupx0ffi571.png?width=1258&format=png&auto=webp&s=869beb0d99b9fbb4108cd5af692d0a6332fd52dd)](https://preview.redd.it/7xoupx0ffi571.png?width=1258&format=png&auto=webp&s=869beb0d99b9fbb4108cd5af692d0a6332fd52dd)
+
+Inside Job (2010) Payment Flow of CDS's
+
+If you've watched The Big Short (2015), you might remember the Credit Default Swaps, because those are what Michael Burry and others purchased to bet against the Subprime Mortgage CDO's.
+
+CDS's were unregulated, so AIG didn't have to set aside any money to cover potential losses. Instead, AIG paid its employees huge cash bonuses as soon as contracts were signed in order to incentivize the sales of these derivatives. But if the CDO's later went bad, AIG would be on the hook. It paid everyone short-term gains while pushing the bill to the company itself without worrying about footing the bill if shit hit the fan. People once again were being rewarded with short-term profit to take these massive risks.
+
+AIG's Financial Products division in London issued over $500B worth of CDS's during the bubble. Many of these CDS's were for CDO's backed by subprime mortgages.
+
+The 400 employees of AIGFP made $3.5B between 2000 and 2007. And the head of AIGFP personally made $315M.
+
+1.6 The Crash And Consumption Of Banks To Consolidate Power
+
+By late 2006, Goldman Sachs took it one step further. It didn't just sell toxic CDO's, it started actively betting against them at the same time it was telling customers that they were high-quality investments.
+
+Goldman Sachs would purchase CDS's from AIG and bet against CDO's it didn't own, and got paid when those CDO's failed. Goldman bought at least $22B in CDS's from AIG, and it was so much that Goldman realized AIG itself might go bankrupt (which later on it would and the Government had to bail them out). So Goldman spent $150M insuring themselves against AIG's potential collapse. They purchased CDS's against AIG.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/m54zv03yfi571.png?width=1411&format=png&auto=webp&s=f6cb605b4c9b36c22e60cd8205b80bd6ac770fac)](https://preview.redd.it/m54zv03yfi571.png?width=1411&format=png&auto=webp&s=f6cb605b4c9b36c22e60cd8205b80bd6ac770fac)
+
+Inside Job (2010) Payment From AIG To Goldman Sachs If CDO's Failed
+
+Then in 2007, Goldman went even further. They started selling CDO's specifically designed so that the more money their customers lost, the more Goldman Sachs made.
+
+Many other banks did the same. They created shitty CDO's, sold them, while simultaneously bet that they would fail with CDS's. All of these CDO's were sold to customers as "safe" investments because of the complicit Rating Agencies.
+
+The three rating agencies, Moody's, S&P and Fitch, made billions of dollars giving high ratings to these risky securities. Moody's, the largest ratings agency, quadrupled its profits between 2000 and 2007. The more AAA's they gave out, the higher their compensation and earnings were for the quarter. AAA ratings mushroomed from a handful in 2000 to thousands by 2006. Hundreds of billions of dollars worth of CDO's were being rated AAA per year. When it all collapsed and the ratings agencies were called before Congress, the rating agencies expressed that it was "their opinion" of the rating in order to weasel their way out of blame. Despite knowing that they were toxic and did not deserve anything above 'junk' rating.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/tto0v644gi571.png?width=1332&format=png&auto=webp&s=f4361dcc23801691d46ec88b241c7d5fa56e2aaf)](https://preview.redd.it/tto0v644gi571.png?width=1332&format=png&auto=webp&s=f4361dcc23801691d46ec88b241c7d5fa56e2aaf)
+
+Inside Job (2010) Ratings Agencies Profits
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/91dpnu78gi571.png?width=1259&format=png&auto=webp&s=1f196573f47a757a8bcca8b9e712c537be84cbe2)](https://preview.redd.it/91dpnu78gi571.png?width=1259&format=png&auto=webp&s=1f196573f47a757a8bcca8b9e712c537be84cbe2)
+
+Inside Job (2010) - Insane Increase of AAA Rated CDOs
+
+By 2008, home foreclosures were skyrocketing. Home buyers in the subprime loans were defaulting on their payments. Lenders could no longer sell their loans to the investment banks. And as the loans went bad, dozens of lenders failed. The market for CDO's collapsed, leaving the investment banks holding hundreds of billions of dollars in loans, CDO's, and real estate they couldn't sell. Meanwhile, those who purchased up CDS's were knocking at the door to be paid.
+
+In March 2008, Bear Stearns ran out of cash and was acquired for $2 a share by JPMorgan Chase. The deal was backed by $30B in emergency guarantees by the Fed Reserve. This was just one instance of a bank getting consumed by a larger entity.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/gbgc30vlhi571.png?width=873&format=png&auto=webp&s=74def34d1783c5e3195492913370e6ae65670301)](https://preview.redd.it/gbgc30vlhi571.png?width=873&format=png&auto=webp&s=74def34d1783c5e3195492913370e6ae65670301)
+
+https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/bear-stearns-sold-to-j-p-morgan-chase
+
+AIG, Bear Stearns, Lehman Bros, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac, were all AA or above rating days before either collapsing or being bailed out. Meaning they were 'very secure', yet they failed.
+
+The Fed Reserve and Big Banks met together in order to discuss bailouts for different banks, and they decided to let Lehman Brothers fail as well.
+
+The Government also then took over AIG, and a day after the takeover, asked the Government for $700B in bailouts for big banks. At this point in time, the person in charge of handling the financial crisis, Henry Paulson, former CEO of Goldman Sachs, worked with the chairman of the Federal Reserve to force AIG to pay Goldman Sachs some of its bailout money at 100-cents on the dollar. Meaning there was no negotiation of lower prices. Conflict of interest much?
+
+The Fed and Henry Paulson also forced AIG to surrender their right to sue Goldman Sachs and other banks for fraud.
+
+This is but a small glimpse of the consolidation of power in big banks from the 2008 crash. They let others fail and scooped up their assets in the crisis.
+
+After the crash of 2008, big banks are more powerful and more consolidated than ever before. And the DTC, ICC, OCC rules are planning on making that worse through the auction and wind-down plans where big banks can once again consume other entities that default.
+
+1.7 The Can-Kick To Continue The Game Of Derivative Market Greed
+
+After the crisis, the financial industry worked harder than ever to fight reform. The financial sector, as of 2010, employed over 3000 lobbyists. More than five for each member of Congress. Between 1998 and 2008 the financial industry spent over $5B on lobbying and campaign contributions. And ever since the crisis, they're spending even more money.
+
+President Barack Obama campaigned heavily on "Change" and "Reform" of Wall Street, but when in office, nothing substantial was passed. But this goes back for decades - the Government has been in the pocket of the rich for a long time, both parties, both sides, and their influence through lobbying undoubtedly prevented any actual change from occurring.
+
+So their game of playing the derivative market was green-lit to still run rampant following the 2008 crash and mass bailouts from the Government at the expense of taxpayers.
+
+There's now more consolidation of banks, more consolidation of power, more years of deregulation, and over a decade that they used to continue the game. And just like in 2008, it's happening again. We're on the brink of another market crash and potentially a global financial crisis.
+
+2\. The New CDO Game, And How COVID Uppercut To The System
+
+2.1 Abuse Of Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities
+
+It's not just [/u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/)'s "House Of Cards" where the US Treasury Market has been abused. It is abuse of many forms of collateral and securities this time around.
+
+It's the same thing as 2008, but much worse due to even higher amounts of leverage in the system on top of massive amounts of liquidity and potential inflation from stimulus money of the COVID crisis.
+
+Here's an excerpt from [The Bigger Short: Wall Street's Cooked Books Fueled The Financial Crisis of 2008. It's Happening Again](https://theintercept.com/2021/04/20/wall-street-cmbs-dollar-general-ladder-capital/):
+
+> A longtime industry analyst has uncovered creative accounting on a startling scale in the commercial real estate market, in ways similar to the "liar loans" handed out during the mid-2000s for residential real estate, according to financial records examined by the analyst and reviewed by The Intercept. A recent, large-scale academic study backs up his conclusion, finding that banks such as Goldman Sachs and Citigroup have systematically reported erroneously inflated income data that compromises the integrity of the resulting securities.
+>
+> ...
+>
+> The analyst's findings, first reported by ProPublica last year, are the subject of a whistleblower complaint he filed in 2019 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Moreover, the analyst has identified complex financial machinations by one financial institution, one that both issues loans and manages a real estate trust, that may ultimately help one of its top tenants --- the low-cost, low-wage store Dollar General --- flourish while devastating smaller retailers.
+>
+> This time, the issue is not a bubble in the housing market, but apparent widespread inflation of the value of commercial businesses, on which loans are based.
+>
+> ...
+>
+> Now it may be happening again --- this time not with residential mortgage-backed securities, based on loans for homes, but commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, based on loans for businesses. And this industrywide scheme is colliding with a collapse of the commercial real estate market amid the pandemic, which has business tenants across the country unable to make their payments.
+
+They've been abusing Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (CMBS) this time around, and potentially have still been abusing other forms of collateral - they might still be hitting MBS as well as treasury bonds per [/u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/)'s DD.
+
+John M. Griffin and Alex Priest released a study last November. They sampled almost 40,000 CMBS loans with a market capitalization of $650 billion underwritten from the beginning of 2013 to the end of 2019. Their findings were that large banks had 35% or more loans exhibiting 5% or greater income overstatements.
+
+The below chart shows the overstatements of the biggest problem-making banks. The difference in bars is between samples taken from data between 2013-2015, and then data between 2016-2019. Almost every single bank experienced a positive move up over time of overstatements.
+
+> Unintentional overstatement should have occurred at random times. Or if lenders were assiduous and the overstatement was unwitting, one might expect it to diminish over time as the lenders discovered their mistakes. Instead, with almost every lender, the overstatement *increased* as time went on. - [Source](https://theintercept.com/2021/04/20/wall-street-cmbs-dollar-general-ladder-capital/)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/5xmcu9hwhi571.png?width=846&format=png&auto=webp&s=66f636574bd66afd3512b9587981e4caaa381cf3)](https://preview.redd.it/5xmcu9hwhi571.png?width=846&format=png&auto=webp&s=66f636574bd66afd3512b9587981e4caaa381cf3)
+
+https://theintercept.com/2021/04/20/wall-street-cmbs-dollar-general-ladder-capital/
+
+So what does this mean? It means they've once again been handing out subprime loans (predatory loans). But this time to businesses through Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities.
+
+Just like Mortgage-Backed Securities from 2000 to 2007, the loaners will go around, hand out loans to businesses, and rake in the profits while having no concern over the potential for the subprime loans failing.
+
+2.2 COVID's Uppercut Sent Them Scrambling
+
+The system was propped up to fail just like from the 2000-2007 Housing Market Bubble. Now we are in a speculative bubble of the entire market along with the Commercial Market Bubble due to continued mass leverage abuse of the world.
+
+Hell - also in Crypt0currencies that were introduced after the 2008 crash. Did you know that you can get over 100x leverage in crypt0 right now? Imagine how terrifying that crash could be if the other markets fail.
+
+There is SO. MUCH. LEVERAGE. ABUSE. IN. THE. WORLD. All it takes is one fatal blow to bring it all down - and it sure as hell looks like COVID was that uppercut to send everything into a death spiral.
+
+When COVID hit, many people were left without jobs. Others had less pay from the jobs they kept. It rocked the financial world and it was so unexpected. Apartment residents would now become delinquent, causing the apartment complexes to become delinquent. Business owners would be hurting for cash to pay their mortgages as well due to lack of business. The subprime loans all started to become a really big issue.
+
+Delinquency rates of Commercial Mortgages started to skyrocket when the COVID crisis hit. They even surpassed 2008 levels in March of 2020. Remember what happened in 2008 when this occurred? When delinquency rates went up on mortgages in 2008, the CDO's of those mortgages began to fail. But, this time, they can-kicked it because COVID caught them all off guard.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/cqbceix0ii571.png?width=848&format=png&auto=webp&s=da81781094a31ae1293b019c4e24f68dfdccc634)](https://preview.redd.it/cqbceix0ii571.png?width=848&format=png&auto=webp&s=da81781094a31ae1293b019c4e24f68dfdccc634)
+
+https://theintercept.com/2021/04/20/wall-street-cmbs-dollar-general-ladder-capital/
+
+2.3 Can-Kick Of COVID To Prevent CDO's From Defaulting Before Being Ready
+
+COVID sent them Scrambling. They could not allow these CDO's to fail just yet, because they wanted to get their rules in place to help them consume other failing entities at a whim.
+
+Like in 2008, they wanted to not only protect themselves when the nuke went off from these decades of derivatives abuse, they wanted to be able to scoop up the competition easily. That is when the DTC, ICC, and OCC began drafting their auction and wind-down plans.
+
+In order to buy time, they began tossing out emergency relief "protections" for the economy. Such as preventing mortgage defaults which would send their CDO's tumbling. This protection ends on June 30th, 2021.
+
+And guess what? Many people are still at risk of being delinquent. [This article](https://therealdeal.com/issues_articles/defusing-the-forbearance-time-bomb/) was posted just yesterday. The moment these protection plans lift, we can see a surge in foreclosures as delinquent payments have accumulated over the past year.
+
+When everyone, including small business owners who were attacked with predatory loans, begin to default from these emergency plans expiring, it can lead to the CDO's themselves collapsing. Which is exactly what triggered the 2008 recession.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/b68fsf5aii571.png?width=945&format=png&auto=webp&s=daa8c725185480d988802023a27291ee782b5c5f)](https://preview.redd.it/b68fsf5aii571.png?width=945&format=png&auto=webp&s=daa8c725185480d988802023a27291ee782b5c5f)
+
+https://www.housingwire.com/articles/mortgage-forbearance-drops-as-expiration-date-nears/
+
+2.4 SLR Requirement Exemption - Why The Reverse Repo Is Blowing Up
+
+Another big issue exposed from COVID is when SLR requirements were leaned during the pandemic. They had to pass a quick measure to protect the banks from defaulting in April of 2020.
+
+> In a brief announcement, the Fed said it would allow a change to the supplementary leverage ratio to expire March 31. The initial move, announced April 1, 2020, allowed banks to exclude Treasurys and deposits with Fed banks from the calculation of the leverage ratio. - [Source](https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/19/the-fed-will-not-extend-a-pandemic-crisis-rule-that-had-allowed-banks-to-relax-capital-levels.html)
+
+What can you take from the above?
+
+SLR is based on the banks deposits with the Fed itself. It is the treasuries and deposits that the banks have on the Fed's balance sheet. Banks have an 'account block' on the Fed's balance sheet that holds treasuries and deposits. The SLR pandemic rule allowed them to neglect these treasuries and deposits from their SLR calculation, and it boosted their SLR value, allowing them to survive defaults.
+
+This is a big, big, BIG sign that the banks are way overleveraged by borrowing tons of money just like in 2008.
+
+The SLR is the "Supplementary Leverage Ratio" and they enacted quick to allow it so banks wouldn't fail under mass leverage for failing to maintain enough equity.
+
+> The supplementary leverage ratio is the US implementation of the Basel III Tier 1 leverage ratio, with which banks calculate the amount of common equity capital they must hold relative to their total leverage exposure. Large US banks must hold 3%. Top-tier bank holding companies must also hold an extra 2% buffer, for a total of 5%. The SLR, which does not distinguish between assets based on risk, is conceived as a backstop to risk-weighted capital requirements. - [Source](https://www.risk.net/definition/supplementary-leverage-ratio-slr)
+
+[Here is an exposure of their SLR](https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/07/26/which-of-the-large-us-banks-is-most-leveraged.aspx) from earlier this year. The key is to have high SLR, above 5%, as a top-tier bank:
+
+| Bank | Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) |
+| --- | --- |
+| JP Morgan Chase | 6.8% |
+| Bank Of America | 7% |
+| Citigroup | 6.7% |
+| Goldman Sachs | 6.7% |
+| Morgan Stanley | 7.3% |
+| Bank of New York Mellon | 8.2% |
+| State Street | 8.3% |
+
+The SLR protection ended on March 31, 2021. Guess what started to happen just after?
+
+The reverse repo market started to explode. This is VERY unusual behavior because it is not at a quarter-end where quarter-ends have significant strain on the economy. The build-up over time implies that there is significant strain on the market AS OF ENTERING Q2 (April 1st - June 30th).
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/ijp4wkxdii571.png?width=1455&format=png&auto=webp&s=46f67d7efcc98ee475ba27fa41850fbf5d894064)](https://preview.redd.it/ijp4wkxdii571.png?width=1455&format=png&auto=webp&s=46f67d7efcc98ee475ba27fa41850fbf5d894064)
+
+https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RRPONTSYD
+
+Speculation: SLR IS DEPENDENT ON THEIR DEPOSITS WITH THE FED ITSELF. THEY NEED TO EXTRACT TREASURIES OVER NIGHT TO KEEP THEM OFF THE FED'S BALANCE SHEETS TO PREVENT THEMSELVES FROM FAILING SLR REQUIREMENTS AND DEFAULTING DUE TO MASS OVERLEVERAGE. EACH BANK HAS AN ACCOUNT ON THE FED'S BALANCE SHEET, WHICH IS WHAT SLR IS CALCULATED AGAINST. THIS IS WHY IT IS EXPLODING. THEY ARE ALL STRUGGLING TO MEET SLR REQUIREMENTS.
+
+2.5 DTC, ICC, OCC Wind-Down and Auction Plans; Preparing For More Consolidation Of Power
+
+We've seen some interesting rules from the DTC, ICC, and OCC. For the longest time we thought this was all surrounding GameStop. Guess what. They aren't all about GameStop. Some of them are, but not all of them.
+
+They are furiously passing these rules because the COVID can-kick can't last forever. The Fed is dealing with the potential of runaway inflation from COVID stimulus and they can't allow the overleveraged banks to can-kick any more. They need to resolve this as soon as possible. June 30th could be the deadline because of the potential for CDO's to begin collapsing.
+
+Let's revisit a few of these rules. The most important ones, in my opinion, because they shed light on the bullshit they're trying to do once again: Scoop up competitors at the cheap, and protect themselves from defaulting as well.
+
+-   DTC-004: Wind-down and auction plan. - [Link](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/dtc/2021/34-91429.pdf)
+
+-   ICC-005: Wind-down and auction plan. - [Link](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/icc/2021/34-91806.pdf)
+
+-   OCC-004: Auction plan. Allows third parties to join in. - [Link](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/occ/2021/34-91935.pdf)
+
+-   OCC-003: Shielding plan. Protects the OCC. - [Link](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/occ/2021/34-92038.pdf)
+
+Each of these plans, in brief summary, allows each branch of the market to protect themselves in the event of major defaults of members. They also allow members to scoop up assets of defaulting members.
+
+What was that? Scooping up assets? In other words it is more concentration of power. Less competition.
+
+I would not be surprised if many small and large Banks, Hedge Funds, and Financial Institutions evaporate and get consumed after this crash and we're left with just a select few massive entities. That is, after all, exactly what they're planning for.
+
+They could not allow the COVID crash to pop their massive speculative derivative bubble so soon. It came too sudden for them to not all collapse instead of just a few of them. It would have obliterated the entire economy even more so than it will once this bomb is finally let off. They needed more time to prepare so that they could feast when it all comes crashing down.
+
+2.6 Signs Of Collapse Coming - ICC-014 - Incentives For Credit Default Swaps
+
+A comment on this subreddit made me revisit a rule passed by the ICC. It flew under the radar and is another sign for a crash coming.
+
+This is [ICC-014](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/icc/2021/34-91922.pdf). Passed and effective as of June 1st, 2021.
+
+Seems boring at first. Right? That's why it flew under the radar?
+
+But now that you know the causes of the 2008 market crash and how toxic CDO's were packaged together, and then CDS's were used to bet against those CDO's, check out what ICC-014 is doing as of June 1st.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/phrxcouvii571.png?width=731&format=png&auto=webp&s=469560cf06458b51b1b5439d84062e9f6e04bda4)](https://preview.redd.it/phrxcouvii571.png?width=731&format=png&auto=webp&s=469560cf06458b51b1b5439d84062e9f6e04bda4)
+
+ICC-014 Proposed Discounts On Credit Default Index Swaptions
+
+They are providing incentive programs to purchase Credit Default Swap Indexes. These are like standard CDS's, but packaged together like an index. Think of it like an index fund.
+
+This is allowing them to bet against a wide range of CDO's or other entities at a cheaper rate. Buyers can now bet against a wide range of failures in the market. They are allowing upwards of 25% discounts.
+
+There's many more indicators that are pointing to a market collapse. But I will leave that to you to investigate more. Here is quite a scary compilation of charts relating the current market trends to the crashes of Black Monday, The Internet Bubble, The 2008 Housing Market Crash, and Today.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/y4reiv86hi571.jpg?width=550&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8845b7b90adf28409772483c6eeeef1763bbaaaf)](https://preview.redd.it/y4reiv86hi571.jpg?width=550&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8845b7b90adf28409772483c6eeeef1763bbaaaf)
+
+Summary of Recent Warnings Re Intermediate Trend In Equities
+
+3\. The Failure Of The 1% - How GameStop Can Deal A Fatal Blow To Wealth Inequality
+
+3.1 GameStop Was Never Going To Cause The Market Crash
+
+GameStop was meant to die off. The rich bet against it many folds over, and it was on the brink of Bankruptcy before many conditions led it to where it is today.
+
+It was never going to cause the market crash. And it never will cause the crash. The short squeeze is a result of high abuse of the derivatives market over the past decade, where Wall Street's abuse of this market has primed the economy for another market crash on their own.
+
+We can see this because when COVID hit, GameStop was a non-issue in the market. The CDO market around CMBS was about to collapse on its own because of the instantaneous recession which left mortgage owners delinquent.
+
+If anyone, be it the media, the US Government, or others, try to blame this crash on GameStop or anything other than the Banks and Wall Street, they are WRONG.
+
+3.2 The Rich Are Trying To Kill GameStop. They Are Terrified
+
+In January, the SI% was reported to be 140%. But it is very likely that it was underreported at that time. Maybe it was 200% back then. 400%. 800%. Who knows. From the above you can hopefully gather that Wall Street takes on massive risks all the time, they do not care as long as it churns them short-term profits. There is loads of evidence pointing to shorts never covering by hiding their SI% through malicious options practices, and manipulating the price every step of the way.
+
+The conditions that led GameStop to where it is today is a miracle in itself, and the support of retail traders has led to expose a fatal mistake of the rich. Because a short position has infinite loss potential. There is SO much money in the world, especially in the derivatives market.
+
+This should scream to you that any price target that you think is low, could very well be extremely low in YOUR perspective. You might just be accustomed to thinking "$X price floor is too much money. There's no way it can hit that". I used to think that too, until I dove deep into this bullshit.
+
+The market crashing no longer was a matter of simply scooping up defaulters, their assets, and consolidating power. The rich now have to worry about the potential of infinite losses from GameStop and possibly other meme stocks with high price floor targets some retail have.
+
+It's not a fight against Melvin / Citadel / Point72. It's a battle against the entire financial world. There is even speculation from multiple people that the Fed is even being complicit right now in helping suppress GameStop. Their whole game is at risk here.
+
+Don't you think they'd fight tooth-and-nail to suppress this and try to get everyone to sell?
+
+That they'd pull every trick in the book to make you think that they've covered?
+
+The amount of money they could lose is unfathomable.
+
+With the collapsing SI%, it is mathematically impossible for the squeeze to have happened - its mathematically impossible for them to have covered. [/u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/) also discusses this in [House of Cards Part 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nlwaxv/house_of_cards_part_2/).
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating, at a much greater magnitude, and COVID ignited the fuse. GME is not the reason for the market crash. GME was the fatal flaw of Wall Street in their infinite money cheat that they did not expect.](https://preview.redd.it/6hge0pxfhi571.png?width=871&format=png&auto=webp&s=aab736cc279cc727524d2cf96384ea3e33109250)](https://preview.redd.it/6hge0pxfhi571.png?width=871&format=png&auto=webp&s=aab736cc279cc727524d2cf96384ea3e33109250)
+
+https://www.thebharatexpressnews.com/short-squeeze-could-save-gamestop-investors-a-third-time/
+
+And in regards to all the other rules that look good for the MOASS - I see them in a negative light.
+
+They are passing NSCC-002/801, DTC-005, and others, in order to prevent a GameStop situation from ever occurring again.
+
+They realized how much power retail could have from piling into a short squeeze play. These new rules will snap new emerging short squeezes instantly if the conditions of a short squeeze ever occur again. There will never be a GameStop situation after this.
+
+It's their game after all. They've been abusing the derivative market game for decades and GameStop is a huge threat. It was supposed to be, "crash the economy and run with the money". Not "crash the economy and pay up to retail". But GameStop was a flaw exposed by their greed, the COVID crash, and the quick turn-around of the company to take it away from the brink of bankruptcy.
+
+The rich are now at risk of losing that money and insane amounts of cash that they've accumulated over the years from causing the Internet Bubble Crash of 2000, and the Housing Market Crash of 2008.
+
+So, yeah, I'm going to be fucking greedy.

01-Must-Read/2021-06-21-The-Fed-is-Pinned-into-a-Corner-from-2008.md

@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the economy up.
+===================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/user/Criand/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o4rfnu/the_fed_is_pinned_into_a_corner_from_the_2008/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+0\. Preface
+
+I am not a financial advisor. I do not provide financial advice. Many thoughts here are my opinion, and others can be speculative.
+
+I'm personally happy to see that there is a shift from GME DD to macro-economics DD. Because it provides a much wider insight into how the market is behaving, and how GME would NOT be the cause of a market crash. Everything has been a pressure cooker over the past decade, ready to burst, and the new DD provides insight on when things might go down.
+
+The new DD also diverges from the expectations of things to shoot up in price every week, where everyone is watching T+21/T+35/Net Capital cycles. It gives a general "MOASS will most likely occur when everything falls due to liquidation of defaulting Banks / Hedge Funds / Financial Institutions".
+
+It gives me peace of mind, because I do not watch for specific dates around GME to cause the surge. I watch the economy at the macro scale to understand when things could blow.
+
+And to any skeptics - yes, it is possible that GME could never blow up. Do I think it will blow up? Sure I do. But I encourage YOU to read this post, disregarding GME, and to instead understand what is going on with the economy on the macro scale.
+
+Even if the GME play is wrong in your eyes, it is good to understand how the economy could crash harder than it did in 2008. I don't care if you don't believe in GME. I care about you, and don't want YOU to be hurt.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/pscahu4lxk671.png?width=727&format=png&auto=webp&s=2e5ee31eaef0413023a8cc4be07087210081554c)](https://preview.redd.it/pscahu4lxk671.png?width=727&format=png&auto=webp&s=2e5ee31eaef0413023a8cc4be07087210081554c)
+
+Me IRL - Maybe - Sometime
+
+1\. Before We Begin: An Overview of Repo And Reverse Repo
+
+Repo and Reverse Repo might be a bit confusing. You probably saw on this subreddit or in news that the reverse repo market has been blowing up, and it's a bit concerning.
+
+It's not too complicated if you just imagine it between two entities: the Federal Reserve and Banks.
+
+For both Repo and Reverse Repo, it is an agreement between two parties for one of them to sell some security for a price, and they agree to buy that security back at a later date at a higher price based on some interest rate (usually). This is called a "Repurchase Agreement", where "Repo" is a standard "Repurchase Agreement" and the "Reverse Repo" is a "Reverse Repurchase Agreement", the inverse of a "Repo".
+
+The length of these Repurchase Agreements can be various lengths. Such as overnight, one month, three month, etc.. But what we're seeing is short-term overnight Reverse Repos. The parties swap, and then the next trading day they swap back. It is not a permanent extraction of the underlying security. It is an overnight swap. A permanent extraction comes from Quantitative Easing or Quantitative Tightening, both of which I will discuss later.
+
+-   Repo (Repurchase Agreement) - This is where the bank swaps collateral (such as US Treasuries) for cash. This is used when the banks have too much collateral and not enough cash, or when the banks want to generate profit off of giving loans to other parties in the repo market.
+
+-   Reverse Repo (Reverse Repurchase Agreement) - This is where the bank swaps cash (liquidity) for collateral (such as US Treasuries). This is used when the banks have too much cash (liquidity) and not enough collateral. The main reason behind this behavior is to pump balance sheets for the night.
+
+Below is a diagram I made which might make this more clear. It is between the Fed (left) and Banks (right):
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/ukum83cf2k671.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=99d4c612df82013aed06ff2b22621500a80071cf)](https://preview.redd.it/ukum83cf2k671.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=99d4c612df82013aed06ff2b22621500a80071cf)
+
+Repo and QT Versus Reverse Repo and QE
+
+2\. Quantitative Easing Can-Kick of 2008, Slowly Draining Collateral From The Market
+
+Note: If you want an overview of what led to the 2008 crash, check out [my previous post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o0scoy/the_bigger_short_how_2008_is_repeating_at_a_much/) which has a summary of the documentary "Inside Job (2010)". It also describes where we're probably headed based on SLR, the DTC, ICC, OCC, NSCC rules, and mortgage default protections expiring June 30th, 2021.
+
+Zoom back in time to 2008. The economy took a massive dump due to Wall Street's abuse of derivatives and leverage. They created a bunch of toxic CDOs mostly consisting of [subprime Mortgages](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/subprimeloan.asp) to create an economic apocalyptic scenario around Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS). Everything was overleveraged and was a massive balloon of bets based on the performance of the MBS's.
+
+Currently, there's evidence of Wall Street doing the same abuse of toxic CDO's but this time with Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS). [See above linked post for this detail]
+
+The economy was hurting pretty bad from the 2008 crash, and it was going to continue going into a complete death spiral until the Federal Reserve (Fed) introduced Quantitative Easing (QE):
+
+> The Fed announced QE1 on November 25, 2008. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke announced an aggressive attack on the financial crisis of 2008. The Fed began buying $500 billion in mortgage-backed securities and $100 billion in other debt. QE supported the housing market that the subprime mortgage crisis had devastated. - [Source](https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-qe1-3305530)
+
+If you're still scratching your head on what QE is, here's the Wikipedia overview definition, as well as (hopefully) a more simplified definition.
+
+[Quantitative Easing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_easing) (QE) - is a monetary policy whereby a central bank purchases at scale government bonds or other financial assets in order to inject money into the economy to expand economic activity.
+
+-   This is what the Fed will do to extract collateral (including US Treasuries) from the economy in order to push in liquidity. The Fed started doing this in 2008 to extract toxic collateral from the market and encourage economic growth because it allowed more cash flow in the economy.
+
+-   This pulls out collateral from the economy, and pushes cash (liquidity) in.
+
+-   It was a ticking timebomb ever since it started, because it extracts collateral from the market, slowly creating a collateral shortage issue.
+
+Check out the effects of QE on the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($DJI):
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/cktjwttu8k671.png?width=1528&format=png&auto=webp&s=4e23f2e54e6204d8c56323d7e6bc8772c1a02535)](https://preview.redd.it/cktjwttu8k671.png?width=1528&format=png&auto=webp&s=4e23f2e54e6204d8c56323d7e6bc8772c1a02535)
+
+DJI Before And After Quantitative Easing Begins
+
+It was helping the economy reverse the death spiral, and it has been pumping the economy ever since the introduction of QE. The problem is, of course, that collateral would continue to be sucked out of the market through the mechanics of QE.
+
+And QE can't continue forever, because collateral is a fundamental part of the repo market which allows cash to flow in the economy. When you don't have collateral, you can't post the collateral in the market for cash from banks, and thus the flow of cash basically shuts down. You cannot perform a normal repo transaction between a Bank / Hedge Fund / Financial Institution.
+
+The Fed tried to stop QE after a while. Instead of pulling collateral out of the economy, they needed to try to push collateral back into the economy. In order to stop QE, they tried what was, in essence, the "reverse" of QE called Quantitative Tightening (QT).
+
+[Quantitative Tightening](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_tightening) (QT) - (or quantitative hardening) is a contractionary monetary policy applied by a central bank to decrease the amount of liquidity within the economy. The policy is the reverse of quantitative easing (QE), aimed to increase money supply in order to "stimulate" the economy.
+
+-   This is what the Fed will do to extract liquidity from the economy in order to push in collateral. It is used to attempt to reverse the effects of QE, to try to regain balance in the economy.
+
+-   This pulls out cash (liquidity) from the economy, and pushes collateral in.
+
+-   The Fed attempted QT in 2018, but it proved to have very bad consequences on the economy. So, they went back to QE in 2019, continuing to can-kick the effects of the 2008 crash.
+
+This is a chart showing the Fed's "Total Assets", where collateral is an asset for the Fed. So when collateral was extracted from the economy through QE, it went onto their "Assets" side of their balance sheet. When collateral was pushed back into the economy through QT, it was extracted from their "Assets" side of their balance sheet.
+
+1.  At the start of QE in 2008, there is a surge of assets due to the buying up of MBS's and treasuries.
+
+2.  Around 2018 the assets began to decline because the Fed attempted QT by pushing collateral back into the economy and sucking liquidity out.
+
+3.  Around September 2019 the assets began to increase again because the Fed went back to QE after realizing the negative effects it was having on the economy due to causing a liquidity shortage.
+
+So... what happened in September of 2019? Why did QT fail after a decade of QE?
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/x6pfomz2ck671.png?width=893&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c667c5cc3dbc94de50944208f107aac1dd72d73)](https://preview.redd.it/x6pfomz2ck671.png?width=893&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c667c5cc3dbc94de50944208f107aac1dd72d73)
+
+https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm
+
+3\. Quantitative Easing Cannot Be Reversed. The Can-Kick Continues Until The Economy Crashes
+
+Despite pumping in a bunch of liquidity into the market through QE, the economy was still lacking liquidity. When the Fed started to reverse QE through QT, the liquidity in the market tightened and thus the negative effects on the economy began to surface in September of 2019.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/9sd32gdxdk671.png?width=630&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ee9d749419bc2b6c0a84682f6f9b0b886ceca93)](https://preview.redd.it/9sd32gdxdk671.png?width=630&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ee9d749419bc2b6c0a84682f6f9b0b886ceca93)
+
+https://blog.pimco.com/en/2019/09/repo-rate-spike-a-tail-of-low-liquidity
+
+Less than a year after starting QT, a liquidity crisis emerged on September 15th, 2019, when the repo rate spiked up severely. This was a clash of events surrounding the lower liquidity issue.
+
+> Banks' "reporting" dates are known inflection points in the short-term funding markets and typically fall at the end of the month, quarter, and of course the year. But periodically, the 15th of the month is also a pressure point. Such was the case this past Monday when a short-term funding rate that had been hovering around 2.21% soared as high as 10%.
+>
+> The funding market succumbed to a trifecta of pressures:
+>
+> 1.  Payments on corporate taxes were due on 15 September, leading to high redemptions of more than $35 billion in money market funds.
+>
+>
+> 2.  Cash balances increased by an additional $83 billion in the U.S. Treasury general account, which reduces excess reserves and simultaneously acts to reduce the aggregate supply of overnight liquidity available in funding markets.
+>
+>
+> 3.  Dealers needed an additional $20 billion in funding to finance the settlement of recent scheduled U.S. Treasury issuance.
+>
+>
+>
+> ...
+>
+> ...
+>
+> On September 15, as so many institutions needed funding, repo rates climbed well above the fed funds upper-end target at the time of 2.25% to briefly touch 5%. The following day, cash repo markets traded as high as 10% for those looking to finance agency mortgage positions overnight. Later that morning, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York acknowledged the pressures and conducted its first Open Market Operation (OMO) in more than a decade to add reserves to the funding markets that were clearly in need of the liquidity. Subsequently, after its meeting Wednesday, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced a cut in the interest on excess reserves (IOER) of 0.30% -- five basis points more than its cut in the fed funds rate -- providing some relief to the upper bound of money-market yields.  - [Source](https://blog.pimco.com/en/2019/09/repo-rate-spike-a-tail-of-low-liquidity)
+
+Due to the reduced liquidity from QT, because it sucks out liquidity and pushes in collateral, the markets hit a critical point where there was too much cash that was needed and not enough to supply those who needed the cash. There was huge amounts of strain on the economy.
+
+This was most likely due to continued large leverage + derivatives abuse stemming from what led to the 2000-2007 Housing Market Bubble. The Fed realized that QT could not continue because of the liquidity shortage that was arising. They had to stop QT and continue QE in order to continue to pull out collateral and pump in liquidity. And thus, the collateral shortage time bomb continued ticking.
+
+Below is the figure of when the repo rate shot up to ~10% within a day. This was awful, because it was much more expensive for loans to go out. The repo market would have shut down from nobody wanting to spend 10% on a repurchase agreement to get cash for the day. How would ANYONE get 10% return overnight to pay for these loans? The flow of cash was about to halt.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/86p3getwwj671.png?width=771&format=png&auto=webp&s=2a503c9055d655f80557da8bf46744c205f60011)](https://preview.redd.it/86p3getwwj671.png?width=771&format=png&auto=webp&s=2a503c9055d655f80557da8bf46744c205f60011)
+
+https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/what-happened-in-money-markets-in-september-2019-20200227.htm
+
+4\. COVID Initiated A Liquidity Crisis In The Banks, Which Now Fights With The Collateral Shortage
+
+QE continued on until 2020, when suddenly, COVID came in. Nobody expected it.
+
+And boy, oh boy, did COVID wreak havoc on the economy and the financial world. While the Fed was slowly approaching a collateral crisis through QE, COVID exacerbated the issue due to the sudden impact it had on liquidity. COVID increased liquidity, and when you have a sudden surge of liquidity, you need to balance it with collateral. The economic balance was tipping as of March of 2020.
+
+This does not even take into account the effects of many people losing their jobs, being unable to pay rent/mortgages, and other issues that arose from COVID. Those all apply to another ticking time bomb: the CMBS issue, equivalent to the MBS bubble of 2000-2007, which I discussed in my other post.
+
+The COVID pandemic caused a surge of money being printed from stimulus packages in the US. When you print a bunch of money into the economy on a whim, you risk driving inflation of the currency itself. What does inflation encourage? Less spending from companies, due to the higher price. This leads to less loaning of cash in the repo market, and banks obtaining an ever-surplus of cash.
+
+COVID caused a sudden surge of trillions of dollars worth that the economy couldn't handle naturally. Compare the treasury balance versus the deposits over time, and the surge that occurred in 2020 in response to the pandemic. The COVID stimulus bills pumped in a massive amount of money into the economy at the risk of inflation. And we're already seeing the effects of inflation occur on the [supply chain](https://www.businessinsider.com/why-supply-shortages-economy-inventory-chips-lumber-cars-toilet-paper-2021-5):
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/amwahlvykk671.png?width=877&format=png&auto=webp&s=1e343c265451a1b2d6754a4d04971bb445e58f43)](https://preview.redd.it/amwahlvykk671.png?width=877&format=png&auto=webp&s=1e343c265451a1b2d6754a4d04971bb445e58f43)
+
+https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm
+
+Stimulus checks were sent out to retail. Companies were bailed out. Unemployment increased, resulting in more unemployment benefits going out due to the relief bills. More money printed. More money deposited at banks.
+
+There was a ton of cash (liquidity) being pumped into the economy over the past year from March 2020 to June 2021. Because of this, due to inflation and an excess of cash, banks began to get a surplus of cash deposited. People had more cash. They didn't need to spend money on rent/mortages. Companies didn't want to spend more due to fears of inflation. So, bank deposits went up.
+
+The main problem with this is that the cash deposited with the banks became a liability on their balance sheets. When you have a surplus of liabilities on your balance sheet, you need to 'balance' it out with assets, such as US Treasuries.
+
+The banks were now in trouble because they had way, way too many deposits. They were at risk of defaulting due to their SLR requirements. Here is a figure showing how deposits (liabilities) of banks increased over time. It mushroomed during the COVID pandemic:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/6dm07sa3oj671.png?width=891&format=png&auto=webp&s=9acce6ceb03841c64828198eefff21eb06b1e310)](https://preview.redd.it/6dm07sa3oj671.png?width=891&format=png&auto=webp&s=9acce6ceb03841c64828198eefff21eb06b1e310)
+
+https://www.ft.com/content/a5e165f7-a524-4b5b-9939-de689b6a1687
+
+To combat this issue, the Fed decided to introduce a relief program for banks regarding SLR because of the massive increase of liquidity due to the uppercut that COVID created on the financial world.
+
+> The supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) is the US implementation of the Basel III Tier 1 leverage ratio, with which banks calculate the amount of common equity capital they must hold relative to their total leverage exposure. Large US banks must hold 3%. Top-tier bank holding companies must also hold an extra 2% buffer, for a total of 5%. The SLR, which does not distinguish between assets based on risk, is conceived as a backstop to risk-weighted capital requirements. - [Source](https://www.risk.net/definition/supplementary-leverage-ratio-slr)
+
+In more of a simplified summary, SLR is a requirement of total equity that a bank must hold compared to their total leverage exposure. If they are exposed to leverage, they need to hold enough capital for that position otherwise they are at risk of defaulting. In this case, they only need to hold a measly 3%-5%, dependent on how large of a bank they are. Just like in 2008 - these banks can have massive leverage and SLR is to "help protect the economy" from them abusing leverage.
+
+But hey, the Fed put in place some protections for the year to help these banks since they were obviously overleveraged to begin with. These protections expired on March 31st, 2021.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/14pa4yngtj671.png?width=1433&format=png&auto=webp&s=534726bcf83b0bf40ede7b196191d66c29094d6e)](https://preview.redd.it/14pa4yngtj671.png?width=1433&format=png&auto=webp&s=534726bcf83b0bf40ede7b196191d66c29094d6e)
+
+https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/29/the-fed-is-ending-one-of-its-pandemic-relief-progr/
+
+> The Fed's relief program last year allowed banks to exclude U.S. Treasuries and central bank reserves from the SLR calculation. The relief program was a response to the many non-banking institutions selling Treasuries to raise cash, and coincided with other measures, including the $2.2 trillion CARES Act, which resulted in even more Treasuries being sold into the market. - [Source](https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/29/the-fed-is-ending-one-of-its-pandemic-relief-progr/)
+
+Right after the expiration of the protection plans of SLR, the Reverse Repo market began to blow up because the banks had way too much liquidity and not enough treasuries on their balance sheets.
+
+The argument that the banks were "parking their money at the Fed" was a reasonable explanation at first. Though, with 0% ROI from the RRP at the time, the banks would literally get no return on their investments. So for that argument, all of their other investments would have had to yield negative in order for RRP to be more enticing. Does this make sense to you that they'd use 0% RRP to be an 'investment'?
+
+The fact that the RRP began to ramp up and then explode after the SLR protections lifted makes this look like a collateral shortage issue. And of course, with QE occurring over the past decade, makes it more likely, because collateral was sucked out of the economy and onto the Fed's balance sheet over the years.
+
+That was of course questionable on whether it was a liquidity or collateral issue, until, the RRP rate dropped negative in March of 2021, as well as in April of 2021.
+
+5\. Reverse Repo Rate Flips Negative; Warnings Of Collateral Shortage
+
+Think about it quite simply in a supply/demand factor and the reverse repo when the RRP rate dropped negative.
+
+You are a bank. You want to get Collateral from the Fed to balance your sheets. The Fed says they'll give you a small amount of interest for borrowing their collateral overnight. But now, imagine that the supply of collateral is too low and demand is too high. The Fed will no longer want to pay you for borrowing its collateral so it will shift the interest rate down. If demand really outweighs supply, then the Fed would then want cash from YOU in order for YOU to borrow the collateral.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/eysh9mx9ok671.png?width=961&format=png&auto=webp&s=4d9d1695922b01651eae06c6bcc2753ad0f5b789)](https://preview.redd.it/eysh9mx9ok671.png?width=961&format=png&auto=webp&s=4d9d1695922b01651eae06c6bcc2753ad0f5b789)
+
+https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-bonds-repo-explainer/explainer-u-s-repo-market-flirts-with-negative-rates-as-fed-seeks-to-absorb-excess-cash-idUSKBN2C32AI
+
+This was just one of the warning signs that a collateral issue was arising. The RRP rates were already at 0%, so the only way for them to move was either up or down. An increase in treasury demand could shift it down, into the negatives, which it did.
+
+6\. The Fed Is Fudging The Numbers And Hiding A Collateral Shortage
+
+The drop in RRP interest rates to the negative came after the Fed increased the total borrowing amount of counterparties in the RRP from $30 Billion to $80 Billion.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/by2ftlpopk671.png?width=1028&format=png&auto=webp&s=747f50e2fb63aabaedb6e9e947aa117f6c75f91b)](https://preview.redd.it/by2ftlpopk671.png?width=1028&format=png&auto=webp&s=747f50e2fb63aabaedb6e9e947aa117f6c75f91b)
+
+https://finadium.com/fed-increases-rrp-limits-from-30-billion-to-80-billion-to-ensure-supply-at-near-0-rates/
+
+Why did they do this? Think of it again as a supply versus demand issue. For simple math, imagine the Fed has 50 members.
+
+-   At a limit of $30 Billion per member, that is a total of $30B * 50 = $1.5 Trillion that can be borrowed.
+
+-   At a limit of $80 Billion per member, that is a total of $80B * 50 = $4 Trillion that can be borrowed.
+
+What is this doing? Why did the Fed increase the limit?
+
+It's artificially inflating the total "supply" of treasuries that can be borrowed by counterparties in the RRP. It is attempting to keep the interest rate positive because there is so much demand for collateral and not enough supply in the markets and on the Fed's balance sheet. The RRP was already at 0%, there was nowhere for it to go besides negative, which as you know implies a shortage of collateral and a red flag for the financial world.
+
+Not only did they artificially inflate the total supply to combat the demand by increasing the total borrow amount, the Fed decided to not affect the assets side of its balance sheet during these RRP transactions. This effectively leaves the supply of treasuries on the Fed's balance sheet the same. This is another method to can-kick to avoid interest rates going negative and flashing a collateral issue.
+
+> When the Desk conducts RRP open market operations, it sells securities held in the System Open Market Account (SOMA) to eligible RRP counterparties, with an agreement to buy the assets back on the RRP's specified maturity date. This leaves the SOMA portfolio the same size, as securities sold temporarily under repurchase agreements continue to be shown as assets held by the SOMA in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, but the transaction shifts some of the liabilities on the Federal Reserve's balance sheet from deposits held by depository institutions (also known as bank reserves) to reverse repos while the trade is outstanding. - [Source](https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/rrp_faq/rrp-faq-archive/rrp-faq-200715)
+
+We can see this visually from the Fed's balance sheet that they're not affecting their assets during the RRP. They're allowing counterparties to borrow treasuries WITHOUT affecting the supply - desperately trying to get away from the rising demand for treasuries and avoid treasury yields from snapping down (and likewise the price of treasuries up):
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/evxua80crk671.png?width=893&format=png&auto=webp&s=6a925b05e7a460b252457923ca97c730c511da6b)](https://preview.redd.it/evxua80crk671.png?width=893&format=png&auto=webp&s=6a925b05e7a460b252457923ca97c730c511da6b)
+
+https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm
+
+On top of this, the Fed showed their hand ONCE AGAIN of fudging the numbers on June 16th when they bumped up the RRP rate to 0.05%. The short-term treasury yields briefly went BELOW the RRP interest amount of 0.05% on June 17th when the new RRP ROI was in effect.
+
+This is a BAD sign because now overnight RRP had a higher return than 2-month and 3-month treasury bonds.
+
+The Fed is fudging the numbers trying to hide the treasury bond shortage.
+
+The Fed cannot keep this up. They're trying to keep the T-bill yield curve propped up despite the treasury shortage. They're not affecting their balance sheet, and they also artificially increased the amount of treasuries in their "supply" by increasing the counterparty borrow limit from $30 Billion to $80 Billion.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/sp52qka5tj671.png?width=858&format=png&auto=webp&s=69d7ec8971035a7939f7bed116f7c923215019d6)](https://preview.redd.it/sp52qka5tj671.png?width=858&format=png&auto=webp&s=69d7ec8971035a7939f7bed116f7c923215019d6)
+
+https://alhambrapartners.com/2021/06/17/the-fomc-accidentally-exposes-itself-reverse-repo-style/
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/1f64o77tsk671.png?width=972&format=png&auto=webp&s=48e83c02895066c4e300c5a8adf3d3a065a6b016)](https://preview.redd.it/1f64o77tsk671.png?width=972&format=png&auto=webp&s=48e83c02895066c4e300c5a8adf3d3a065a6b016)
+
+https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield
+
+The Fed is also planning on increasing interest rates. This starts to scare the economy, which is most likely why we're now seeing the dump of the stock market over the past few days and the dump leading into the week of June 21st. This is bad for the markets because it means it's going to cost more for the economy to function (e.g. what happened in 2019 when Repo Rates spiked to 10%). Companies have to spend more to hire, produce, etc. It costs the economy more to function.
+
+The Fed is pinned between a collateral issue from QE sucking out collateral, and a liquidity issue and COVID pumping in too much liquidity for the banks to handle.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/uhhhzguotk671.png?width=1202&format=png&auto=webp&s=cab32cef615311320c6cf27461fa7fb18b0fc7af)](https://preview.redd.it/uhhhzguotk671.png?width=1202&format=png&auto=webp&s=cab32cef615311320c6cf27461fa7fb18b0fc7af)
+
+https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/16/fed-holds-rates-steady-but-raises-inflation-expectations-sharply-and-makes-no-mention-of-taper.html
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/p0v9ij2b0k671.png?width=1013&format=png&auto=webp&s=bf8f525bfc55e8f1287e921bbaaa408c5c27a253)](https://preview.redd.it/p0v9ij2b0k671.png?width=1013&format=png&auto=webp&s=bf8f525bfc55e8f1287e921bbaaa408c5c27a253)
+
+https://www.bbc.com/news/business-57090421
+
+7\. Quarter Ends Explode The Reverse Repo. The Next Quarter End Is June 30th, 2021.
+
+This is not a date to look forward to for GME potentially rising. This is a date of "Holy shit. The RRP could explode to the point where treasury supply vs demand is unable to take it any more".
+
+About 3-4 days prior to quarter ends, the RRP explodes up in the amount of collateral that is borrowed from the Fed. This is because of the underlying plumbing of the financial markets, identified in Section 3 above, causes additional strain on the financial markets. The banks need more collateral to prop up their balance sheets for the night of the quarter-ends.
+
+The RRP borrowed amount can shoot up almost 2-4x the current levels. The amount of RRP at the moment is $747 Billion. The RRP could explode 2-4x the amount it is at upon June 25th, 2021. What if it's $1 Trillion by then due to the massive amount of collateral needed by the banks? More?
+
+Can the Fed handle it?
+
+Can they still prop the yield curve up?
+
+Will the short-term treasuries dip below the RRP amount once more due to this shortage and flash red flags to the world of financial instability in the US?
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The Fed is pinned into a corner from the 2008 can-kick utilizing QE, and the economic effects of COVID. They are stuck battling a collateral crisis AND a liquidity crisis. The Fed is currently fudging the numbers of treasuries to hide a collateral shortage and to try to prop the ...](https://preview.redd.it/63daa1s8gk671.png?width=1277&format=png&auto=webp&s=d04d4a6b577152d26d6f7ea6e0c31f05f7ce80dc)](https://preview.redd.it/63daa1s8gk671.png?width=1277&format=png&auto=webp&s=d04d4a6b577152d26d6f7ea6e0c31f05f7ce80dc)
+
+https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nylihz/previous_rrp_behavior_on_quarter_ends_massive/
+
+If the US Treasury yield curve snaps down from this instability and the Fed no longer able to prop up the yield curve, then it can drive treasury prices up.
+
+If [/u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/)'s "[Everything Short](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgucv2/the_everything_short/)" is true and they're actually shorting treasuries, then that can lead to banks defaulting due to the price of treasuries shooting up. When they default, they'll be forced to buy up all the treasuries that they've shorted into the market.
+
+And it is very possible that they are shorting treasuries.
+
+When performing RRP of 0%, the repo market was most likely shut down due to nobody needing cash loaned out. The banks only profitable move was to perform the RRP with the Fed and then short treasuries into the market, rehypothecating the treasuries to other parties. This would have also helped prop up the market by artificially increasing the supply of treasuries (collateral) in the market.
+
+If it's true, and they have truly been performing the "Everything Short", then it could initiate a Global Financial Crisis equivalent to The Great Depression.
+
+Do I want that to happen? No. But is there a chance? Yes, there is.
+
+Is GME going to squeeze? Is the DD just false hopium? I don't think it's just hopium. I believe in the DD.
+
+But some users might think otherwise and not believe in GME or the DD. Hello users outside of [r/superstonk](https://www.reddit.com/r/superstonk/)! If you're reading this, check out the DD on the subreddit!
+
+Even if there's a slight chance of a GME squeeze in your eyes, and all of these signs are pointing to a market crash...
+
+[Why not give it a shot](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4nSHsbFe-o)?

01-Must-Read/2021-06-23-Updated-Go-No-Go-Launch-Checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,421 @@
+UPDATE -- Go / No-Go For Launch - The checklist keeping GME on the launchpad.
+=============================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/nothingbuttherainsir](https://www.reddit.com/user/nothingbuttherainsir/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhh0f1/update_go_nogo_for_launch_the_checklist_keeping/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Possible DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Possible%20DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+*TL;DR:*\
+DTCC / OCC / ICC etc. & Wall St want key things in place before GME unwinds, and we're now looking at a list that's been mostly checked off. This rocket is just about cleared for launch.
+
+*Last updated: 2021-06-23* | [Original post from 2021-04-22](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvq6rs/go_nogo_for_launch_the_dtcc_checklist_keeping_gme/)
+
+Go / No-Go For Launch
+
+Opinion - Status: Hold ❌\
+*We're on a scheduled hold. Preliminary system checks are good enough to launch, and now we are being held for atmospheric conditions to be just right.*
+
+*GME ignition needs to appear from the outside to be organic, or it will be fairly obvious to the public that The System is built on lies, and run by liars, completely unfair, and this stock was just being flat out controlled for months. Even if Wall St survives financially by implementing all these rules, if they lose the public trust then it is literally "game stopped." They need plausible cover to launch now, the rest is in place.*
+
+1 - Rules of Engagement ✅
+
+2 - Funding ✅
+
+3 - Cover Story for Timing ❌
+
+4 - Avoiding Perception of Responsibility ✅
+
+--- *End TL;DR* ---
+
+Busy few weeks, eh Apes? Figured I'd give this a brush up and post it again since it was a month ago I posted the original. So here's the refreshed, reviewed, reassessed, reformatted, and return of the Go / No-Go Checklist. Freshness stamp at the top, changes by date at the bottom. Please comment with any additions and corrections as always.
+
+Official notice that this is not financial advice, etc etc. I have no idea if any of this is indeed why these things are happening, or if they are even what I think they are. I bought a handful of shares before DFV's Congressional hearing because something seemed fucky, and that was my first stock purchase EVER. If you make financial decisions off of this speculation, you probably do eat crayons like me. I am literally just some Ape on the internet mashing buttons and you're gonna have to explain to your wife's boyfriend why you took this as advice and then spent your whole allowance already this week.
+
+So this [post](https://reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mu9xed/why_were_still_trading_sideways_and_why_we_havent/) from [u/c-digs](https://www.reddit.com/u/c-digs/) is about as close as anyone has come to my personal theory that there is a literal checklist somewhere that is getting marked off before this is allowed to unravel. The DTCC and Wall St (and probably the SEC) definitely do not want this spring to unwind before they are ready, and certainly not in a way in which they don't feel they are in control. These players are Big Corporate dicks with Big Corporate mindsets, and its my bet that they don't do anything without a plan that at least addresses all eventualities.
+
+However, as it is now probably alarmingly clear to them this isn't just gonna go away on its own (cue Apes waving from the windows of the rocket sitting on the launchpad), the DTCC and pals are now scrambling to get the last things in place before somebody trips over the cord to the shredder at 3am and lands on the launch button.
+
+I think the list goes something like this, but am intending this to be a crowdsourced document because there is no way I can keep this all straight on my own, and the GME Investor community has done so so much great DD already. There is definitely more to add in terms of DTCC / OCC / NSCC / SEC rules, and please comment with additional items & sources and I'll try to keep up with editing them into the list. Compiling it here can possibly help determine just how close GME probably is to liftoff. It feels like we aren't that far from it now.
+
+1 - Rules of Engagement
+
+Opinon - Status: Go for Launch ✅\
+*The System would benefit most if new rules about payments in a member default situation are in effect prior to launch, and as far as we know at this point, all rules to cover that scenario that were filed are now in place. They can use remaining days to shore up a few more monetary rules, but there aren't any disaster-level rules still pending out there. My opinion is at 100% Go for rules being in place.*
+
+Let's cover some basics before getting into each specific rule.
+
+Whose rules cover what:
+
+DTCC stands for Depoisitory Trust and Clearing Corporation which is made up of 3 self-regulating bodies:
+
+-   [DTC](https://www.dtcc.com/about/businesses-and-subsidiaries/dtc) - The Depository Trust Company
+
+-   [NSCC](https://www.dtcc.com/about/businesses-and-subsidiaries/nscc) - National Securities Clearing Corporation
+
+-   [FICC](https://www.dtcc.com/about/businesses-and-subsidiaries/ficc) - Fixed Income Clearing Corporation
+
+and handles:
+
+-   Physical Stock Certificates and ownership records, big institutional trades (DTC)
+
+-   Securities trades, clearing, and settlement for nearly all transactions involving US based marketplaces (NSCC)
+
+-   Government Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities (FICC)
+
+[OCC](https://www.theocc.com/) - Options Clearing Coroporation handles:\
+Options (shocker, I know)
+
+[ICC](https://www.theice.com/clear-credit) - Intercontinental Exchance (ICE) Clear Credit handles:\
+Credit Default Swaps, or CDS for short.
+
+Naming Scheme (yes the whole thing is important)\
+example: SR-DTC-2021-005
+
+-   SR - Type of document filed, SR = Self Regulation
+
+-   DTC - Name of self regulated entity filing it
+
+-   2021 - Year regulation was filed
+
+-   005 - Sequence filed in (5th, so far)
+
+✅ = in effect now\
+❌ = pending review / revision
+
+Rules To Protect The System
+
+Stocks/Securities
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-003: Obligation to Reconcile Activity on a Regular Basis ✅\
+    *The "You're gonna report your risk daily now, you little shits" Rule.*\
+    Filed 2021-03-09\
+    Effective 2021-03-16\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m793h7/new_dtcc_rule_just_passed_in_effect_immediatly/)
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-004: Amend the Recovery & Wind-down Plan ✅\
+    *The "We'll liquidate your asse(t)s if you default, then make your pals chip in, before we pay a dime ourselves" Rule.*\
+    Also stipulates what the DTCC is willing to cover when reconciling, as in only shares on the books, and why you (yes you Ape) should have a cash account and not a margin account.\
+    Filed 2021-03-29\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgs05i/analysis_of_srdtc2021004_dtcc_changing_the_game/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-005: Modify the DTC Settlement Service Guide and the Form of DTC Pledgee's Agreement ✅\
+    *The "We're tagging the shares you lend out so you can't do it more than once" Rule.*\
+    While this won't help prevent the current GME squeeze scenario, and would likely ignite the engines on its own, this will prevent a *GME-like* scenario from happening again in the future. [u/Leenixus](https://www.reddit.com/user/Leenixus/) has posted lots of info around DTC-2021-005 if you'd like to follow the saga.\
+    Filed 2021-04-01 [archived original](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o2nx3z/i_have_the_original_sec_srdtc2021005_before_it/)\
+    Removed for further review src-1\
+    Refiled 2021-06-15 src-2\
+    Effective Immediately upon re-filing\
+    [src-1](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mpmcyz/good_news_update_on_dtc2021005_according_to_john/), [src-2](https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rule-filings/2021/DTC/SR-DTC-2021-005.pdf)
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-006: Remove the Security Holder Tracking Service ✅\
+    *The "We're dropping the old way of tracking shares, cause it didn't work well, and DTC-2021-005 will do it better" Rule.*\
+    It was speculated in another post that the old system of tracking needed to be removed so there was no conflict in implementing DTC-2021-005 (I can't find that post here on reddit anymore, src needed!). It's likely that this could pave the way for 005 to be implemented. As if 2021-05-20 I am more inclined to think that it was removed to keep anyone from implementing share tracking prior to 005 being implemented. Filed 2021-04-22\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mwhyhw/sec_files_srdtc2021006_removing_the_old_and/) <- also my post
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-007: Update the DTC Corporate Actions Distributions Service Guide ✅\
+    *The "Stop bickering back and forth over the manual adjustments to your peer to peer trade records via the dumb APO method, and just use the GD computer validated Claim Connect system, please" Rule.*\
+    Way to make a super vague title DTC... This is mostly about borrowed shares and updating who pays how much when circumstances - like rates - change. The old system (APO) needed both parties to just agree on the adjustments and one side could only submit an adjustment at a time, so it was rarely agreed upon in one pass and the bad guys could likely stall with many back and forths. To me this reads as a please use this better thing now, because APO will go away on July 9th 2021 so you'll have to use Claim Connect by then anyways. Since the lender is likely incentivized to use the new system, it may get adopted in higher numbers sooner.\
+    Filed 2021-04-30\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    Mandatory 2021-07-09\
+    [src](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/dtc.htm#SR-DTC-2021-007), [Explainer post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n28jes/new_dtc_regulation_posted_srdtc2021007/)
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-009: Provide Enhanced Clarity for Deadlines and Processing Times ✅\
+    *The "Don't assume we'll be keeping up with our own deadlines just because we have been in the past. We'll do what we want when we want. Also dont cry to us if our choices about deadlines, or someone else's rules about deadlines, kick you in the wallet. We're not chipping in for that." Rule.*\
+    This is basically a re-statement of an ongoing policy by the DTC that their precedent around deadlines/timetables that they themselves have control over should not be misunderstood as a guarantee of them adhering to those same deadlines/timetables in the future. This does not effect deadlines imposed by external regulations though. Further, the DTC stipulates that they are not liable for damages (monetary losses) that are incurred by members from the DTC's choices to act or not act in the same timeframes as they had before, or damages from the actions of anybody else's rules, (SEC, OCC, NSCC, etc).\
+    Filed 2021-06-08\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/dtc/2021/34-92198.pdf), [Explainer post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o1ds30/new_dtc_filing_srdtc2021009_notice_of_filing_and/), [more info](https://reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o63ev5/dtc2021009_implemented_tomorrow_saying_the_dtc/)
+
+-   SR-NSCC-2021-002: Amend the Supplemental Liquidity Deposit Requirements ✅\
+    *The "We'll margin call your ass if your new daily reports say you're overextended and make us feel scared" Rule.*\
+    Works in conjunction with DTC-2021-003. This rule now appears to be clear to be acted on by the SEC. NSCC filed a Partial Ammendment to this on June 17th for clarification.\
+    Possible insight on why this may have been strategically delayed, via [/u/yosaso](https://www.reddit.com/u/yosaso/) src-4\
+    NSCC-2021-801 Gave Advance Notice of this, and as of 2021-05-04 is cleared to be included with NSC-2021-002. src-2\
+    Filed 2021-03-05\
+    Comment Period Extended to 05-31 / Expected action on or before 2021-06-21 src-3\
+    Approved 2021-06-21 with partial ammendment src-4\
+    Effective 2021-06-23 src-5 [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mc0zfn/too_ape_didnt_read_summary_of_srnscc2021801/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf), [src-2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n51u5d/sec_has_no_objections_to_nscc801/), [src-3](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nscc/2021/34-91788.pdf), [src-4](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n67h63/the_reason_why_may_4th_was_important/), [src-4](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nscc/2021/34-92213.pdf), [src-5](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o4z0jc/implementation_of_the_proposed_changes_to_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
+
+-   SR-NSCC-2021-004: Amend the Recovery & Wind-down Plan ✅\
+    *The "Just so we're clear about stocks specifically, we're really serious about us not paying for your fuckups unless we have to rule" Rule.*\
+    Works in conjunction with DTC-2021-004, but this is specific to securities and was filed first. src-1 This ALSO has language in it about clarifying the mass transfer of customer accounts from a failing member to a stable member. src-2\
+    Filed 2021-03-05\
+    Effective 2021-03-18\
+    [src-1](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mc0zfn/too_ape_didnt_read_summary_of_srnscc2021801/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf), [src-2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvybgf/sec_is_expecting_the_need_for_a_mass_emergency/)
+
+-   NSCC-2021-005: Increase the NSCC's Minimum Required Fund Deposit *pending* ❌\
+    *The "We're gonna up your minimum deposit with us from an hysterically low $10K each, to an almost certainly still not enough $250k each" Rule.*\
+    DTCC has submitted this to SEC, but SEC has not approved / published yet, so details may change. src-1\
+    Filed 2021-04-26\
+    Published: 2021-05-10\
+    Approved: Pending, expected action on or before 2021-06-24 (45 days after publication)\
+    Effective: Approval + 10 days max\
+    [src-1](https://www.dtcc.com/legal), [Explainer post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mz9gl6/nscc2021005_has_been_signed_today_implementation/)
+
+Options
+
+-   SR-OCC-2021-003: Increase Persistent Minimum Skin-In-The-Game / Waterfall ✅\
+    *The "You Market Makers are gonna give us more money now in case you fuck up with options later and owe someone more than you have" Rule.*\
+    This is the rule associated with the SR-OCC-2021-801 advanced notice, and SIG filed an opposition during the review period delaying the implementation. src-1 You can read that whiney rant here via this [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhh0f1/update_go_nogo_for_launch_the_checklist_keeping/gznui8r?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)\
+    OCC-2021-003 is now approved and both should be in effect no later than Tuesday 2021-06-01 10am Eastern (if SEC approval notice counts as the official written notice to OCC members). src-2\
+    Filed 2021-02-10\
+    Approved 2021-05-27\
+    Effective on or before 2021-06-01 10am EST\
+    [src-1](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mm8pnz/update_from_sec_on_srocc2021801_aka_srocc2021203/), [src-2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nmjbov/srocc2021003_approved_that_one_was_needed_for/gzqwqzc?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
+
+Credit Default Swaps
+
+-   SR-ICC-2021-005: Amend the ICC Recovery & Wind-down Plan ✅\
+    *The "Guys, DTC had a pretty good idea, lets also liquidate members first before touching our own cash." Rule.*\
+    Fairly straightforward with this nugget as described by [u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/Criand/):\
+    "Something really cool is they'll not only wipe out members who default on a certain security, they'll wipe out similar positions in that same security of all their other members IF it's high risk/stress to the market."\
+    Filed 2021-03-23\
+    Approved 2021-05-10\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nfl69o/new_icc_rules_summary_they_are_preparing_for/)
+
+-   SR-ICC-2021-007: Update the ICC's Treasury Operations Policies and Procedures ✅\
+    *The "Your capital balance sheet is looking a little shaggy there, we think you need a Collateral Haircut" Rule.*\
+    Tightens up what can and cant be considered as collateral, trimming off the stuff that is not deemed worthy, and reducing overall capital, which means you can handle less total risk and/or volatile CDS contracts.\
+    Filed 2021-03-29\
+    Approved 2021-05-13\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nfl69o/new_icc_rules_summary_they_are_preparing_for/)
+
+-   SR-ICC-2021-008: Update the ICC Risk Management Model Description ✅\
+    *The "We're gonna start using our best guesses on if the collateral for the loans these psuedo-insurance contracts are based on might go crazy in the near future, 'cause shit is getting weird out there" Rule.*\
+    This is about [Credit Default Swaps](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/creditdefaultswap.asp), which are a bit complex. Essentially this rule appears it primarily will help to reduce the chances of say, BofA failing because they agreed to get paid to take on some of the risk of a loan made by say JP Morgan, and then BofA got fucked over just because JP Morgain made the loan using a volatile stock as collateral and then that stock went bananas... a stock which everyone probably knew was volatile but somehow wasn't a big factor in making the agreement before this rule. The rule also limits the ICC maximum total losses/payout, and ups initial margin requirements.\
+    Filed 2021-03-31\
+    Approved 2021-05-18\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nfl69o/new_icc_rules_summary_they_are_preparing_for/)
+
+-   SR-ICC-2021-009: Update the ICC Risk Parameter Setting and Review Policy ✅\
+    *The "We're basing risk on day to day averages now instead of month to month averages" Rule.*\
+    When something strays too far outside of the acceptable baseline, it gets flagged. Now that baseline is automatically calculated day to day, instead of month to month, and manualy reviewed the old way at least monthly. It will result in faster response time to fast moving changes and real risks (safer), but also less shock from too few updates (smoother). All that so they can keep margin levels appropriate. Also cleans up some language to be more generic and descriptive like "Extreme Price Change Scenarios."\
+    Filed 2021-04-02\
+    Approved 2021-05-20\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhdw0f/rick_management_updates_just_went_from_monthly_to/)
+
+-   SR-ICC-2021-014: Update the ICC's Fee Schedules ✅\
+    *The "Huuuuuuuge discounts on swaps! Get 'em while they last!" Rule.*\
+    This cuts fees on CDS contracts about 25%, which sounds like they want to incentivize risk sharing even more. Program is for the 2nd half of 2021, and discounts start June 1st.\
+    Filed 2021-05-07\
+    Approved 2021-05-18\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nfl69o/new_icc_rules_summary_they_are_preparing_for/)
+
+Rules to protect the value of the market in general as best as possible
+
+-   SR-OCC-2021-004: Revisions to OCC's Auction Participation Requirements ✅\
+    *The "Everyone can come to the feeding frenzy party when we liquidate one of you idiots" Rule.*\
+    Allows more firms that were traditionally excluded from an auction of this type to now join in, probably making the market wide bleeding end sooner, and retain more value overall.\
+    Filed 2021-03-19\
+    Effective 2021-05-19\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mnpzu5/srocc2021004_why_this_proposed_rule_change_is/)
+
+Non-regulation / Other Announcments
+
+-   Exchange Act Rule 15c3-3 Compliance Letter: Staff Statement on Fully Paid Lending ✅\
+    *The "We're making you keep full collateral on hand for your shit, you've got six months to get it together" letter.*\
+    Letter sent 2020-10-22\
+    Effective 2021-04-22\
+    [src](https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/staff-fully-paid-lending?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery)
+
+-   GOV-1085-21: DTCC / FICC White Paper Announcing WABR added as a Sponsored Member ✅\
+    WABR Cayman Limited is a firm specializing in helping Institutional Sales Traders in times of "thin markets". [u/stellarEVH](https://www.reddit.com/u/stellarEVH/) explains:\
+    *"When a company needs to quickly pay off their debts as in the case of a margin call, it can be challenging for them to gather all the money from their various investments. There are firms in place that are specialized in liquidating their portfolio in a manner to minimize market impact while they pay off their debt."*\
+    Announced 2021-04-23\
+    Effective 2021-04-29\
+    [src](https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/pdf/2021/4/23/GOV1085-21PDF.PDF), via [this post & comments](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/my1hio/friday_the_dtcc_approved_wabra_morgan_stanley/), linked from [It's Just a Bug, Bro Part 6 - Bug Spray Edition](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/myl37p/its_just_a_bug_bro_part_6_bug_spray_edition/)\
+    [Additional info on who WABR is](https://reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mz4oza/the_rabbit_hole_of_wabr_cayman_company_limited/) 👀 *Spidey senses are tingling*\
+    *I love this community*
+
+-   MBS978-21: FICC Notice on MBSD Intraday Mark-to-Market Charge - Timing of Intraday Collection ✅\
+    *We've been lenient for the past year cause shit was wack, but we're going back on that regular hourly assesment for margins.* "Starting on May 3, 2021, the fixed time of 1:00PM will be eliminated and the MBSD Intraday Mark-to-Market Charge will return to an hourly assessment." This combined with other things will tighten the screws.\
+    [/u/stellarEVH](https://www.reddit.com/u/stellarEVH/) bringing that good good again: *"For example, it'll be much harder to short GameStop and/or trade in dark pools when you're expected to cover your margin every hour. For the last year, they've only needed to prove they were covered at 1pm."*\
+    Notice Date 2021-04-21\
+    Effective 2021-05-03\
+    [src post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n3m0qu/the_mandatory_dtcc_common_stock_reallocation_for/), [explainer comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n3m0qu/the_mandatory_dtcc_common_stock_reallocation_for/gwr8n2a?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
+
+-   OCC Notice 48718: TEMPORARY INCREASE TO CLEARING FUND SIZE ✅\
+    *Yeah if you could give us some more of your money for a bit, that would be great.*\
+    Yeah they used all caps, and gave 2 days notice before they would just go into members bank accounts to get that money. Must've needed it bad for the 19th, because it normally is just increased monthly on the 1st. Total increase was $588,378,155.\
+    Notice Date 2021-05-17\
+    Deposit by Date 2021-05-19 [by 9am](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nfz9xa/huge_crypto_dump_currently_things_are_hotting_up/).\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nftyg4/occ_has_issued_a_statement_to_all_clearing/)
+
+*(please help me fill in other important rules via comments)*
+
+2 - Funding
+
+Opinion - Status: Go for Launch ✅
+
+To pay out for shares of GME
+
+-   [SHF Pulling money from crypt0](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-doge-ethereum-ripple-price-monday-19-april-crypto-latest-081427050.html)
+
+-   SHF Pump and Dump on other stocks
+
+-   SHF Liquidate other Assets Under Management (market-wide dive on 2021-04-22?) [Citadel Sell-off?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n0fwx2/kenny_might_be_in_a_bit_of_a_pickle_right_now/)
+
+-   Wind Down and Recovery Strategies (SR-DTC-2021-004, SR-ICC-2021-005)
+
+-   *(other suggestions w/ sources wanted)*
+
+Secure cash to buy up liquidated assets to prevent total market collapse
+
+-   [Big Banks do a Bond Sales](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mu8a5m/6_out_of_the_7_top_listed_us_banks_have_made/), [Citigroup: "Me Too!"](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mzvcli/citigroup_borrowing_55_billion_in_latest_bank/)
+
+    -   Need plausible reasons for making those sales such as earnings report, or LIBOR to SOFR switch, or *insert wildcard like $50 Bil Football League*, etc ...
+
+-   Banks Re-Structuring / Netting [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mur8bz/srdtc2021004_the_dtcc_and_jp_morgan_theyre/)
+
+-   [Wells Fargo to liquidate two of its trusts](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nh5ed7/wells_fargo_to_liquidate_two_of_its_trusts/)
+
+-   Rule SR-OCC-2021-004 allowing more players at the auction of the defaulting member's assets.
+
+3 - Cover for Timing of Launch
+
+Opinion - Status: No-Go for Launch ❌\
+*This will likely be the very last one, and we'll only know what they will use as an excuse once it's started. I think all the other pieces would need to be in place* (Narrator: They are.) *for them to feel most confident to light the fuse. This will be more oportunistic in nature, I think.*
+
+I'm splitting this into 2 objectives: why GME is going up, and why the market in general is tanking.
+
+GME Go BRRRRRRRRRRRR! Cover
+
+Ideally a plausible Corporate or Market Event that the stock price "should" respond to in order to initiate upward price movement without the timing looking SUS AF and destabilizing the broader market due to fear of systemic problems and/or loss of public trust. These events are mostly out of the control of The System, and one will likely be the ignition.
+
+-   Corporate: ~~AGM Voting Proxy Release~~
+
+-   Corporate: ~~Quarterly Earnings (Q1 2021)~~
+
+-   Corporate: ~~CEO Announced~~
+
+-   Corporate: ~~AGM Vote Count + Board Elections~~
+
+-   Corporate: ~~RC Appointed as Chairman Official News~~
+
+-   Corporate: ~~New Cash Reserves from ATM Stock Offer~~
+
+-   Corporate: Dividend Issue / Stock Split
+
+-   Corporate: Major Partner Announcement
+
+-   Corporate: Possible NFT Announcement 2021-07-14?
+
+-   Market: Broader Retail Gains
+
+-   Market: $GME moves from Russell 2000 to Russell 1000 after close on 2021-06-25
+
+-   TBD / Unkown
+
+Markets Go clank! Cover
+
+Major policy announcements, world politics, regularly scheduled economic reports released... Pick your favorite here, cause they will and already have. This cover will justify why the markets are hemorhaging to hide the fact that positions are being liquidated to start paying for buying-back all those GME shares.
+
+-   Market: Global Supply Chain Issue
+
+-   Market: Liquidity Stress Tests
+
+    -   [April 26th, 2021](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mww2ah/dtcc_planning_liquidity_risk_testing_on_26th/)
+
+    -   [May 13th, 2021](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n763vq/dtcc_members_are_having_a_liquidity_check_may_13th/)
+
+    -   Note: As far as I can tell, these happened yearly, typically in April/May, but only once... 2 back to back?
+
+-   Government: ~[POTUS joint address to Congress](https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-nancy-pelosi-coronavirus-pandemic-267e753a5d1ab7a72d3274728b25f63c)\
+    Green New Deal? Capital Gains Announcement: [similar to BS on 2021-04-22?](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-22/biden-to-propose-capital-gains-tax-as-high-as-43-4-for-wealthy)
+
+-   Government: [2021-05-06 Congressional Hearing with SEC / Gensler, DTCC / Bodson, FINRA / Cook.](https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=407762)
+
+-   Government: [2021-05-26+27 Congressional Hearing with Big Banks](https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=407740)
+
+-   Government: Monthly [Consumer Price Index numbers released](https://www.bls.gov/schedule/news_release/cpi.htm), next is June 13th
+
+-   Government: [US Treasury Stability Council Meeting June 11th](https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-treasury-stability-idUSL2N2N638S)\
+    Possible platform for policy announcement? Typically hold 6 +/- a year, but this would be first of 2021 and was postponed from May 21st.
+
+-   Government: [US 2022 Fiscal Year Budget Proposal](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-propose-6-trillion-us-budget-2022-fiscal-year-nyt-2021-05-27/)
+
+-   *(other suggestions wanted)*
+
+4 - Fallguy, and the Lack of Prevention
+
+Opinion - Status: Go for Launch ✅\
+*While they will likely have a fallguy decided upon prior to launch, I don't see it as a necessity that would delay it, certainly not like the Rules of Engagement or Funding would. I also think that nothing would keep them from changing the story if something else influences the narrative in an acceptable way shortly after liftoff.*
+
+Blame!
+
+After the market pain is significant enough that the public wants answers, why not lay all the blame on bad actors, and defer attention from the system to try to avoid additional exterior regulation.
+
+-   SHFs (now liquidated) as overly greedy and got what they deserved
+
+-   Retail (as Anarchists, or greedy and oportunistic)
+
+    -   [Forbes article on January Gamma Squeeze](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvf7r3/forbes_reminder_as_we_hodl_towards_the_moass_gme/gvc5c8f/?context=3)
+
+-   Foreign Actors trying to destabilize the US Markets
+
+-   *(other suggestions w/ sources wanted)*
+
+Control Public Image of the System via PR
+
+-   DTCC: ["We're doing a great job! Take our word for it!"](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvozps/dtcc_trying_to_get_ahead_of_the_story_the_most/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
+
+-   DTCC: "We're announcing our plan to keep working on a plan to kind of band-aid a problem that's pretty bad and we've known about for awhile, and like we have definitely been talking about it and stuff, but now we're like really gonna talk about it using words like "in-depth analysis" cause up to now we were mostly just talking about it like how you tell that one friend *"yeah, we should totally hang out soon"* and then you never do, but not now cause we're serious now, and it's definitely not because we've gotta talk to the US Congress this week or anything. Like, honestly." AKA the announcement of [the DTCC's T+1 Settlement Plan.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n5b91j/dtcc_rolls_out_plan_and_faq_for_a_new_t1/)
+
+* * * * *
+
+...Meanwhile, at the SEC
+
+"Let's at least *look* like we aren't asleep at the wheel here, lads"
+
+-   [Whistleblower Awards](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mrfxvg/secgov_sec_awards_over_50_million_to_joint/)
+
+    -   [47.4% of the Amount of all SEC Whistleblower Awards Ever Given Have Been Awarded in the Last 12 Months (Out of 105 Months of Program Activity)](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nf3n64/474_of_the_amount_of_all_sec_whistleblower_awards/)
+
+-   [Closed door meetings](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mihiv9/another_sec_closed_door_meeting_scheduled_for_48/)
+
+-   [2021-05-27 Sunshine Act Meeting - Scheduled](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhgh3i/sunshine_meeting_rescheduled_may_27/)
+
+    -   These have been cancelled 4 out of 7 times... so far!
+
+-   Speech by SEC Commissioner Peirce inlcuding the line that the SEC is *"working on a report about the events related to meme stock trading earlier this year, and some regulatory initiatives may come out of that work."* and a few other statements about how the SEC shouldn't be concerned with firms loosing money... aka Tough Titties Archegos, et al.\
+    [src post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n2ax63/something_apes_missed_read_this/)
+
+-   [SEC sues HF, filed 5/19/21- states NAKED SHORT SELLING is ILLEGAL and ask FOR a JULY TRIAL!!!](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/nhmaxw/sec_sues_hf_filed_51921_states_naked_short/)
+
+Any and all additions you think may belong on this list, feel free to put in the comments, and I'll try to update and give credit where possible. If I got any of these wrong, or you've found better links that explain the rules, let me know in the comments and I'll make those edits.
+
+Contributions noted where possible, and initial start from previous work on Recent Filings by [/u/Antioch_Orontes](https://www.reddit.com/u/Antioch_Orontes/) [here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/msh5mt/a_brief_overview_of_recent_filings_from_the_dtc/)
+
+Looking for the TL;DR? It's at the top.
+
+* * * * *
+
+Buy. Hodl. Buckle Up.
+
+... and make history.
+
+🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
+
+Edit 2021-05-22:\
+Typos, add expected effective timeframe for DTC-2021-005. May 27th SEC Meeting Scheduled. SEC Lawsuit. Restructured the 3rd/Cover section to clarify for some comments and feedback about why I think cover is important. Also by now I've got plenty of reddit points/currency, so spend new money on GME!
+
+Edit 2021-05-28:\
+SR-OCC-2021-003 approved. Add CPI release as market drop cover, US Treasury meeting, US Budget Proposal.
+
+Edit 2021-06-21:\
+SR-DTC-005 approved and in effect, SR-NSCC-2021-002 / 801 approved. SR-DTC-2021-009 added. Updated expected timeline for SR-NSCC-2021-005
+
+Edit 2021-06-23:\
+SR-DTC-2021-009 updated with additional info. Added move to Russell 1000 as possible cover story (thanks [u/godkyle11](https://reddit.com/user/godkyle11/) for the prompt). Updated section 3 to better illustrate corporate events now in the past.

01-Must-Read/2021-06-24-Dark-Pools-Price-Discovery-and-Short-Selling.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+Dark Pools, Price Discovery and Short Selling/Marking
+=====================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/dlauer](https://www.reddit.com/user/dlauer/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o70lid/dark_pools_price_discovery_and_short/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Recently, and since I've joined this sub-reddit, there have been a ton of questions around the role that Dark Pools play in US equity market structure. I wanted to put together a post to clarify some things about how they operate, what they do, and what they cannot do.
+
+Dark pools were created as part of Regulation ATS (Alternative Trading System) in 1998. Originally they were predominantly ECNs (Electronic Crossing Networks), including ones you're familiar with today as exchanges such as Arca and Direct Edge. Ultimately though, most dark pools after Reg NMS was implemented in 2007 were either broker-owned (such as UBS, Goldman, Credit Suisse and JP Morgan, to name the top 4 DPs today) or independent block trading facilities, such as Liquidnet. Note that I am not discussing OTC trading, which is what Citadel and Virtu do to internalize retail trades. I'll talk about that in a bit.
+
+To understand Dark Pools, and what makes them different from exchanges, you need to understand some regulatory nuances, and some market data characteristics. From a regulatory perspective, it is easier to get approval for a dark pool (regulated by FINRA), than an exchange (regulated by the SEC). This is on purpose - ATSs are supposed to be a way to foster competition and innovation. Unfortunately, that has resulted in 40+ dark pools and extreme off-exchange fragmentation.
+
+Most dark pools are there ostensibly to allow institutional asset managers to post large orders that they do not want to be visible on an exchange. This is the fundamental difference between dark pools and exchanges - no orders are visible on dark pools (hence "dark"), whereas you can have visible orders on exchanges. Now, you can also have hidden orders on exchanges. And there's nothing preventing an ATS from posting quotes (Bloomberg used to do this on the FINRA ADF). However, generally speaking, today, there aren't dark pools that show any posted orders.
+
+So what about trades? All trades in the national market system have to be printed to a SIP feed. It does not matter where they happen. And all trades during regular trading hours (9:30am - 4pm) MUST be within the NBBO. These are hard and fast rules that cannot be violated. All trades on exchanges are reported to the regular SIP. All trades that happen off exchange (ATS or OTC) are reported to the Trade Reporting Facility (TRF) run by NYSE, Nasdaq or FINRA (there are 3 of them). All trades have to be reported to the TRF within 10 seconds of being executed, though the reality is that they are reported nearly instantaneously:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Dark Pools, Price Discovery and Short Selling/Marking](https://preview.redd.it/32d06z9kn7771.png?width=827&format=png&auto=webp&s=726e2d7857e2bf6d1baeea21eff3e696127ed8d5)](https://preview.redd.it/32d06z9kn7771.png?width=827&format=png&auto=webp&s=726e2d7857e2bf6d1baeea21eff3e696127ed8d5)
+
+There was a question on FOX and Twitter yesterday - can hedge funds "go short" in dark pools and not need to report it? I did not mean to be flippant in my tweet about how that is non-sensical, but I had a long day yesterday and had no brain power left. But such a statement is non-sensical. That's not how dark pools work.
+
+There is practically no difference at all between trades executed on-exchange or off-exchange, especially when you're talking about reporting short positions or short sale marking. The rules are identical, regardless. Short-sale marking is not dependent on whether you trade on-exchange or off-exchange. I'm not trying to make a statement as to whether firms are doing it adequately or accurately, but there is no nexus with dark pools here. I also have never heard of this idea that firms will choose whether to execute on-exchange or off-exchange based on where they want "buying pressure" or "selling pressure" to show up. Every sophisticated trading firm out there is watching the TRF and categorizing every trade that takes place relative to the NBBO. Every time a trade happens at the ask (or near it) they characterize that as a buy. Every time a trade happens at the bid (or near it) they characterize it as a sell. You cannot hide what you are doing in dark pools or through OTC internalization - it cannot be done. All trades are public and reported within 10 seconds.
+
+Here's what I think was trying to be said. If trades are taking place OTC, such as retail orders that are being internalized by Citadel or Virtu, both of those firms qualify as Market Makers. Market Makers DO have an exemption for short selling - they are allowed to do so without having located the shares first. However, they still have to mark those sales as "short" and they are still, under standard rules, required to ultimately locate those shares. Again, I'm not trying to get into whether there is naked shorting taking place, or whether these rules are being followed - that's a different conversation. I'm just trying to help you understand that dark pools are not nefarious, and that there is very little difference between dark pools and exchanges from a trading, position marking and reporting perspective.
+
+Ok, so finally, to get to the meat of this - can you use dark pools and off-exchange trading to artificially hold down the price of a stock? I struggle to see the mechanism by which this can be done. I've never heard of it, other than here. As I've said several times, every trade needs to be reported. Every single retail trade that buys GME at the ask is reported to the tape. There's no hiding that. The only market manipulation I've ever studied and measured, and that has been subject to enforcement action by the SEC, has been on exchanges. That is done with layer and spoofing, or other manipulative practices such as banging the close. Retail buying pressure OTC will be picked up on by firms watching the tape, and it will also find its way on to exchanges as the internalizers need to lay off their inventory (they will accumulate shorts, and want to close out those positions). You might claim that this is where naked shorting comes in, but again that's a speculative leap, and really hard to imagine that firms that excel at risk management would put themselves in such a position. I'm not saying it doesn't happen - enforcement actions and lawsuits make it clear that this is an issue. But even if it does happen, the trades to open those short positions were printed to the tape for everyone to see - they cannot be hidden.
+
+tldr; The only difference between dark pools and exchanges is that dark pools don't display quotes, where exchanges do. Dark pool trades are all publicly reported within 10 seconds. You cannot get around short sale marking and position reporting requirements based on where you trade (dark pool or exchange). I don't believe you can suppress the price of a stock through manipulation that only involves dark pools or off-exchange trading, as it is all publicly reported.
+
+EDIT: Let me clear on something: There is WAY too much off-exchange trading. This harms markets. It acts as a disincentive to market makers on lit exchanges. I want market makers on exchanges to make money, and I want open competition for order flow. Off exchange trading is antithetical to those aims. It has its place for institutional orders. But the level of off exchange trading, especially in stocks traded heavily by retail such as GME is a symptom of a broken market structure with intractable conflicts-of-interest, such as PFOF. When the head of NYSE says that the NBBO isn't doing its job for price discovery, this is what she is referring to. If I, as a market maker, post a better bid on-exchange, and then suddenly a bunch of off-exchange trades happen at the price level I just created, then the off-exchange trades are free-riding my quote. They are taking no risk, and reaping the reward, while I take all the risk on-exchange and do not get the trade. That's a real problem in markets, and it's why I have pushed hard for rules to limit dark pool trading, such as you find in Canada, UK, Europe and other markets.

01-Must-Read/House-of-Cards-by-atobitt/2021-05-26-House-of-Cards-Part-II.md

@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
+House of Cards - Part 2
+=======================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/user/atobitt/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nlwaxv/house_of_cards_part_2/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+*Prerequisite DD:*
+
+1.  [Citadel Has No Clothes](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m4c0p4/citadel_has_no_clothes/)
+
+2.  [The EVERYTHING Short](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgucv2/the_everything_short/)
+
+3.  [The House of Cards -- Part 1](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvk5dv/a_house_of_cards_part_1/)
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+TL;DR- No freaking way I can do that.
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+1. Pilot
+
+I wasn't looking into GameStop when all of this began. Most of my time was spent researching the pandemic's impact on the economy. I'm talking about the economic steam engine that employs people and puts food on their tables. Especially the small businesses that were executively steamrolled by COVID lockdowns. It was scary how fast they had to close their doors.
+
+I spent a lot of time looking at companies like GameStop. Brick-n-mortar businesses were basically running out of bricks to sh*t. Frankly, GameStop looked a lot like the next Blockbuster and it just seemed like a matter of time before they went under. Had DFV not done his homework, it's possible we wouldn't have a rocket to HODL or a story to TODL.
+
+Whoever has/had a short position with GameStop was probably thinking the same thing. The number of shares that can be freely traded on a daily basis is referred to as "the float". GameStop has 70,000,000 shares outstanding, but 50,000,000 shares represented "the float". With a small float like this, a [short position of 20% becomes significant](https://bullishbears.com/vw-short-squeeze/). Heck, Volkswagen got squozed with just a [12.8%](https://bullishbears.com/vw-short-squeeze/) short position. So let's use little numbers to walk through an example of how this works.
+
+Assume VW has 100 shares outstanding. If 12.8% of the company has been sold short, then 12.8 shares (let's just say 13) must be available to purchase at a later date (assuming VW doesn't go bankrupt). However, VW had a float of 45% which meant there was no real strain to cover that 12.8% short position at any moment. However, when Porsche announced they wanted to increase their position in VW, they invested HEAVILY.
+
+*"The kicker was that Porsche owned 43% of VW shares, 32% in options, and the government owned 20.2%.... In plain terms, it meant that the actual available float went from 45% down to 1% of outstanding shares" (bullishbears.com/vw-short-squeeze/).*
+
+Let's revisit our scenario. With 100 shares outstanding and 13 shares sold short, what happens if only 1 share was available to cover instead of 45?
+
+Well..... THIS:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 2](https://preview.redd.it/c1n24ypq5k171.jpg?width=348&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2401d50c3ec1197e08564be1ffbd643558e52b6a)](https://preview.redd.it/c1n24ypq5k171.jpg?width=348&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2401d50c3ec1197e08564be1ffbd643558e52b6a)
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+GameStop is/was the victim of price suppression through short selling. I discussed this topic with [Dr. T](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGVY2Kco8ng) and [Carl Hagberg](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHnpPfWdf78) in [our AMAs.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHnpPfWdf78) Every transaction has two sides- a buy and a sell. Short selling artificially increases the *supply* of shares and causes the price to decline. When this happens, the price can only increase if *demand* exceeds the increase in supply.
+
+I started looking closely at GameStop after confirming their reported short position of [140%](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-retail-trading-congress-shorting/short-selling-under-spotlight-in-gamestop-hearing-idUSKBN2AJ026). It's important for me explain this why this is so much different than the VW example...
+
+140% of GameStop's FLOAT was sold short. There were 50,000,000 shares in that float, so 140% of this was equal to the 70,000,000 shares the company has outstanding. This means AT LEAST 100% of their outstanding shares has been sold short. Now compare that to VW where the short position was only 12.8%... Simply put, it is mathematically impossible to cover more than 100% of a company's outstanding stock.
+
+The *peak* of the VW squeeze was reached when the demand for shares became surpassed by the supply of those shares. Here, demand represents 12.8% of their stock which must be available to close the short position. With only 1% of shares available, this guaranteed a squeeze until the number of shares available to trade could satisfy the remaining short interest.
+
+When a company has a short position with more than 100% of total shares outstanding, the preceding argument is thrown out the window. Supply cannot surpass demand because the company can only issue 100% of itself at any given time. Therefore, the additional 40% could only be explained by multiple people claiming ownership of the same share... Surely this is a mistake.. right? I thought this level of short selling was impossible..
+
+..Until I saw the number of short selling violations issued by FINRA..
+
+As we go through these FINRA reports, there are a few things to keep in mind:
+
+1.  FINRA is not a part of the government. FINRA is a non-profit entity with [regulatory powers set by congress](https://www.finra.org/about). This makes FINRA the largest self-regulatory organization (SRO) in the United States. The SEC is responsible for setting rules which protect individual investors; FINRA is responsible for overseeing most of the brokers (collectively referred to as members) in the US. As an SRO, FINRA sets the rules by which their members must comply- they are not directly regulated by the SEC
+
+2.  FINRA investigates cases at their own pace. When looking at the "*Date Initiated"* on their reports, it is not synonymous with "*date of occurrence".* Many times, FINRA will not say when a problem occurred, just resolved. It can be YEARS after the initial occurrence. The [DTC participant report](https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/client-center/DTC/alpha.pdf) is littered with cases that were initiated in 2019 but occurred in 2015, etc. Many of the violations occurring today will take years to discover
+
+3.  FINRA can issue a violation for each occurrence using a 1:1 format. When it comes to violations like short selling, however, these "occurrences" can last months or even years. When this happens, FINRA issues a violation for multiple occurrences using a 1:MANY format. I discussed this event in [Citadel Has No Clothes](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m4c0p4/citadel_has_no_clothes/) where one violation represented FOUR YEARS of market f*ckery. What's sh*tty is that FINRA doesn't tell you which violations are which. You have to read each line and see if they mention a date range of occurrence within each record. If they don't, you must assume it was for one event... BRUTAL
+
+4.  FINRA's investment portfolio is held by the same entities they are issuing violations to... Let that sink in for a minute
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+2. State your case...
+
+Can you think of a reason why short sellers would want to understate their short positions? Put yourself in their situation and imagine you're running a hedge fund...
+
+You operate in a self-regulated (SRO) environment and your records are basically private. If the SEC asks you to justify suspicious behavior, you really don't have to provide it. The worst that could happen is a slap on the wrist. I wrote about this EXACT same thing in [Citadel Has No Clothes](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m4c0p4/citadel_has_no_clothes/). They received a cease-and-desist order from the SEC on 12/10/2018 for failing to submit complete and accurate records. This 'occurred' from November 2012 through April 2016 and contained deficient information for over 80,000,000 trades. Their punishment... $3,500,000... So why even bother keeping an honest ledger?
+
+Now, suppose you short a bunch of shares into the market. When you report this to FINRA, they require you to mark the transaction with a short sale indicator. In doing so, FINRA builds a paper trail to your short selling activity.
+
+However... if you omit this indicator, FINRA can't distinguish that transaction from a long sale. Who else would there be to hold you accountable for covering your position? This is especially true for self-clearing organizations like Citadel because there are less parties involved to hold you accountable with recordkeeping. If FINRA thinks you physically owned those shares and sold them (long sale), they have no reason to revisit that transaction in the future... You could literally pocket the cash and dump the commitment to cover.
+
+Another very important advantage is that it allows short sellers to artificially increase the supply of shares while understating the outstanding short interest on that security. The supply of shares being sold will drive down the price, while the short interest on the stock remains the same.
+
+So.. aside from paying a fine, how could you possibly lose by "forgetting" to mark that trade with a short sale indicator? It would seem the system almost incentivizes this type of behavior.
+
+I combed through the [DTC participant report](https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/client-center/DTC/alpha.pdf) and found enough dirt to fill the empty chasm that is Ken Griffin's soul. Take a guess at what their most common short selling violation is.. I'm going to assume you said "FAILING TO PROPERLY MARK A SHORT SALE TRANSACTION".
+
+For the record, I just want to say I called this in March when I wrote [Citadel Has No Clothes](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m4c0p4/citadel_has_no_clothes/). Citadel has one of the highest concentrations of short selling violations in their FINRA report. At the time, I didn't fully understand the consequences of this violation... After seeing how many participants received the same penalty, it finally made sense.
+
+There are roughly 240 participant account names on the DTC's list. Sh*t you not, I looked at every short selling violation that was published on [Brokercheck.finra.org](https://brokercheck.finra.org/). To be fair, I eliminated participants with only 1 or 2 violations related to short selling. There were PLENTY of bigger fish to fry.
+
+I literally picked the first participant at the top of the list and found three violations for short selling.
+
+*cracks knuckles*
+
+[ABN AMRO Clearing Chicago LLC](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_14020.pdf) (AACC) is the 3rd largest bank in the Netherlands. They got popped for three short selling violations, one of which included a failure-to-deliver. In total, they have 78 violations from FINRA. Several of these are severe compared to their violations for short selling. However, the short selling violations revealed a MUCH bigger story:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 2](https://preview.redd.it/3t5ylyfz5k171.jpg?width=1055&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f961999d09eeee7fbe42364700cbc727869f9e3f)](https://preview.redd.it/3t5ylyfz5k171.jpg?width=1055&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f961999d09eeee7fbe42364700cbc727869f9e3f)
+
+So... ABN AMRO submitted an inaccurate short interest position to the NYSE and FINRA and lacked the proper supervisory systems to comply with... practically everything...
+
+In 2014, AMRO forked over $95,000 to settle this and didn't even say they were sorry.
+
+In these situations, it's easy to think *"meh, could have been a fluke event"*. So I took a closer look and found violations by the same participants which made it much harder to argue their case of sheer negligence. Here are a couple for AMRO:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 2](https://preview.redd.it/vir299076k171.jpg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e17e6ceff040a4be0113c1bc4e435f29fb5ce0a6)](https://preview.redd.it/vir299076k171.jpg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e17e6ceff040a4be0113c1bc4e435f29fb5ce0a6)
+
+ABN AMRO got slapped with a $1,000,000 fine for understating capital requirements, failing to maintain accurate books, and failing to supervise employees. If you mess up once or twice but end up fixing the problem- GREAT. When your primary business is to clear trades and you fail THIS bad, there is a much bigger problem going on. It gets hard to defend this as an accident when every stage of the trade recording process is fundamentally flawed. The following screenshot came from the same violation:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 2](https://preview.redd.it/mnpm2gz96k171.jpg?width=733&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7e5c66293566b7ca2329f20bcdb634c35395943f)](https://preview.redd.it/mnpm2gz96k171.jpg?width=733&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7e5c66293566b7ca2329f20bcdb634c35395943f)
+
+[Warehouse receipts](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/warehousereceipt.asp#:~:text=A%20warehouse%20receipt%20is%20used,well%20as%20provide%20inventory%20management.) are like the receipts you get after buying lumber online. You can print these out and take them to Home-Depot, where you exchange them for the ACTUAL lumber in the store. Instead of trading the actual goods, you can trade a warehouse receipt instead... so yeah... since this ONE record allowed AMRO to meet their customer's margin requirement, it seems EXTREMELY suspicious that they didn't appropriately remove it once they were withdrawn.
+
+Do I think this was an accident? F*ck no. Because FINRA reported them 8 years later for doing the SAME F*CKING THING:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 2](https://preview.redd.it/sv0v5igw6k171.jpg?width=1071&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=02f17082135c702fad6bbc064073ae031151cee7)](https://preview.redd.it/sv0v5igw6k171.jpg?width=1071&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=02f17082135c702fad6bbc064073ae031151cee7)
+
+Once again, AMRO got caught understating their margin requirements. Last time, they used the value of withdrawn warehouse receipts to meet their margin requirements. Here, they're using securities which weren't eligible for margin to meet their margin requirements..
+
+You can paint apple orange, but it's still an apple..
+
+The bullsh*t I read about in these reports doesn't really shock me anymore. It's actually the opposite.. You begin to *expect* bigger fines as they set higher benchmarks for misconduct. When I find a case like AMRO, I'll usually put more time into it because certain citations represent puzzle pieces. Once you find enough pieces, you can see the bigger picture. So believe me when I say I was genuinely shocked by the [detail report](https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/2016049875801%20ABN%20AMRO%20Clearing%20Chicago%20LLC%20CRD%2014020%20AWC%20va%20%282019-1572740384682%29.pdf) on this case...
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 2](https://preview.redd.it/4lgyti547k171.jpg?width=844&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=633a928d28caef8cc6719873532aef60f271cefb)](https://preview.redd.it/4lgyti547k171.jpg?width=844&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=633a928d28caef8cc6719873532aef60f271cefb)
+
+This has been going on for 8 F*CKING YEARS!?
+
+Without a doubt, this is a great example of a violation where the misconduct supposedly *ended* in 2015 but took another 4 years for FINRA to publish the d*mn report. If my math is correct, the 8 year "relevant period" plus the 4 years FINRA spent... I don't know... reviewing?... yields a total of 12 years. In other words, from the time this problem started to the time it was publicized by FINRA, the kids in 1st grade had graduated high school...
+
+Does anyone else think these self-regulatory organizations (SROs) are doing a terrible job self-regulating...? How we can trust these situations are appropriately monitored if it takes 12 years for a sh*t blossom to bloom?
+
+...OH! I almost forgot... After understating their margin requirements in 22 accounts for over 8 years, ABN AMRO paid a $150,000 fine to settle the dust...
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+I know that was a sh*t load of information so let me summarize it for you:
+
+One of the most common citations occurs when a firm "accidently" marks a short sale as long, or misreports short interest positions to FINRA. When a short sale occurs, that transaction should be marked with a short sale indicator. Despite this, many participants do it to avoid the borrow requirements set by Regulation SHO. If they mark a short sale as long, they are not required to locate a borrow because FINRA doesn't know it's a short sale.
+
+This is why so many of these FINRA violations include a statement about the broker failing to locate a borrow along with the failure to mark a short sale indicator on the transaction. It literally means the broker was naked short selling a stock and telling FINRA they physically owned that share..
+
+Suddenly, a "small" violation had much bigger implications. The number of short shares that have been excluded from the short interest calculation is directly related to these violations... and there are HUNDREDS of them. Who knows how many companies have under reported short interest positions..
+
+To be clear, I did NOT choose them based on the amount of 'dirt' they had. AMRO's violations were like grains of sand on a beach and It's going to take A LOT of dirt to fill the bottomless pit that is Ken Griffin's soul. Frankly, ABN AMRO wouldn't get us there with 10,000 FINRA violations. So without further ado, let's get dirty..
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+2. Call em' out...
+
+When FINRA publishes one of their reports, the granular details like numbers and dates are often left out. This makes it impossible to determine how systematic a particular issue might be.
+
+For example, if you know that *"XYZ failed to comply with FINRA's short interest reporting requirements"* your only conclusion is that the violation occurred. However, if you know that *"XYZ failed to comply with FINRA's short interest reporting requirements on 15,000 transactions during 2020"* you can start investigating the magnitude of that violation. If XYZ only completed 100,000 transactions in 2020, it means 15% of their transactions failed to meet requirements. This represents a major systematic risk to XYZ and the parties it conducts business with.
+
+I spent some time analyzing [Apex Clearing Corporation](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_13071.pdf) after I left ABN AMRO. Apex is 8th on the list and the 2nd participant I found with an evident short selling problem.
+
+In 2019, FINRA initiated a case against Apex for doing the same sh*t as ABN AMRO. However, the magnitude of this violation really put things into perspective: I got a small taste of how f*cked this house of cards truly is..
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 2](https://preview.redd.it/u1b4zh6m7k171.jpg?width=1076&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0f14f5fa49e73dad79ff605464fc1c64fa73f5bd)](https://preview.redd.it/u1b4zh6m7k171.jpg?width=1076&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0f14f5fa49e73dad79ff605464fc1c64fa73f5bd)
+
+This is practically a template of the first ABN AMRO violation we discussed. To see the difference, we need to look at their [letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent](https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/2016049448301%20Apex%20Clearing%20Corporation%20CRD%2013071%20AWC%20va%20%282019-1573777189509%29.pdf) (AWC)..
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 2](https://preview.redd.it/zaiywobp7k171.jpg?width=938&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7fe2d2323e757efcdedf2ab22aa1ff34e10d7d55)](https://preview.redd.it/zaiywobp7k171.jpg?width=938&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7fe2d2323e757efcdedf2ab22aa1ff34e10d7d55)
+
+Let's break this down step-by-step...
+
+Apex had an issue for 47 months where certain customers recorded their short positions in an account which was NOT being sent to FINRA. It only takes a few wrinkles on the brain to realize this is a problem. The sample data tells us just how bad that problem is..
+
+When you see the term "*settlement days",* think "[T+2](https://www.schwab.com/resource-center/insights/content/stock-settlement-why-you-need-to-understand-t2-timeline#:~:text=the%20seller's%20account.-,When%20does%20settlement%20occur%3F,would%20typically%20settle%20on%20Wednesday.)". Apex follows the T+2 settlement period for both [cash accounts and margin accounts](https://www.apexclearing.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Apex-Customer-Information-Brochure-2019.pdf) which means the trade *should* clear 2 days after the original trade date. When you buy stock on a Monday, it should settle by Wednesday.
+
+Ok.. quick maff...
+
+There are roughly [252 trading days](https://therobusttrader.com/how-many-trading-days-are-there-in-a-year/) in one year after removing weekends and holidays. Throughout the 47 month "review period", we can safely assume that Apex had roughly 987 ((252/ 12) * 47) settlement dates...
+
+In other words: 256 misstated reports over 47 months is more than 1 misstatement / week for nearly 4 years. Tell me again how this is *trivial?*
+
+The wording of the "sample settlement" section is a bit ambiguous... It doesn't clarify if those were the only 2 settlement dates they sampled, or if they were the only settlement dates with reportable issues. Honestly, I would be shocked if it was the latter because auditors don't examine every record, but I can't be certain...
+
+Anyway... FINRA discovered 256 short interest positions, consisting of 481,195 shares, were *incorrectly* excluded from their short interest report. In addition, they understated the share count by 879,321 in 130 separate short interest positions. Together, this makes 1,360,516 shares that were excluded from the short interest calculation. When you realize nearly 1.5 million 'excluded' shares were discovered in just 2 settlement periods and there were almost 1,000 dates to choose from, it seriously dilates the imagination...
+
+Once again... FINRA wiped the slate clean for just $140,000...
+
+I want to talk about one last thing before we jump to the next section. Did you happen to notice the different account types that Apex discussed in their [letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent](https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/2016049448301%20Apex%20Clearing%20Corporation%20CRD%2013071%20AWC%20va%20%282019-1573777189509%29.pdf) ? They specifically instructed their customers to book short positions into a TYPE 1 (CASH) account, or TYPE 5 (SHORT MARGIN) account. A short margin account is just a margin account that holds short positions. The margin requirement for short positions are more strict than regular margin accounts, so I can see the advantage in separating them.
+
+In the [AMA with Wes Christian](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rJujnpKiqM) *(starting at 7:30)*, he specifically discussed how a broker-dealer's margin account is used to locate shares for short sellers. However, the margin account contains shares that were previously pledged to another party. Given the lack of oversight in securities lending, the problem keeps compounding each time a new borrower claims ownership of that share.
+
+Now think back to the situation with Apex..
+
+They asked their customers to book short positions to a short-margin account or a cash account. The user agreement with a margin account allows Apex to continue lending those securities at any time. As discussed with Dr. T and Carl Hagberg, the broker collects interest for lending your margin shares and doesn't pay you anything in return. When multiple locates are authorized for the same share, the broker collects multiple lending fees on the same share.
+
+In contrast, the cash account falls under the protection of [SEA 15c3-3](https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/SEA.Rule_.15c3-3.pdf) and consists of shares that have not been leveraged- or lent- like the margin-short account. According to Wes *(starting at 8:30)*, these shares are segregated and cannot be touched. The broker cannot encumber-or restrict- them in any way. However, according to Wes, this is currently happening. He also explained how Canada has legalized this and currently allows broker-dealers to short sell your cash account shares against you.
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+Alright.... I'll stop beating the dead horse regarding short sale indicators & inaccurate submissions of short interest positions. Given the volume of citations we haven't discussed, I'll summarize some of my findings, below.
+
+Keep in mind these are ONLY for "FAILURE TO REPORT SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS" or "FAILURE TO INDICATE A SHORT SALE MODIFIER". If the violations contain additional information, it's because that citation actually listed additional information. It does NOT represent an all-inclusive list of short selling violations for these participants.
+
+...You wanted to know how systematic this problem is, so here you go... *(EACH BROKER-DEALER NAME IS HYPERLINKED TO THEIR FINRA REPORT)*
+
+1.  [Barclays](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_19714.pdf) | Disclosure 36 -- "SUBMITTED 86 SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS TOTALING 41,100,154 SHARES WHEN THE ACTUAL SHORT INTEREST POSITION WAS 44,535,151 SHARES.. FAILED TO REPORT 8 SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS TOTALING 1,110,420 SHARES"
+
+a. $10,000 FINE
+
+2\. [Barclays](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_19714.pdf) | Disclosure 54 -- "SUBMITTED AN INACCURATE SHORT INTEREST POSITION TO FINRA AND FAILED TO REPORT ITS SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS IN 835 POSITIONS TOTALING 87,562,328 SHARES"
+
+a. $155,000 FINE
+
+3\. [BMO Capital Markets Corp](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_16686.pdf) | Disclosure 23 -- "SUBMITTED SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS TO FINRA THAT WERE INCORRECT AND FAILED TO REPORT TO FINRA ITS SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS TOTALING OVER 72 MILLION SHARES FOR 11 MONTHS"
+
+a. $90,000 FINE
+
+4\. [BNP Paribas Securities Corp](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_15794.pdf) | Disclosure 53 -- "FAILED TO REPORT TO FINRA ITS SHORT INTEREST IN 2,509 POSITIONS TOTALING 6,051,974 SHARES"
+
+a. $30,000 FINE
+
+5\. [BNP Paribas Securities Corp](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_15794.pdf) | Disclosure 9 -- "ON 35 OCCASIONS OVER A FOUR-MONTH PERIOD, A HEDGE FUND SUBMITTED SALE ORDERS MARKED "LONG" TO BNP FOR CLEARING. FOR EACH OF THOSE "LONG" SALES, ON THE MORNING OF SETTLEMENT, THE HEDGE FUND DID NOT HAVE THE SHARES IN IT'S BNP ACCOUNT TO COVER THE SALE ORDER. IN ADDITION, BNP WAS ROUTINELY NOTIFIED THAT THE HEDGE FUND WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO COVER. NEVERTHELESS, WHEN EACH SETTLEMENT DATE ARRIVED AND THE HEDGE FUND WAS UNABLE TO COVER, BNP LOANED THE SHARES TO THE HEDGE FUND. IN TOTAL, BNP LOANED MORE THAN 8,000,000 SHARES TO COVER THESE PURPORTED "LONG" SALES"
+
+a. $250,000 FINE
+
+6\. [Cantor Fitzgerald & Co](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_134.pdf) | Disclosure 1 - (literally came out on 5/6/2021) -- "THE FIRM SUBMITTED INACCURATE SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS TO FINRA. THE FIRM OVERREPORTED NEARLY [55,000,000 SHORT SHARES](https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/2018059464001%20Cantor%20Fitzgerald%20%26%20Co.%20CRD%20134%20AWC%20va.pdf) WHICH WERE CUSTODIED WITH AND ALREADY REPORTED BY ITS CLEARING FIRM, WITH WHICH CANTOR MAINTAINS A FULLY DISCLOSED CLEARING AGREEMENT"
+
+a. $250,000 FINE
+
+7\. [Cantor Fitzgerald & Co](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_134.pdf) | Disclosure 31 - "...THE FIRM EXECUTED NUMEROUS SHORT SALE ORDERS AND FAILED TO PROPERLY MARK THE ORDERS AS SHORT... THE FIRM, ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS, ACCEPTED SHORT SALE ORDERS IN AN EQUITY SECURITY FROM ANOTHER PERSON, OR EFFECTED A SHORT SALE FROM ITS OWN ACCOUNT WITHOUT BORROWING THE SECURITY..."
+
+a. $53,500 FINE
+
+8\. [Cantor Fitzgerald & Co](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_134.pdf) | Disclosure 33 - "...EXECUTED SHORT SALE ORDERS AND FAILED TO PROPERLY MARK THE ORDERS AS SHORT. THE FIRM HAD FAIL-TO-DELIVER POSITIONS AT A REGISTERED CLEARING AGENCY IN THRESHOLD SECURITIES FOR 13 CONSECUTIVE SETTLEMENT DAYS... FAILED TO IMMEDIATELY CLOSE OUT FTD POSITIONS... ACCEPTED SHORT SALE ORDERS FROM ANOTHER PERSON, OR EFFECTED A SHORT SALE FROM ITS OWN ACCOUNT, WITHOUT BORROWING THE SECURITY OR HAVING REASONABLE GROUNDS TO BELIEVE THAT THE SECURITY COULD BE BORROWED..."
+
+a. $125,000 FINE
+
+9\. [Canaccord Genuity Corp](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_1020.pdf) | Disclosure 17 - "THE FIRM EXECUTED SALE TRANSACTIONS AND FAILED TO REPORT EACH OF THESE TRANSACTIONS TO THE FINRA/NASDAQ TRADE REPORTING FACILITY AS SHORT"
+
+a. $57,500 FINE
+
+10\. [Canaccord Genuity Corp](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_1020.pdf) | Disclosure 20 - "THE FIRM EXECUTED SHORT SALE ORDERS AND FAILED TO PROPERLY MARK THE ORDERS AS SHORT"
+
+a. $27,500 FINE
+
+11\. [Canaccord Genuity Corp](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_1020.pdf) | Disclosure 31 - "...SUBMITTED TO NASD MONTHLY SHORT INTEREST POSITION REPORTS THAT WERE INACCURATE"
+
+a. $85,000 FINE
+
+12\. Citadel Securities LLC | [Citadel Has No Clothes](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m4c0p4/citadel_has_no_clothes/) -- LITERALLY ALL I TALK ABOUT IN THAT POST. GO READ IT
+
+13\. [Citigroup Global Markets](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_7059.pdf) | Disclosure 10 -- "THE FIRMS TRADING PLATFORM FAILED TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE FIRM WAS SELLING SHORT WHEN IT WAS ACTING AS THE CONTRA PARTY TO A CUSTOMER TRADE. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM ERRONEOUSLY REPORTED SHORT SALES TO A FINRA TRADE REPORTING FACILITY AS LONG SALES... EFFECTING SHORT SALES FROM ITS OWN ACCOUNT WITHOUT BORROWING THE SECURITY..."
+
+a. $225,000 FINE
+
+14\. [Citigroup Global Markets](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_7059.pdf) | Disclosure 59 -- "...THE FIRM RECORDED 203,653 SHORT SALE EXECUTIONS ON ITS BOOKS AND RECORDS AS LONG SALES, SUBMITTED INACCURATE ORDER ORIGINATION CODES AND ACCOUNT TYPE CODES TO THE AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM FOR APPROXIMATELY 2,775,338 ORDERS... "
+
+a. $300,000 FINE
+
+15\. [Citigroup Global Markets](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_7059.pdf) | Disclosure 76 -- "...FAILED TO PROPERLY MARK APPROXIMATELY 9,717,875 SALE ORDERS AS SHORT SALES... FINDINGS ALSO ESTIMATED THAT THE FIRM ENTERED 55 MILLION ORDERS INTO THE NASDAQ MARKET CENTER THAT IT FAILED TO CORRECTLY INDICATE AS SHORT SALES..."
+
+a. $2,250,000 FINE
+
+16\. [Cowen and Company LLC](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_7616.pdf) | Several Disclosures -- almost every other disclosure is for failing to mark a sale with the appropriate indicator, including short AND long sale indicators
+
+17\. [Credit Suisse Securities LLC](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_816.pdf) | Disclosure 34 -- "NEW ORDER REPORTS WERE INACCURATELY ENTERED INTO ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM (OATS) AS LONG SALES BUT WERE TRADE REPORTED WITH A SHORT SALE INDICATOR"
+
+a. $50,000 FINE
+
+18\. [Credit Suisse Securities LLC](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_816.pdf) | Disclosure 95 -- "BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 2006 AND JUNE 2008, CREDIT SUISSE FAILED TO SUBMIT ACCURATE PERIODIC REPORTS WITH RESPECT TO SHORT POSITIONS..."
+
+a. $40,000 FINE
+
+19\. [Deutsche Bank Securities INC.](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_2525.pdf) | Disclosure 50 -- "THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS IN DUALLY-LISTED SECURITIES"
+
+a. $200,000 FINE
+
+20\. [Deutsche Bank Securities INC.](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_2525.pdf) | Disclosure 52 -- "THE FIRM... EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE PROBLEMS WITH ITS BLUE SHEET SYSTEM THAT CAUSED IT TO SUBMIT INACCURATE BLUE SHEETS TO THE SEC AND FINRA... INCORRECTLY REPORTED LONG ON ITS BLUE SHEET TRANSACTIONS WHEN CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS SHOULD HAVE BEEN MARKED SHORT"
+
+a. $6,000,000 FINE (SEVERAL OTHER ISSUES REPORTED IN ADDITION TO SHORTS)
+
+21\. [Deutsche Bank Securities INC.](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_2525.pdf) | Disclosure 58 -- "BETWEEN JANUARY 2005 AND CONTINUING THROUGH NOVEMBER 2015, THE FIRM IMPROPERLY INCLUDED THE AGGREGATION OF NET POSITIONS IN CERTAIN SECURITIES OF A NON-US BROKER AFFILIATE... IN ADDITION... DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN APRIL 2004 AND SEPTEMBER 2012, THE FIRM INAPPROPRIATELY REPORTED CERTAIN SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS ON A NET, INSTEAD OF GROSS, BASIS.."
+
+a. $1,400,000 FINE
+
+22\. [Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_361.pdf) | Disclosure 32 -- "THE FIRM REPORTED SHORT SALE TRANSACTIONS TO FINRA TRADE REPORTING FACILITY WITHOUT THE REQUIRED SHORT SALE MODIFIER"
+
+a. $260,000 FINE (SEVERAL OTHER ISSUES REPORTED IN ADDITION TO SHORTS)
+
+23\. [Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_361.pdf) | Disclosure 54 -- "FAILED TO ACCURATELY APPEND THE SHORT SALE INDICATOR TO FINRA/NASDAQ TRADE REPORTING FACILITY REPORTS... INACCURATELY MARKED SELL TRANSACTIONS ON ITS TRADING LEDGER"
+
+a. $55,000 FINE
+
+24\. [Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_361.pdf) | Disclosure 63 -- "...SUBMITTED TO FINRA AND THE SEC BLUE SHEETS THAT INACCURATELY REPORTED CERTAIN SHORT SALE TRANSACTIONS AS LONG SALE TRANSACTIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE FIRM SIDE OF CUSTOMER FACILITATION TRADES... THE FIRM REPORTED SHORT SALES AS LONG SALES ON ITS BLUE SHEETS WHEN THE TRADING DESK USED A PARTICULAR MIDDLE OFFICE SYSTEM..."
+
+a. $1,000,000 FINE
+
+25\. [Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_361.pdf) | Disclosure 150 -- "GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. FAILED TO REPORT SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS FOR FOREIGN SECURITIES AND NUMEROUS SHARES ONE MONTH... THE FIRM REPORTED SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS IN SECURITIES TOTALING SEVERAL MILLION SHARES EACH TIME WHEN THE ACTUAL SHORT INTEREST POSITIONS IN THE SECURITIES WERE ZERO SHARES... ACCEPTING A SHORT SALE ORDER IN AN EQUITY SECURITY FROM ANOTHER PERSON, OR EFFECTED A SHORT SALE FROM ITS OWN ACCOUNT, WITHOUT BORROWING THE SECURITY OR BELIEVING THE SECURITY COULD BE BORROWED ON THE DATE OF DELIVERY..."
+
+a. $120,000 FINE
+
+26\. [Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_361.pdf) | Disclosure 167 -- "...THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT TO THE NMC THE CORRECT SYMBOL INDICATING THAT THE TRANSACTION WAS A SHORT SALE FOR TRANSACTIONS IN REPORTABLE SECURITIES..."
+
+a. $600,000 FINE (SEVERAL OTHER ISSUES REPORTED IN ADDITION TO SHORTS)
+
+27\. [HSBC Securities (USA) INC.](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_19585.pdf) | Disclosure 26 -- "FIRM EXECUTED SHORT SALE TRANSACTIONS AND FAILED TO MARK THEM AS SHORT... HSBC SECURITIES HAD A FAIL-TO-DELIVER SECURITY FOR 13 CONSECUTIVE SETTLEMENT DAYS AND FAILED TO IMMEDIATELY CLOSE OUT THE FTD POSITION... THE FIRM CONTINUED TO HAVE A FTD IN THE SECURITY AT A CLEARING AGENCY ON 79 ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT DAYS..."
+
+a. $65,000 FINE
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+I'm going to stop at 'H' because I'm tired of writing. Hopefully, you all understand the point so far. We're only 8 letters into the alphabet and have successfully buried Ken to his waist.
+
+The system that is used to mark the proper transaction type (sell, buy, short sell, short sell exempt, etc.) is obviously broken... There, I said it.. the system is INDUBITABLY, UNDOUBTEDLY, INEVITABLY F*CKED..
+
+Regardless of the cause- fraud or negligence- there are too many firms failing to accomplish a seemingly simple task. The consequences of which are creating far more shares than we can imagine. It's a gigantic domino effect. If you fail to properly mark 1,000,000 short shares and a year goes by without catching the problem, it's already too late. They're like the f*cking replicators from Stargate..
+
+In each of the examples listed above, the short interest on the stock was understated by the number of shares excluded... and that was just a handful..
+
+Knowing this, how can someone look at the evidence and say it's *trivial....?*
+
+No one really knows HOW systematic this issue is because it is so deeply incorporated in the market that it has BECOME the system itself. Therefore, there is obviously something much deeper going on, here.. How does one argue against the severity of these problems after reading this? There are FAR too many things that don't make sense and FAR too many people turning a blind eye..
+
+The only conclusion I keep coming back to is that the people with money know what's going on and are desperately trying to keep it under wraps..
+
+..So.... In an effort to prove this, I looked for violations that showed their desperation to protect this f*cked up system.
+
+..Buckle up..
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+*HOUSE OF CARDS - PART 3 (I'm uploading it now; will link ASAP)*

01-Must-Read/House-of-Cards-by-atobitt/2021-05-26-House-of-Cards-Part-III.md

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+House of Cards - Part 3
+=======================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/user/atobitt/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nlwqyv/house_of_cards_part_3/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+*Prerequisite DD:*
+
+1.  [Citadel Has No Clothes](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m4c0p4/citadel_has_no_clothes/)
+
+2.  [The EVERYTHING Short](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgucv2/the_everything_short/)
+
+3.  [The House of Cards -- Part 1](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvk5dv/a_house_of_cards_part_1/)
+
+4.  [The House of Cards - Part 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nlwaxv/house_of_cards_part_2/)
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+TL;DR- No freaking way I can do that.
+
+_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+Continuing from HOC Part II...
+
+4. Slimy...
+
+If you watched the [AMA with Wes Christian](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rJujnpKiqM), he talks about the number of occurrences where the actual short interest is severely understated based on the data his firm obtained for legal proceedings. According to his numbers, in most cases the short interest is 50% - 150% MORE than what is reported by the SEC *(starting at 14:30).*
+
+The objective isn't to address the issue: it's to keep the issue hidden. Firms that underreport their short interest are gaming the system by taking advantage of how the short interest calculation is done. When the SEC relies on reports that broker-dealers provide, and FINRA takes YEARS to reveal the lies within those reports, the broker-dealer can lie without immediately facing the consequences. It allows these firms to operate in a high-risk environment without exposing just HOW big their risk-appetite is.
+
+Another example that Wes mentioned was [Merrill Lynch](https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2016-128.html). Merrill was fined [$415,000,000](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_16139.pdf) *(violation 3)* in 2016 for using securities held in their customer's accounts to cover their own trades. Check out this screenshot I took from that case:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/v9625j8wek171.jpg?width=1115&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=85d43bc351fbda75e347bd33a1a550b67dda970e)](https://preview.redd.it/v9625j8wek171.jpg?width=1115&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=85d43bc351fbda75e347bd33a1a550b67dda970e)
+
+Remember when we mentioned [SEA 15c3-3](https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/SEA.Rule_.15c3-3.pdf) in the case with Apex? They were asking customers to book short positions to either a cash account or a short margin account. [SEA 15c3-3](https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/SEA.Rule_.15c3-3.pdf) protects those customers from allowing brokers to lend out the securities within their cash accounts...
+
+Well Merrill Lynch knocked that one right out of the f*cking park...
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/s3zok5wyek171.jpg?width=1129&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=815e5344912234ceba846dc0d45c8b8b488b82c4)](https://preview.redd.it/s3zok5wyek171.jpg?width=1129&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=815e5344912234ceba846dc0d45c8b8b488b82c4)
+
+Merrill made it seem like the required deposit in their customer reserve account was much lower than it truly was. They wouldn't have been able to use that cash if it reduced the amount below the minimum capital requirement, so they found a way to fudge the numbers. In doing so, they managed to prevent a CODE RED while reaping the benefits of a high-risk 'opportunity'. Should Merrill have filed bankruptcy during that time, those customers would have been completely blindsided.
+
+In the case of short selling, the *true* exposure of short interest is unknown... and I'm not just talking about the short sale indicator. When a firm fails to deliver securities that were sold short, there's a pretty good indication that they've exposed themselves to a bit of a problem.. Now imagine a case where the FTDs start piling up and they STILL continue to short sell that same security.. think I'm joking?
+
+Check out the [Royal Bank of Canada](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_31194.pdf):
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/u6yl6tj2fk171.png?width=812&format=png&auto=webp&s=1e44cc507247db1e28c00a213f90054b9abdaa6a)](https://preview.redd.it/u6yl6tj2fk171.png?width=812&format=png&auto=webp&s=1e44cc507247db1e28c00a213f90054b9abdaa6a)
+
+Again... I was pretty shocked at that one. However, nothing rang-the-bell quite like this one from [Goldman Sachs](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_361.pdf):
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/5f408er6fk171.png?width=1031&format=png&auto=webp&s=38b9ad83d2a07360af5b5cd99d834a8771b66c93)](https://preview.redd.it/5f408er6fk171.png?width=1031&format=png&auto=webp&s=38b9ad83d2a07360af5b5cd99d834a8771b66c93)
+
+Goldman had 68 occasions in 4 months where they didn't close a failure-to-deliver... In 45 occasions, they CONTINUED to accept customer short sale orders in securities which it had an active failure-to-deliver...
+
+When a firm is really starting to sweat, they pull certain tricks out of their ass to quell the situation. Again, this is nothing but smoke and mirrors because that's all they can really do. Just as Merrill Lynch artificially lowered their customer reserve deposit, other firms make it look like they cover their short positions.
+
+One of the ways they do this is by short selling a SH*T load of shares right before a buy-in... Since we're talking about Goldman Sachs, this seems like a great time to showcase their experience with this..
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/zhf1hr1afk171.png?width=1049&format=png&auto=webp&s=f704c3722ae287480057ce3e01c561a28b77cf4c)](https://preview.redd.it/zhf1hr1afk171.png?width=1049&format=png&auto=webp&s=f704c3722ae287480057ce3e01c561a28b77cf4c)
+
+I promise... It really is as dumb as it sounds...
+
+So the perception here is when Goldman's client has a FTD and they find out a buy-in is coming, the required buy-in would obviously be too extreme for the client to handle.. So they begin to buy those shares while simultaneously shorting AT LEAST the same amount they were required to purchase...
+
+Have you ever failed to repay a loan so you went to another bank and got a loan to cover the first one? Well that's exactly what this is... I know what you're probably thinking... "didn't that just kick the can down the road?". The answer is YES: it didn't actually solve anything..
+
+There's still one more citation that Goldman received which truly represents the pinnacle of *no-sh*ts-given.* After I cover this, I don't know how anyone could argue the systematic risks that exist within the securities lending business.. Check it out:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/0md200bdfk171.png?width=940&format=png&auto=webp&s=cf5e8310fbcbd73699e3593b2ab5dab418055ab0)](https://preview.redd.it/0md200bdfk171.png?width=940&format=png&auto=webp&s=cf5e8310fbcbd73699e3593b2ab5dab418055ab0)
+
+For 5 years, Goldman relied on a team of 10-12 individuals to locate shares to be used by its clients for short selling. This group was known as the "demand team". Naturally, as the number of requests coming in the door started to increase, it became difficult for the team to properly document all of them. The volume peaked at 20,000 requests PER DAY, but the number of individuals that handled this job stayed the same.
+
+Obviously, this became too much for them to handle so they opted out of the manual process and found another solution- the F3 key....
+
+Yes- the F3 key... This button activated an autofill system which completed 98% of Goldman's orders to locate shares
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/exqzge3gfk171.png?width=964&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed9c8b740974dad01db69460332c56df81a8d768)](https://preview.redd.it/exqzge3gfk171.png?width=964&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed9c8b740974dad01db69460332c56df81a8d768)
+
+The problem with Goldman's autofill system was that it used the number of shares available to borrow at the beginning of that day, which had already been accounted for. After using the auto-locate feature, the demand team didn't even verify the accuracy of the autofill feature or document which method was used to locate the shares for each order... and this happened for 5 years..
+
+Just goes to show how dedicated firms like Goldman Sachs truly are to the smallest of details, you know? Great f*cking work, guys.
+
+By the way, I have to show one of Goldman's short sale indicator violations... It's too good to pass up.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/5iuhlkcjfk171.png?width=1082&format=png&auto=webp&s=f4e2fa1f106e78b9d282b60c3cee9944e919ea82)](https://preview.redd.it/5iuhlkcjfk171.png?width=1082&format=png&auto=webp&s=f4e2fa1f106e78b9d282b60c3cee9944e919ea82)
+
+At some point, you just have to laugh at these ass clowns... I mean seriously... one violation for a 4 year period involving over 380,000,000 short interest positions... they have plenty of other short interest violations, I just laughed at how the magnitude of this one was summarized by FINRA with 10 lines and roughly 4 minutes... whoever wrote that one must have been late for lunch..
+
+The last thing I'd like to note here is the way in which short sellers use options to "cover" their positions. Wes gave a great overview of this in the AMA *(starting at 6:25)*. Basically, one group will buy puts and another group buys calls. This creates a synthetic share that is only provided if the option is activated. Regardless, short sellers will use that synthetic share to cover their short position and the regulators actually accept it...
+
+However, as Wes points out, most of those options expire without being activated which means the share is never delivered. This expiration can be set months down the road and allows the short seller to keep kicking the can.
+
+I doubt I need to say this, but we all remember the wild options activity that was happening shortly after GameStop spiked in January. [u/HeyItsPixel](https://www.reddit.com/u/HeyItsPixel/) was one of the first to point this out. While a lot of that activity was on the retail front, I suspect a lot of it was done by short sellers to cover those positions.
+
+____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+5. Hedgies are f*cked...
+
+I'm officially +20 pages deep and there's still so much I'd like to say. It's best saved for another time and another post, I suppose. So I guess I'll wrap all of this up with some of the best news I can possibly provide...
+
+It all started with a [73 page PDF](https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-08/s70808-318.pdf) that was published in 2005 by a silverback named John D. Finnerty.
+
+John was a Professor of Finance at Fordham University when he published *"short selling, death spiral convertibles, and the profitability of stock manipulation"*. The document is loaded with sh*t that's incredibly relevant today, especially when it comes to naked short selling. He dives into the exact formula that short sellers use, which is far beyond what my wrinkled brain can interpret, alone...
+
+..However, when firms are naked shorting a company with the goal of bankrupting them, they leave footprints which are only explained by this event. The proof is in the pudding, so to speak..
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/ax7u0r4wfk171.jpg?width=1072&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1828755bfe49c47ca178d960f91dfd21d8b0d680)](https://preview.redd.it/ax7u0r4wfk171.jpg?width=1072&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1828755bfe49c47ca178d960f91dfd21d8b0d680)
+
+Any of this sound familiar??
+
+*"The manipulator can not drive the share price close to zero unless he can naked short an extraordinary number of shares...* *this form of manipulation would result in... unusually heavy trading volume, and unusually large and persistent fails to deliver at the NSCC".*
+
+Anyone else remember the volume in GME during the run-up in January? The total volume traded between 1/31/2021 and 2/5/2021 was 1,508,793,439 shares, or an average daily trade volume of 88,752,555 shares. On 1/22/2021, the volume reached 197,157,946... that's roughly 3x the number of shares that exist..
+
+if this doesn't sound like unusual volume then I'm not sure what is. Furthermore, the FTD report on GameStop was through the roof during this time:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/brz98nbzfk171.jpg?width=1625&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=83ae877853acd2ec65fa73f57216f00b708a7eab)](https://preview.redd.it/brz98nbzfk171.jpg?width=1625&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=83ae877853acd2ec65fa73f57216f00b708a7eab)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/zlla3ak0gk171.jpg?width=1038&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c5d4a1331f8c9d97b5338cc55a37310a95c9559b)](https://preview.redd.it/zlla3ak0gk171.jpg?width=1038&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c5d4a1331f8c9d97b5338cc55a37310a95c9559b)
+
+Notice the statement where the manipulator will be relieved of its obligation to cover IF the firm's shares are cancelled in bankruptcy? Did you happen to see footnotes 65 & 66 in the first screenshot of his PDF? It references a company that he used for his analysis...
+
+[![r/Superstonk - House of Cards - Part 3](https://preview.redd.it/zdp3at43gk171.jpg?width=997&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8508c9d0c869544f0ccd3a15477abfd64d38897c)](https://preview.redd.it/zdp3at43gk171.jpg?width=997&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8508c9d0c869544f0ccd3a15477abfd64d38897c)
+
+Charter Communications had a whopping 241.8% short float in 2005... The ONLY way the manipulator could have escaped this was by bankrupting the company and relieving the obligation to repurchase those shares...
+
+Guess what happened to Charter? They filed for [bankruptcy](https://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=7189668&page=1) in 2009...
+
+However, unlike John's example where naked short sellers were driving down the price without opposition, GameStop had extremely high demand from retail investors to counter this activity. As I have discussed with Dr. T and Carl Hagberg, the run-up in volume during January and February was largely conducted by naked short sellers in an attempt to suppress the share price. As I have shown in the example with Goldman Sachs, firms will short sell during a buy-in for the same exact reason. To stabilize the price, you must stabilize supply and demand.
+
+...You know what Charter didn't have?
+
+AN ARMY OF APES TO HODL THE STONK
+
+DIAMOND. F*CKING. HANDS

01-Must-Read/House-of-Cards-by-atobitt/2021-05-27-House-of-Cards-Parts-2-and-3-AUDIO.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+House of Cards Part 2 & 3 AUDIO
+===============================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/GoryAmos](https://www.reddit.com/user/GoryAmos/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nlzhrr/house_of_cards_part_2_3_audio/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Discussion 🦍](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Discussion%20%F0%9F%A6%8D%22&restrict_sr=1)
+I'm one of those apes who needs to listen to the words while they read the words so I am making recordings of [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/)'s newest additions to the House of Cards trilogy. I figure I'm not the only ape who needs to hear stuff for it to make sense, so I'm sharing my recordings here. Please forgive any flubs and corrections of flubs - I'm reading it all in my head for the first time as I'm reading it all out loud.
+
+The mp3 for Part 2 is...
+
+The mp3 for Part 3 will be posted first thing in the AM, probably during pre-market. I'll update this post with the link when it's done.
+
+UPDATE: omg APES BROKE DROPBOX. I had no idea this would be this popular. My account's been suspended lol. I'm adding a feed to my libsyn podcast account and posting the links through that. Stay tuned, replacement link will be posted shortly
+
+DOUBLE UPDATE: This is now officially a podcast. Takes some time for it to show up on all the podcast apps, but in the meantime you can listen directly on libsyn here: [https://superstonkddaudio.libsyn.com](https://superstonkddaudio.libsyn.com/)
+
+I'll update again once Part 3 and Part 1 are done.
+
+THRUPDATE (that's a portmanteau i just coined for "third update"): Part 3 is LIVE: <https://superstonkddaudio.libsyn.com/house-of-cards-pt-3-by-uatobitt>
+
+The podcast name is SUPERSTONKDDAUDIO bc i'm an Ape and I forgot to use spaces.
+
+Spotify and Apple Podcast feeds are being worked on. Spotify should be live later tonight but Apple usually takes about a week to process a new podcast.
+
+I was so nervous to post the first recording last night - would Apes laugh? would Apes make fun? But I was nervous for naught! Apes support! Apes rejoice!
+
+So grateful for this community!
+
+I LOVE THIS STONK.

01-Must-Read/House-of-Cards-by-atobitt/2021-05-27-House-of-Cards-Parts-I-II-and-III-PDF.md

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 A House of Cards parts I, II, & III in PDF
 ==========================================
 
-| Author      | Source | 
-|  :----:     |    :----:   |        
-| [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/user/atobitt/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nm83eb/a_house_of_cards_parts_i_ii_iii_in_pdf/) |
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/user/atobitt/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nm83eb/a_house_of_cards_parts_i_ii_iii_in_pdf/) | 
 
 ---
 
@@ -12,3 +12,9 @@ A House of Cards parts I, II, & III in PDF
 <https://pdfhost.io/v/lRQ4HqpG0_House_of_Cards_Atobitt.pdf>
 
 BIIIIIIGGGG shoutout to [u/Softlykile2](https://www.reddit.com/u/Softlykile2/) for providing the link and [u/jupitair](https://www.reddit.com/u/jupitair/) for the post. Go forth and share across all of the interwebs. Let every boomer-ape absorb this information through a traditional & newspapery medium.
+
+---
+
+**Alternative PDF Location in case PDFHost is Down posted by [u/Meticulous-](https://www.reddit.com/user/Meticulous-/)**
+
+[House-of-Cards-by-atobitt.pdf](https://github.com/verymeticulous/wikAPEdia/files/6721578/House-of-Cards-by-atobitt.pdf)

01-Must-Read/MOASS-Preparation-Guide-by-socrates6210/2021-06-29-MOASS-Preparation-Guide-2.md

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+The MOASS Preparation Guide 2.0
+===============================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/socrates6210](https://www.reddit.com/user/socrates6210/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/oakqvt/the_moass_preparation_guide_20/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+*******************************************************
+
+*I'm just gonna start off by saying that this is a sequel to* [*The MOASS Preparation Guide*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mm5qle/the_moass_preparation_guide/)*, a post I wrote a few months ago. I felt it deserved an updated version considering so much that has happened recently, also i've learned a lot since then. This guide will be pretty in depth but don't worry, my view is that when you're explaining something, always imagine you're talking to a 5 year old (ELI5). So make yourself a cup of coffee, and grab a tasty crayola and enjoy.*
+
+*The subsequent sections are as follows:*
+
+-   *Pre-liftoff preparation*
+
+-   *D-Day*
+
+-   *During the MOASS*
+
+-   *Immediate Aftermath*
+
+-   *Long term aftermath*
+
+*******************************************************
+
+Please read though this as i believe it is important that we all have an understanding on the game plan 🚀
+
+Pre-liftoff Preparation
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The MOASS Preparation Guide 2.0](https://preview.redd.it/pskg3gxrka871.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=09b3bccc95d16594bc2a8cf9e5307e08eaf11058)](https://preview.redd.it/pskg3gxrka871.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=09b3bccc95d16594bc2a8cf9e5307e08eaf11058)
+
+-   Brokers preparation - I think everyone should take the time to understand the nuances and rules that the broker applies on trading. Some brokers may have some sneaky fine prints. So you should make sure that nothing can get in the way of you and your tendies.
+
+    -   Take note of the brokers that previous placed trade restrictions [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mowzjk/the_broker_preparation_guide/).
+
+    -   some brokers (Trading212 for example) have decided to restrict buying if you do not agree to their share lending program (*Do* *NOT* *agree to this.*)
+
+    -   If you have all your shares in one of these bad brokers and can't transfer, don't sweat it too much. JUST DO NOT SELL YOUR SHARES. The message was clear as crystal in January: if they prevent free trade like Robinhood did then that means they will lose customers and face litigation, so i *hope* for their sake that they have prepared for this.
+
+    -   It also wouldn't hurt to email your brokers customer service and ask them "*will you prevent me from selling if the price goes to X amount?*". Additionally, i would recommend keeping documentation, screenshots and recordings of your positions just incase f*ckery arises. It's good to create a paper trail just incase you need to bring them to court.
+
+-   Back up broker - If you can, open up an account as soon as possible on a reputable broker and buy at least 1 share. Don't aim to maximize gains but to minimize the regret of missing out just in case your broker decides to f*ck you. The rule of thumb is usually that commission based boomer brokers with horrible user interfaces are the most trustworthy. See the "good brokers" in the link above.
+
+-   Diversify Brokers - if you can, spread out your holdings across multiple brokers. Also take note of what clearing house they use. You don't want to be caught up in some f*ckery where both brokers wont let you sell because they share the same clearing house. A solution to this could be to transfer shares. Some brokers allow you to transfer shares to others, but small "shit" brokers like eToro for example, do not. If thats the case then hold tight and buy on a different broker, if you wanna buy more shares.
+
+    -   Here is a [list of some brokerages](https://investorjunkie.com/stock-brokers/broker-clearing-firms/) and the respective clearing houses they use.
+
+    -   Here is a list of [brokers who placed restrictions](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mowzjk/the_broker_preparation_guide/) in a follow up post i made.
+
+    -   Trading212 for example: they're becoming Robinhood 2.0 now as they decided [to place buy restrictions](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/oa7nq4/fud_alert_t212_simply_do_not_agree_to_terms_hold/) if you don't agree to their share lending program. Admittedly, I am a Trading212 customer. So this is why you should diversify brokers, you never know when they are going to pull some shady shit.
+
+    -   *side-note*: I would stay away from brokers that use Apex Clearing, they're shady as shit.
+
+-   Order Routing - Order routing is when an order to buy or sell a stock is sent from your broker to an exchange. There are two kinds of exchanges: *Lit pools and Dark pools.*
+
+    -   Dark pools do not display prices at which participants are willing to trade (ie; in the dark), whereas lit pools do show these various bids and offers in a stocks. It's been said that the naked shorting gang pay millions to brokers to have millions of orders routed through their own dark pools, to which they can perform shady business (skimming cents off the spread of every order, suppressing buying pressure etc).
+
+    -   This brings me to my point: If you are thinking about buying some shares, you should route it through IEX, which is an exchange that was made in order to mitigate the affects of high frequency trading. [Oh hey, look! Our friends at Citadel don't like IEX](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/oa7st6/citadel_really_doesnt_like_iex_if_you_have_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3).
+
+-   Cash account, not margin - if you haven't already, request your broker to change your account from a margin account to a cash account. This way your shares are entirely your own and aren't being lent out to short sellers. Note that you need to have no options or short positions active with your account before you do this. If you are reluctant to switching your account then make sure that you have no withstanding deficits in your account so you don't get margin called and your broker automatically closes positions without your consent. Yes, this has happened to people before.
+
+-   Online Security - If you have learned anything from all this it's that you should not trust anyone. Take the time to enable two-factor authentication on your bank/broker accounts. Also you should have a different password for each account, preferably 20+ characters with a mixture of alphanumeric characters and symbols.
+
+    -   Do not use public wifi to log into your broker account.
+
+    -   Use a VPN when possible.
+
+-   Taxes - It is crucial that you learn about your countries [capital gains taxes](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/capital_gains_tax.asp). I would go deeper into this, However different tax rates apply in different countries depending on how long you are holding the stock. To keep this general for all users i will say Just google "*what are the tax laws for stocks in <my country>?*". (If you're a smooth brain, dont worry. I have the solution for you in immediate aftermath section)
+
+-   Prepare a personal balance sheet - It may be a good idea to prepare a balance sheet. A balance sheet is a snapshot of net worth and lists all your assets, liabilities, cash etc. This will make your life (*and your accountants life*) easier when you need an accountant. If you need a better understanding of balance sheets see this [video here](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhKO6MRvk_c).
+
+-   Mental preparation - This one isn't so obvious, but please prepare yourself for seeing life changing money in your possession. Have a long think what you are going to do with this money. And as a side note: try to not tell too people you're invested, the less people know the easier your life will be.
+
+D-Day
+
+0:04
+
+0:08
+
+-   Take care of your health - Firstly, on the day of lift off you will definitely feel overwhelmed with emotions and anxiety. You're probably going to feel a little dizzy seeing the price increase exponentially. Please sit down when you are checking the price. The last thing i want to hear is that a fellow ape fainted and cracked their head because of being overwhelmed with emotions. In my opinion, deep slow [diaphragmatic breathing](https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/9445-diaphragmatic-breathing) really helps to slow down your heart rate and reduce anxiety.
+
+-   Expect Trading Halts - There is a difference between trading suspension and trading halt. Securities exchanges have the power to temporarily [halt](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tradinghalt.asp), in the middle of the trading day, or delay, at the beginning of the trading day, trading on a stock. halts and delays usually last less than one hour. As opposed to suspensions, which can last two weeks. Suspensions are enforced by the SEC
+
+    -   In the case of trading halt: The NYSE may stop trading if the price rises too quickly. This is usually done to prevent massive impulse waves and let people calm down for a few minutes. But this is futile in the setting of a short squeeze, because all shorts must cover regardless. You can also check when GME is halted [here](https://www.nyse.com/trade-halt-current). Do not freak out if the graph flatlines.
+
+    -   In the case of trading suspension: I believe that if the infinity pool happens, meaning shorts literally will not be able to cover the potentially billions of synthetic shares they have created, driving the price to literally infinity, that the SEC most likely implement a trading suspension. We won't know unless it happens. But, who knows? They might not. You can read about trading suspensions [here](https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-and-bulletins/ib_tradingsuspensions).
+
+-   BOTS, BOTS EVERYWHERE - This could go two ways: either the shorts don't have anymore money to pay shills or we will have a massive influx of bots/shills on here and <*other stonk subs*> trying to nudge people to sell. They will say something like "wow i sold my 3 shares for 30K" and try to create a narrative that below 100K is the peak. 100K is not the peak. don't listen to it. we set the price.
+
+-   Reddit might be down - during the rally from $40 to $90 in February Reddit inexplicably went offline. It happened a couple of other times before when the price rose considerably. This could be due to a DDOS attack or just too much traffic to the site. Either way, if Reddit does go down don't worry. We are all still here.
+
+    -   The only call to action would be to go to the [SuperStonk youtube](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCI4EET9NJPWxUuXGlG6fxPA) channel, which the mods said they will do an emergency broadcast when things kick off. So go there for communication.
+
+    -   Backup places to check out would be the mods twitter pages
+
+        -   <https://twitter.com/rensole>
+
+        -   <https://twitter.com/RedChessQueen99>
+
+        -   <https://twitter.com/PinkCatsOnAcid>
+
+During the MOASS
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The MOASS Preparation Guide 2.0](https://preview.redd.it/54mzc28uka871.png?width=1890&format=png&auto=webp&s=e6554f4f0e276f93d84d22c6cd766167638bd9c1)](https://preview.redd.it/54mzc28uka871.png?width=1890&format=png&auto=webp&s=e6554f4f0e276f93d84d22c6cd766167638bd9c1)
+
+-   Diamond hands - This one i cannot stress enough, the mantra is clear: HOLD! If you sell early you creating downward pressure against the MOASS. If the short position is in the billions of shares (which has been theorized) then this shouldn't be too much of a problem, but regardless - KEEP THOSE HANDS DIAMOND! The squeeze could last a few days, week or indefinitely. At this point no one knows. Don't feel pressure to sell when it goes $100K+, if the DD is correct (and it has been so far) then we are not stopping add measly hundreds of thousands.
+
+    -   A forced buy-back differs from a Margin call, in which a margin call is just a notice to "*increase the amount of money in your account before we close your positions, because you won't be able pay us if this goes any higher*"
+
+    -   Prime brokers will implement forced buy-back of hedge funds to cover their short positions. This means they will go the open market and buy them for what ever someone is will to sell them for.
+
+    -   The stock price = the last price it sold for. If the only sells available were asking for 1 million, then that means the price will be 1 million. And since it's likely there aren't enough shares in existence to cover the amount of shorting that went on then theoretically this ape filled rocket could blast through the moon and land on Alpha centauri B.
+
+-   Whats an exit strategy? - This one isn't so obvious because the we don't know what the peak will be, but you should have an exit strategy: Plan out what you need on the day of selling, where do you need to be? think about that day and visualize it so you aren't overwhelmed with anxiety when it actually happens. As for selling: all i can say on this matter is do not sell on the way up as it's a bad idea. ([~~explained here that you should~~](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m073v6/exit_strategy_dd_a_comprehensive_guide_to/)) Use [this exit strategy](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nogxnr/infinity_war_the_final_exit_dd_compilation/) instead by [u/gherkinit](https://www.reddit.com/u/gherkinit/):
+
+-   Understand the different types of orders - Limit Order, Market Order, Stop Limit Order and Stop Loss Order, explanations on the pro's and cons of each can also be found [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nogxnr/infinity_war_the_final_exit_dd_compilation/)
+
+    -   Some people have noted that certain brokers have limits on the amount you can place an order for online (in terms of dollar value). Just to be safe make sure you have phone credit and the number for your broker ready to contact them to execute an order if this applies to you.
+
+    -   Also, some brokers may not even limit orders (Revolut as far as i know). Don't sweat it, this is beyond your control. Just sell on the way down, or don't. I don't care this is not financial advice.
+
+-   Sit down when you decide to take gains - When the dust has settled and you decide to take gains, again, sit down and drink some water and breath.. because you may faint or possibly get sick from seeing that you have sold a single share for an ungodly amount.
+
+-   Don't publish your realised gains publicly - Obvious one, don't be that person who flaunts the gains online. You are going to cause a lot of fair-weather friends and family to crawl out of the woodwork trying to get their hands on your tendies. It may be tempting to rub it in the faces of the people who doubted you, but just don't. It's not worth it.
+
+-   T+2 settlement - When you sell a share, it actually doesn't get settled until 2 days after it's executed, meaning you don't actually have the money in your brokerage until 2 days later. Learn about the [settlement violations here](https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/trading-investing/trading/avoiding-cash-trading-violations) before you start going off buying other stocks with your gains. This T+2 settlement also gives the SEC the power to reverse any transactions they seem fit due to violations. Not meant to be FUD, i just thought its useful to know. I doubt they will start reversing transactions during the MOASS, but if it does occur. Hold tight, again: we set the price.
+
+-   WHAT DO WITH MONEY? - It should be known that your regular current/checking account is only insured up to $250,000 if you're in the [US under the FDIC](https://www.fdic.gov/deposit/deposits/faq.html) and €100,000 if you are [in the European Union](https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/financial-supervision-and-risk-management/managing-risks-banks-and-financial-institutions/deposit-guarantee-schemes_en). So its not advised to dump all your money into your bank account straight away. I would wait for T+2 settlement to clear then invest in value stocks, so you're money isn't tied to your broker, should they have issues. This brings me to the next section...
+
+Immediate Aftermath
+
+0:00
+
+0:02
+
+-   Assemble a team of legal and financial advisers:
+
+    -   Lawyer up - Hire a [tax attorney](https://www.moneycrashers.com/when-to-hire-a-tax-attorney/) to deal with any problems that may arise from all of this. Hire a family law or estate planning attorney that can arrange a Will for your family immediately.
+
+        -   side note: do NOT sign anything, from your broker/bank/crayon dealer or anyone if you do not understand it. Make sure you have an attorney read anything you may or may not be asked to sign.
+
+    -   Get an accountant - Get certified public accountant who helps wealthy families organize their finances and guide you through your finances.
+
+    -   Hire a financial advisor - Make sure you hire a financial advisor that is sworn to act as a fiduciary (*acting in your best financial interests, not theirs*), preferably with experience managing significant wealth. Make sure you check their certifications and that they aren't trying to push you to buy some insurance policy. The requirements to be a FA aren't concrete so there are a lot of snake oil salesmen that really don't have your best interests at heart. Make sure how you ask how they profit from you being their client and make sure they aren't trying to make commissions. Also, look out for high fees. Minimum advisor fees based on AUM should not be over 1% unless they can justify it with amazing historical returns.
+
+-   Expect to vilified by MSM - In the case of a financial crisis, i can nearly guarantee that they will try to blame us rather than the hedgies and regulators who caused it. Pay no mind to mainstream media and stand your ground.
+
+    -   Expect people to say you just got lucky, expect them to speak as though we are ones who caused this. They will lie, twist and corrupt the truth. Expect your friend who paper-handed a few months back and still think's GameStop is dying brick-and-mortar resent you. You don't need to justify yourself. All of our research has been documented, archived and literally shouted from the rooftops for months. As Michael brrry would say "*I warned, but no one listened*".
+
+    -   They may also try and backtrack to a pro-GME narrative now that it's not financial in their interest to side with SHFs. Just remember: MSM is not your friend, these people are allows pushing the narrative that they are paid push. It's literally their business model.
+
+-   Do nothing with the money - this kind of piggy backs off the first point about assembling a team of advisors, but please don't just cash out and go crazy with the money. Sit and think about it for some time. Let reality settle in and decide how are you going to use this money to help yourself and the people around you. Lambos are great but they won't bring you happiness forever. Don't blow that money down the drain. Educate yourself on how wealthy people maintain their wealth.
+
+Longer Term aftermath
+
+-   Expect turbulence in the economy - this wont be just contained to the world of GME. This is going to have a ripple affect across the world economy as the powers-that-be, who have been taking advantage of the system loops holes, finally pay their debt. Here is some essentials you should check out (in order) if you haven't already, this is 2008 ~~all over again~~ continued:
+
+1.  [Inside Job (Full movie)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2IaJwkqgPk) - by [Charles Ferguson](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Ferguson_(filmmaker))
+
+2.  [The Bigger Short. How 2008 is repeating](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o0scoy/the_bigger_short_how_2008_is_repeating_at_a_much/) - by [u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/Criand/)
+
+3.  [A House of Cards](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nm83eb/a_house_of_cards_parts_i_ii_iii_in_pdf/) - by [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/)
+
+4.  [The EVERYTHING Short](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgucv2/the_everything_short/) - by [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/)
+
+High/hyper Inflation - We need to talk about [inflation](https://www.fdic.gov/deposit/deposits/faq.html). In v1.0 of this guide I mentioned a possibility of inflation, but as more news has come out it's pretty much a guarantee. Also, I didn't give much recommendations on what to do about it. So, i learned a bit about inflation so you don't have to:
+
+-   The What?
+
+    -   Since governments have moved away from the gold standard, countries have the power to create money out of thin air through [quantitative easing](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quantitative-easing.asp).
+
+    -   Inflation is the annual percentage rise in the cost of living. Okay so what does that really mean? Here is smooth brain explanation: If you have $1 in 2020, and inflation rises 10% in 2021, you still have your $1 but you only have the buying power of $0.90 relative to last year. This is why holding onto cash is not good in a high inflationary economy.
+
+-   The How?
+
+    -   Everyone always says its from over-printing of money, but in reality this is just a symptom of a failing economy, and a byproduct of the citizens lack of confidence in the currency.
+
+    -   In order to counter these rise in prices, the FED (or central bank) will raise interest rates, essentially reducing the amount of money in circulation.
+
+    -   The chair of the Fed, JPOW himself, said interest rates won't be [raised until 2023](https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/16/fed-holds-rates-steady-but-raises-inflation-expectations-sharply-and-makes-no-mention-of-taper.html). However, fear is arising in the stock market as many speculate we have high inflation because the massive amount of "free money" initiatives to help the country get back on its feet, but it's just not being seen due to COVID-19.
+
+    -   I think it is also noteworthy to say there is a difference between high inflation and hyperinflation. Hyperinflation is a term to describe rapid, excessive, and out-of-control general price increases in an economy. While inflation is a measure of the pace of rising prices for goods and services, hyperinflation is rapidly rising inflation, typically measuring more than 50% per month.
+
+-   How to protect yourself?
+
+    -   Well firstly I'd like to note assets to avoid during high inflation:
+
+        -   [Fixed rate bonds](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fixedrate-bond.asp)
+
+        -   [Growth stocks](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/growthstock.asp)
+
+        -   [Cash](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cash.asp) (yes, that includes the money in your savings account)
+
+    -   The best investments during high inflation:
+
+        -   [Real estate/land](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/realestate.asp)
+
+        -   [Commodities](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/commodity.asp) (Gold, oil etc.)
+
+        -   [Boomer Value Stocks](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/valuestock.asp)
+
+-   How about crypt-0?
+
+    -   I can't name certain coins here because of auto-mod, but you know of the big ones I'm talking about.
+
+    -   It is assumed that anything with a limited supply will inevitably move with inflation. the loss in confidence people have in fiat currency is prevented with crypt-0-currency as it has an immutable finite supply.
+
+    -   However, you also need to bear in mind the *utility* of the asset. Just because something has a limited supply does not mean it's valuable (*The 2021 shit-coin craze being evidence of this*)
+
+    -   In a financial nuclear winter event, it may a case that some coins may become too expensive to mine due to rise in electricity prices, leading to a disinterest/disincentivization in holding the asset and thus reducing it's value.
+
+    -   Be careful if you decide to hedge with these assets as they are yet to be stress-tested during a financial crisis, some might succeed and many will fail.
+
+-   side-note: One silver lining i learned about inflation is that the burden of any debt you may have will be softened as the nominal value of the debt stays the same even as the value of the currency decreases. What does this mean? if you owe money, lets say a mortgage or student loan, it is easier to pay of that debt as it is assumed you wages will increase, while the number of dollars you owe stays the same. (*not that you will have a job after the MOASS anyway ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)* )
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The MOASS Preparation Guide 2.0](https://preview.redd.it/4xpmi7xxka871.jpg?width=1908&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1b1e4adfcd66be4d4003cbee35d6d0796c96badf)](https://preview.redd.it/4xpmi7xxka871.jpg?width=1908&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1b1e4adfcd66be4d4003cbee35d6d0796c96badf)
+
+Taken during the 2011 Ocupy Wallstreet March (At National i
+
+*If there is anything else you think should be in here let me know in the comments. This is just my opinion and not financial advice. I am just an ape who eats crayons for fun. This will probably be my last DD before valhalla (financially speaking), I'll finish by leaving you with this image (above ^). Remember what happened in 2008 and don't show any mercy. HOLD.*
+
+- Socrates ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+
+🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
+
+TLDR: no tldr you lazy ape, go read it. Its important
+
+_____________________________________________
+
+- edits 1: Diamond hands section typo : "***aren't* *enough shares", not "are enough shares"*
+
+*- edits 2: removed WardenElites exit strategy, added the gherkinit's exit strategy*
+
+*- edits 3: added mods twitters in Reddit going down section*

01-Must-Read/Sun-Never-Sets-on-Citadel-by-swede-child-of-mine/2021-06-18-The-Sun-Never-Sets-on-Citadel-Part-I.md

@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+The Sun Never Sets On Citadel -- Part 1
+=======================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/swede_child_of_mine](https://www.reddit.com/user/swede_child_of_mine/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o2xz48/the_sun_never_sets_on_citadel_part_1/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+[Hello Superstonk](https://i.redd.it/y39nj0kvo2671.gif)
+
+Preface
+
+I became bothered by a question a few months ago. The GME saga started with MAJOR fight in the financial landscape between Team Citadel vs. Team Other (Blackrock, Vanguard, etc.), and Superstonk is here now because of Team Other getting Ryan Cohen on the board at GME, then "retail" landed on the scene, now Apes, etc. But this ONE question always bothered me:
+
+> What did Citadel do to piss everyone off? WHY would they want to give Citadel the most epic beat down in financial history?
+
+So I spent some time looking into that because it *must* be good and...
+
+*HO BOY, GET YOUR POPCORN, I'VE GOT SOME GOODS TO SHARE WITH YOU AND IT'S GONNA BE JUICY*
+
+* * * * *
+
+Note: this is a strategy post. [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/) and [u/criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/criand/) focus on macro topics about Citadel's structure in the overall market, but this series is going to be about financial industry strategy. I have a master's degree in business and specialize in strategy and operations. While I don't have direct experience in finance per se, I really enjoy finding the "hows" and "whys" behind what businesses do.
+
+Also, I'll give shout outs to the Apes who did relevant DD before this. Parts of this are my own discovery, parts are building on the work of those who came before :) This is an overall picture.
+
+Symbol indicators:
+
+-   [] - request for link to relevant DD ([r/Superstonk](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/) DD posts or legitimate sources)
+
+* * * * *
+
+1.0: Introduction
+
+The Price of $GME is artificial. Prior posts ([1](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mn0q9q/theory_all_the_pieces_pt_1_the_anatomy_of_the/), [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ms9z0n/theory_all_the_pieces_pt_2_the_deep_end_of_the/)) have covered how Citadel and other players in the market have greedily, illegally conspired to change the price of stocks for their own profit. While Citadel's criminal price manipulation of GME represents a failed scheme to fabricate shares for profit, this was only a small corner of a much larger body of activity. *Citadel's overall activity shows a plan to monopolize markets worldwide and control securities transactions at the exchange level*.
+
+Yep.
+
+Buckle up :)
+
+* * * * *
+
+Key Term
+
+Market Maker (or "MM") -- a special role in a stock exchanges around the world. An MM's primary role is to provide liquidity, or "to make sure there are shares available to buy if people want them" as well as "make sure there is a buyer if people want to sell." Exchanges need it: liquidity makes for easy buying and selling.
+
+-   A MM is the intermediary for almost any securities transaction. It is positioned between the exchange and the brokers/dealers/funds that do not have access to the exchange, or they use the MM to do the buying work for them, lol. Or the MM is positioned on the other side of a transaction, supplying the securities in demand.
+
+-   A MM is always in a position of risk. They are constantly in a place to be on the losing side of a transaction if they "guess" wrong.
+
+-   Note: Citadel has many branches, but it's two major branches are its hedge fund and its MM. I will be referring only to its MM activity.
+
+* * * * *
+
+1.1: Plus Ultra
+
+Take a moment to marvel at how Citadel has installed themselves in [so many markets around the world](https://www.fi-desk.com/market-structure-meet-the-new-market-makers/). They are Market Makers and/or liquidity providers in nearly every major exchange on earth: (*Note: my undersrtanding of a liquidity provider is that it's a bit like a less-powerful MM*)
+
+[Citadel Securities own splash page](https://i.redd.it/tolp2scxfw571.png)
+
+-   US/North America: NYSE, NASDAQ, CBOE (not even going to bother with links here, you know they're there), [Toronto](https://www.tsx.com/trading/toronto-stock-exchange/order-types-and-features/market-maker-program/market-makers-list?id=5)
+
+-   Europe: [London/Ireland](https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/brokers/citadels-technology-arm-posts-30-decline-in-2019-revenue/), Amsterdam[], Frankfurt[]
+
+-   Asia/Pacific: Hong Kong, [Singapore](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-citadel-singapore/citadel-securities-hedge-fund-citadel-to-open-new-office-in-singapore-idUSKBN25K08J), Sydney [], Shanghai []
+
+-   (Apologies on missing links, I've saved so many links through this whole drama that I can't find some of my sources anymore. And this is not the full list, this is only what I could put together for this post.)
+
+Citadel is truly an intmidating company based on the position it occupies in markets worldwide.
+
+1.2: E Pluribus Unum
+
+So WHY has Citadel strived to achieve such a large footprint across the globe?
+
+*Because there is a flaw in the markets across the world: it depends on Market Makers.*
+
+-   Exchanges are set up to have several Market Makers providing liquidity.
+
+-   So the Market Maker has responsibilities for supply and demand of a given security.
+
+-   It's an essential service so exchanges empower MMs with exclusive powers and responsibilities.
+
+Take a look at the exclusive powers the NYSE gives its DMMs (like a "Super" Market Maker): [From the NYSE DMM page](https://i.redd.it/n16pu83yiw571.png)
+
+-   MMs have *Superpowers* and wield immense control over securities.
+
+-   Exchanges rely on incentives for winning bids (coupons) as a way of creating competition and fair prices at the exchange.
+
+MMs are intended to be balanced by competing against each other
+
+-   ...so that the customers (brokers) can get the best value, and the Market Makers are financially rewarded for their service...
+
+-   ...but that means the MMs are competing for as many transactions as possible on the exchange. As much as their risk can allow.
+
+So the better the MMs are at managing risk, the more control they have over the exchange (because they capture more of the transactions)
+
+-   And there are advantages for MMs who perform better and capture more volume -- they can leverage the volume to achieve better prices and capture even *more* transactions.
+
+-   You've probably seen this chart, but it shows the size that MMs have become: [Citadel is almost as big as the CBOE -- the main options exchange for the US](https://i.redd.it/idkn9cchpn571.png)
+
+-   (Citadel, Virtu, and G1 are all MMs.)
+
+-   The important part about that graphic is the NYSE, NASDAQ, and CBOE volumes *include the transactions with Citadel and Virtu*.
+
+The MMs are becoming (or already are) bigger than the exchanges themselves. And the exchanges depend on them.
+
+-   Furthermore, the exchange is limited -- to a certain location, structure, set of regluations, list of securities, etc. Almost all exchanges are for profit.
+
+-   But if the exchange provides no security that can't be bought on another exchange, then the exchange needs to compete on best price - or else it's revenue goes away.
+
+-   And exactly *who* at the exchange offers the best price?
+
+-   But a Market Maker is free to engage in multiple exchanges. So if a financial product is available in one exchange, but not another, and an MM is in both exchanges, then the Market Maker can offer it because it a separate entity (if it legally can).
+
+-   And the Market Maker is free offer their best price at multiple exchanges, or even directly.
+
+What advantage does the exchange itself have? They can't provide *anything* that the Market Makers themselves can't/don't provide.
+
+-   *As an analogy, if you are used to shopping for separate items across several stores -- food at the farmers market, clothes at the mall, etc. -- a company like Amazon or WalMart will have an advantage by selling the same items for a comparable price in one convenient place.*
+
+It's "malls" vs. "Target/WalMart/Amazon/Costco" all over. We all know who won that one.
+
+1.3: Man o' War
+
+I mentioned "volume" earlier -- that is going to be key here.
+
+-   Market Making is already very risky, but the size of the established players make it prohibitive for new entrants. A new MM would need significant advantages to compete against Citadel, Susquehanna, and Virtu who will have superior positioning, expertise, technology, market understanding, funding, risk tolerance...
+
+> "The way to think about Citadel is as the Amazon of trading," says Spencer Mindlin, a capital markets technology analyst at Aite Group. In an industry that relies heavily on technology, Citadel has forged ahead by playing "a game of scale. You reach a point where it's impossible for others to compete," he says. [emphasis mine] - [Quartz](https://qz.com/1969532/how-ken-griffins-citadel-transformed-financial-markets/)
+
+Backstory:
+
+-   In the early 2010's Ken tired to make Citadel an investment bank and failed (lol)....
+
+-   ...but it ended up being one of those "lemons to lemonade" things for him. Because Ken realized that other MMs were *banks*, which were a major disadvantage. You see, *Banks* were encumbered with "regulations", "capital requirements" and stupid "investors". But Market Makers didn't need a bank, so they didn't need to have those pesky constraints.
+
+-   Then Ken stopped trying to be a bank. Which meant he could capture the MM market.
+
+-   Citadel went on to buy out competing Market Maker assets from [Citi](https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/05/16/citadel-securities-buys-citi-market-making-assets/84437638/), [Goldman Sachs/IMC](https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/citadel-securities-reaches-preliminary-agreement-to-acquire-dmm-unit-from-imc-301149075.html), and [KCG](https://www.tradersmagazine.com/departments/brokerage/citadel-purchases-kcg-dmm-business-becomes-1-on-nyse/) to grow his market share and reduce compeition.
+
+-   And now, the Market Maker field is NOT competitive. The number of DMMs in NYSE has decreased over the years.
+
+-   Citadel has heavily "leveled-up" and is bar none THE biggest player on the field.
+
+This is why Citadel is in so many exchanges. Successful practices can be copied from one exchange to the next, with market advantages and rewards that scale. Why shouldn't Citadel be a MM in every major exchange on earth?
+
+-   But you realize what this means, right?
+
+*The exchanges have become commodities.* They are necessary for fulfilling their role as a securites selling venue, but have no unique value to themselves.
+
+> "We already have 16 stock exchanges, over 30 ATSs and handful of market maker SDPs, do we really need the banks to further fragment liquidity?" [emphasis mine] - [Themis Trading](https://blog.themistrading.com/2020/12/14434/)
+
+The TRUE value to the market is a firm that spans multiple exchanges and offers the breadth of securities available at competitive prices.
+
+1.4: The Commonwealth
+
+*But, but -- what about compeition? What about Virtu, G1, and the MMs in other countries? I thought you said this was a cOmPEtITivE field.*
+
+It's true, Virtu & G1 do "compete" against Citadel. But they have an... "interesting" relationship which prompts some theories and requires further investigation.
+
+-   First, Citadel needs to maintain the appearance of a free market to avoid antitrust lawsuits. They also need other Market Makers to offload the transactions that they are unwilling to take. A duopoloy or even triopoly is fine as long as they control the market.
+
+-   Second, from Virtu's perspective (*they're the largest competitor so I'll use them here*), it doesn't make sense to go head-to-head directly with Citadel on transactions -- Citadel has better positioning and a technological edge.
+
+-   And directly competing with a superior opponent would be expensive for Virtu. However, they would stand to profit from joining with Citadel if they took the same positions as them.
+
+-   And wouldn't you know it, Apes have discovered that Virtu and Citadel are doing the *exact same things* across many tickers. Here are 2 famous ones: [MAX-D](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nyxs1f/learn_from_the_past_when_they_didnt_care_to_hide/), [GME](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nr6urb/i_look_up_top_brokers_for_gme_year_to_date_and/) [Any more Apes want to do asset comparison between Citadel & Virtu? CALLING SUPERSTONKS MOST QUANTED] (s/o to [u/BadassTrader](https://www.reddit.com/u/BadassTrader/), [u/JustBeingPunny](https://www.reddit.com/u/JustBeingPunny/), [u/Sti8man7](https://www.reddit.com/u/Sti8man7/))
+
+-   That said, Virtu could still compete *indirectly* - they would need to find a niche where they could gain an advantage and separate themselves from Citadel...
+
+-   ...and oh look Virtu seems [very focused on client experience](https://s21.q4cdn.com/422114427/files/doc_presentations/2020/09/Virtu-Financial-Presentation-Sept-2020-Draft-v3.pdf), where Citadel is focused on product and market position.
+
+So Virtu is disincentivized to directly compete against Citadel, and is incentivized to coordinate with and complement Citadel.
+
+Monopoly much?
+
+1.5: The Crown Jewel
+
+If you STILL believe that being a Market Maker IS competitive and that exchanges are NOT commoditized, and that Virtu and Citadel are taking the same positions for non-collusive reasons ("*Exchanges are the pumping heart of a free economy! Of course EXCHANGES have control and NOT the Market Makers, the Market Makers are just making the plays they see are winners*"), and you need even more convincing... I have bad news.
+
+About 9 months ago the MEMX exchange opened.
+
+*Why is that a big deal? Who opened the exchange?* [*Let's check the MEMX website...*](https://memx.com/)
+
+-   [Oh.](https://i.redd.it/ujeiloi5dw571.png)
+
+-   Citadel and Virtu (and some other players you might recognize) *OPENED THEIR OWN EXCHANGE.*
+
+-   [Yeah.](https://i.redd.it/0kxh46xwcw571.jpg)
+
+"*But, but -- they wouldn't open their own exchange to profit at the expense of the market, would they?*"
+
+-   [*On the MEMX own splash page*](https://i.redd.it/gff2fr1edw571.png)
+
+-   "*MEMX will represent the interests of its founders*" - MEMX.com
+
+-   So, founders first, everybody else after. FROM. THEIR. OWN. FUCKING. SPLASH. PAGE.
+
+"*But, but -- maybe it's just a small side thing and it's not really going anywhere?*"
+
+-   [Right. Yeah. Sure.](https://i.redd.it/owqyk8kxdw571.png)
+
+"*But, but -- wouldn't that piss off the other exchanges? They would want to attack the MEMX founders in some way, right?*"
+
+-   [Yup.](https://i.redd.it/hknpksgdew571.png)
+
+Exchanges have become so commoditized and Market Makers have such an entrenched advantage that the dominant Market Makers have opened their own exchange, MEMX, whose primary purpose is to serve their interests at the expense of other exchanges.
+
+"Free market."
+
+TL;DR
+
+Citadel is/was moving to monopolize securities transactions at the exchange level.
+
+-   Market Makers have the most control over transactions at exchanges.
+
+-   Citadel is the largest Market Maker across exchanges worldwide (*can't find the sauce []*).
+
+-   Citadel has more power than the exchanges do, offering more products, more ways to purchase them, in more venues than the exchanges.
+
+-   Citadel has even started its own exchange in September 2020, which is growing rapidly.
+
+-   MM Competition is deterred from directly competing with Citadel - they have too much influence, and competitors are incentivized to coordinate with Citadel, not compete.
+
+-   The number of MMs have decreased in major exchanges while Citadel's market share is growing.
+
+Structurally speaking, Citadel is in a position to directly control the price of many securities and transactions at the exchange level.
+
+And that's not even all of it. Part 2 coming soon...

01-Must-Read/Sun-Never-Sets-on-Citadel-by-swede-child-of-mine/2021-07-03-The-Sun-Never-Sets-on-Citadel-Part-2.md

@@ -0,0 +1,449 @@
+The Sun Never Sets on Citadel -- Part 2
+=======================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/swede_child_of_mine](https://www.reddit.com/user/swede_child_of_mine/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/od4bb1/the_sun_never_sets_on_citadel_part_2/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+[Part 1](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o2xz48/the_sun_never_sets_on_citadel_part_1/)
+
+Apes, I'm stunned. I've rewritten this post several times because of what I've discovered. I haven't seen it anywhere else on Superstonk.
+
+All of this is intertwined. I won't be able to get to all of the pieces of Citadel in this part so this DD will continue... and build... into Part 3.
+
+This is a fucking ride.
+
+* * * * *
+
+Preface, part 1: Kudos
+
+First I'd like to follow up on some key critiques from [Part 1](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o2xz48/the_sun_never_sets_on_citadel_part_1/) and give kudos:.
+
+-   EU MMs -- MAJOR kudos to [u/NoughtyNought](https://www.reddit.com/u/NoughtyNought/) who did digging on finding [the list of EU MMs](https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/list_of_market_makers_and_primary_dealers.pdf).
+
+-   DE markets -- MAJOR kudos to [u/LNhamburg](https://www.reddit.com/u/LNhamburg/) who has been looking into European markets since February and even followed up on my post with an [awesome post of their own](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o3c7ar/a_european_footprint_after_reading_the_sun_never/).
+
+But first, I need to apologize. I erroneously said Citadel was an MM across the EU in Part 1. I found conflicting sources, and Citadel *is* an MM in Ireland, but I should have clarified. I'll explain more on "how" and "why" I missed this later, but props to these Apes above who did their Due Due Diligience, I am in your debt. (*"To err is human..."*)
+
+-   Several users also pointed out: MEMX lists several "friendly" institutions, including BlackRock and Fidelity, as founders, not just Citadel and Virtu.
+
+-   This is true! Kudos to the several users who broght this up: [u/mattlukinhapilydrunk](https://www.reddit.com/u/mattlukinhapilydrunk/), [u/Robin_Squeeze](https://www.reddit.com/u/Robin_Squeeze/)
+
+So what should we make of Citadel being at MEMX? *Does Citadel really control MEMX -- or even monopolize the market -- if Blackrock, Virtu, and Fidelity are there too?*
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.0: Introduction
+
+The price of $GME is artificial. Prior posts have shown how $GME is being illegally manipulated by key players to the financial system, namely Citadel. These companies abuse their legitimate privileges to profit themselves at the expense of the market and investors. But it goes much deeper: Citadel is now positioned to do more than just monopolize securities transactions. Citadel is positioned to BE the market for securities transactions.
+
+Wait, what?
+
+Buckle up.
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.1: KING, I
+
+Citadel's influence on the market is all due to one quality: Volume.
+
+Volume is king.
+
+-   There is no way to understate it. Remember [this chart?](https://i.redd.it/idkn9cchpn571.png) Citadel and Virtu's combined volume being larger than ANY exchange is only the *beginning*, it's our *starting point*.
+
+Do you want to know why it's taking so long to MOASS?
+
+-   Look at this [tweet estimating the fees the MMs make off of volume.](https://i.redd.it/0ruptccy0u871.png) - [sauce](https://twitter.com/EricBalchunas/status/1354775322445701128)
+
+-   MMs made an estimated $350M+ in four days. January 27 (the "sneeze") [volume was 24.8 billion equities traded](https://www.marketsmedia.com/us-equity-trading-volume-reaches-record/) for a single day.
+
+-   (we now know the MMs also took the full income of the shares they sold since they were selling pledged shares and never delivered)
+
+-   This illustrates how the MMs generate revenue off of any volume. They do this with nearly any security or transaction they make a market for.
+
+*So the same activities that empower Apes to create the MOASS also provide the MMs with more resources to prolong the arrival of MOASS.*
+
+What a fuckin' paradox.
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.2: Kneel before the crown
+
+Volume is king. Once a firm hits a critical mass of transactions, it become impossible NOT to deal with that firm. For example:
+
+Exchanges
+
+-   The NYSE & Nasdaq view Citadel/MEMX as a threat. Look at this article posted on the Nasdaq website [regarding MEMX](https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/the-answer-to-memx-2020-07-06):
+
+> "MEMX will provide market makers with the ability to bypass the exchanges entirely." (*lol, so pissy*)
+
+*(credit to *[u/Fantasybroke](https://www.reddit.com/u/Fantasybroke/)* for their *[*awesome comment*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o2xz48/the_sun_never_sets_on_citadel_part_1/h2936st/)*)*
+
+-   As much as these exchanges might be "frenemies" with Citadel, they still need to function as businesses.
+
+-   This pandemic posed a major issue for the NYSE: *how could they do IPOs* -- a critical function for exchanges -- *when all traders were remote?*
+
+-   They relied on Citadel. [Nine times](https://www.businessinsider.com/how-citadel-securities-dmms-are-handling-ipos-remotely-2020-5).
+
+-   There was *no other firm* that had the capability to execute. Only Citadel.
+
+Brokers
+
+-   Awhile back there was a post about how a broker sent notice to clients saying in effect that they wouldn't know how to source their transactions in the event of Citadel defaulting. Users should expect delays in transactions if that happened.
+
+-   (*eToro? WeBull? Schwab? TDA?* *Superstonk I need the source, help![]*)
+
+-   If confirmed, this implies major brokerages are becoming or already are reliant on Citadel for basic, essential functions.
+
+[WHAT. THE. FUCK.](https://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/tom-delonge-wtf1.gif)
+
+Let me it say again another way: we are at a point where MAJOR BROKERAGES AND EVEN EXCHANGES DO NOT KNOW HOW TO FUNCTION WITHOUT CITADEL.
+
+But it's bigger than that -- it's not just key players in the market that are reliant on Citadel.
+
+But first.
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.3: The Four Corners
+
+> *We... manufacture money.*\
+> *-- Ken Griffin*
+
+That Ken Griffin quote stood out to me, I have a background in operations with experience in manufacturing & logistics. "Manufacture" implies certainty of output, given the correct inputs. Looking at Citadel's actions in the context of manufacturing - supply and demand -- we can reverse engineer the strategy. Understand how we got here. Let's go. (*This is important groundwork, but if you need to skip you can jump to "2.4: Corner 3: Buyer"*)
+
+Overview
+
+You can think of the financial industry as one that manufactures "transactions", in the same way that the automotive industry manufactures "vehicles" of all varieties.
+
+To manufacture a transaction requires a buyer, a seller, a product, and is produced in a venue (a.k.a. a "Transaction factory").
+
+-   The national "supply" comes from the collection of the different "factories": exchanges, ATS's (Dark Pools), SDP's (single-company terminals), etc. Each of the venues produces a slice of the overall Transactions pie chart.
+
+-   Supply of "raw materials" (lol) - buyers and sellers with products - flow into the various factories. Exchanges have been the primary "Transaction factories" for centuries. NYSE and Nasdaq still produce a large portion of US transactions every year.
+
+-   These exchanges employ Market Makers as a permanent stand-in buyer, seller, or provider of products at the exchanges -- whatever is needed. Exchanges charter MMs to provide the missing pieces to complete the transactions, and provide the MMs with special abilities to do so. Because exchanges benefit from having MMs.
+
+So...
+
+if you were a Market Maker, and you already provide the raw materials for buyer, seller, and product pieces of "production," what would you want to do next if you wanted to grow?
+
+You would want a venue. Then you could manufacture transactions independently.
+
+So guess what Citadel wants to do?
+
+But -- is Citadel is ready? Do they really have enough Products, Sellers, and Buyers to supply a "factory" of their own?
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.2: Corner 1: PRODUCT
+
+Product is about range. Range of available products is CRITICAL feature demanded by clients, as well as the necessary volume.
+
+Storytime:
+
+-   A few months back a reddit user commented about their experience working at a financial firm (*for the love of everything I can't find the comment now -- Superstonk help again!?[]*). I don't remember the username, probably something like "stocksniffer42" or whatevs, lol. Let's call him "Greg."
+
+-   Greg would occasionally need to make securities transactions at a nearby terminal, a couple times a week. Price wasn't really important to Greg.
+
+-   But what WAS significant was availability. Greg had providers he preferred because they had what he needed. When they didn't it was super inconvenient for him because THEN Greg would have to search through enough providers to find what he needed. The more "availability" that a certain provider offered, the more likely Greg used them.
+
+-   This is pretty much the Amazon/WalMart/Target strategy. You're more likely to buy from them since they have everything. Even if it's not the lowest price.
+
+Exchanges have a limited offering -- CBOE doesn't offer the same products as NYSE and vice-versa.
+
+Huh, look at that. Citadel is a MM for multiple exchanges - CBOE, NYSE, and NASDAQ. Looks like Citadel can offer options, securities, bonds, [swaps](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-01/ken-griffin-gets-redemption-in-swaps-market-once-ruled-by-banks), and pretty much [any product under the sun](https://www.citadel.com/disclosures/).
+
+Seems like they have "Product" pretty well sorted. What about the other pieces?
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.3: Corner 2: SELLER
+
+Generally, Sellers are interested in only PRICE. However, price is the LEAST important aspect of all demand, believe it or not. (*Note: we'll assume some interests overlap between buyer and seller because the same party can alternate roles.*)
+
+Price is supported market-wide by a sense of trust and pre-arranged transaction costs:
+
+-   Price is set nationally by the NBBO -- [the National Best Bid and Offer](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nbbo.asp). A national price range that establishes trust with buyers and sellers. Everybody abides by it. [Nobody will be scamming anyone on price in the NBBO](https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/bartlett_mccrary_latency2017.pdf). Because...
+
+-   Venues (like exchanges) don't make money off price, they make it from member fees, or sub-penny fees.
+
+-   Product prices can vary quickly, so it's somewhat relative. Precision pricing isn't a concern for the vast majority of non-HFT trades.
+
+-   Buyers will proceed if the price is within their acceptable range and doesn't have an undue markup.
+
+-   Market Makers make very little money on individual transactions, usually.
+
+-   (We individual retail investors may want maximum profit through a single transaction (**cough** DIAMOND HANDS **cough**)... but not Market Makers.)
+
+However, institutional sellers have an additional price agenda:
+
+-   Volume sellers don't want to flood the market of their given security, dropping the price right as they sell. They want to offload the asset in a price-friendly way.
+
+-   Strategic sellers don't want the marketplace to know that they changed a position, they want to keep their transactions private.
+
+These sellers would want a venue that won't affect the public price and remains private.
+
+So price agenda is relative - it's up to each party to decide their interests. At the point of transaction price is either pre-negotiated (for volume sells), or else *precise* price does not matter for non-HFT transactions. (*Would you sell $XYZ at $220.05 but NOT at $220.02?*)
+
+Strategically, if Citadel wanted to increase its volume of sellers it would need:
+
+-   the ability to absorb large volumes of securities (i.e. buy a lot at a competitive price)
+
+-   source a large volume of buyers to match with the sellers.
+
+-   have a private transaction venue to attract sellers of any volume
+
+Interesting. Seems like Citadel is probably already doing a lot of this activity through the exchanges or Dark Pools they might be connected to.
+
+How about the last piece?
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.4: Corner 3: BUYER
+
+A Buyer is interested in one thing: EASE OF ACCESS.
+
+*Like Greg, a buyer wants easy access to a range of securities, acceptable prices, and easy access to to sellers.*
+
+Citadel can be all of these and/or provide them, but, wait --
+
+How exactly can clients BUY from Citadel?
+
+*Maybe clients can buy from Citadel on the public exchanges?*
+
+-   True, but Citadel could still lose the bid. Or pay additional fees, or lose on the bid-ask spread.
+
+-   Also, that's no good for Citadel. It means the clients are coming to the exchanges, which are the venues Citadel is trying to compete against.
+
+*Perhaps their target clients are institutions that want the kind of lower-cost, lower-visibility option that a Dark Pool offers? Can clients buy from Citadel on one of the many Dark Pools/ATSs?*
+
+-   Yes, but the Dark Pools can be "pinged" by HFTs to reveal positions and interest. Someone else could front run the transaction.
+
+-   And again, the venue would be making the transaction, not Citadel.
+
+*So why doesn't Citadel do their own Dark Pool then? Why should the US's largest Market Maker pay to use someone else's Dark Pool?*
+
+-   Okay, let's check if Citadel Has their own ATS. Hmmm... that's weird. There is [no ATS registered to Citadel](https://www.sec.gov/files/data/alternative-trading-system-ats-list/atslist053121.pdf). *Anywhere.*
+
+-   (Dark Pools have to [register through form ATS-N](https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/form-ats-n-filings.htm) due to SEC regulation ATS)
+
+*So if Citadel has to compete for buyers in exchanges, and they pay to go through Dark Pools, then why, or how, do clients buy from Citadel? How does Citadel get its volume?*
+
+Easy.
+
+Citadel Connect.
+
+*Wait, what?*
+
+[Citadel Connect](https://i.redd.it/v35705zpru871.png).
+
+That's right. You've been in these subs for 6 months and you haven't heard of Citadel Connect? Citadel's "not a Dark Pool" Dark Pool? (That's not by coincidence, btw).
+
+[*MOTHERFUCKER WHAT?!?!*](https://i.redd.it/wy0fpnnb0u871.jpg)
+
+Citadel Connect is an SDP, not an ATS. The difference is the reporting requirements. SDPs do not have to make the disclosures that either the exchanges or even the ATSs (a.k.a. Dark Pools) have to.
+
+-   (FINRA once took a look at [regulating SDPs](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/finra/2019/34-86315.pdf), but decided [not to](https://i.redd.it/328lgq1s1v871.png)).
+
+[Yep.](https://media0.giphy.com/media/UvtKiyeWYEhRC/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47d9juouou9jrbshblwc2adl6q17tv6g424rp2kvoi&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g)
+
+There is a laughable amount of search results for Citadel Connect on Google. There are no images of it that I could find. I believe it is an API-type feed that plugs into existing order systems. But I couldn't tell you based on searches. I found no documentation -- just allusions to its features.
+
+-   So when the SEC regulated ATSs in 2015, Ken shut down Citadel's actual Dark Pool, [Apogee](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-citadel-darkpool/citadel-securities-to-close-apogee-dark-pool-sources-idUSKBN0MN22Q20150327), in order to avoid visibility altogether. Citadel started routing transactions [through Citadel Connect](https://www.reuters.com/article/citadel-darkpool/citadel-sees-volume-surge-in-its-citadel-connect-dark-pool-idUSL2N0LQ17H20140221) instead.
+
+-   Citadel Connect doesn't meet the definition of an ATS. There is no competition -- no bids, no intent of interest, no disclosures -- nothing. It is one order type from one company.
+
+-   Order type is IOC (Immediate Or Cancel), and the output is binary -- a type of "yes" or "no". You deal only with Citadel.
+
+-   *"Citadel, here's 420 shares of $DOOK, will you buy at $6.969?"*
+
+-   "YES" --> *transaction complete*, or
+
+-   "NO" --> *end transaction*
+
+-   Since it's private, the only information that comes out of the transaction is what's reported to the tape, 10 seconds after the transaction.
+
+*Okay, so you're just buying from a single company, that doesn't seem like a big deal. And aren't there are *[*a lot of other SDPs*](https://blog.themistrading.com/2020/12/14434/)*? So why is this a problem?*
+
+By itself? Not a problem. Buyers and sellers love it, I'm sure.
+
+However...
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.5: KING, II
+
+Volume is king.
+
+Citadel does such volume that it is considered a "securities wholesaler", one of only a few in the US. Like Costco, or any wholesale business, it deals in bulk. But Citadel can deal in small transactions, too.
+
+Citadel has a massive network of sales connections through its Market Maker presence at US exchanges. It capitalizes on the relationships through Citadel Connect, turning them into clients.
+
+-   Citadel has a market advantage with its volume of clients.
+
+Citadel Connect integrates into existing ATSs and client dashboards (here's an example from [BNP Paribas](https://i.redd.it/dojfd7lyru871.png) - [sauce](https://globalmarkets.cib.bnpparibas/app/uploads/sites/4/2021/05/execution-venues-us-version.pdf)). Like Greg's testimonial, I suspect it's easy for just about any financial firm to deal directly with Citadel.
+
+-   Citadel has an ease of access advantage.
+
+And given Citadel's wide range of products it conducts business in and is a Market Maker for, I'm sure Citadel is an attractive option for just about anyone in the financial industry who wants to buy or sell a financial product of any kind. Competitive prices. Whether in bulk or in small batches. Whether privately or publicly. However frequently, or whatever the dollar amount might be.
+
+-   Citadel has a privacy and pricing advantage.
+
+Like Amazon, WalMart, and Target, Citadel is offering *everything*: a wide range of products, nearly any volume, effortless ease of access, the additional powers of an MM, and a nearly ubiquitous presence. Doing so lets Citadel capture a massive amount of market share. So much that it is prohibitive to other players, relegating them to smaller niche offerings and/or a smaller footprint.
+
+-   Citadel has market presence advantage.
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.6: The Final Piece: VENUE
+
+So guess what Citadel wants to do?
+
+But... do you get it? Have you figured it out?
+
+Citadel doesn't need to get a venue.
+
+Citadel *IS* the venue.
+
+Citadel is [internalizing](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/internalization.asp) a substantial volume of transactions from the marketplace. It's conducting the transactions inside its own walls, acting AS the venue in itself.
+
+Said another way, Citadel is "black box"-ing the transaction market, and it's doing so at a [massive volume](https://i.redd.it/drdcsznn0u871.png) - [sauce](https://www.rblt.com/market-reports/let-there-be-light-us-edition-24).
+
+-   *Okay, so it sounds like Citadel is just buying and selling from multiple parties, and making a profit off the spread. Every firm does that, though, right? It's just arbitrage, it doesn't make them an exchange.*
+
+Citadel is offering the features of an exchange, or even benefiting from existing exchanges (i.e. the NBBO, MM powers across multiple exchanges) without any of the regulations of an exchange. It can offer more products, more easily, more quickly, more cheaply, and more privately than an exchange could. It's so non-competitive that IEX - yeah, the exchange - [wrote about the decline of exchanges](https://medium.com/boxes-and-lines/the-rising-tide-of-broker-costs-and-the-shrinking-pool-of-competitors-40d4d389e59a):
+
+> "...trends of the past decade have seen a sharp increase in costs to trade on exchanges, a sharp decrease in the number of exchange broker members, and a steady erosion in the ability of smaller or new firms to compete for business."
+
+It is doing this at the same time that brokers and even exchanges are relying on Citadel more and more. And, by the way - *why are they so reliant on Citadel in the first place?* Glad you asked.
+
+Volume is limited. So the more volume Citadel takes...
+
+-   ...the less volume there is for the competition.
+
+-   ...the more reliant the other players are on Citadel for buying and selling.
+
+-   ...the less profit for competitors, so the more expensive their services have to be.
+
+This "rich-get-richer" advantage is known as a "virtuous cycle" (hah -- "virtuous") -- one of the most sought-after business advantages.
+
+Citadel is capturing and internalizing more and more transactions, driving up costs for exchanges and making the competition smaller and smaller while also making them more dependent on Citadel to conduct critical business operations.
+
+"Free market"
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.7: "...to forgive, devine."
+
+Apes, I told you I would follow up on "how" and "why" I missed on Citadel not being an MM across the EU.
+
+The EU marketplace is structured differently than the American markets, with different rules and roles. I knew Citadel had a massive presence in the EU, I just missed the role. I think you can put together [why](https://i.redd.it/axa0gpvap1971.png).
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.8: TL;DR
+
+Citadel is moving beyond monopolizing the MM role, it has captured a massive portion of all securities transactions and is moving them off-exchange. For an undisclosed portion of transactions, Citadel IS the market.
+
+-   Citadel positioned itself to provide every piece required to provide transactions -- buyers, sellers, product -- at an unrivaled scale, allowing it to be a wholesale internalizer.
+
+-   ("Internalizing" here is shorthand for "one company acting as a private exchange without exchange regulations or oversight").
+
+-   Citadel does this through an SDP called "Citadel Connect," which is a type of Dark Pool that doesn't require disclosure.
+
+-   Citadel's overall volume and market position are prohibitive to new competition and also drives away all but the largest competitors.
+
+-   Even exchanges are losing volume to Citadel's OTC market share, threatening the exchanges' position in the market.
+
+Citadel is capturing more and more of the transactions market, experiencing less competition, as it enjoys more and more entrenched advantages, at the expense of the market and the investor.
+
+This is the groundwork that will set us up for Part 3.
+
+* * * * *
+
+Part 3 coming soon...
+
+* * * * *
+
+EPILOGUE: Dieu et mon droit
+
+"But it's bigger than that -- it's not just key players in the market that are reliant on Citadel."
+
+Including this after the TL;DR for all to see. This is why I was delayed.
+
+This is a 2 minute video from Citadel's own page. [Watch it.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVfxEBE-nI4&t=158s) It blew me away when I saw it, and I'll explain why below. Transcription mine (streamlined version):
+
+> *Mary Erodes:* That's a really important shift. The groups that used to make markets, i.e. step in when no one else was there, were the banks. They have shrunk by law. So when we need liquidity in the future... [points at Ken] He's has a fiduciary obligation to care only about his shareholders and his investors. He doesn't have an obligation to step in to make markets for the sake of making markets. It will be a very different playbook when we go through the liquidity crunch that eventually will come.
+
+> *Ken Griffin:* I think this is very interesting, "what is the role [Citadel] will play in the next great market correction?" ...[In financial crashes] no one buys the asset that represents the falling knife. The role of the market maker is to maximize the availability of liquidity to all participants. Because the perception and reality that you create liquidity helps to calm the markets. We worked with NYSE and the SEC to re-architect trading protocols... The role of large investment banks has been supplanted by not only Citadel Securities, but by a whole ecosystem of statistical arbitrage that will absorb risk that comes to market quickly.
+
+[emphasis mine]
+
+Let me summarize. Mary and Ken commented that:
+
+-   The old way of stabilizing financial crises was through multiple banks negotiating a solution to stabilize the economy.
+
+-   Banks can no longer do this due to regulations and their position in the market.
+
+-   Citadel (Ken) sees a Market Maker's role as a stabilizer, to make sure there are no violent price swings.
+
+-   Citadel worked with NYSE and SEC to re-architect the markets/economy on this belief that MMs will stablize and calm markets.
+
+IF this is true, and IF what Ken spoke of is an accurate reflection of how the market is now structured, then here is the subtext and implications:
+
+-   Market Makers, specifically Citadel and Virtu, are now the ECONOMY'S "immune system," they are the first and best line of defense against catastrophic collapse.
+
+-   Their function is to make sure that no single security or asset class can expose the market to overwhelming risk.
+
+-   They manage this risk through statistical arbitrage and coordination with authorities (NYSE & SEC) on behalf of the market.
+
+-   Citadel worked with the oversight organizations to influence the structure of the overall market.
+
+Going deeper:
+
+Everyone in this room knew about naked shorting. And that Citadel was a primary culprit.
+
+Which implies that somewhere, at some point, a deal was reached, tacitly or explicitly. The NYSE and SEC were in on it (at the time):
+
+Citadel/MM's get to control securities prices with relative impunity. Naked shorting and all.
+
+And in return, Citadel is responsible for making sure that no more crashes happen.
+
+[WHAT THE FUCK.](https://i.giphy.com/media/kGweWfIbaezO8/giphy.webp) I have no words.
+
+IF this is true, the implications for the MOASS are...
+
+-   Citadel defaulting is the equivalent of the entire economy getting full blown AIDS and spinal cancer at the same time. Knocking out the immune system and the functional response chain of the market.
+
+-   This leaves the market vulnerable to violent price swings that can instantly bankrupt other players
+
+-   ...which is why the DTCC is so concerned about member defaulting and transferring of assets...
+
+-   ...and another reason why the MOASS is taking so long: every player in the economy needs Citadel's assets need to remain intact, to stabilize the market and continue acting as the immune system.
+
+This video is from 2018. It has been over 2 years since then, at the time of this writing.
+
+Buy. Hodl.
+
+* * * * *
+
+Note 1: [u/dlauer](https://www.reddit.com/u/dlauer/) if you're reading this I'd like to connect re:part 3 - HMU with chat (DMs are off)\
+Note 2: If you guys find the links I couldn't find (i.e. "Greg", and the brokerage letter saying Citadel defaulting would delay their transactions) - comment and I'll update!\
+Note 3: Apes, I've seen responses to part one that end in despair. Be encouraged - regulators (NYSE, SEC, et. al) don't seem to like the current setup anymore. Gary Gensler's speech last month was laser-focused on Citadel and Virtu (and also confirms this DD):
+
+> Further, wholesalers have many advantages when it comes to pricing compared to exchange market makers. The two types of market makers are operating under very different rules. [...]
+
+> Within the off-exchange market maker space, we are seeing concentration. One firm has publicly stated that it executes nearly half of all retail volume.[2] There are many reasons behind this market concentration --- from payment for order flow to the growing impact of data, both of which I'll discuss.
+
+> Market concentration can deter healthy competition and limit innovation. It also can increase potential system-wide risks, should any single incumbent with significant size or market share fail.
+
+I don't think the guy likes Citadel very much lol
+
+* * * * *
+
+Edit: I'm seeing some responses that think this post implies Citadel is all powerful or controls everything. Very much not the case. Apes have them by the balls. Buy and Hodl, as always. But it helps to know exactly *what* we are up against, and *why* the MOASS is taking time. Also, we don't really want Citadel to just change the name on the building and get a new CEO - that doesn't really solve the problem, does it?

01-Must-Read/The-Naked-Shorting-Scam-by-broccaaa/2021-06-16-Naked-Shorting-Scam-in-Numbers-Part-II.md

@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.
+================================================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/broccaaa](https://www.reddit.com/user/broccaaa/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o14ccz/the_naked_shorting_scam_in_numbers_part_deux_up/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Introduction
+
+Since my last major post a lot's happened with our favourite stonk. Top DD apes like [u/criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/criand/) and [u/HomeDepotHank69](https://www.reddit.com/u/HomeDepotHank69/) have dug into how the FTD cycle impacts price down the road. [u/RocketApes](https://www.reddit.com/u/RocketApes/) managed to build a model to predict GME price movements. And we saw another big price movement up to the edge of $350.
+
+The purpose of this post is to update a lot of the figures I've shared previously while adding a few more observations. I'll give brief descriptions of what each figure is showing but I'll not go into deep speculation here. Instead I'll possibly work on a follow up theory post in the coming days but already make all the data in this post available to the community.
+
+My previous posts went into a lot more speculation and can be referenced if you're interested in going deeper in a particular area:
+
+1.  [The naked shorting scam revealed: lending of market maker privileges, the married put trade and why inflicting max pain will bleed them dry](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgj0j1/the_naked_shorting_scam_revealed_lending_of/)
+
+2.  [The naked shorting scam update: selling nude like its 2021](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mh6lnz/the_naked_shorting_scam_update_selling_nude_like/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
+
+3.  [The naked shorting scam in numbers: AI detection of 140M hidden FTDs, up to 400M naked shorts in married puts and massive dark pool activity by Shitadel and the shorts](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvdgf5/the_naked_shorting_scam_in_numbers_ai_detection/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
+
+4.  [The naked shorting scam using ETFs: mass shifting of FTDs from GME to 20+ ETFs & 27+ billion dollars still owed in remaining SI](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n1vgbb/the_naked_shorting_scam_using_etfs_mass_shifting/)
+
+5.  [All New 13F filings: data visualised for all major fund position changes and the new short players in GME](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nev6po/all_new_13f_filings_data_visualised_for_all_major/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
+
+6.  [Analysis deep dive: looking at historical SI% + FTD data and modelling share borrow fees since Jan](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mma7eh/analysis_deep_dive_looking_at_historical_si_ftd/)
+
+Now to get into the data and see what the fuck has been going on with reported stonk numbers in the last weeks.
+
+*Note: this is not financial advice. I am not a cat. I gathered some data, made some figures and tried to understand them. Any number of my interpretations could be flawed and wrong. Do your own research, make your own mind up.*
+
+Understanding the Cycle: Fails to deliver (FTDs) in GME and linked ETFs
+
+A lot of great posts in recent weeks have looked at T-21, T-35 and more recently net capital requirement cycles. Other apes have pointed out that price often moves upward just before short interest (SI) reporting cycles to manipulate down their numbers.
+
+Although elements to all these theories are now close to proven there remain some outstanding questions. Why are the cycles apparently so clean without many overlapping cycles? What is the exact trigger for the shorts' FTD countdowns?
+
+I don't have the answer to these but I'll put out a bunch of data that might help the other wrinkly apes improve their theories. In later sections I also try to understand what is linking the different 'meme' stock price movements in 2021.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/vd301zksol571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=fc0e1e050248189449d35e7cb5f498a39bb694d3)](https://preview.redd.it/vd301zksol571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=fc0e1e050248189449d35e7cb5f498a39bb694d3)
+
+Total FTDs for GME and selected ETFs in 2021 with GME close price overlaid.
+
+Fails in GME dropped off after the January mini-squeeze but were transferred over to GME containing ETFs from February onwards. IWM and XRT are the most popular ETFs to naked short and fail on. In mid-May IWM, the *iShares Russell 2000 ETF*, had a massive 4 million share spike in FTDs. GME price began to rise steadily shortly after.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/12jl7hzuol571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=d2cde3c0a6237ea464cb419c6664b5b9fba393ce)](https://preview.redd.it/12jl7hzuol571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=d2cde3c0a6237ea464cb419c6664b5b9fba393ce)
+
+Total FTDs for GME and all ETFs combined in 2021 with GME close price overlaid.
+
+Although I only selected the top 19 GME containing ETFs for most of the analyses (first figure), when I grouped all GME containing ETFs together (more than 70 of them) we see that the pattern of FTDs in 2021 is very similar. This means that the selected 19 ETFs contain almost all of the interesting FTD info.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/wb6gjdhzll571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=cdf92de9dbaebbd1542211b936f8ade353235cc9)](https://preview.redd.it/wb6gjdhzll571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=cdf92de9dbaebbd1542211b936f8ade353235cc9)
+
+Total FTDs for GME and selected ETFs in since Jan 2020 with GME close price overlaid.
+
+Looking back on GME and ETF FTDs since Jan 2020 we see that the recent large spike in IWM FTDs is actually relatively small compared to some of the FTD spikes seen in 2020. On 3 separate occasions in 2020 IWM FTDs spiked to over 8 million shares.
+
+The link between GME and other 'meme' stocks
+
+So it's clear to anyone that's been watching GME and the 'movie stock' for a while that they move together in a way that would not make sense in a free market.
+
+Here's a figure I put together covering up to the end of May 2021. Clear correlation and fuckery between these 3 stocks.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/0oeky4jf5m571.jpg?width=2414&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3fb2229a8e39b33b8e9cd7475ab6c2febb67b7c7)](https://preview.redd.it/0oeky4jf5m571.jpg?width=2414&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3fb2229a8e39b33b8e9cd7475ab6c2febb67b7c7)
+
+2021 price movements for GME and 2 other well known 'meme' stocks
+
+Since I made this figure the movie stock has diverged from the GME trend. But why? Here are some figures to compare and some basic speculation.
+
+Value of fails for meme stocks: GME, movie and headphone stocks
+
+These plots take a look at total fail values for meme stocks and associated ETFs. It's important to plot these in fail value rather than total failed shares because each stock has a different free float and share price.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/jf8ckih0pl571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=18d9d3ad79f57ed2b9e9c91523f37a255abee1d1)](https://preview.redd.it/jf8ckih0pl571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=18d9d3ad79f57ed2b9e9c91523f37a255abee1d1)
+
+Total Value of FTD fails for GME and selected ETFs in 2021 with GME close price overlaid.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/36ip4ow4pl571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=c64a8b6b2019578e71414cddd1c7cb0e722b2dff)](https://preview.redd.it/36ip4ow4pl571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=c64a8b6b2019578e71414cddd1c7cb0e722b2dff)
+
+Total Value of FTD fails for movie-stock and selected ETFs in 2021 with close price overlaid.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/lkyluj83pl571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=966ade7d1862e23bfe7c7f65c95a40de19812295)](https://preview.redd.it/lkyluj83pl571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=966ade7d1862e23bfe7c7f65c95a40de19812295)
+
+Total Value of FTD fails for headphone-stock and selected ETFs in 2021 with close price overlaid.
+
+What do we notice? Well the value of fails for movie-stock and headphone-stock has always been relatively small with just a single day in January with large $100+ million dollar for each of these. GME has larger fail values in Jan across multiple days but has then dropped off in following months.
+
+GME also has large fails across a bunch of ETFs but with most of the fail values occurring in IWM. *The movie-stock and headphone-stock only have fails for IWM*.
+
+What links these different meme-stocks is their inclusion in the same *iShares Russell 2000 ETF - IWM.* IWM has been shorted to shit since Covid came around. It must've seemed like an obvious choice to short a bunch of vulnerable companies all at the same time. Fails are massive for IWM with up to 5-10% of total ETF shares failing on certain days in the last year.
+
+Reported Short Interest for meme stocks: GME, movie and headphone stocks
+
+Now we've looked at FTDs in these meme stocks let's take a look at reported short interest. This number is prone to manipulation and is reported by the very people that benefit from manipulating the number down. That being said let's see how the 'official' numbers compare.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/pcnirq7lpl571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=fe4db101d80512e6893f3556bf013cbaea7581bb)](https://preview.redd.it/pcnirq7lpl571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=fe4db101d80512e6893f3556bf013cbaea7581bb)
+
+Total value of reported SI for GME and selected ETFs.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/ww7elprnql571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f655b223c2d571cf593e298c7819b1d40780daf)](https://preview.redd.it/ww7elprnql571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f655b223c2d571cf593e298c7819b1d40780daf)
+
+Total value of reported SI for movie-stock and selected ETFs.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/a7w7eufpql571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=bb7e5662c999646ea6ac02d539ebf6de29a6b9c6)](https://preview.redd.it/a7w7eufpql571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=bb7e5662c999646ea6ac02d539ebf6de29a6b9c6)
+
+Total value of reported SI for headphone-stock and selected ETFs.
+
+Movie-stock SI value owed is almost exclusively coming from IWM. Since the recent run up the reported SI for the movie-stock has also increased to a similar value owed for current GME reported SI value.
+
+For the headphone-stock the vast amount of reported SI value is coming from the IWM and XOP ETFs.
+
+The value of GME reported OI is also dominated by the huge open short position in IWM but also with relatively large short positions in XRT and VTI.
+
+So the IWM open short position is insane. Current value owed by reported IWM shorts is $30 billion when total IWM net assets are just $68 billion. That's 44% of all assets in the ETF that have been short sold with a borrow. This doesn't even include the huge number of FTDs and naked short selling for IWM in the last year.
+
+Open Options Interest for meme stocks: GME and movie stocks
+
+One of the weirdest things that happened after the end of Jan mini-squeeze is that open put interest in GME spiked to some pretty insane levels. [I previously suggested that this could be due to options fuckery to hide short positions](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvdgf5/the_naked_shorting_scam_in_numbers_ai_detection/).
+
+At the end of Jan 1.5 million new put contracts were opened in just a couple of days. These contracts cover 150 million shares. Most were in junk strike prices (e.g. $0.50) that were never likely to be reached again. Recently other DD apes like [u/Leenixus](https://www.reddit.com/user/Leenixus/) have [reported finding more weird put option activity](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nxgcu5/i_taut_i_taw_a_married_put_i_did_i_did_see/).
+
+Here I'll compare open option interest for GME and the movie-stock. Headphone-stock does not have options as far as I can tell. Data was obtained from [marketchameleon.com](https://marketchameleon.com/) .
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/za8mj3bexl571.png?width=4032&format=png&auto=webp&s=3d0dd92c078bf8fba10cb2c4e542788a7d098610)](https://preview.redd.it/za8mj3bexl571.png?width=4032&format=png&auto=webp&s=3d0dd92c078bf8fba10cb2c4e542788a7d098610)
+
+Total open interest for puts & calls for GME since Jan 2020.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/ozvo22ffxl571.png?width=4032&format=png&auto=webp&s=aea9d6aa5a6fcb77a45467dc49add853196c7e8e)](https://preview.redd.it/ozvo22ffxl571.png?width=4032&format=png&auto=webp&s=aea9d6aa5a6fcb77a45467dc49add853196c7e8e)
+
+Total open interest for puts & calls for GME since Jan 2020.
+
+So a massive spike in GME open put interest in January that disconnected from all previous levels. A large number of puts expired in April and 410k more will expire on July 16th. Despite prices dropping down to $40 in Feb and many options expiry dates coming and going, open put interest for GME still sits at around 1 million contracts. For GME only approx. 300k put contracts were reported in 13Fs despite 1.5 million being held. *Who holds the puts? Family offices?? Shells??*
+
+For the movie-stock the picture is quite different. Puts and call open interest never really diverged. The recent major run up has increased the number of open put contracts but it's still in line with the number of calls. Even at this high of 2 million open contracts it is important to remember that the movie-stock free float is approx. 10-times larger than for GME. So even with this recent bump in open interest, options fuckery is much less obvious and even if it were occurring the magnitude is 10% or less than what we've seen in GME.
+
+Meme Stock Summary
+
+Many of the weird indicators for GME do not show up as clearly in other meme-stocks. The most obvious similarity between them is that all 3 of the main meme stocks are part of the IWM ETF which has been shorted to shit this last year. GME is about to move out of the IWM Russell 2000 ETF and this could explode the shorts FTD juggling.
+
+Why is the movie-stock moving more than GME recently? I don't really know. My guess would be that it's got extra hype at the moment but the naked short indicators are just not there. They never have been. In 2020 the max movie-stock reported SI was about 20% while GME was at the reporting limit of 140% for months. Why would they manipulate movie-stock reporting when they were so careless to report GME SI% of 140%??
+
+In terms of options fuckery I just don't see it as clearly for movie-stock as for GME. There is nothing particularly out of the ordinary in the open interest. I've also not seen anyone identify deep ITM calls or married puts for the movie-stock when it's been so easy for GME and found independently over many different dates.
+
+I wish the movie-stock apes all the best but worry that they might just be riding the hype. For GME on the other hand I believe that the hole has been getting deeper and deeper since the known minimum SI% of 140% reported in Jan before the major fuckery even began.
+
+Dark Pool Trading in 'Squeeze Stocks'
+
+In the past I reported some weird behaviour in OTC trading in GME. I took anther look and extended the analysis to 73 stocks that appear to have squeezed in 2021. This list of stocks was taken from the work of [u/BurnieSlander](https://www.reddit.com/user/BurnieSlander/) and [his post on squeeze stocks](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nzajpv/the_matrix_is_everywhere_a_quant_dd/).
+
+I selected 73 stocks that have sustained a 200% growth since Jan. I then compared how these stocks have been trading compared to 9600 other stocks that trade OTC.
+
+*Important note: Each stock has a different number of shares outstanding and share price. To compare these stocks I first normalised each of them by subtracting their mean value for the window and dividing by the standard deviation.*
+
+The following plots show relative differences in OTC trading based on each shares' normalised values.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/4ilrlxa7ul571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed29834cb0cbe1ad488e59e687438ef10df52d02)](https://preview.redd.it/4ilrlxa7ul571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed29834cb0cbe1ad488e59e687438ef10df52d02)
+
+Normalised OCT trading volumes for 'Squeeze' stocks and other typical stocks.
+
+Through January and early Feb the squeeze stocks saw a spike in OTC trading volume on average compared to a typical stock. The total shares traded OTC were not substantially different to other stocks before or after the January period.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The naked shorting scam in numbers part deux: Up to date FTD, ETF, SI, Options & Dark Pool Data. GME is the shorted to shit unicorn that can never happen again.](https://preview.redd.it/g5emeccotl571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=76d9229b8cdfffef0e2286f523c19e3998dc74a5)](https://preview.redd.it/g5emeccotl571.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=76d9229b8cdfffef0e2286f523c19e3998dc74a5)
+
+Normalised OCT trading volumes for 'Squeeze' stocks and other typical stocks.
+
+When we look at average shares per trade the picture is different. Note that because the data is normalised we are just looking at the relative changes over time for the squeeze stock and typical stock groups.
+
+Typical stocks have not seen any major change in the average OTC trade size. The value is flat over time. For the squeeze stocks we see a dramatic shift. Particularly from January onwards, the number of shares per trade seen OTC dropped dramatically. This means smaller and smaller batches are traded OTC compared to their historical norm.
+
+Some of this could be because of retail taking part in more trades and PFOF issues but I can't believe that retail is driving this consistently across 73 different stocks. Why would order size OTC drop in recent months? Could it be wash sales or 'short ladder attacks' to manipulate prices? Wrinkle apes needed for this!
+
+TLDR; / Conclusion
+
+Go take a look at the figures! I tried to explain as clearly as I could. The best way to understand is to look at the figures yourself. That being said here are some highlights:
+
+-   Huge FTDs and SI% in the IWM ETF appear to link GME and other meme stonks
+
+-   A recent spike in IWM FTDs may have helped to drive the recent run up in meme-stocks
+
+-   IWM is the iShares Russell 2000 ETF. GME will move out of this soon. How will the shorts adapt their FTD juggling? Will it even be possible for them??
+
+-   GME continues to have huge open put interest and observed options fuckery. Many more puts expiring on July 16.
+
+-   Movie stock does not have any obvious options fuckery as far as I can see. If it's there then the scale is probably no more than 10% compared to GME.
+
+-   OTC data is weird and consistent across more than 70 different stocks that have maintained 200%+ gains since January. Why are average OTC trade sizes so small for these 70 stocks? Could this be wash sales to manipulate prices down? Something else??
+
+I've been zen with GME for months now and full YOLO. I wanted to get a 200+ million vote count announced but what we got changes nothing. Evidence of mass fuckery with GME for months. Price movements that make the fuckery undeniable. Huge GME fails and SI hidden in options and ETFs that will eventually unravel. A great team of execs now at Gamestop leading the turn around. In short, I like the stock.
+
+🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

02-Resources/2021-07-01-Resources.md

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+# Resources
+
+| Last Updated | July 7, 2021 |
+| :---: | :---: |
+
+| Name | Description |
+| :---: | :---: |
+| [GameStop Newsroom](https://gamestop.gcs-web.com/news-releases-0) | Stay up to date with GameStop's latest strategic initiatives. |
+| [GameStop Investor Relations](https://gamestop.gcs-web.com/home) | Source for GameStop's financial news. |
+| [Ape's Guide to the Galaxy](https://www.reddit.com/r/DDintoGME/comments/mnss65/the_apes_guide_to_the_galaxy_a_compilation_of_dds/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share) | Compilation of DD, News, Announcements, Tools, and Resources |
+| [GME DD](https://gmedd.com/) | Resource that aggregates a compilation of GME due diligence. |
+| [GME Timeline](https://gmetimeline.com/) | Comprehensive timeline of GME-related events. |
+| [GME Technical Analysis](https://www.investing.com/equities/gamestop-corp-technical) | Tracks technical analysis, news, and other insights for a particular stock. |
+| [IBorrowDesk](https://iborrowdesk.com/report/GME) | Monitors borrow rates and availability using Interactive Broker's freely available data. |
+| [Stonk-O-Tracker](https://gme.crazyawesomecompany.com/) | Tracks available shares to borrow, options data, FTDs, and more. |
+| [Where are the Shares?](https://wherearetheshares.com/) | Tool that monitors FTDs. |
+| [SEC - Fails-to-Deliver Data](https://www.sec.gov/data/foiadocsfailsdatahtm) | Website that provides FTD data. |
+| [GME ETFs](https://www.etf.com/stock/GME) | Tracks how many ETFs hold GME. |
+| [ETF Channel](https://www.etfchannel.com/symbol/gme/) | Website that shows ETF holdings of a particular stock. |
+| [NASDAQ Short Interest](https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=ShortInterest#) | Provides short interest data for mid-month and end of month settlement dates for a particular stock. |
+| [Ortex - Short Interest](https://www.ortex.com/symbol/NYSE/GME/short_interest) | Dashboard that show short interest data. |
+| [NASDAQ - Real Time Trades](https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/gme/latest-real-time-trades) | Tool to monitor real time trades. |
+| [S&P 500 Heatmap](https://finviz.com/map.ashx) | Website that allows you to observe when Hedge Funds are liquidating in which sector(s). |
+| [Holdings Channel](https://www.holdingschannel.com/bystock/?symbol=gme) | Displays a list of funds holding GME. |
+| [Fintel - GME Institutional Ownership](https://fintel.io/so/us/gme) | Dashboard that shown ownership data, short interest %, and other reports. |
+| [FINRA - Morningstar](http://finra-markets.morningstar.com/MarketData/EquityOptions/detail.jsp?query=14%3A0P000002CH&sdkVersion=2.60.0) | Tracks equity and options data along with other information. |
+| [Yahoo - GME Historical Data](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GME/history?p=GME) | Shows a running history of GME previous open and closing prices, volume, etc. |
+| [Superstonk Quants](https://www.superstonkquant.org/) | Open-source resource that aims to provide quantitative analysis on the market. |
+| [Gamestonk Terminal](https://www.reddit.com/r/DDintoGME/comments/mxl0co/move_over_bloomberg_terminal_here_comes_gamestonk/) | Bloomberg-like Terminal created by [u/SexyYear](https://www.reddit.com/u/SexyYear/) |
+| [Stockgrid - Dark Pool Data](https://www.stockgrid.io/darkpools) | Dashboard that shows dark pool data. |
+| [NASDAQ - Reg SHO Threshold List](https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=RegSHOThreshold) | List that displays securities that are currently on threshold. |
+| [Repo and Reverse Repo Operations](https://apps.newyorkfed.org/markets/autorates/tomo-results-display?SHOWMORE=TRUE&startDate=01/01/2000&enddate=01/01/2000) | Tracks ON-RRP and participants daily. |
+| [Buffet Indicator](https://currentmarketvaluation.com/models/buffett-indicator.php) | Resource that depicts when the market is overvalued or undervalued. |
+| [Advisor Perspectives](https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2021/06/04/the-s-p-500-dow-and-nasdaq-since-their-2000-highs) | Shows inflation-adjusted charts of the S&P 500, Dow 30, and Nasdaq. |
+| [DTCC - SEC Rule Filings](https://www.dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings) | Lists rule filings from major institutions. |
+| [US Senate Stock Watcher](https://senatestockwatcher.com/) | Website created by [u/rambat1994](https://www.reddit.com/u/rambat1994/) that tracks stock trades of US Senate Members. |
+| [US House of Representatives Stock Watcher](https://housestockwatcher.com/) | Website created by [u/rambat1994](https://www.reddit.com/u/rambat1994/) that tracks stock trades of US House of Representatives. |
+| [Investor.gov - Researching Investments](https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/getting-started/researching-investments) | Website that you walks you through how to do your due diligence. |
+| [Tax My Tendies](https://taxmytendies.com/) | Tools that helps you calculate how much you'll owe in taxes post-MOASS. (US only). |
+| [Gamestop NFT](https://nft.gamestop.com/) | GameStops' official NFT website |
+| [GME NFT Relationships](https://github.com/schismsaints/GME_NFT) | Graphic that shows the relationships between GME tokens. |
+
+*Table inspired by [u/Truffluscious](https://www.reddit.com/user/Truffluscious/)*
+
+# GameStop 
+| Show support at | 
+| :-: |
+| [Gamestop.com](https://www.gamestop.com/) | 
+| [Become a PowerUp Rewards Member](https://www.gamestop.com/poweruprewards/) | 
+| [... Which gets you a subscription to Game Informer Magazine](https://www.gameinformer.com/) | 
+| [Follow Gamestop on Twitter](https://twitter.com/GameStop) | 
+| [Subscribe to Gamestop's YouTube Channel](https://www.youtube.com/user/gamestopvideo) | 
+| [Follow Gamestop on Twitch](https://www.twitch.tv/gamestop) | 
+| [Follow Gamestop on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/gamestop/?hl=en) | 
+| [Follow Gamestop on Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/GameStop) | 
+| [Apple Devices- Download the Gamestop App](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/gamestop/id406033647) (Link to App Store) | 
+| [Android Devices- Download the Gamestop App](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gamestop.powerup) (Link to Play Shop) |
+| Brands owned by Gamestop; ThinkGeek, GameInformer, [MicroMania](https://www.micromania.fr/), and [EB Games](https://www.ebgames.ca/) |
+| [Gamestop Ireland](https://www.gamestop.ie/), [Gamestop Germany](https://www.gamestop.de/) |
+
+*Table created by [u/pinkcatsonacid](https://www.reddit.com/user/pinkcatsonacid/)*
+ 
+# Social Media
+| Name | Twitter | YouTube |
+| :-: | :-: | :-: |
+| [Superstonk](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/) | | 🚨 [Superstonk Emergency Broadcast](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCI4EET9NJPWxUuXGlG6fxPA) 🚨 |
+| [u/DeepFuckingValue](https://www.reddit.com/user/DeepFuckingValue/) | [@TheRoaringKitty](https://twitter.com/theroaringkitty?lang=en) | [Roaring Kitty](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0patpmwYbhcEUap0bTX3JQ) |
+| Ryan Cohen | [@ryancohen](https://twitter.com/ryancohen) |  |
+| [RedChessQueen](https://www.reddit.com/user/redchessqueen99/) | [@RedChessQueen99](https://twitter.com/RedChessQueen99) |  |
+| [Rensole](https://www.reddit.com/user/rensole/) | [@rensole](https://twitter.com/ryancohen) |  |
+| [HeyItsPixel](https://www.reddit.com/user/HeyItsPixeL/) | [@heyitspixel69](https://twitter.com/heyitspixel69) |  |
+| [PinkCatsOnAcid](https://www.reddit.com/user/pinkcatsonacid/) | [@PinkCatsOnAcid](https://twitter.com/PinkCatsOnAcid) |  |
+| [Dennis Kelleher](https://www.reddit.com/user/WallSt4MainSt/) | [@BetterMarkets](https://twitter.com/BetterMarkets) |  |
+| [Alexis Goldstein](https://www.reddit.com/user/dontfightthevol/) | [@alexisgoldstein](https://twitter.com/alexisgoldstein) |  |
+| Justin Dopierala | [@DOMOCAPITAL](https://twitter.com/DOMOCAPITAL) | [DOMO Capital Managment LLC](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3rCaBlsLlWJagcpbsais4w) |
+| Susanne Trimbath, PhD | [@SusanneTrimbath](https://twitter.com/SusanneTrimbath) |  |
+| [Dave Lauer](https://www.reddit.com/user/dlauer) | [@dlauer](https://twitter.com/dlauer) |  |
+| Andy Lee |  | [Andy Lee](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2e4QZAVEXQyH7BXfEE1GyA) |
+| [ByeTriangle](https://www.reddit.com/user/Bye_Triangle/) | [@ByeTriangle](https://twitter.com/ByeTriangle) | |
+| [sharkbait](https://www.reddit.com/user/sharkbaitlol) | [@u_sharkbaitlol](https://twitter.com/u_sharkbaitlol) | |
+| [BradduckF](https://www.reddit.com/user/Bradduck_Flyntmoore/) | [@BradduckF](https://twitter.com/BradduckF) | |

AMAs/Lucy-Komisar-AMA/Part-I/2021-05-24-Lucy-Komisar-AMA-Powerpoint-and-Partial-Script.md

@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
+POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script
+===========================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/pinkcatsonacid](https://www.reddit.com/user/pinkcatsonacid/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nke7sp/post_ama_dd_lucy_komisar_ama_powerpoint_and/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Many of you noticed I made a snazzy powerpoint to use during the Lucy K AMA today, but didn't get to use it due to technical difficulties. So even though it's not the same, here is the bulk of what was intended for the interview, including Lucy's written script. Knowledge is Power! 💪
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/g8nivrt6l6171.jpg?width=677&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=60102104cecd6de43dfc9d914a4525be62e1f80b)](https://preview.redd.it/g8nivrt6l6171.jpg?width=677&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=60102104cecd6de43dfc9d914a4525be62e1f80b)
+
+🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
+
+Lucy Komisar AMA Part 2 [(Link here)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuPizlDY0Ys&t=22s)
+
+Topic of Discussion- The SEC
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/p98qxh2476171.jpg?width=180&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=463cc9d081a8fa5a35b8828dd41b6121dd2737ec)](https://preview.redd.it/p98qxh2476171.jpg?width=180&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=463cc9d081a8fa5a35b8828dd41b6121dd2737ec)
+
+Securities and Exchange Commission
+
+THE SEC for Superstonk- Script By Lucy Komisar
+
+*When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it."* --- Frédéric Bastiat, 19th century French Economist
+
+How the SEC was created
+
+One reason for the stock market collapses in 1929 was watering stock. A meme went "he who sells what isn't his'n must pay it back or go to prison." Traders would print up counterfeit stock certificates. Sound familiar. Naked short selling. The crash that started the depression.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/l346v5i456171.jpg?width=470&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dbf1ac2b34080b60690ed448ed917fbce742f990)](https://preview.redd.it/l346v5i456171.jpg?width=470&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dbf1ac2b34080b60690ed448ed917fbce742f990)
+
+Ferdinand Pecora
+
+1932 Ferdinand Pecora was an immigrant working class kid from Sicily who put himself through New York Law School. He was hired in 1932 by the Senate Banking Committee to investigate the causes of the crash, to do a whitewash, but he didn't get the memo. His hearings exposed such practices as pools to support bank stock prices. Such as Let's all coordinate trades to pump up the stock. Sound familiar? GameStop? National City Bank (now Citibank) had hidden bad loans by packaging them into securities and selling them off to unwary investors. Sound familiar? Mortgage-backed securities that tanked? And that the bank sellers knew would tank?
+
+The findings of the Pecora Commission exposing corruption of the financial industry let to public support for regulation, -- it took really dirty stuff to move the pubic -which would be the Glass--Steagall Banking Act of 1933, the Securities Act of 1933, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. That last set up the SEC.
+
+Franklin Roosevelt appointed Joseph Kennedy (father of Jack and Robert) SEC chair. He had built the family fortune on financial manipulation, but Roosevelt thought he knew where the bodies were buried, who the miscreants. So the SEC cleaned up the Wall Street stables for five years. Then Kennedy's buddies of the financial oligarchy took charge again, in early regulatory capture.
+
+Pecora wrote a memoir, Wall Street Under Oath. He said: "Bitterly hostile was Wall Street to the enactment of the regulatory legislation." What, the thieves don't want rule of law? About disclosure rules, he said that "Had there been full disclosure of what was being done in furtherance of these schemes, they could not long have survived the fierce light of publicity and criticism. Legal chicanery and pitch darkness were the banker's stoutest allies." Think about who are their allies today.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/kulo5kk756171.jpg?width=354&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=89e834a1f13f04b2d889fdc66e9156d0bab67db1)](https://preview.redd.it/kulo5kk756171.jpg?width=354&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=89e834a1f13f04b2d889fdc66e9156d0bab67db1)
+
+Irving Pollack- Father of the SEC Division of Enforcement
+
+1985 Irving Pollack
+
+Fast forward about half a century. With the support of friends in Congress, Wall Street has neutered the securities acts by assuring the SEC would not enforce them. It made sure its foxes were guarding the henhouse. But the corruption was sometimes inconvenient. In 1985, the National Association of Securities Dealers, now FINRA, which represents the brokers, hired Irving Pollack, a former SEC commissioner who was honest, to look at short selling. Among his report's proposals: reporting of short interest -- the amount of short sales not yet covered -- should be public and perhaps more frequent. A borrowing for delivery in broker-dealer transactions should be required. A mandatory buy-in should be adopted for a delivery after a reasonable period when there has been a fail. That means the broker for the buyer who hasn't gotten the shares can buy them on the market and charge the short seller's broker. There should be surveillance of large short-interest positions, shorts not yet covered.
+
+Did the SEC adopt these proposals with enthusiasm? Obviously not. Short interest is not reported frequently. Broker dealers "locate" instead of borrow or they use counterfeit shares. There's no buy-in. Buy-ins were allowed but not required. And Leslie Boni, an academic who in 2004 did a paper for the SEC on buy-ins said they were rare. But requiring buy-ins would make the stock go up, the shorts lose money.
+
+And there was no surveillance of large short-interest positions.
+
+In fact, corruption would be increased thanks to friends of Wall Street president Bill Clinton and his collaborator Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin (formerly of Citibank) who in 1999, killed the Glass-Steagall Act which had separated investment banking from retail banking. Retail banks till then could not use depositors' funds for risky investments. Only 10% of their income could come from selling securities.
+
+That sets the stage for the last few decades.
+
+2004 RegSHO set up to fail
+
+The SEC, battered with complaints, in July 2004 promulgated Reg SHO, SHO for short selling. The hedge funds and big brokers who had been or would be shown to be illegally shorting all lobbied against it. It was a tepid reform of short selling that was Swiss-cheesed with loopholes. Think of Al Capone writing the tax laws. (On the other hand, his crooked progeny do write the tax laws!) Reg SHO would be implemented in 2005
+
+The SEC knocked out a proposal for penalties for failing to deliver.
+
+And it wrote two giant exceptions into Reg SHO. Ex-clearing and market makers.
+
+The rule didn't apply to ex-clearing, which means clearing outside the DTCC, The Depository Trust Clearing Corporation, the national stock clearing company. (Yes, it's a private company owned by the broker dealers) It applied only to trades going through a registered clearing agency, i.e. what got sent through the DTCC. It said ex-clearing was "rare."
+
+Sales that avoided clearing agencies could fail -- not be delivered -- without buyers' brokers reporting the fails to the DTCC or buying in, requiring the short sellers broker to buy shares on the market and deliver them. To protect short sellers and avoid Reg SHO, dealers went ex-clearing. They either cleared internally or with a cooperating broker-dealer or they went through dark pools. They were private exchanges set up by the big prime brokers and banks.
+
+The major perpetrators are the large banks, doing it for large clients, hedge funds, or their own accounts. If they can do the transaction privately [ex-clearing], RegSHO doesn't apply. Now about 40% of trades go through dark pools. *If a trade failed ex-clearing, it didn't fail at the DTCC!*
+
+Reg SHO also didn't apply to derivatives, the financial casino bets acknowledged as a prime cause of the current economic crisis and which also did not trade through a clearing house.
+
+Even stocks that cleared through the DTCC were not always covered. The brokers got a "grandfather clause" that allowed existing fails to continue! Because we know that brokers simply rolled them over. And brokers didn't have to close out the shares they had sold short before the stock went on the Threshold List which includes shares that for five consecutive settlement days had fails to deliver of 10,000 shares or more at a clearing agency and where the level of fails was equal to at least one-half of one percent of the issuer's outstanding shares.
+
+Then brokers were subject to mandatory covering only on the fifth day. Then the broker-dealer had 13 days to deliver the shares to the buyer or lender, and if it failed to do so, it could not trade that stock until it did. But the SEC knew, because staff wrote a paper on it, how options conversions allowed brokers to put off fail dates forever.
+
+MARKET MAKERS
+
+RegSHO allowed an options market maker exception, called after the person who designed and pushed for it: the Madoff Exception! (Did I say the crooks wrote the rules?)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/ndifb6fvk6171.png?width=1482&format=png&auto=webp&s=4b96285ed2e17c6fa057802f34861c4c532400c0)](https://preview.redd.it/ndifb6fvk6171.png?width=1482&format=png&auto=webp&s=4b96285ed2e17c6fa057802f34861c4c532400c0)
+
+Bernie Madoff, who died in prison in Apr 2021
+
+In prison in 2012 Madoff told Forbes journalist Diana Henriques: "I fell into my crime of staying Naked Short. The fact that the prosecutor and Trustee seemed clueless of this is why my frustration is so great." Clueless, or complicit? You just don't go there.
+
+The SEC in 2007 eliminated Uptick Rule that requires short sales to be conducted at a higher price than the previous trade. Not helpful if the purpose is to batter down the stock price. It was never enforced.
+
+2008 Stock lending and taking care of the banks
+
+According to the SEC Office of Economic Analysis (2008) Reg SHO in effect since 2005 had not reduced outstanding fails. Many stocks remained on the SEC Regulation SHO Threshold List for hundreds of trading days
+
+For years, the SEC claimed naked short selling and fails to deliver were not a problem. Once things began to go sour in 2008, the first thing the SEC did was ban naked short selling in 17 financial stocks plus Fannie and Freddie. It was ironic, since the big banks/brokers had been carrying out the scam on others. Hoist on their own petard.
+
+And they chose the solution that people battling naked short selling had advocated for years. A July 2008 order said no traders could make trades involving those institutions unless they had pre-borrowed the security or otherwise had it available in their inventory. They had to deliver the security on the settlement date. Borrow shares before you sell them short. Stop the counterfeiting. All the regs that came out were because naked shorting, the counterfeiting of shares, was undermining banks. The SEC went from nothing is happening till the fall of 2008 that the market coming apart because of naked shorting. They chose the solution that people battling naked short selling had advocated for years. Borrow shares before you sell them short. Stop the counterfeiting.
+
+The SEC said it was investigating the collapse of Bear Stearns. It had been massively naked shorted. The SEC didn't come up with anything.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/jca68d5g56171.jpg?width=330&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=741e78b0f0b0ac9ab85b0f27f872316eabbca976)](https://preview.redd.it/jca68d5g56171.jpg?width=330&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=741e78b0f0b0ac9ab85b0f27f872316eabbca976)
+
+Ted Kaufman- former US Senator, Delaware
+
+2009 Kaufman and the hard locate
+
+A little-known backstory involved former Delaware Senator Ted Kaufman who ran Biden's post-election transition team. It shows how big stock market players and the institutions they control have blocked attempts to deal with naked short selling. Kaufman was Biden's longtime chief of staff, and was named to the Senate seat vacated by his boss when Biden became Barack Obama's vice president.
+
+After the 2008 market meltdown that included abusive naked short selling of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, Kaufman, a Democrat, and Georgia senator Johnny Isakson, a Republican, introduced legislation that directed the SEC to write regulations to end the practice. They determined that the SEC's current regulations were unenforceable. Hedge funds could spread rumors, do massive shorts without locating stocks, and deliver after the prices dropped.
+
+In July 2009, Kaufman and six colleagues from both parties wrote to the SEC, proposing a "hard locate" plan that would ban all short sales unless the executing broker first obtained a unique identification number for the shares, perhaps through an automated centralized system. This would prevent multiple short sales on the basis of a single share.
+
+According to Jeff Connaughton, then Kaufman's chief of staff, months before the letter, "the DTCC (the national stock clearing agency) had gone to the SEC with a proposed solution to naked short selling that looked like Kaufman's solution, with the DTCC creating a centralized database that would prevent the same shares from being used for multiple short sales.
+
+The DTCC told Connaughton, 'We got pulled back.' They meant, he said, by their board, by the Wall Street powers-that-be." Because in the case of the DTCC as well as the SEC, the fox is guarding the henhouse.
+
+In 2009 staffers of the Senators met with the SEC's Enforcement Division to find out the status of its investigation into the naked short selling of Bear Stearns and Lehman stock. SEC lawyers told them they'd have to be patient and that the investigation would take at least another year. It never happened.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/m6a9h2jl56171.png?width=263&format=png&auto=webp&s=4074499e1301f9ad2712d1a806d20a0383873fa2)](https://preview.redd.it/m6a9h2jl56171.png?width=263&format=png&auto=webp&s=4074499e1301f9ad2712d1a806d20a0383873fa2)
+
+Ted Kaufman as long time advisor to the current President
+
+2010 Kaufman continued to try to fight naked short selling in the Dodd-Frank debate. SEC had been ordered by the Dodd-Frank law of 2010 11 years ago to require more transparency in short selling and stock lending. It has ignored it.
+
+There were some alleged improvements made that year, 2008.
+
+The market makers exemption was eliminated, because the SEC said substantial levels of fails had continued in Threshold securities, and a significant number were the result of market maker exceptions. But they still had 6 days to settle their trades. So you have market makers failing and rolling their shares over every 5 ½ days.
+
+The grandfather provision on Threshold securities was eliminated. Unless its position in Threshold securities was closed, a broker-dealer couldn't effect further shorts in them without borrowing or arranging to borrow the securities. Don't worry, they finessed that.
+
+The amendments addressed fake borrows. It said that where a broker-dealer entered into an arrangement with another party to purchase or borrow securities, and the broker-dealer knew or has reason to know that the other party would not deliver securities in settlement of the transaction, the purchase or borrow would not be *"bona fide."*
+
+It repeated that: "The NSCC - clears and settles the majority of equity securities trades conducted on the exchanges and in the over-the-counter market."
+
+So the rules still didn't apply to ex-clearing and dark pools. So the ex-clearing route to naked shorts was protected. fails could be concealed at the start by ex-by not reporting them to the NSCC, the National Securities Clearing Corporation.
+
+In fact, the dealers could use ex-clearing to opt out of fails from trades through the exchanges. They could take them onto their own books and deal with the fails as they chose to, meaning do nothing, let the fails sit*.*
+
+And protecting the interests of the big banks/brokerages, the SEC did not include a hard locate requirement in its amendments to Reg SHO.
+
+But the SEC occasionally takes enforcement actions that go after low-hanging fruit, ie don't bother anyone significant or don't order more than minor penalties, the cost of doing business.
+
+2003 Sedona/Badians
+
+The Sedona case, where the Badian brothers ran a death spiral financing scheme that in 2001 involved providing a loan that would be repaid in shares. And then it did a massive shorting attack that knocked down the price of the shares from $6 to 20cents. the SEC in February 2003 filed a complaint against Thomas Badian and his company, Rhino, for fraud and market manipulation of Sedona shares. Badian and Rhino immediately settled with the SEC for a $1-million fine without admitting or denying guilt. The $1 mil was a pittance, cost of doing business.
+
+In 2006, the SEC filed a civil suit against Andreas Badian, four officials of Pond Equities and a trader at Refco, all involved directly in the naked shorting, but not against Ladenburg, the high-profile broker-dealer that facilitated the deals and collaborators.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/fqrt6qam66171.jpg?width=960&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f91e36651dc8f18ba0e83a6e77d3bc079b718f3c)](https://preview.redd.it/fqrt6qam66171.jpg?width=960&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f91e36651dc8f18ba0e83a6e77d3bc079b718f3c)
+
+2005 Eagletech
+
+Eagletech, which had an invention, new at the time, to push phone calls to other devices. letting people to usee a single phone number that followed them from phone to phone. He became a target of a group of death spiral financing criminals working with Salomon Smith Barney in New York five Salomon officers and a group of investors offering to buy convertible preferred shares from Eagletech for up to $6 million
+
+They did a pump up and then naked shorting so the stock dropped from $14 to 75 cents, reducing the market value by $113 ml. The stock went to 2 cents. The FBI was investigating. They busted 17 members of organized crime, including the crooks that ran the scheme against Eagletech.
+
+SEC filed suit against Serubo, Labella and organized crime collaborators who ran the corrupt operation that got control of stock of Eagletech. It said they generated in excess of $12.7 million from the sale of Eagletech stock. Members of his Salomon Smith Barney financing team and their options market-makers in Chicago were selling shares and then failing to deliver.
+
+Serubo, Labella and organized crime collaborators would be banned from penny stock trading and pay back the ill-gotten gains and fines. I couldn't find any penalties against the Salomon Smith Barney team or their options market maker collaborators.
+
+Then the SEC filed suit against the victim, Eagletech, to deregister its shares because it couldn't afford several hundred thousand dollars to file audited financial reports. The delisting is like a bankruptcy, all investors are wiped out and the naked shorters never have to cover. The SEC finished what the mob started, it killed the company.
+
+2007 Goldman
+
+From at least March 2000 to May 2002, that's more than 2 years, certain customers of Goldman Clearing used the firm's direct market access, automated trading system to unlawfully sell securities short in advance of follow-on and secondary offerings when they could get the shares cheaper.
+
+Although they were selling the offered securities short, used Goldman Clearing's direct market access, automated trading platform, the REDI System, preparing their own orders to sell on computer terminals and falsely marked them "long." The orders were routed directly to the New York Stock Exchange and other markets for execution.
+
+Goldman Clearing's own records contained information that Customers were selling securities short and that they were misrepresenting their "short" sales as "long". Goldman Clearing's records showed that the customers were repeatedly failing to deliver to Goldman Clearing the securities that they purported to sell long.
+
+So for two years of allowing shorts to be marked longs, Goldman had to pay civil money penalty of -- wait for it -- $1 million
+
+2012 SEC v OptionsXpress
+
+OptionsXpress, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Charles Schwab repeatedly engaged in sham transactions, known as "resets," designed to give the appearance of having purchased shares to close-out an open failure-to-deliver position while in fact not doing so.
+
+OptionsXpress had its customers buying shares and simultaneously selling call options that were the equivalent of selling shares short. The purchase of shares created the illusion that the firm had covered the short; however, the shares were never actually delivered to the buyers because on the same day, calls were exercised, effectively reselling the shares. The purpose was to perpetuate an open short position.
+
+In 2009, the six optionsXpress customer accounts bought $5.7 billion worth of securities and sold short approximately $4 billion of options. They did this to a couple of dozen companies. In January 2010, the customers who did the scam accounted for 48% of the daily trading volume in Sears. In the end OptionsXpress had to pay $4 million. Cost of doing business.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/si49uknr56171.jpg?width=206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=56bf1d0512b8fdfc9e42c662d506fd8bc85c821f)](https://preview.redd.it/si49uknr56171.jpg?width=206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=56bf1d0512b8fdfc9e42c662d506fd8bc85c821f)
+
+Gary Aguirre- Former Investigator for SEC & Whistleblower
+
+The insiders tell the SEC corruption
+
+The story of Gary Aguirre says it all
+
+As a student at Georgetown Law School, Aguirre got a prize from the SEC for paper on Wall Street corruption as detailed in the Pecora hearings that led to passage of the Securities Act of 1933. So we know where he stands. In September 2004, he started as a senior counsel at the SEC Division of Enforcement. He said, "I understood what SEC was supposed to be doing: keep Wall Street from running amok. The SEC in July had promulgated Reg SHO, which it said would stop abusive naked short selling. He recalled, "The first thing I noticed is there seemed to be a deference to the large law firms who represented Wall Street players. And there were a lot of people there not at the same skill set level as the attorneys representing some of the players from Wall Street.
+
+Aguirre was assigned to an investigation that implicated a powerful Wall Street insider. John Mack had been head of the hedge fund Pequot Capital Management. The suspicion was that Mack had tipped Pequot's then CEO, Arthur Samberg, of General Electric's pending acquisition of Heller Financial. Mack was the only suspect. Without that investigation, the SEC would never be able to even consider the filing of insider trading charges against Mack, Samberg, Pequot or anyone else arising out of Pequot's trading in GE and Heller
+
+Aguirre refused to stop his investigation; Senior officials within the SEC's Division of Enforcement blocked an SEC subpoena seeking Mack's testimony and records in the investigation. Aguirre had contacted the Office of Special Counsel to discuss the filing of a complaint about the SEC's protection of Mack. Three days later, while on vacation, Aguirre was abruptly fired without warning on September 1, 2005, he was fired by phone.
+
+An SEC official told him it would be very difficult to take Mack's testimony because of his political influence. He told him that Mack was "an industry captain," that he had powerful contacts . . . , that Mary Jo White could contact a number of powerful individuals, any of whom could call Linda about the examination. Mary Jo White was a lawyer at a Wall Street firm, Linda was Linda Thomsen, the head of enforcement. Aguirre confirmed the conversation in two e-mails to the official the next morning. The first email referenced Ferdinand Pecora.
+
+Aguirre gave key papers to Charles Grassley on the Senate Finance Committee. And to the Judiciary Cmte. There were hearings in 2006.
+
+He told Congress that an SEC official told him it would be very difficult to take Mack's testimony because of his political influence. The official told him Mack was "an industry captain," that he had powerful contacts . . . , that Mary Jo White could contact a number of powerful individuals, any of whom could call Linda about the examination. Mary Jo White was a lawyer at a Wall Street firm, Linda Thomsen was head of enforcement.
+
+He said the SEC "favor" to Mack cleared the way for his return on June 30, 2005, as Morgan Stanley's CEO with no danger of an SEC lawsuit for insider trading. Mary Jo White would become chair of the SEC 2013 to 2017, appointed by Wall Street's favorite guy, Barak Obama, who apparently didn't know the Aguirre story.
+
+Later David Kotz, the SEC's inspector general, said he had found evidence that "raised serious questions about the impartiality and fairness" of the SEC's investigation of possible insider trading at the Pequot Capital Management hedge fund.
+
+Kotz also condemned what he called the "common practice" of giving outside lawyers' clients access to high-level SEC officials when they had complaints about front-line investigators. Kotz made numerous recommendations for reform, which the SEC ignored.
+
+Aguirre sued the SEC and won ¾ of million $ in back pay and damages.
+
+Mack, after being CEO Morgan Stanley, became CEO of Credit Suisse, then chair of Morgan Stanley and now is senior advisor to the global investment firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, whose strategic partners are hedge funds.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/odru363cqa171.jpg?width=200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=852f95acbb1d5354e65c9f6b1fc32c131c93a32a)](https://preview.redd.it/odru363cqa171.jpg?width=200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=852f95acbb1d5354e65c9f6b1fc32c131c93a32a)
+
+Mark Fickes
+
+2005 Fickes and Overstock, Chris Cox
+
+Here's another case of an SEC staffer who tried to do the right thing but was pulled back. In August 2005, Overstock.com filed suit against hedge fund Rocker Partners and the equities research firm, Gradient Analytics saying they illegally colluded in short-selling the company while paying for negative reports to drive down share prices.
+
+Byrne took his information to the SEC. Mark Fickes of the SEC San Francisco office. He said, "Look at the patterns, their stocks are naked shorted by Dan Loeb, David Einhorn, Steven Cohen, David Rocker. [Look at] the dates journalists Bethany, Boyd, Remond, Greenberg wrote trash jobs. [that was Bethany McLean writing for Fortune, Carol Remond for Dow Jones, Roddy Boyd for the NY Post, Herb Greenberg for MarketWatch] Byrne said, "It was the same pattern, each one of these one of these journalists writes a hatchet job, there is naked shorting, SEC action begins against them, and the Milberg Weiss lawsuit. In every case, it's part of same bum rush on the stock."
+
+Byrne argued that Gradient, an investment advisor which was putting out fraudulent reports the shorters used, should be investigated -- and that the journalists were central to his case. The subpoenas were issued to Carol Remond and Herb Greenberg to provide information about conversations that they had with stock traders and analysts.
+
+Fickes issued the subpoenas with the approval of the SEC's head of enforcement, Linda Thomsen. It was announced that the SEC was investigating Gradient and had issued subpoenas to Carol Remond, Herb Greenberg and to Jim Cramer of TheStreet. David Rocker sold his shares in TheStreet. A month later Cramer sold some of his shares.
+
+Bryne: "Jim Cramer gets a subpoena; you have three days to disclose it. He knows TheStreet will crater, he can't just go sell it with undisclosed material information. He can get a plan to sell x amount per quarter after he gets the subpoena. TheStreet broke under a dollar."
+
+"Why would a hedge fund guy have an interest to own a financial publication? Cramer discloses in his books stuff that is widely illegal. Protection for journalists is about protecting sources about stories they are writing, not about their own corrupt market manipulation."
+
+The question is whether freedom of the press extends to reporters whose articles are part of illegal naked short selling scams. Fickes wanted to know.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/s650tr5z56171.jpg?width=330&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e085154954818611d3c78b7b0ed95a00a02303c7)](https://preview.redd.it/s650tr5z56171.jpg?width=330&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e085154954818611d3c78b7b0ed95a00a02303c7)
+
+Chris Cox- Former SEC Chair
+
+He was summoned to Washington to meet with the new SEC chair, Cris Cox. Ultimately, Byrne said, the SEC caved under the media pressure. Cox killed the subpoenas and the SEC dropped its investigation of Gradient. Cox was SEC chair when Gary Aguirre was fired.
+
+What should the SEC do now? Solutions are there if it wants to protect investors, not do as it is told by the big broker-dealers.
+
+-   Require buy-ins. Require the broker of the investor who doesn't get shorted stock delivered to buy it on the market and charge the seller's broker. Of course, requiring buy-ins would make the stock go up, the shorters lose money.
+
+-   Restore the uptick rule so shorters can't sell for less that the last shorted trade. That would stop shorters hammering a stock down to bankruptcy.
+
+-   Create a consolidated audit trail (CAT) to collect order and trade execution information to identify and enable punishment of illegal trading activities, including naked short selling. More than a decade after the SEC promised it, following the 2010 flash crash, CAT doesn't exist.
+
+-   Impose real penalties on transgressors, like loss of license.
+
+-   Send cases of serial trading cheats to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution.
+
+-   End the revolving door with Wall Street.
+
+-   What will Gary Gensler do? And will he listen most to the pushback from the big brokers or investors like people on Superstonk?
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/8x1el37566171.jpg?width=988&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=296865c7cefe2fbb38b2ce25f4e6730bb498fa2a)](https://preview.redd.it/8x1el37566171.jpg?width=988&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=296865c7cefe2fbb38b2ce25f4e6730bb498fa2a)
+
+Gary Gensler- Current SEC Chair
+
+_____________________________________________________________________________________
+
+Questions
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/wwox8t4896171.jpg?width=998&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=01378e780fc8c6f174a6c840b76132b2b9e33c1e)](https://preview.redd.it/wwox8t4896171.jpg?width=998&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=01378e780fc8c6f174a6c840b76132b2b9e33c1e)
+
+-   You mentioned in your last interview that NSS has been going on for a very long time, but that it ends with Gamestop. Can you clarify further *how* you see this ending with Gamestop?
+
+>LK: I meant the story I tell in the book I am writing ends with GameStop. NSS goes on.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/x8tcjb0m96171.png?width=1234&format=png&auto=webp&s=051d06480a45392f1cf48bd7579fc85a6f609447)](https://preview.redd.it/x8tcjb0m96171.png?width=1234&format=png&auto=webp&s=051d06480a45392f1cf48bd7579fc85a6f609447)
+
+-   Understanding that this is an unprecedented situation, we would simply like your personal opinion: Do you think that Wall Street/ US Gov't could/would pull some "trickery" to prevent the short squeeze from happening? What rules are they unable, or unwilling to break?
+
+>LK: We saw in GameStop trickery using dark pool trades of single shares. We know -- even the SEC admits -- that brokers create fake options conversions shares. They will break every rule, helped by the SEC which chooses not to enforce or orders mild penalties.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/6prc9two96171.jpg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5901203d74c13d3f0177dc484a6838a6b62a12e6)](https://preview.redd.it/6prc9two96171.jpg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5901203d74c13d3f0177dc484a6838a6b62a12e6)
+
+now i want to play stardew valley
+
+-   What is your recommendation for finding a trustworthy, easily digestible news source for those of us who "don't have the time" to watch full hearings or read full bills?
+
+>LK: Depends on the subject. An aggregator I like is Naked Capitalism which has a lot of economic stories. The Daily Poster of David Sirota. I think the American Prospect that ran my NSS story is good. You have to try various online media to find the ones that do what your asking.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - POST AMA DD- Lucy Komisar AMA powerpoint and partial script](https://preview.redd.it/iosfnjcv96171.jpg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dc409dc5f02241f1aa8d009096fcb65758e029a9)](https://preview.redd.it/iosfnjcv96171.jpg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dc409dc5f02241f1aa8d009096fcb65758e029a9)
+
+*For clarification- The Hearings will be held: by U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on May 26, and by the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services on May 27.*
+
+-   Congress has 2 hearings scheduled this week that are bringing megabank execs up to testify. In your opinion, will the correct questions be asked, or do you believe this is just political theatre?
+
+>LK: It's political theater. This is the same congress that has not reinstated the Glass -Steagall act of 1933 that separated commercial and investment banking, meaning keeping depositors' money from being used for banks own investments. thanks to Bill Clinton and Robert Rubin, the friends of Wall Street. You can tie the 2008 crash to that.
+
+_________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+Thank y'all again for being so awesome through technical difficulties!! The show must go on, right?
+
+Thanks again to Lucy Komisar for joining us for a second time. Lucy will be back next Wednesday to speak with Wes Christian. Details to come in tomorrow's Jungle Beat! Be sure to follow [u/theJungleBeat](https://www.reddit.com/u/theJungleBeat/) so you catch the latest news from around Superstonk, every day at market close!
+
+I did speak to Lucy on the phone tonight and we agreed to both have a glass of wine in honor of Supertonk. And she said she will be sure to charge her iPad ;) 🥂

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-05-19-Theory-The-SLGG-Merger-is-Happening-Potentitally-Launching-MOASS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+Theory: The SLGG merger IS happening, it's a MOASS launching button and RC has been pointing it out for a long time (TODAY AS WELL ♥)
+=====================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/pepsodont](https://www.reddit.com/user/pepsodont/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ngdwjj/theory_the_slgg_merger_is_happening_its_a_moass/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Opinion 👽](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Opinion%20%F0%9F%91%BD%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+I think it might be apparent from my posts now that I'm not wrinkle-brained in financials, chart reading and other ~~boring~~ important stuff but I like finding patterns. I've been working as a psychologist and a marketer for a long time, so believe me when I tell you there's a lot to be uncovered by understanding behavior patterns or just patterns of things that look unrelated, but really aren't.
+
+Some people call it far-reaching, tinfoil, confirmation bias, whatever - but check my post history and you'll see I've been more right than wrong.
+
+As one of the veteran apes wrote in a comment in here once: "One weird thing happening is a coincidence, two is enemy action".
+
+So with that in mind, let's check out why I think this is a pattern (not a coincidence) which is pointing into Gamestop merging with SLGG after all. Yes, even after we forgot about it because we thought it was a nothingburger.
+
+Once again - this is a "tinfoil" theorycrafting. Don't go into comments telling me that, I KNOW. Get in here to get your tits jacked and drink up on confirmation bias. Alright, retards?
+
+1\. Gamestop changing its logo
+
+Today, apes started reporting Gamestop changing its logo from "Gamestop" to just "GS" on WeBull. We also saw a changed logo on their astronaut tweet.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Theory: The SLGG merger IS happening, it's a MOASS launching button and RC has been pointing it out for a long time (TODAY AS WELL ♥)](https://preview.redd.it/rt1hpjcyo5071.png?width=591&format=png&auto=webp&s=b62b363068dbe4a36e486f62cfa77e83dffec0b1)](https://preview.redd.it/rt1hpjcyo5071.png?width=591&format=png&auto=webp&s=b62b363068dbe4a36e486f62cfa77e83dffec0b1)
+
+There's no reason to do it unless you're planning on changing that logo - if they wanted it shorter, they could've gone for "GME" which is standard and everybody knows it.
+
+Conclusion: It looks like Gamestop is signaling a logo change. When do you usually change a company's logo? When the company goes through a transformation, maybe a merger.
+
+2\. The astronaut is drinking Carlsberg beer which underwent a notable merger recently
+
+We thought that the Carlsberg beer was a nod to our AMA with Carl Hagberg, but was it really?
+
+Just google "Carlsberg" and "merge" - [one of the biggest merges in the last year](https://www.bighospitality.co.uk/Article/2020/10/30/Carlsberg-and-Marston-s-merger-completes) with Marston's taking a smaller position of 40% despite their much more superior valuation with difference in 380 million of british pounds.
+
+3\. A merger would put GME shares on the moon, it's a fucking launch button
+
+If you don't know, I'll tell you something juicy. If, theoretically, Gamestop were to merge with another entity (RC Ventures, SLGG) and decided on changing their name even slightly, they would get a new stock market ticker.
+
+That would initiate a mother of all share recalls since ALL the issued shares would have to be taken in for ~~questioning about Kenny's mayo habits~~ a reissuance - which means all the lent shares would be requested back and the naked ones would have to be bought at market price. That would initiate the MOASS.
+
+4\. Gamestop has a brand new official esports Twitter page
+
+If you create an esports Twitter page, you probably want to start dabbling in esports, right? But damn, it's fucking hard for a transforming company to just start an esports division on their own from scratch, where would they even begin? They didn't even hire key managers for this, so how are they gonna navigate through these salty waters?
+
+Well, the industry standard for companies who want to enter a new market and have cash is to simply BUY A COMPANY THAT SPECIALIZES IN THAT MARKET.
+
+Boy, would it be fortunate if such a company was aro....oh fuck me Ryan, where exactly were you a few weeks ago?
+
+5\. RC was near SLGG HQ and he tweeted about it
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Theory: The SLGG merger IS happening, it's a MOASS launching button and RC has been pointing it out for a long time (TODAY AS WELL ♥)](https://preview.redd.it/o9lwxqvcp5071.png?width=1507&format=png&auto=webp&s=f08bd9a69f46f5094c7a85985d2c316db526603a)](https://preview.redd.it/o9lwxqvcp5071.png?width=1507&format=png&auto=webp&s=f08bd9a69f46f5094c7a85985d2c316db526603a)
+
+Why would you pinpoint where you are Ryan?
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Theory: The SLGG merger IS happening, it's a MOASS launching button and RC has been pointing it out for a long time (TODAY AS WELL ♥)](https://preview.redd.it/puf08k8fp5071.png?width=967&format=png&auto=webp&s=77f5e8eac8974c2b6d58f82e5dfd08a480b4e737)](https://preview.redd.it/puf08k8fp5071.png?width=967&format=png&auto=webp&s=77f5e8eac8974c2b6d58f82e5dfd08a480b4e737)
+
+Oh that's why!
+
+6\. RC tweeted an ice-cream and a frog pointing at Ann Hand, CEO of SLGG
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Theory: The SLGG merger IS happening, it's a MOASS launching button and RC has been pointing it out for a long time (TODAY AS WELL ♥)](https://preview.redd.it/yvw3kl3ip5071.png?width=603&format=png&auto=webp&s=bd5b09f8fcc79eca28bbe14cbe22cc5938bd9a36)](https://preview.redd.it/yvw3kl3ip5071.png?width=603&format=png&auto=webp&s=bd5b09f8fcc79eca28bbe14cbe22cc5938bd9a36)
+
+I was there, 3000 years ago...
+
+Yeah, the famous ice-cream and a frog tweet. I don't think any of the theories as of to its significance paid off so let me offer one of the less popular ones.
+
+Check out where did Ann Hand, the CEO of SLGG work before.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Theory: The SLGG merger IS happening, it's a MOASS launching button and RC has been pointing it out for a long time (TODAY AS WELL ♥)](https://preview.redd.it/7swu9s1pp5071.png?width=796&format=png&auto=webp&s=3d421bcdf96bf5f2ca0faeb564c0f6ba0ad82088)](https://preview.redd.it/7swu9s1pp5071.png?width=796&format=png&auto=webp&s=3d421bcdf96bf5f2ca0faeb564c0f6ba0ad82088)
+
+Coincidences, huh?
+
+7\. He tweeted "love" recently and a heart / love today (probably completely wrong, check EDIT)
+
+Why repeat the same sentiment Ryan? What's so important about love? Are you just sending positive vibes our way? You never did this before, why would you start now, without reason?
+
+My personal opinion on this is that the grandma tweet didn't work the way he wanted to - maybe it was a funny coincidence it worked so well with lyrics saying hold me hold me squeeze me or maybe he didn't realize. After all, he never tried decrypting his tweets in song lyrics so I don't think it was intentional.
+
+Did you guys realize how fast this tweet came? It's almost like "yeah, but I wanted to tell you something else".
+
+By going with that theory - what does "love" usually mean? Love, sex, all that stuff - isn't it a merger between 2 people usually? Hmmm? HMMMMMMM?
+
+I know many people will say "tinfoil", "far-reaching", "reaching", "speculating", blahblah, miss me with that noise. No shit this is a speculation, there's nothing else to do with it.
+
+But that's how investigation works. You create a hypothesis, a theory and later you'll see if you were right or not. For me personally, these things are adding up too nicely for them to be "just coincidences" or "glitches" or shit.
+
+No, this is a pattern.
+
+Could I be wrong? Most likely. But it's the best we got imo. Have fun jacking them tits to this motherload of confirmation bias! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
+
+*- Jacques Le Titz*
+
+EDIT: It came into my attention that the heart ❤️ tweet would be much simpler to explain with "hedgies are on their last life". I'm a big fan of Occam's Razor, so I'm going to go with it - the grandma tweet has therefore been decrypted nicely and "love" isn't the concept he's going for!
+
+I also like the theory it's a < and 3, which means "less than 3" weeks to the meeting. Theorycrafting is fun!
+
+EDIT 2: Ugh, because I probably should've seen it coming - no people, I'm not encouraging anyone to buy SLGG. The only position I have is GME, because that's the only play.
+
+But if you want to I mean, sure, I'm pumping it and then dumping with a fucking tinfoil hat theory, Jesus. I have the dump button right before me and it's big and red (that's what she said). SMH
+
+EDIT 3 because of course: Guys, please, be careful about buying SLGG. People are already going apeshit (haha) on me that this is a pump and dump post since Citadel is long on SLGG.
+
+That fact alone doesn't mean anything since Shitadel is long on thousands of stocks and they could expect GME to do exactly what I've been saying and maybe they want to block them by voting against or they wanna ride the wave, I don't know. Nobody knows. Just...fuck other stocks except GME okay?
+
+It's also up by 15% or so AH so yay for the power of Superstonk I guess?
+
+EDIT 4: No I don't have a damn clue what's going on with the All Seeing Awards. Maybe DFV's mouse button got stuck and he needs help with the mouse since he's not a cat?
+
+EDIT 5: For those who STILL don't believe this is an organic post, here are the screenshots ( <https://i.imgur.com/naiRTJP.png> and <https://i.imgur.com/f3CEioL.png> ) of how the idea originated in our private Discord and that should be the end of it or I swear to Wendy's tendies I will turn into a vibrator from so much shaking of my head.

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-05-22-Every-Apes-Gets-Paid.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+Every ape gets paid. A look at the numbers.
+===========================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Themeloncalling](https://www.reddit.com/user/Themeloncalling/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nihl31/every_ape_gets_paid_a_look_at_the_numbers/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+TL;DR: Apes can get tendies. No doomsday for world economy. Ook ook. 🚀 🚀 🚀
+
+Who pays the apes?
+
+Let's take a look at the chain of failures. Short hedgies go broke trying to pay the apes with shares. Their positions are transferred to their creditors, the big banks. What happens when they don't have enough money? They go to the lender of last resort, in this case, the Federal Reserve. Here's a video on it:
+
+<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb4Dkf5puJg>
+
+The last time this happened was in 2008, when among others, AIG latched onto the Federal tit for a massive bailout and later paid hundreds of millions in bonuses to the very department that triggered the bailout. Seriously, this happened: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIG_bonus_payments_controversy>
+
+If any of you XX or higher shareholders out there are holding past $218 million in payouts as a symbolic gesture, just remember, you deserve it more than AIG. Anyone who says otherwise can go play leapfrog with unicorns.
+
+How much will the Fed need to print?
+
+According to this DD on Geometric Mean: <https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m9td6w/estimations_for_the_total_payout_of_gme_based_on/>
+
+Around 5 trillion dollars at the $20 million a share range, averaged out for paper hands along the way. Assuming that 20% of the ownership is outside of America, that leaves 4 trillion going into the domestic economy. But wait! Taxes. 2 trillion goes to apes, 2 trillion goes to the treasury. If I was the ruling party, 2 trillion dollars with no strings attached to advance my party's interests would be pretty sweet, another reason why doing nothing is the best approach. The budgetary spending for 2020 was 4.79 trillion dollars. This windfall would be worth around 41.8% of their budget. Imagine if the government was an average person, 41.8% of what they spend for the year is a small jackpot but not life changing. It is definitely not enough to be considered hyperinflation. Assuming that 80% of this subreddit is American shareholders, this works out to be 240,000 shareholders / 331 million people = 0.0725% of the population. Spreading the payout around such a small group of people will not have a huge effect on the consumer price index or put a lot of pressure on demand, unless you are considering fringe categories like Lambos and McLarens.
+
+Won't all this money ruin the economy?
+
+NO! According to the Fed data gathered by Forbes, the top 1% of Americans have a combined net worth of 34.2 trillion dollars: <https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/10/08/top-1-of-us-households-hold-15-times-more-wealth-than-bottom-50-combined/?sh=5b0c5c835179>
+
+The top 1% own 43% of the world's wealth, totaling over 173.3 trillion dollars in 2019: <https://inequality.org/facts/global-inequality/>
+
+With the geometric mean, the top 1% of wealth in America will increase by 5.8%. On a global scale, 3 trillion dollars after taxes is a 1.7% increase. The payout will register a small blip, and those who paper hand early may not even make the cut for the top 1%. What does this conclude? Fears of an ape payout causing hyperinflation is FUD. The payout causing global hyperinflation or massive distortion of the world's wealth is FUD. Don't hold for a number that seems big to you. Hold for a number that seems big to THEM. Even if the number of diamond hands doubles or triples, 9 trillion dollars after taxes is a small ripple in the global supply of wealth. Let's hope some of you apes will know how to create a positive butterfly effect with your tendies.
+
+Edit: [u/Allohn](https://www.reddit.com/u/Allohn/) pointed out this DD here has a more correct Apeish number of 60 trillion:
+
+<https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mmt8rh/geometric_mean_exponential_increase_and_gme_price/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share>
+
+How does that change the overall picture? 25 trillion taxes, 25 trillion to apes, 10 trillion abroad. Net impact of 35 trillion. 20.2% increase in the top 1% of worldwide wealth with ultimate diamond hands. Still not enough to pay off the national debt of 28 trillion and counting. Seeing as how M2 is no longer counted, and the true number of shares to be paid out is unknown, I wonder if they can sweep this much money under the rug. Only one way to find out!

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-05-23-Crypto-Market-Liquidated-Over-One-Trillion-Dollars-since-May.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+According to TradingView.com, Crypto market has liquidated over $1,000,000,000,000 USD since May. The price of GME has no limit.
+================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/KFC_just](https://www.reddit.com/user/KFC_just/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nj5beh/according_to_tradingviewcom_crypto_market_has/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Discussion 🦍](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Discussion%20%F0%9F%A6%8D%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+TL;DR: Pretty picture show hedgies r fukt.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - According to TradingView.com, Crypto market has liquidated over $1,000,000,000,000 USD since May. The price of GME has no limit.](https://preview.redd.it/vvr25m60ku071.png?width=2048&format=png&auto=webp&s=0eb9c9f529beb404146c59563a9efc161919386f)](https://preview.redd.it/vvr25m60ku071.png?width=2048&format=png&auto=webp&s=0eb9c9f529beb404146c59563a9efc161919386f)
+
+1Trillion gone from Crypto since May 2021
+
+So i have seen several posts debating firstly the potential size of the collective payout that is going to come for GME, and secondly what the maximum price that will actually be paid for GME is likely to be.
+
+While everything is a hypothetical until it happens, and I am by no means a maths guy, I submit that the evidence of massive liquidations of the crypto currency market which we strongly think is being cyclically pumped and dumped to raise cash for Citadel and co, I submit that the grand total of 1 Trillion dollars so far just on crypto means that we control the price.
+
+There are of course the usual caveats that not all of this is GME related, or Citadel related, but involve every other possible reason in addition for every other player involved, preparations for Atobitt to release HOC 2 and 3 and trigger the liquidity crisis, and yada tada yada you get the point.
+
+But, caveats aside, the fact that 1 Trillion dollars has already been pulled out of just one sector of the market in preparation should be sufficient to jack your tits.
+
+Every single share of Gamestop both real and synthetic, in market, in dark pools, in ETFs, in options and calls and puts and shorts and everything else under the sun, every single one of them already has a designated owner before this started. Remember that. Before apes began mass buying and holding every single share was already owned. And now they're all "owned" many times over. What fun.
+
+This is why they cheated and lied and stole and counterfeited more shares than could ever exist in this company. This is why it is impossible for them to close their positions. This is why they are collectively collecting 1 Trillion dollars just to start with.
+
+Because every single paper handed bitch in the world selling low couldnt possibly change this maths now that so many synthetic shares are due. Every single share, real and synthetic, must be purchased at whatever price is available. And as the paper hands leave, and shares concentrate in the diamond hands of the apes, the price to buy increases exponentially.
+
+All shorts must cover
+
+This is why you are going to win.
+
+Edit: [Link to TradingView source](https://www.tradingview.com/markets/cryptocurrencies/global-charts/) damn watching that go down in real time across the whole crypto, rather than any particular stock is quite the sight.
+
+Edit 2 shills got to pump it
+
+[![r/Superstonk - According to TradingView.com, Crypto market has liquidated over $1,000,000,000,000 USD since May. The price of GME has no limit.](https://preview.redd.it/hywxgvkqrx071.png?width=2048&format=png&auto=webp&s=1cc378aeff2e99171575895b61a1dfe1c4de4655)](https://preview.redd.it/hywxgvkqrx071.png?width=2048&format=png&auto=webp&s=1cc378aeff2e99171575895b61a1dfe1c4de4655)
+
+Headline 1: Bitcoin tumbles 50%. Headline 2: Buy now you fool. Transparent much

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-06-11-GME-Dates-and-End-Game-Predictions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+Let's Talk Dates....the Last Few Weeks of June Are Turning Me On......I Know We Don't do Dates But Here Are Some Dates.....and End Game Predictions
+===========================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Ginger_Libra](https://www.reddit.com/user/Ginger_Libra/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nxu1ck/lets_talk_datesthe_last_few_weeks_of_june_are/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Apes, you ever held something for 6 months and wake up one day fucking sick and tired of Games Kenny plays? That was me on Wednesday. For the love of Harambe, I've had enough of the corruption.
+
+Well, strap in. I'm jacked to my tits and I've got some dates for you.
+
+Saturday June 12th-Tuesday June 15th- [E3, biggest gaming industry event usually with lots of good news and announcements. PC Mag has the deets for you.](https://www.pcgamer.com/e3-2021-schedule-dates-lineup/) Thanks to several Gamer Apes in the comments.
+
+Rumor: managers at GameStop have been told to expect something big the 15th to coincide with E3 but haven't been told what. See comments.
+
+Monday June 14th- Small T+21 FTD date from May 21 (according to some monkeys on Discord. Correct if wrong. It's not big volume).
+
+Am leaving this so you can keep an eye on it but [u/criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/criand/) may have disapproved his own FTD theory for the new, sexy, holy fuck net capital theory. [And holy fuck, I am jacked. Go read it.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ny2ov4/a_revisit_to_net_capital_what_is_truly_driving/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
+
+Tuesday June 15th- [Emergency Meeting at the Fed](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nxnyxf/emergency_fed_meeting_called_for_tuesday_june_15/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb) credit to Smart Ape [u/TreeSquid007](https://www.reddit.com/u/TreeSquid007/) for reading good.
+
+*Wut doing JPow?*
+
+Edit: apes in the comments say this is a normally scheduled meeting with standard language. But you know they are talking about us.
+
+June 15th-16th- JPow do a meet about raising interest rates. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC).
+
+To those of you who can only focus on the next date out of all the dates and rocket fuel here and have to comment, fuck off. Tell your wife to top up my cell phone so I can FaceTime her tonight. She keeps begging me to switch teams. She says you've got a tool you don't know how to use.
+
+Now keep reading.
+
+Friday June 18- [Quadruple Witching Day](https://investinganswers.com/dictionary/q/quadruple-witching)
+
+*What Is Quadruple Witching?*
+
+Quadruple witching (also called "quad witching") refers to the third Friday of every March, June, September and December. On these days, derivatives (e.g. market index futures, options futures, stock options, stock futures) expire, usually resulting in increased volatility.
+
+You know what I like? Volatility. You don't scare me anymore, Kenny. I'm into that shit. I've got daddy and mommy issues.
+
+I know the last one was a letdown. Don't focus on one date.
+
+Edit: Wrinkly Ape [u/Francis46n2WSB](https://www.reddit.com/u/Francis46n2WSB/) pointed out last Quad Witching wasn't normal and Kenny was stressed.
+
+*The last quadruple witching day was not a letdown, it had an enormous explosion in volatility.
+
+What happened was, if you check the charts you'll notice, Kenny and friends massively suppressed the the price so that the volatility wouldn't be noticed. I compare it to diving and laying over a grenade.
+
+This time I think they're running out of stuff to contain the blast.*
+
+Also on Friday June 18th [Some crazy junk bond shit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ns7k6q/could_gamestops_liftoff_unravel_corporate_junk/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share) that everyone is balls deep in except us and Goldman Sacks. Thanks to Literate Ape [u/Get-It-Got](https://www.reddit.com/u/Get-It-Got/) for this one. Go put some wrinkles on this one. OP is asking for more eyes.
+
+Also Friday June 18th- tons of SPY puts. Usually about a billion. At 60 billion. Thanks to SPY ape [u/rabsgood](https://www.reddit.com/u/rabsgood/). We aren't sure what this means. Could be nothing. Could be fuckery.
+
+Monday June 21st- NSCC 002 most likely falls into place. You know what that means? More on NSCC 002 below. Marge is a demanding bitch.
+
+Also June 21st- ~~Aussie~~ Ape Matt Furlong becomes CEO of GameStop.
+
+Detail Ape clarified Matty isn't from Oz....just ran the Amazon for them for 2 years. 8 years total at Amazon. Welcome back to cold Christmas, my dude. I hear Texas has snow now.
+
+Tuesday June 22nd to Thursday June 24th- Net Capital, aka margin call spikes. [u/criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/criand/) has redone his FTD predictions to include Net Capital, AKA margin call requirements. [here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ny2ov4/a_revisit_to_net_capital_what_is_truly_driving/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
+
+Wednesday June 23rd and Thursday June 24- Big Wrinkly Brain Ape [u/criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/criand/) says another FTD cycle. [Danger Zone 2 here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nwgzw7/danger_zone_part_2_shorts_are_terrified_of_a_310/) and [comment from today here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nxajjj/comment/h1fns10) **see above for new Net Capital updates from criand.
+
+Thursday June 24th- Kenny wants to look clean and tidy for FINRA. Cleans up his shorts to make a pretty for the paper. Short interest report day from [FINRA. ](https://www.finra.org/filing-reporting/regulatory-filing-systems/short-interest)often causes the price to rise. It's GME so expect it to fall, even if they reveal it's shorted 2000% (they won't). Thanks to new redditor [u/Superstonkfollow](https://www.reddit.com/u/Superstonkfollow/) for the message.
+
+Look at previous FINA SI receipt dates. 27 Jan. 9 Feb. 24 Feb. 9 Mar. 24 Mar. 12 Apr. 26 Apr. 11 May. 25 May. 9 June. Overlap with the T+21/ T+35 on 24 Feb, 26 Apr, 25 May. [When the dates align, the wombo combo happens](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nf22qz/theory_on_the_ftd_loop_missing_link_a_t35_surge/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=usertext&utm_name=stocks&utm_content=t1_h0qiqzc) [u/criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/criand/) got another wombo wrinkle. Thanks again to [u/superstonkfollow](https://www.reddit.com/u/superstonkfollow/) for putting all that together.
+
+Friday June 25th- JPow wants 715 BILLION in reverse repo payments back. [Holy Fuck. ](https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/current/h41.pdf)Thanks to Detail Ape [u/aquadisaster](https://www.reddit.com/u/aquadisaster/) for the wrinkle.
+
+Also Friday June 25th- Mr. Russell Gets a Extreme Stonk Makeover..... after hours. See [this thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nxjvpg/gme_russell_1000_rebalance_day_and_t21_and_t35/) from Wrinkly Ape [u/vierzehnter](https://www.reddit.com/u/vierzehnter/) for in depth Mr. Russell wardrobe change analysis.
+
+But the summary is this: paraphrasing OG Wrinky Ape d/lauer.....Russell rebalance is volatile AF.
+
+Papa Cohen said to buckle up.
+
+Monday June 28th First day of trading after Mr. Russell gets a makeover
+
+AND
+
+T+35 FTD date according to Math Ape [u/Unsure_if_relevant](https://www.reddit.com/u/Unsure_if_relevant/) Check out criands new [Net Capital 21 Day Loop here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ny2ov4/a_revisit_to_net_capital_what_is_truly_driving/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
+
+EDIT: wrong year. Another ape caught it. June 2023. ~~Wednesday June 30th-US switches from LIBOR to SOFR. Fuck if I remember what any of this means. LIBOR is the The London Inter-bank Offered Rate. SOFR is Secured Overnight Financing Rate.
+
+This is the rate which determines how much it costs BofA to borrow from Wells, etc. Ape do a wrinkle and link and explain more, pls and thank.
+
+New redidior [u/SuperStonkFollow](https://www.reddit.com/u/SuperStonkFollow/) linked me to Big Wrinkly Mod Ape [u/sharkbaitlol](https://www.reddit.com/u/sharkbaitlol/)'s Magnum Opus [Chaos Theory involving LIBOR and SOFR](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mseyai/chaos_theory_the_final_connection/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf) and holy fuck. I can't sum it up. Go read it again.
+
+Holy fuck moment: SOFR the last time it was attempted to transitioned into (in 2019) almost IMPLODED the market due to many realizing that banks and others could not handle a higher interest rate (based off the DAILY TRESURY YIELD RATE) versus the fabricated one that banks provide.
+
+This can be postponed......again. someone call JPow and tell him we are done fucking around.~~
+
+LIBOR to SOFR isn't happening until June 30, 2023.
+
+But I'll still jacked.
+
+Add this with reverse repo and I'm jacked.
+
+Monday July 5th just a reminder the casino is closed ~~so that Kenny and Steve and Gabe and Mikey can have a much deserved day of rest~~ Murica celebrates its birthday, Bitches.
+
+Wednesday July 14th GameStops NFT on E-network word I can't say ~~but I can't find thread. Linky me, pls.~~ High tech Ape says more [here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/nkzqyv/gamestop_crypto_or_nft_to_go_live_july_14_2021_at/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
+
+Friday July 16 [Crazy high option volume](https://gme.crazyawesomecompany.com/)
+
+Also Friday July 16th- crazy amount of SPY puts. Could be nothing. Could be sus. Keep an eye peeled.
+
+Monday July 26th- 21 Day Net Capital cycle. Fresh off the press from criand. [Here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ny2ov4/a_revisit_to_net_capital_what_is_truly_driving/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
+
+Monday August 16th- T+21 for the July 16th giant tidal wave of options
+
+Friday August 20th- T+35 for July 16th tidal wave 🌊
+
+Do you see why I'm jacked??
+
+Now a note on NSCC 002/801 because everyone seems to be confused. This is *the* margin call rule.
+
+Marge: Hello, Kenny? It's Marge.
+
+Kenny, peeing his pants: Yes, Marge?
+
+Marge: Pay me more money. You've got 1 hour.
+
+No more days to fuck around and come up with funds.
+
+Now I want to clarify here because I see a lot of misconception floating around this jungle about Marge.
+
+When Marge calls, hedgies can meet their margin, meaning they can deposit more funds with their co-conspirators the DTCC and NSCC and keep on trading.
+
+A margin call doesn't automatically mean default or MOASS.
+
+Funny, cause if Marge calls my dumb ass I can't trade the rest of the day until I get my balance over 25k, so most likely out two days while my wire goes through. But Kenny and Steve and Gabe are special and previously they had days to meet their margin call.
+
+Apes seem to think that when Marge calls, it's game over for the hedgies. Not true. They've probably already been margin called and met their margin requirements several times already. But now they only have 1 hour.
+
+It's when they can't meet their margin calls that shit gets fun. Once 002 is in place, 1 hour. I expect to see more sell offs of their long positions when this happens. And I can't wait. Isn't Citadel long on Tesla and Burry short?
+
+Now, when they can't meet their margin (or supplemental liquidity requirements) that's when they default. Default is what we are waiting for, my ape relations.
+
+When default happens, that's when the DTC computer starts closing positions. Computer don't care how many zeros. [More about that process here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nvrouv/i_feel_like_this_deserves_its_own_post_remember/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb)
+
+Also remember there are multiple hedgies playing fuck you in the ass here.
+
+My guess (and I'm a dumb internet ape so don't listen to me or take this as financial advice) is that when the price skyrockets, the not quite as dumb hedgies will try to get out first and save themselves and add fuel to the fire.
+
+Expect trading halts. Expect wild swings. Expect the rest of the market in the red and VIX going crazy. That's when you know MOASS is here.
+
+Note I'm not saying MOASS will start when 002 falls into place. I'm saying 002 tightens the noose.
+
+NSCC 002 is the rule that makes 801 actually work, in case you're keeping track.
+
+Thanks to Smart Astronaut Ape [u/MoonTellsMeASecret](https://www.reddit.com/u/MoonTellsMeASecret/) for this [801/NSCC 002 Ape Guide Here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n5idj9/801_and_nscc002/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf).
+
+Now some of you wrinkly brains are wondering where is DTC 005.
+
+[u/Existing-Reference53](https://www.reddit.com/u/Existing-Reference53/) did an email [with the DTC](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ngwhzu/where_is_srdtc2021005_the_update/) and they say it's being reformatted and posted soon.
+
+DTC 005 is the rule that says Bad Kenny can't hide his dirty undies in the options anymore. Some apes say it's mission critical. Some say not. I'm too dumb to weight in on this.
+
+Wut doing [Mikey](https://www.dtcc.com/about/leadership/board)? DTC need to borrow my paid license for Microsoft Word to hurry up that formatting? DM me. I'll hook you up.
+
+But I smell a fucky here. If it is the lynchpin and I was DTC Mikey and also a co-conspirator in massive fraud (Lawyer Ape Wes said trillions in fraud in our lifetimes) I would hold it back as long I could too. My guess is they are waiting for the first wave of defaults and it will magically be done with formatting. According to the emails once it's published it is approved.
+
+Which leads me to this. My End Game Theory: No one wants to be a market manipulator or set off The Greatest Transfer of Wealth EVER. No one will force it. Not BlackRock. Not the DTC. Not GameStop or Papa Cohen.
+
+It will happen when it happens. No dates, but taking all these things into account.....soon.
+
+Kenny and Steve and Gabe and Mikey want it to be bad enough they can get a bailout. Then they can blame us.
+
+[That scene in The Big Short about the bailout rattles in my mind.](https://youtu.be/RvI5mN3RIAI) Steve Carrell says "Paulson and Bernanke just left the White House. There's going to be a bailout."
+
+[Guess where former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke works now?](https://www.citadel.com/leadership/dr-ben-s-bernanke/) He's probably helping write the bailout as we speak. Remember, this is bigger than Kenny and Steve and Gabe. This is also Mikey at the DTC. It's the prime brokers. It's the banks. The ones who allowed illegal naked shorting to happen.
+
+Also. Don't forget. Fed Repo rate breaking records daily. Elliot Wave guy says up. Sign Guy is epic. DFV still in. Papa Cohen in the Cap'n seat of the rocket.
+
+Your homework this weekend: hydrate. Play. Leave the basement and get some sun on your skin. For fucks sake, watch The Big Short if you haven't already. It's free in the US on Hoopla with a library card if you're temporarily broke AF (because you're about to be rich). If someone will willingly and enthusiastically consent to shagging you then do that too.
+
+Film Noir Ape [u/Best_Account](https://www.reddit.com/u/Best_Account/) also recommends you watch [The Inside Job (YT)](https://youtu.be/T2IaJwkqgPk) and [Princes of the Yen (YT)](https://youtu.be/5-IZZxyb1GI) to the weekend watch list.
+
+I also recommend Margin Call and Billions. And The Big Short book is even crazier than the movie.
+
+If you've got any other important dates let me know and I'll add them here. Them just corrected to 🌝. It's a sign.
+
+Past 4pm my time. Signing off for a strong beverage.
+
+Buckle up.
+
+TL,DR: just skim for FFS.
+
+Lots of fuel in the rocket. Andromeda called. She's ready for the apes.
+
+Thanks for all the awards! I've had so many anonymous ones I'm going to pretend both DFV and Papa Cohen have sent at least one each.
+
+Edit again: Jesus H. Roosevelt Christ. I mention Quadruple Witching Day as 1 of 20 other dates with things going on and it's all some of you can see. STFU and read the rest.

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-06-12-Analysis-of-Ryan-Cohens-Tweet-Activity-and-T+21-Dates.md

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+Cohen has reached the same conclusion as u/Criand's T+21 Net Capital thesis: An analysis of tweet activity and corporate announcements
+======================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Nalifi](https://www.reddit.com/user/Nalifi/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nycuk4/cohen_has_reached_the_same_conclusion_as_ucriands/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+*This is not financial advice. I am a retard who always lets one banana in the bunch he buys go bad because I can't time eating the bananas correctly.*
+
+This post will re-analyze Cohen's tweets and Gamestop's positive price movements in relation to [u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/Criand/)'s new T+21 net capital thesis.
+
+First of all I would like to lead you to Criand's new post, "Revisit to Net Capital".
+
+<https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ny2ov4/a_revisit_to_net_capital_what_is_truly_driving/>
+
+I believe that TA does not apply to our favorite stock (but look forward to Elliot Wave guys proving me wrong), but the initial T+21/T+35 cycles were unique in that they don't rely on normal stock behavior, and instead analyze the unique situation GME is in (excessive shorting, FTD's). Additionally, it has had almost a 100% success rate at predicting price movements.
+
+I believe the net capital requirement thesis ties this together by eliminating loose ends in the previous theory, such as the shaky T+35 price movements, in addition to providing a solid explanation as to *why* these movements occur.
+
+I decided to take this opportunity to revisit speculation on Cohen's tweets/Gamestop major news, their timing, and analyze if these were the causes of price movements (and thus not the actual cycles). I decided to investigate by going full retard on my only day off and investigating each news report compared to the net capital cycle. The result has my *tits absolutely, indescribably jacked***:**
+
+If you'd like to follow along, let's open Criand's beautiful chart -
+
+<https://preview.redd.it/xh4u2ugmfs471.png?width=1438&format=png&auto=webp&s=85188eccc2bf3841bb98e37e5be98b8badcc01c7>
+
+and take a look with some positive Gamestop news catalysts and tweets from our favorite Ryan Cohen. I'll keep this area to data only and leave speculations for the end.
+
+1\. The Ice Cream Cone
+
+<https://twitter.com/ryancohen/status/1364650709669601289>
+
+Ryan Cohen tweets the famous ice cream cone on Feb 24, lining up perfectly with the T+21 net capital requirement date. The price rockets that day.
+
+2\. Voluntary redemption of senior notes is announced.
+
+<https://news.gamestop.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gamestop-announces-voluntary-early-redemption-senior-notes-0>
+
+GME announces a voluntary early redemption of senior notes on April 13th. Price spike is April 13 AH -- T+14 date is April 15th. The positive news does not correlate with price movement.
+
+*Side note:* DFV Final Yolo update: April 16th
+
+3\. Cohen train tweet.
+
+<https://twitter.com/ryancohen/status/1386485746916380673>
+
+April 25th: Cohen tweets a train coming. South Park. This is one day before the T+21 or 75% Net capital cycle. Additionally:
+
+4\. Gamestop announces completion of the At-The-Market equity offering program.
+
+<https://news.gamestop.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gamestop-completes-market-equity-offering-program#:~:text=GameStop%20disclosed%20on%20April%205,time%20through%20the%20ATM%20Offering>.
+
+This news is placed directly on the T+21 date. *Price spikes.*
+
+May 3rd; Gamestop completes voluntary early redemption of senior notes, leading them out of debt.
+
+T+7 is May 5th, no price movement on this announcement. They also announce acquisition of a 700,000 sq. ft fulfillment center, resulting in *no price movement*.
+
+May 11; Gamestop tweets man on the moon, T+14 is May 14th,
+
+May 12, Gamestop Esports twitter profile is launched.
+
+None of these announcements result in significant price movement.
+
+May 25, Ryan Cohen tweets "Don't try this at home" at 12:32 AM, midnight before market open on the T+21 cycle the next day.
+
+<https://twitter.com/ryancohen/status/1397047791889879041>
+
+*Price spike.*
+
+Later that day, the Gamestop NFT is found. It has a launch date of July 14, 1 day before June 24 T+14 cycle.
+
+May 29, Cohen tweets "R.I.P. dumb ass", noting that the T+21 cycle has been figured out and the Hedgies. Are. Fuk.
+
+Speculation:
+
+Cohen is *fully aware* of the T+21 net capital loop that the hedge funds are trapped in. Given that both good news and hype tweets are clearly insufficient to result in a positive price movement (See: May 3rd, May 11, May 12, April 13), I am highly doubtful that an ice cream cone tweet is enough to drive up the price by over 100%.
+
+I believe that Cohen has had this figured out since very early on, and that's clear in his tweet behavior on later T+21 dates.
+
+This can also explain why Gamestop made the choice to conduct a share offering on 6/9 -
+
+6/9, the Gamestop shareholder meeting, as meme of a date as it may be, is *not* on a significant net capital requirement date, and thus Cohen and friends were well aware that the price would fall again. To counteract negative sentiment, he announces the share offering; effectively, FUD immunity, because any negative movement can be attributed to it. Additionally, it provides *1 billion dollars* in capital for future positive announcements, which he can place on the T+21 dates; for example, the June 24 T+21, which is in close proximity to the Russel rebalancing. Note: So far, only Cohen tweets have lined up with T+21 dates. If positive Gamestop news; an acquisition, a dividend, NFT's, esports deals lines up... oh god. No dates, but those with shares have nothing to worry about - they're in good hands. *Only up.*
+
+Tl;dr: Cohen is well aware of the T+21 dates and has lined up his own tweets *in clear indication* of it. The 6/9 ATM market offering, although I know many apes including myself were disappointed by, is basically FUD immunity as the price falls in between T+21 cycles. Furthermore, it raises capital for positive corporate announcements which can be lined up with T+21 dates, which so far, only Cohen tweets have lined up with. Price movements are largely irrelevant to news.
+
+*We're in good hands. If you hodl shares, there's nothing to worry about. HODL!*
+
+Edit: formatting. If anyone has criticisms, announcements, or additional news that I missed, please comment below.
+
+*Not financial advice.*
+
+EDIT: Guys I fucking missed one.
+
+On March 25, Cohen tweets our smoky teddy,
+
+<https://twitter.com/ryancohen/status/1375159657166209031>
+
+Lining up with the T+21 date on March 25th.
+
+With this, out of 18 Cohen tweets since his activity in Gamestop, 4 of them line up with the 5 T+21 cycle days thus far, missing only the first one on January. While it is *possible* that this is a coincidence, given that there's about 180 days since the beginning of all this I don't think it's very likely. If anyone is a statistics legend and could calculate the probability that this is random it would be much appreciated. Also, I don't think there's much of another reason why he would tweet an ice cream cone.
+
+edit: Reached out to friend who is a statistics major. He just graduated and doesn't want to do math but his response was - "Pretty sure though just from inspection it'll be statistically significant". Statisticians who are *not* lazy bums please comment if you can figure this out!
+
+edit 2: Update - math wrinkle brain messaged me with:
+
+"I can't post bc of karma but the probability of having at least 4 right dates on 5 while picking 18 out of 180 is 0.0339% It's an hypergeometric law."
+
+In basically any statistical research model this is *significant*. As always if anyone has any corrections to this please comment or message me. Tits jacked!

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-06-14-FINRA-Short-Interest-Reporting-Suggests-Hedge-Funds-are-Giving-Up.md

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+FINRA short interest reporting: The current price action is anomalous
+=====================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/No1Important_4real](https://www.reddit.com/user/No1Important_4real/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nztx4l/finra_short_interest_reporting_the_current_price/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+----TLDR; No price jump before a Short Interest Report date might mean Citadel and friends are unable to continue hiding their short interest. Reported SI numbers will climb.----
+
+For the year of 2021 two major events have been clearly and predictably affecting the price of GME, what's know as the FTD cycle, and FINRA reporting. I want to discuss the FINRA reporting.
+
+Many apes are unaware of the FINRA short interest reports and their affect on GME's price because they are largely eclipsed by the larger and more scandalous FTD cycle, but it's affect on the price action has been clear and predictable since the start.
+
+WHAT IS SHORT INTEREST REPORTING
+
+To summarize here is a quote from FINRA's own site:
+
+```
+FINRA requires firms to report short interest positions in all customer and proprietary accounts in all equity securities twice a month. All short interest positions must be reported by 6 p.m. Eastern Time on the second business day after the reporting settlement date designated by FINRA.
+
+```
+
+Also on the FINRA site is a calendar of important short interest reporting dates (<https://www.finra.org/filing-reporting/regulatory-filing-systems/short-interest>). There are three terms that are important with this calendar. Settlement Date, Due Date, and Exchange Receipt Date.
+
+Firstly, for those who aren't familiar, Short Interest is the term used to describe shares sold short but not yet covered or closed out. In terms of GME, this is all those synthetic shares and the whole reason this ape party is happening.
+
+Settlement Date is the date of the snapshot of short interest. If the settlement date is Friday, then the current short interest on Friday is used to as the data source to compile the report.
+
+Due Date is the date on which the reports must be submitted to FINRA.
+
+Exchange Receipt Date is the date on which the reports are published.
+
+From what I can discern though, there is possibly wiggle room within those dates. For example, it seems as though the reports are compiled with data from market open on the Settlement Dates, as often massive shorting begin anew on each Settlement Date. I assume the same is true on the opposite end and the published reports may not be until the end of the receipt date, which means they aren't readily available until the following business day for retail public.
+
+HOW SHORT INTEREST REPORTING AFFECTS PRICE
+
+Basically, the entities shorting GME don't want their short positions published. By design, shorts are supposed to be settled within a matter of days and it's only through gross manipulation and breaking of rules have they been able to draw them out (which is how the FTD cycle comes into play). What the short entities don't want is their true Short Interest to be known, and these reports are supposed to do exactly that. So, to get around the reports, they hide their positions (covered in many of the wonderful DD on the topic on the FTD cycle and Deep ITM hiding), or they close their short positions long enough to create the report.
+
+In any given day, more and more short positions are created and hidden away, but between report Settlement Dates, any short positions that can't be swept under a rug need to be closed, which causes price climbs in the days leading up to the Settlement Date. Typically on Settlement Date, after the data for the report has been captured, they will then begin shorting with abandon again to suppress the price.
+
+HISTORICAL PRICING
+
+[![r/Superstonk - FINRA short interest reporting: The current price action is anomalous](https://preview.redd.it/s4fo6knrx9571.png?width=1866&format=png&auto=webp&s=57f1a9e5effe14f1d14ef0e4e0b5c3ad77085d51)](https://preview.redd.it/s4fo6knrx9571.png?width=1866&format=png&auto=webp&s=57f1a9e5effe14f1d14ef0e4e0b5c3ad77085d51)
+
+FINRA Short Interest Reporting Dates
+
+I have taken the time to draw each Settlement Date on the graph of the calendar year for GME price. Each blue vertical line is a Settlement Date. You can clearly see in the day or two before each date the price will climb modestly or steeply. That is the closing of unhidden short positions. The two times this didn't happen was Feb 12 and April 30. Those two dates though were preceded by a flat period, most likely the open short positions were close or hidden within that flat period. It's most noticeable on April 30th where the was a large rally in the days preceding. If you increase the granularity of the candles you'll also find that on the days leading up to April 30th all the steep deeps were immediately met with steep climbs, I believe this is them closing their short positions on the same day they open them, keeping the price effectively flat.
+
+From the above chart, an minimum there is a moderately strong relationship between FINRA Short Interest Settlement Dates and the price of GME rising. You don't see a huge dip two days before a Settlement Date due to them not opening large quantities of new short positions, though actual market trading still does occur like on Feb 25th.
+
+WHATS HAPPENING NOW
+
+Right now we're in the midst of another anomaly when it comes with FINRA reporting. The price for the last two days has been flat and dipped hard just before then. If they need to close their short positions before the Settlement Date, it raises the question as to what's going on.
+
+As I see it, there are three scenarios that can account for what's happening.
+
+1.  The sale of 5 million shares is entirely at fault the for 30% price decline, open short positions were closed over the days leading up to that fall, or were able to be hidden during that time.
+
+2.  They are going to lie on their report more than usual and have no intention on playing the "hide the short" game anymore
+
+3.  They aren't bothering hiding anymore
+
+DISCLAIMER: The following is merely my opinion and not a factual analysis:
+
+I don't believe possibility of option 1 is very likely, simply due to the scale of the 5 million shares. That dilution would affect around 7-9% of the share price, and buy pressure has been steadily increasing. There would be people fighting to buy the 5 million shares with the shorts attempting to cover shares they couldn't hide. I don't believe there would be enough power in that sale to drop the price a whole 30%.
+
+Option two is possible, but would open up someone for clear fraud, probably a chain of individuals. Why go to jail for your boss, why go to jail as well as go bankrupt, especially if it doesn't change the outcome.
+
+Option three is the one that makes the most sense to me. They don't plan on hiding their positions any longer, either because doing so it's prohibitive, or they believe that Gamestop will report the full count of the vote and make hiding unnecessary.
+
+Should that be the case, we would find out on the 25th.
+
+Please comment below if you have any better understanding and deeper insight into this.
+
+EDIT: Added a disclaimer before my opinion and changed the tag from DD to education as some felt the DD tag should be used for more data driven analysis.

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-06-21-GME-Banks-The-Movie-Stock-and-Elliot-Waves.md

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+GME, Banks Falling Off a Cliff, The Movie Stock, Elliot Waves, WUT Mean For This Week? 🚀
+=========================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/possibly6](https://www.reddit.com/user/possibly6/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o4jxb3/gme_banks_falling_off_a_cliff_the_movie_stock/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Sup Apes
+
+Elliot waves guy here doing my best to give you your daily dose of confirmation bias before the market opens!
+
+Not financial advice, I do unimaginable things with the crayons I get when I ask for a kid's menu at restaurants.
+
+NON NEGOTIABLE: PLAY THIS AS YOU READ (This song slowly builds, idk the vibes feel right <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvBfiRWLj_0>)
+
+HAPPY FUCKING FATHERS DAY TO ALL YOU PAPA SILVERBACKS OUT THERE!!! If you're drunk from the day's festivities, this read will be even better.
+
+This might be a shorter post, I don't have too much to say as of yet other than I'm FUCKING JACKED 🚀
+
+First off, I'm sure you all have seen the posts regarding bank stocks following and how we can potentially use that as a predictive indicator in terms of GME stock price. Great work here if you missed the post: <https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o42bfm/big_banks_lost_a_lot_of_value_on_january_14th_but/>
+
+Let's take a look at the banks last week:
+
+[OOOOF](https://preview.redd.it/vqt6zzy8ji671.png?width=2802&format=png&auto=webp&s=0e482ac603a8601e6d2988e8ac7e1475473c5140)
+
+This might be one of my favorite screenshots of all time. Let's take a look at the banks back in the middle of january and see if that had any correlation to GME goin bananas at the end of January.
+
+[death to big banks](https://preview.redd.it/eb9h44rgji671.png?width=2806&format=png&auto=webp&s=d45dcd5616c6db3ab3d85698ad1f65b9c31dc424)
+
+Given that GME's run peaked in the end of January, the conclusions that I draw from that are the banks hit a low around GME's peak. Granted, there were many outside factors at play back then, so this is all speculative. However, Let's look at GME in january now, pay close attention to the dates on the bottom and compare those to the banks above:
+
+[squeeze for ants](https://preview.redd.it/jg73y59tji671.png?width=2770&format=png&auto=webp&s=0af347858b726f3fe3104a2339cd794cc2412543)
+
+just from eyeballing, we can see that the banks seem to find their "bottom" as GME begins to lift off. Does this mean the banks will go to zero before GME squeezes? absolutely not, please don't think that will be the case. HOWEVER, we can assume that the financial sector and GME have some sort of inverse relationship, simply based on the erratic price action between the pairs.
+
+This time around, I'm expecting banks to continue to fall as GME rises. Can't halt buying this time around!
+
+I haven't charted out the bank stocks because frankly I don't really care, I want the major banks at 0 personally, wouldn't pay a penny more to hold that garbage (all my homies hate the financials sector)
+
+Alright, so we can *seemingly* use the falling stock price of banks as a predictive indicator for upwards GME price action. Do note, I didn't conduct any significance tests or anything, this is all simply from comparing candle charts and looking for similarities/differences.
+
+Speaking of comparing candle charts, something super interesting was brought to my attention in a group discussion, big shoutout to [u/roman_axt](https://www.reddit.com/u/roman_axt/) for the hard work you ultra wrinkly brained primate. Below are images of GME and the movie company, courtesy of [u/roman_axt](https://www.reddit.com/u/roman_axt/) as the arrows are drawn so the smoothest of brains can interpret what tf is going on. Do note, these are from about a week ago, so not all candles are up to date (if it even matters)
+
+[movie company](https://preview.redd.it/k6na9x1ali671.png?width=1642&format=png&auto=webp&s=b76c79799b8653e2f7a1abd4519511f3ec4de0d9)
+
+[GME](https://preview.redd.it/vsbpkxlqli671.png?width=1652&format=png&auto=webp&s=968f2fdef4407b30ca589c9c7b6ad887dec9fc4e)
+
+The reason I bring this up is because some of my friends in the trading world (that only trade off price action mind you, they don't really understand the whole GME saga) noticed this as well. It APPEARS that the movie company and GME not only move in a somewhat similar/predictable pattern, but GME seems to be lagging behind by about 2 or so weeks. Do note, this is just an approximation from eyeballing, please take this all with a grain of salt and remember I am retarded.
+
+Here is a view sent to me by one of my good friends who noticed the same fishiness occurring (from mobile thinkorswim):
+
+[moveee stonk](https://preview.redd.it/uq7aosflmi671.png?width=457&format=png&auto=webp&s=a068716cd483c2b6793e4d54d98ed2e1f852c613)
+
+[gAmEsToNk](https://preview.redd.it/1xw8lktmmi671.png?width=457&format=png&auto=webp&s=ad27d18e0a9739aa32ec178e69b29a6a39f9dc4f)
+
+now what REALLY has me jacked is the pattern lines up from a few weeks ago, when the movie stock was trading for sub $16/share. It then ran to upwards of 70+. I was able to predict the movie stock's relative high's and low's using EW as well, which I've gotta say is actually super exciting. I own none, BUT it worked on a seemingly "impossible" to time stock. Idk about you, but I don't believe in coincidences.
+
+Disclaimer, I hodl ZERO of the movie stock, I have always believed it was a distraction. the fact that the media is talking about it should tell you enough.
+
+Now let's tie this assumption into my GME elliot waves analysis, try not to get too jacked:
+
+[4hr](https://preview.redd.it/04006jafni671.png?width=2812&format=png&auto=webp&s=eb668952f63ba29226abd0855cbecd476b479466)
+
+As stated time and time again, we are in a 3 within a 3 within a 3, which is quite literally an elliot wave trader's wet dream. This setup is valid down to about 113, so I wouldn't worry about "is the structure still valid?" yes. yes it is.
+
+This is literally as bullish a setup you can get, all we need is a match to light the fuse. Our cycle 3 (white line) is targeting at the MINIMUM 440, though I would love to see the 1.618:1 ratio hit, as is most common for wave 3. This puts GME at roughly 582, though remember this is all pre squeeze.
+
+As always, the motto is simple. Buy hodl, sell for life changing money (not no 10k/share bullshit, 8 figures/share is life changing in my eyes, and that's just my floor).
+
+I'm not saying we will break into the 400+ range this week by any means, but man the stars are aligning for some crazy shit to go down. I'm fookin jacked m8.
+
+Lastly, let's take a look at SPY and the VIX, as we can use each as a tool to gauge not only sentiment, but potential fuckery before it happens. In my post regarding the SP500 and GME, I brought up how In the January squeeze, SPY took a fucking HIT as GME broke into the hundreds for the first time ever. Here's my view of SPY:
+
+[4hr](https://preview.redd.it/tg53oi4ioi671.png?width=2830&format=png&auto=webp&s=fb523f927bed85a65d2e1a43b2b000295e84d8bf)
+
+NGL, SPY is kind of in no man's land right now. I'll have to see how we open to have a better idea of where it's going. By all means this COULD be the beginning of our long awaited bear market, but it could very well form an impulsive wave 1 to the upside to make for a final push to around 430 before shit hits the fan
+
+My OWN PERSONAL THESIS is that we will see the markets pumped to valhalla 1 last time to try and draw as many "suckers" in so wall street can offload the bag at the peak. Put yourself in their shoes, seems like a logical play to strike fear into everyone, then prop the markets up a bit longer to make everyone think its okay, then proceed to dump the bag on them
+
+Lastly, the VIX, the fear/volatility indicator:
+
+[VIX](https://preview.redd.it/58x900k3pi671.png?width=2802&format=png&auto=webp&s=5ee14be1a71b82ca0ab2cde627b5e47467dad7f5)
+
+Finished up 16% on friday? spicy. In one of my posts I mentioned how we can use the VIX to gauge when GME will potentially do something erratic. just compare the spikes of the VIX and GME, you'll see there's at least some correlation there. I mean shit, end of january? Clear as kenny's "for sale" sign on his marked down penthouse that he suddenly is in a rush to sell. wonder why? (I think it sold actually lol, even funnier).
+
+I'm preparing for the best while always expecting the worst. I'm never disappointed this way and always excited, 10/10 would recommend.
+
+June 30 is the end of the grace period for banks, worth noting. I'm expecting the VIX to FLY when that happens, though again, pure speculation.
+
+TLDR: worth the read. Banks falling is a potential indicator that GME will do some crazy shit, GME also *appears* to be lagging behind the movie stock. That part is pure speculation, but speculation is part of the fun part no? (Sorry the song doesn't fit perfectly, you'd be surprised how much time i spend trying to link a fitting song lol. as long as you're jacked, i consider this a job well done)
+
+Now Imma go get high af so I'm well rested for MONDAY🚀 🚀 🚀
+
+edit: funny story cause y'all are fam, I went to the porsche dealer yesterday to test drive my post-moass whip, and the salesman googled me before I came in to make sure I wasn't some degenerate looking to crash their pristine GT4. I get there, and the salesman said he googled me and knew me as the elliot wave guy. Simulation confirmed. during the drive we talked about trading, I showed him my wave count, hopefully he got some GME. idk, random. Thought I'd share cause I thought it's a nice story. This movement is bigger than we can comprehend. EW guy is in the bio of my socials, so he put 2 and 2 together after googling my real name.
+
+Edit 2: proof I went and they let me drive the gt4: <https://imgur.com/a/uzTn3OR>

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-06-22-Is-NSCC-002-about-to-turn-the-T+21-T+35-Loop-into-a-Death-Spiral.md

@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+Wait... Is NSCC-002 about to turn the T+21/T+35 loop into a death spiral of T+0 as we approach Q2 end?
+======================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/user/Criand/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o5ingt/wait_is_nscc002_about_to_turn_the_t21t35_loop/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Possible DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Possible%20DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+0\. Preface
+
+I am not a financial advisor. I do not provide financial advice. Many thoughts here are my opinion, and others can be speculative.
+
+So, NSCC-002 just got approved, along with NSCC-801 for one-hour margin calls. Not only did it get approved, it got accelerated approval and will be in effect Wednesday, June 23rd.
+
+This got me JACKED. But of course don't get too hyped just because of me. It could all be a nothing burger in the end. But, there's some crazy shit going down that I think is telling of what is about to come.
+
+There's also comments of "these rules mean nothing until they are enforced". Yes, I agree. But, consider the fact that the NSCC, ICC, OCC, DTC have all been drafting up rules to protect themselves in the event of member defaults and extreme market stress. They aren't just drafting these up to say, "Meh. Nevermind". The NSCC, ICC, OCC, DTC are full of members who are NOT short on GameStop or other positions that put these entities at risk. The other members have influence and do not want to be dragged down either. It's a battle of survival.
+
+I also apologize if anyone has already posted about this. I do know that [/u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/) had identified these SLD periods in their post about T+35 when tying in the spikes of price! Such a smart ape! I'm going to expand on their post here, identifying the importance of NSCC-002 to the theory.
+
+A comment by [/u/minnowstogetherstonk](https://www.reddit.com/u/minnowstogetherstonk/) also encouraged this discussion, first identifying [that T+35/T+21 could turn into T+0 that feeds on itself.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o4y2so/nscc2021002_approved_with_partial_amendments/h2k0os3?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) If this is what is about to happen... genius ape!
+
+I personally think that NSCC-002 will trigger a death-spiral for SHFs as we approach Q2 end, and shit is about to hit the fan across all markets.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Wait... Is NSCC-002 about to turn the T+21/T+35 loop into a death spiral of T+0 as we approach Q2 end?](https://preview.redd.it/q1te0jsbzr671.png?width=1686&format=png&auto=webp&s=4407f66bc6efcdd10e5d6323bea7bc2611371385)](https://preview.redd.it/q1te0jsbzr671.png?width=1686&format=png&auto=webp&s=4407f66bc6efcdd10e5d6323bea7bc2611371385)
+
+Awww shit
+
+1\. NSCC-002 And It's Effects On Liquidity Deposits
+
+Note: Like I said above, this is expanding off of [/u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/)'s post of T+35 found here: [T+35 Is The One True Cycle](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o155a6/t35_is_the_one_true_cycle_evidence_to_back_my/). It visually showed the NSCC liquidity cycle times and the effects it had on FTDs, which never really clicked until thinking about NSCC-002 a bit more. Give their post a read! :)
+
+Something big to remember is that NSCC-801 now goes into effect along with NSCC-002, which allows for one-hour margin calls. This means that when a member does not have sufficient liquidity, they will be asked to post it within one hour to the NSCC. If they do not post the liquidity, then the member defaults. And thus, the snappening begins.
+
+Let's investigate the most important bits of NSCC-002. First, a glance at what the rules used to be and the NSCC's concern driving the rule change**:**
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Wait... Is NSCC-002 about to turn the T+21/T+35 loop into a death spiral of T+0 as we approach Q2 end?](https://preview.redd.it/yjhyg0vrzr671.png?width=793&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c593670c431dca25f897bf1ffa26197b3b60fc9)](https://preview.redd.it/yjhyg0vrzr671.png?width=793&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c593670c431dca25f897bf1ffa26197b3b60fc9)
+
+NSCC-002 Part 1; Old Liquidity Requirements
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Wait... Is NSCC-002 about to turn the T+21/T+35 loop into a death spiral of T+0 as we approach Q2 end?](https://preview.redd.it/k7sfq4iszr671.png?width=784&format=png&auto=webp&s=61deac31a63ecb823c3ea5939792043b2b890a87)](https://preview.redd.it/k7sfq4iszr671.png?width=784&format=png&auto=webp&s=61deac31a63ecb823c3ea5939792043b2b890a87)
+
+NSCC-002 Part 2; Old Liquidity Requirements
+
+Prior to this rule change, the NSCC would collect liquidity deposits only during Monthly Options expiry periods. What is a monthly option? It is the third Friday of each month:
+
+-   January 15
+
+-   February 19
+
+-   March 19
+
+-   April 16
+
+-   May 21
+
+-   June 18
+
+-   July 16
+
+-   Etc.
+
+The NSCC realized that shit could get really wonky between those liquidity periods of the monthly options. These volatile movements in the markets would put the NSCC itself at risk due to some of its members positions. So, they decided to draft up this rule which allowed them to not only grab liquidity around monthly options, but to be able to ask for more liquidity on a daily basis. This allows the NSCC to take hold of volatility and say, "enough is enough, you're done for".
+
+Now, check this out:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Wait... Is NSCC-002 about to turn the T+21/T+35 loop into a death spiral of T+0 as we approach Q2 end?](https://preview.redd.it/754z0dte1s671.png?width=799&format=png&auto=webp&s=736bb773f6515211f916788f10fe1ba914c1569c)](https://preview.redd.it/754z0dte1s671.png?width=799&format=png&auto=webp&s=736bb773f6515211f916788f10fe1ba914c1569c)
+
+NSCC-002 Part 2; New Liquidity Requirements
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Wait... Is NSCC-002 about to turn the T+21/T+35 loop into a death spiral of T+0 as we approach Q2 end?](https://preview.redd.it/wp8f279f1s671.png?width=741&format=png&auto=webp&s=cae04b68606972c68160dc782ad61d53a9bbac03)](https://preview.redd.it/wp8f279f1s671.png?width=741&format=png&auto=webp&s=cae04b68606972c68160dc782ad61d53a9bbac03)
+
+NSCC-002 Part 2; New Liquidity Requirements
+
+The NSCC defined a period of grabbing liquidity and holding it to be 2 business days prior to monthly expiration, and ending 7 days after monthly expiration. From the dates listed above, this gives you the following time periods of liquidity deposits for monthly expirations:
+
+| Monthly Option Date | Liquidity Deposit Given By Member To NSCC | Liquidity Deposit Returned To Member From NSCC |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| January 15 | January 13 | January 27 |
+| February 19 | February 17 | March 2 |
+| March 19 | March 17 | March 30 |
+| April 16 | April 14 | April 27 |
+| May 21 | May 19 | June 2 |
+| June 18 | June 16 | June 29 |
+
+And if you remember from [/u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/)'s posts, these periods all contain the T+21/T+35 dates of January 25, February 24, March 25, April 26, May 25, and June 24. So it appears that, as [/u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/) concluded, that they struggle with liquidity during these time periods of FTD deliveries and the price gets much greater upward momentum.
+
+Going back to the images above of NSCC-002... notice that in the old rule that the amount of liquidity that needed to be posted for monthly expirations was based on settlement activity of the prior 24 months. That's a lot of leeway on how much liquidity is needed per member as it was not checking real-time data.
+
+NOW... the NSCC is changing it to a daily calculation. It's no longer a one-and-done deal of the monthly liquidity based on the prior 24 months. It is going to be based on a constant check of real-time data. This can shift the total liquidity required from the previous rule up significantly, mainly because it is no longer based on the prior 24 months of settlement activity.
+
+2\. T+21/T+35 Loop Turns Into A T+0 Death Spiral
+
+Remember how shit went absolutely wild around March 10th? That was outside of a liquidity deposit phase. And then, the price was tanked and brought down severely JUST BEFORE the next liquidity deposit was required.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Wait... Is NSCC-002 about to turn the T+21/T+35 loop into a death spiral of T+0 as we approach Q2 end?](https://preview.redd.it/yv2xmolw2s671.png?width=251&format=png&auto=webp&s=972401702a7cdee5648397fb0a827f137d3c1902)](https://preview.redd.it/yv2xmolw2s671.png?width=251&format=png&auto=webp&s=972401702a7cdee5648397fb0a827f137d3c1902)
+
+GME Price Action Prior To Next Liquidity Requirement
+
+In fact, something curious is that the price has never been above $228 entering the next liquidity posting date, and has never been above $300 during these liquidity dates. Hmmm? Margin call price could be dangerously close. And with NSCC-002/801, it can absolutely screw the SHFs.
+
+What does this all mean in the end? Well, it can turn the T+21/T+35 loop into a T+0 death spiral.
+
+They used to have to post liquidity two days prior to the monthly options. But now, the NSCC has the discretion to ask for MORE liquidity at ANY time based on daily movements of prices. The previous liquidity posting was a one-and-done deal instead of a liquidity requirement that would constantly update every day of the year. And if they fail these new liquidity checks? One. Hour. Margin calls.
+
+Here's a figure based on [/u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/)'s liquidity deposit phases identifying what could happen starting Wednesday, June 23rd:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Wait... Is NSCC-002 about to turn the T+21/T+35 loop into a death spiral of T+0 as we approach Q2 end?](https://preview.redd.it/ebuouwrl4s671.png?width=1536&format=png&auto=webp&s=adb54e7938d647d2f1d43f1b9ccbaeeac3701cad)](https://preview.redd.it/ebuouwrl4s671.png?width=1536&format=png&auto=webp&s=adb54e7938d647d2f1d43f1b9ccbaeeac3701cad)
+
+GME Price Action And Liquidity Deposit Phases
+
+This could very well be why they are trying to obliterate the price at the moment.
+
+The next FTD spike can cause the price to absolutely soar into a price range which requires more liquidity, making it harder for them to suppress the price, and pushing GME more towards the margin call price. Which then feeds on itself requiring more liquidity, and it continues on an absolute death spiral.
+
+Which can then lead to this:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Wait... Is NSCC-002 about to turn the T+21/T+35 loop into a death spiral of T+0 as we approach Q2 end?](https://preview.redd.it/emkfeo659s671.png?width=1536&format=png&auto=webp&s=a1459a1ed24e63e7193930567c2dbcd1c4917884)](https://preview.redd.it/emkfeo659s671.png?width=1536&format=png&auto=webp&s=a1459a1ed24e63e7193930567c2dbcd1c4917884)
+
+Happy GME TA
+
+2\. Urgency to Approve NSCC-002; Quarter End Of June 30th; Meeting Between Biden, Powell, Yellen, Gensler
+
+Guess what? The 2008 crash "started" around the end of Q3 with the collapse of Lehman Bros on September 15, 2008. End of quarters are when the system gets really strained due to the underlying plumbing of the markets and the necessity to pump balance sheets.
+
+> Banks' "reporting" dates are known inflection points in the short-term funding markets and typically fall at the end of the month, quarter, and of course the year. But periodically, the 15th of the month is also a pressure point. - [Source](https://blog.pimco.com/en/2019/09/repo-rate-spike-a-tail-of-low-liquidity)
+
+Fast forward to when the Fed attempted to reverse QE. A year after performing QT (reverse of QE), the repo market blew up to 10% interest on September 15, 2019 due to way way way too many loans that had to be handled. You can see how strain on the markets starts to amplify around particular dates of Quarter-ends and occasionally the 15th of months.
+
+We're approaching the end of Q2 which is June 30th. Hm. Quarter end?! Sound familiar? 👀
+
+The NSCC-002/801 is having accelerated effectiveness. There is huuuge urgency to get this passed for margin requirements and margin calling members. Why would they be pushing this to get it out the door? I think shits about to hit the fan. They NEED to protect themselves.
+
+Something else to note is that Biden, Yellen, Gensler, and Powell all met for "Climate Change" discussions today.
+
+> "The regulators reported that the financial system is in strong condition," the White House said in a readout of the meeting. - [Source](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/06/21/joe-biden-live-updates/)
+
+That's the entire context of the quote. That the financial system is "in strong condition". What are they actually doing at this meeting? Something similar to discussing letting X Y and Z fail just like they discussed letting Lehman Bros fail in 2008?
+
+The [Jungle Beat Monday Post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o54hl2/the_jungle_beat_monday_06212021/) talked about this very briefly and it was something I latched onto immediately. I remembered [the meeting for 2008](https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/12/bernanke-paulson-and-geithner-say-they-bailed-out-wall-street-to-help-main-street.html) but did not connect the dots to this meeting between Biden, Powell, Yellen, and Gensler possibly being similar in scope.
+
+Wild times we live in. But remember - don't fuckin' dance.

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-06-29-NYSE-Threshold-List-Collapsing-Shorts-and-Launching-the-MOASS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+The NYSE threshold list: collapsing shorts and launching the MOASS
+==================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Bladeace](https://www.reddit.com/user/Bladeace/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/oao9oo/the_nyse_threshold_list_collapsing_shorts_and/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+TA;DR: threshold list killed small shorts in January. Big shorts took on their positions. Threshold list restrictions coming for big shorts too. Watch for GME being added to the threshold list.
+
+TL;DR: restrictions associated with extended periods of failures to deliver inform the past six months of GME shenanigans. These restrictions killed the small players who were short GME in January and allowed big players to take on their position. Big players assumed they could use their powers and resources to turn this losing hand into a big win. Apes stopped them. Now, finally, the big players are going to find these same restrictions applied to them - watch for GME being added to the threshold list.
+
+Background
+
+The New York Stock Exchange provides a list of 'threshold securities', which are securities that are regarded as difficult to borrow due to a large number of recent failures to deliver. When a security is on this list, there are limits on a market maker's ability to short sell the security in question and obligations regarding delivery requirements. These restrictions and obligations can increase the longer the security stays on the list. For further information and some relevant links, please see [this comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o9x3hf/guys_before_you_downvote_this_to_hell_bc_its_not/h3e1asv?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) by [u/Cirand](https://www.reddit.com/u/Cirand/). There is currently some discussion of this topic because moviestock has been added to the threshold list recently, [this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o9x3hf/guys_before_you_downvote_this_to_hell_bc_its_not/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) by [u/OrwellsWarning](https://www.reddit.com/u/OrwellsWarning/) presents tweets by [u/dlauer](https://www.reddit.com/u/dlauer/) and Susanne Trimbath which is a good place to look for discussion of the significance of the threshold list (see the comments).
+
+In short, the ability to perform fucketry is diminished when a security is on the threshold list. /udlauer tweets that it might be unusual for companies like GME to make it onto this list (usually it's small companies). [This rather underappreciated post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/oadcb3/i_made_these_charts_illustrating_occurrences_of/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) by [u/mlebjerg](https://www.reddit.com/u/mlebjerg/) provides graphs of the price of moviestock and GME in relation to their being on the threshold list. Notice that the price of moviestock does not appear to be related to their being on the threshold list. Neither does the price of GME, with a notable exception.
+
+Key point
+
+Given the restrictions that come with being on the threshold list and its relationship with the historical prices of the two securities, I suspect the effect of being on the threshold list do not translate to price changes until the security has been on the list for long enough to compromise the ability of those with short positions to manipulate the price. On the below graph I compare the price of GME with the number of concurrent days it has been on the threshold list:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The NYSE threshold list: collapsing shorts and launching the MOASS](https://preview.redd.it/yfmbrye3lb871.png?width=685&format=png&auto=webp&s=c28e1c25971667b38fc8717aba790de881771e86)](https://preview.redd.it/yfmbrye3lb871.png?width=685&format=png&auto=webp&s=c28e1c25971667b38fc8717aba790de881771e86)
+
+From the end of December 2020 and into the beginning of February 2021 GME was on the threshold list for 39 market days. I believe that this answers an important question that has been outstanding since February: it explains why they needed to resort to a market halt to stop the January spike but not the February gamma.
+
+The difference between January and February
+
+In [this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvvuhp/feb_2426_failed_launch_attempt_and_proof_the_dtcc/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) from April I argue that the unusual market activity during February, the 'gamma swarm' or 'gamma squeeze', was an attempt to launch the MOASS that failed due to those shorting GME flooding the market with ever more short positions, which mitigated attempts to rapidly rise the price. In [this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nc1h4o/findings_from_my_analysis_of_605_data_huge_short/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) from May I argue that the changes in order flow indicate that the market center Citadel Securities was used to open a large short position in January and the NASDAQ market center was used to manipulate the price in February. These two arguments leave an unanswered question: if the spike in February was prevented by manipulation involving inter-market-center fucketry, why did they need to resort to a trading halt to prevent the January spike?
+
+I think the threshold list answers that question: trading was halted in January because GME had been on the threshold list for weeks prior to the spike, which prevented the other methods of price restricting manipulation available to those shorting GME. After weeks on the threshold list, and in the face of massive buying pressure, they had no winning play left - so they halted trading. I suspect that, with trading halted, they then brought the minimum number of GME shares required to cover the outstanding failures to deliver which then removed GME from the threshold list. I expect that this actually left them with *an even bigger* outstanding short position, considering how much it would have expanded during the January spike: they opened a bigger position due tomorrow, to close the positions keeping GME on the list today. I think this led to the game they've been playing since February.
+
+The story so far
+
+Notice that GME has not returned to the threshold list since early February. I think that this is because the parties shorting GME since then have been more competent, better resourced, and more powerful. I suspect that GME went onto the threshold list in December 2020 because a smaller player, perhaps Melvin Capital, was failing to cover or defer their short positions. Ultimately, this led to the January spike and a more powerful institution capable of the manipulation required to stop the spike stepping in. Essentially, I think at least one smaller player who was short GME collapsed in December and January which undermined the ability of the larger players to control the situation. In response, I suspect that the larger players with market maker privileges and influence over market centers took over these collapsing players.
+
+This is why I think that the short position was *expanded* in January even though I also think some positions were covered. As I discuss [in my post regarding the 605](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/nc2zcc/findings_from_my_analysis_of_605_data_huge_short/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) data (also linked earlier, the may post), it appears that the market center Citadel Securities was used to expand a short position during the January spike. Notice that the restrictions associated with a security being on the threshold list are not applied to all parties equally. This is how shorting took place in January, despite GME having been on the list for weeks - it was one of the smaller players failing to deliver that got GME on the list, so the big players were not suffering all of the related restrictions (especially those with influence over their own market center). I suspect that the short position was expanded dramatically in the leadup to the January spike and then, after the trading halt, the *oldest positions* were covered to resolve those failures to deliver that were keeping GME on the threshold list. In this manner, the short position was moved from small players to the big ones and the overall short position expanded while the reported short position lowered substantially.
+
+With their short position bigger than ever, I suspect that they attempted to crash the price in February to convince everyone that it's time to sell their GME shares. At this point, their position is likely looking quite strong - the short positions opened in January were at a high price per share, which means they've received more money from buyers than the current share price. So, on paper anway, they are in a strong position - yes, they owe an insane amount of GME shares, but the price of GME is now much lower. As long as they can *eventually* convince everyone this is over, they'll likely come out of this stronger than ever. If they can keep issuing more short positions that they eventually cover at a much lower price, after shareholders give up and move on, they'll actually have profited over this debacle and gobbled up smaller players. Provided the apes stop buying and move on, they've turned an infinite loss position into a huge win. Masterstroke.
+
+This is a bold plan, it will turn a massive loss into a huge win. So, they go all in and do an excellent job of it. The trading halt works by allowing them to consolidate the short positions into only those players big enough to pull this strategy off. Expanding the short position provides an influx of cash from buyers. Further shorting after the trading halt drops the price in early February. The political fallout allows them to announce very publicly that they've closed their positions. The media narrative fits perfectly to what they need to portray. For the first few weeks of February, it's working.
+
+Except, it doesn't work. It's an excellent play and they executed it well. Regardless, two factors prevent their success. Firstly, millions of weirdos from the internet appear to have disregarded all traditionally authoritative sources of information and keep buying more shares. Given the complete lack of any evidence to justify this behaviour, it's understandable that this caught the shorts off guard. At this point, it's too late - they're beyond fully committed to this play, they've gambled everything they have and the health of the entire financial markets on this. So, they do what they can to undermine this bizarre online resistance. Unfortunately, for them, they are also facing resistance from other big players who, for whatever reason, are not willing to allow them this victory. This resistance from other big players comes in the form of the February gamma, which attempts to launch the squeeze that was prevented with the trading halt ([link to my April post on this](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvvuhp/feb_2426_failed_launch_attempt_and_proof_the_dtcc/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3), also linked earlier).
+
+This sets the stage for everything that follows, March onwards. In January and early February the shorts win the battles. Smaller players die and cause a massive mess, but this allows the big-shorts to take over their positions and expand their short positions at a favorable price point while doing so. They gamble on an extreme play, a trading halt, to crash the price and it works. However, Apes pervert their attempts to motivate selloffs and realize they are being targeted with misinformation - so, they gather together to defend themselves. Ultimately, this becomes [r/SuperStonk](https://www.reddit.com/r/SuperStonk/). Other big players, perhaps fearing what the big-shorts have become and are doing, instigate the February gamma which reverses a large portion of the price crash and exposes the ongoing manipulation. As February draws to a close, the gamma has failed to launch the rocket and the Apes have only a vague understanding of what is happening. It's a stalemate.
+
+I think the battles fought in January and February have informed everything that followed. The big players short GME have used their power, influence, and resources to avoid any further restrictions on their GME activities. The big players opposing them have done what they can, but can't launch the rocket. Apes' might be described as the wildcard, but I think they're better understood as the battleground. As the months drag on, they grow in sophistication, numbers, and power. Six months into this mess, they're the ones holding the winning hand. It's the Apes' whose shares need to be brought: the shorts always needed retail shares, but after six months of endless shorting they now need *a lot* of retail shares and, much worse, the retail holders know it.
+
+If my outline, story I guess, is correct, then the outcome is inevitable. At least, assuming Apes hold. Eventually, especially in the face of tightening restrictions, GME is going to end up back on that threshold list. Once it does, the powers and privileges allowing those short GME to fight will be steadily stripped away until they can't do anything except watch as their obligations to the NSCC kick in and the attempt to close the infinite loss position they have burdened their peers with begins. I suspect this is why the new restrictions are finishing off with 'rules clarifications' that limit rehypothecation and prevent a borrowed share from being used to 'deliver' an earlier position. Once the failures to deliver can no longer be hidden, GME is going to end up back on that threshold list. Once it's there, those with outstanding failures to deliver will have their ability to short GME restricted and the big-shorts will be caught in the same trap they 'saved' the little shorts from in January.
+
+Finally, please note a recent by [u/Feeling_Point_5978](https://www.reddit.com/u/Feeling_Point_5978/) yesterday (I can't link, it's on a different subreddit) for discussion of this in the context of Moviestock. For what it's worth, I think that Moviestock is our canary in the coal mines on this issue. I suspect that the new restrictions, finally in effect from last week, will result in the failures to deliver GME to being piling up quite soon. If this happens, expect to see GME on the threshold list soon after. Once it's there, the restrictions escalate until it's off the list. I suspect that there is only one way GME is getting off that list once it's back on it, and that's the MOASS.
+
+(Please note that my incompetence limits the reliability of any of the above. I argue, think, and suspect many things; my saying it doesn't mean much regardless of how I phrase it - read with caution!)

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-06-29-RRP-is-the-Reason-for-No-Margin-Call-Liquidations.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Holy shit, THOSE MOTHER FUCKERS. thesis 2.0: RRP is the reason there has been no big boy margin call liquidations in the states. US T Bonds are considered collateral, its funding rehypothication, allows dividends, and finally institutions are able to circle jerk each other ETFs as their holdings.
+=========================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/A_KY_gardener](https://www.reddit.com/user/A_KY_gardener/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/oab880/holy_shit_those_mother_fuckers_thesis_20_rrp_is/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Discussion 🦍](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Discussion%20%F0%9F%A6%8D%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+![Collateral is US T bonds](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123951557-ec5dc700-d972-11eb-841d-c3509a0c643d.png)
+
+![RRP 06.28](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123951619-fb447980-d972-11eb-852f-e0fad949a813.png)
+
+![TDA Investing in Friendly Competitors](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123951648-05667800-d973-11eb-896c-d3fe59d37308.png)
+
+![TDA funds detailed](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123951747-1fa05600-d973-11eb-954f-fcb6839b4180.png)
+
+![TDA trust owning all sorts of Schwab in 2019](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123951774-27f89100-d973-11eb-89b4-e04f55e06657.png)
+
+!["Collateral will be in the form of US Treasury Bonds"](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123951843-38a90700-d973-11eb-90a8-b9826a51c35f.png)
+
+![Schwab investing in themselves?](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/123951915-4e1e3100-d973-11eb-85d9-acdcd17a64f8.png)
+
+
+
+
+
+

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-06-30-Hanks-Thot-Experiment.md

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+Hank's thot experiment
+======================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/HomeDepotHank69](https://www.reddit.com/user/HomeDepotHank69/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/oay9vr/hanks_thot_experiment/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Discussion 🦍](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Discussion%20%F0%9F%A6%8D%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+******** I am not a financial advisor, this is not financial advice *********
+
+Hey everyone thanks for reading my post yesterday. I'm still on a break from making big DDs (unless I stumble upon something major that warrants immediate attention), but in the mean time I wanted to create a dialogue, a thought experiment if you will.
+
+The point of this post is simply to create a discussion in the comments that will serve as ideas for future DDs for myself and other wrinkles as well as to generally facilitate a discussion.
+
+Here are my discussion questions:
+
+GENERAL QUESTIONS:
+
+In your opinion, what is the most likely trajectory of GME (i.e. if you had to predict what it will do for the next few months, what would you say)?
+
+```
+   What other scenarios could you see?
+
+```
+
+What topics do you want to see wrinkles make DDs about?
+
+What are the biggest weaknesses in the body of content of our current DD (i.e. what topics do we need to focus on because they are weaker)?
+
+What is the weakest part of the general theory of GME? What is the strongest?
+
+SPECIFIC QUESTIONS:
+
+Even if the FTD cycle theory is incorrect, it's still true that each cycle, the floor/support increases, which means that the price has increased steadily since February. However, as we all know, volume has been absolutely horrible -- pathetic. In a normal stock, this increase would be called a nonvolume supported trend; however, I think most of us believe this is happening because apes are holding, so the volume is just day traders and the HFs have moved buying volume into OTC trades. With that in mind, let's say that volume continues to decrease. If volume continues to decrease, assuming nothing material changes about GME, what do you think is the most likely trajectory (i.e. is there a point we could get to where volume would be miniscule or close to zero and if so what would do you think will happen)?
+
+The $350 level seems to be significant. The previous two times we got near it, we were BRUTALLY rejected and saw HUGE downtrends. The only time we got over it was January, when the market literally shut down buying. With that in mind, what is your take on the significance of this level? Is there a method we could use to reverse engineer it to try to find SI? What would you like to see us focus on with DD here?
+
+Do you think the MOASS will happen sooner (let's say before the end of August) or later and why?
+
+Many of you probably saw my last post where I used data from the absolute beauties that are our quants to determine that the "meme stocks" are correlated. My thoughts were that it indicated that institutions took large short positions on them all at the same time. What are your thoughts? Why do you think all of these stocks have been following similar patterns? IMO I don't think retail is behind it because it's impossible for a nonorganized/noncorrdinated group to make multiple stocks behave the same way for months. Though we undoubtedly have power, we can't coordinate like HFs, so I don't think that retail just randomly decided to buy and sell all of these at the same time? What do you think?
+
+What do you think about GME and coin (can't say because of automod)? I've documented the FTD cycle connection and how it might be used for covering, but what do you think?
+
+We all thought that RC being named board lord would be the "catalyst" causing the MOASS, but GME has reacted inconsistently to catalysts. Do you think catalysts have are relevant anymore? Do you think a catalyst will cause the MOASS or do you think it will be random like January?
+
+Finally, I expect this post to get a fair amount of activity, so if you have anything interesting to say or ask that I didn't cover above please put it below!
+
+******** I am not a financial advisor, this is not financial advice *********

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-06-30-The-Final-Battle.md

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+The Final Battle
+================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/thomas798354](https://www.reddit.com/user/thomas798354/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/DDintoGME/comments/oar709/the_final_battle/) | 
+
+---
+
+[𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻](https://www.reddit.com/r/DDintoGME/search?q=flair_name%3A%22%F0%9D%97%A6%F0%9D%97%BD%F0%9D%97%B2%F0%9D%97%B0%F0%9D%98%82%F0%9D%97%B9%F0%9D%97%AE%F0%9D%98%81%F0%9D%97%B6%F0%9D%97%BC%F0%9D%97%BB%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Apes as I see my fellow comrades disappointed on the battlefield I began to go back to my drawing board and think tactfully as how I would wargame from Citadel's point of view. I realize a lot of you are mad about T+21 and I must really have supporting documents this time so I will proceed slowly with lots of quotes and rule references, I invite anyone to politely cite their opinion.
+
+TLDR; Citadel used the OTM options locates one last time to the extreme before 005 came into effect to try and buy back shares at the lowest price possible. Hold the Stock, don't fall for the other baited plays coming up, and be patient apes. Short squeezes will be a thing of the past after this. 005 will hopefully stop locates in options chains and also prevent a lent shares from being rehypothecated and leant to someone else. We could see the borrow time reduced to a maximum of T+6.
+
+REG SHO 101-
+
+Rule 203: Locate requirement- *Locate Requirement*. Regulation SHO requires a broker-dealer to have reasonable grounds to believe that the security can be borrowed so that it can be delivered on the date delivery is due before effecting a short sale order in any equity security.[[7]](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/regsho.htm#_ftn7) This "locate" must be made and documented prior to effecting the short sale.
+
+Rule 204: *Close-out Requirement*. Rule 204 requires brokers and dealers that are participants of a registered clearing agency[[8]](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/regsho.htm#_ftn8) to take action to close out failure to deliver positions. Closing out requires the broker or dealer to purchase or borrow securities of like kind and quantity. The participant must close out a failure to deliver for a short sale transaction by no later than the beginning of regular trading hours on the settlement day following the settlement date, referred to as T+4. If a participant has a failure to deliver that the participant can demonstrate on its books and records resulted from a long sale, or that is attributable to bona fide market making activities, the participant must close out the failure to deliver by no later than the beginning of regular trading hours on the third consecutive settlement day following the settlement date, referred to as T+6. If the position is not closed out, the broker or dealer and any broker or dealer for which it clears transactions (for example, an introducing broker)[[9]](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/regsho.htm#_ftn9) may not effect further short sales in that security without borrowing or entering into a bona fide agreement to borrow the security (known as the "pre-borrowing" requirement) until the broker or dealer purchases shares to close out the position and the purchase clears and settles. In addition, Rule 203(b)(3) of Regulation SHO requires that participants of a registered clearing agency must immediately purchase shares to close out failures to deliver in securities with large and persistent failures to deliver, referred to as "threshold securities," if the failures to deliver persist for 13 consecutive settlement days.[[10]](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/regsho.htm#_ftn10) Threshold securities are equity securities[[11]](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/regsho.htm#_ftn11) that have an aggregate fail to deliver position for five consecutive settlement days at a registered clearing agency (e.g., National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC)); totaling 10,000 shares or more; and equal to at least 0.5% of the issuer's total shares outstanding. As provided in Rule 203 of Regulation SHO, threshold securities are included on a list disseminated by a self-regulatory organization ("SRO"). Although as a result of compliance with Rule 204, generally a participant's fail to deliver positions will not remain for 13 consecutive settlement days, if, for whatever reason, a participant of a registered clearing agency has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency in a threshold security for 13 consecutive settlement days, the requirement to close-out such position under Rule 203(b)(3) remains in effect.
+
+Rule 204 Exception: Rule 204 provides an extended period of time to close out certain failures to deliver. Specifically, if a failure to deliver position results from the sale of a security that a person is deemed to own and that such person intends to deliver as soon as all restrictions on delivery have been removed, the firm has up to 35 calendar days following the trade date to close out the failure to deliver position by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity.
+
+Okay lets start with what is happening, since before January the SHF (short Hedge Funds) realized that they couldn't bankrupt GME anymore. Their new goal is to get the price to be as low as possible before they cover due to almost all the Hedge Funds short already being at 49% losses or more. In 2019, before they were going to short GME to death they wanted to profit off of the derivatives market and placed puts on Jan 15th a huge options date that could have been bet on years out. At T+3 we saw a big run up Jan 22 from T+4 opened 42$ closed 65$ running to 96$ before premarket. The next day, T+5 was trash it opened at 96$ and closed at 76.79$ (not special). This was followed with T+6 where the latest date to close was opened at 88.56 and closed at 147.98 after markets running to 354.83. May 21 lead to May 26/27 and June 1/2 T+3, T+6 sometimes the deliveries catch up after market and premarket.
+
+Time to start explaining my little working theory. I am now a hedge fund, come join me in shorting GME (theoretically). So imagine this, we want to short the crap out of GME in a few different ways. Everyday downwards pressure to suppress price, and once a month we want to unload to spike it down. In order to short GME we must first find a broker willing to lend us shares, but this provides us with a problem because we don't own these shares we have to return them in T+3 or T+6. If we provide the locate for these shares meaning we own them or a security that is "like" them then we fall under the exception.
+
+Let me paint a picture for you, June 2 closed high from the T+6 from May. June 4th I was eating a protein bar on a ruck march thinking about how fucked the HF were when I saw SSR for AMC and GME.....Then the SHF borrow shares 3 & 4 June to short and replace them T+3 which was June 8/9 the SSR was because the HF borrowed all the shares possible from the brokers and ETFs. We are hype going into the shareholder meeting, so hype about 350$ no one is questioning why the SHF bought so many OTM options on July 16th. The HF loaded their short cannons with locates for the earnings report meaning they could short shares as much as possible with their locates at close to 85M total shares in JULY-JAN2022 options chain.
+
+"If a failure to deliver position results from the sale of a security that a person is deemed to own and that such person intends to deliver", "the firm has up to 35 calendar days following the trade date to close out the failure to deliver position by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity." Funny how they shorted the crap out of GME June 10th and 35 calendar days is July 15th, the day prior to their options expiring.
+
+Let me show you what this looks like from the round table at citadel securities:
+
+Hey Ken, I can't buy you anymore time over at DTCC. I have to pass 005 but I can make sure we file it June 24 and that it doesn't get sent to the federal register until June 30th. This buys you enough time to trick them with a T+3 borrow and a massive located short sale during a share offering, not to mention their disappointment that the new rules don't work at all. The short will cause apes to lose faith when 30% of the value disappears, and the only risk is that if you cant get the price low enough to cover under 350$ before July 16th. We lose anyways because 005 is in effect and July 16th will have T+3, T+6 buys when those OTM locates expire and cannot be kicked. To make matters worse the ETFs cannot help them anymore, the Russel 1k has even less shares to borrow. This is the last ditch effort to get the price down before they have to cover. Simultaneously they are attacking us with all of these "buy this instead" plays while GME sits idle and loses value, look at the threshold securities list! Half the people hyping it don't even know wtf it means.
+
+Remember the DFV tweet from Ready Player One, sometimes we must go backwards to win the race. Remember the latest cohen tweet with the fart alluding to the south park movie where kenny watches Terrance and Phillip in the movie theater and lights his own fart on fire, then he dies by getting dumped on by a "russell's" salt truck.
+
+[I'm not making this up](https://preview.redd.it/thwgb9sjic871.png?width=926&format=png&auto=webp&s=a33017b3e7998cdb02a1f66fdabda05cce27fca2)
+
+Threshold Securities List- Threshold securities are equity securities[[11]](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/regsho.htm#_ftn11) that have an aggregate fail to deliver position for five consecutive settlement days at a registered clearing agency (e.g., National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC)); totaling 10,000 shares or more; and equal to at least 0.5% of the issuer's total shares outstanding. Let me show you how easy this is to do with large float stocks for insert example stock...... borrow 500M*.005 shares= 2.5M and then don't return them.
+
+That's it! That's all they have to do borrow less than 1% of the float and not return it.
+
+Edit: Let me explain why I don't think net settlement is a big deal, these bad guys have an unfathomable amount of money. I highly doubt someone that controls 30% of all trading is going to go bankrupt over a single security guys. These little HFs have been going bankrupt, they have. Look at Melvin, archegos, greensill, GFG, the new one out of London. They are feeling the heat, one by one they have been failing. Getting these giant bosses to fail is a completely different story, as much as we want to see these giant ones fall it's most likely not going to happen. They will survive with bailouts, tricks, illegal trading, whatever the reason may be. Make no mistake however this is a financial revolution and we got what we wanted. These rules that are put in place will stop them from doing what they have been doing under REG SHO. Will they take a big hit at the end of the day? Yes, will they all die? No, did we change the way the game is played? Certainly. They paid to take over Reddit nuff said.
+
+Just buy and hold GME. Our time is coming.

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-07-01-GME-Appears-to-have-Thirty-Times-more-FTDs-than-TSLA.md

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+Simple FTD math based on u/ChrisCraftTexasUSA post... GME appears to only have about 30 times more FTDs than TSLA... Just...
+============================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/taranasus](https://www.reddit.com/user/taranasus/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/obh3z3/simple_ftd_math_based_on_uchriscrafttexasusa_post/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Possible DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Possible%20DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+The starting point of my maths: [(1) GME FTD shares Failed to Deliver SEC link: https://sec.report/fails.php?tc=36467W109 : Superstonk (reddit.com)](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/obet09/gme_ftd_shares_failed_to_deliver_sec_link/)
+
+I think "FUCK ME" is an understatement here. I've been comparing GME FTDs with TSLA FTDs since TSLA is the more "Volatile" of the stocks out there. The numbers are mind blowing.
+
+The very last datapoint we have on GME is June 14, with a FTD count of 105,712
+
+The highest ever nr of FTDs in one day for TSLA was on DEC 17, 2020, at 1,382,452 FTDs.
+
+At first glance, it would look like the tesla number is 10 bigger than the GME one no? Well you'd be right, however we need to remember that the number of outstanding shares for the two companies are wildly different. On Dec 17, TSLA had 905,000,000 outstanding shares, while on June 14, GME had only (assumed) 77,000,000 outstanding shares.
+
+So if you put these percentage wise:
+
+- TSLA: 1382452 / 905000000 * 100 = 0.1527 % of total shares were FTD
+
+- GME: 105172 / 77000000 * 100 = 0.1372 % of total shares were FTD
+
+So just a random day in June for GME had as many FTDs as Tesla did in its highest day ever in its history.
+
+So then... the question on everyone's mind... what was GME's highest FTD day? Well you see everyone, Oct 13 2020: 3,210,148. On that date, according to ycharts, GME had 65.2M outstanding shares. I'm actually going to go with 70 mill shares as I think the 65M number is wrong. So
+
+- 3210148 / 70000000 * 100 = 4.5% of total shares were FTD. THEY COULDN'T LOCATE 4.5% OF THE GOD DAMN COMPANY!
+
+SEC what the fuck are you doing??? Seriously who looks at these numbers and goes like "YEP, THIS IS FINE!". Do your god damn job!
+
+Sources:
+
+GME FTD data <https://sec.report/fails.php?tc=36467W109>
+
+TSLA FTD data <https://sec.report/fails.php?tc=TSLA>
+
+GME Outstanding Share Count data: <https://ycharts.com/companies/GME/shares_outstanding>
+
+TSLA Outstanding Share Count data: <https://ycharts.com/companies/TSLA/shares_outstanding>
+
+No fuckery going on here people....

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-07-01-T+35-Follow-Up.md

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+T+35 Follow Up [some general thoughts]
+======================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/user/dentisttft/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/obng9s/t35_follow_up_some_general_thoughts/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Discussion 🦍](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Discussion%20%F0%9F%A6%8D%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Hello everybody! Yes, I'm still here.
+
+I wrote a post a couple weeks ago about T+35 FTD's. [T+35 is the one true "cycle"](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o155a6/t35_is_the_one_true_cycle_evidence_to_back_my/)
+
+I've been wanting to write a follow up post for a while, but I didn't want to write it until I had more answers. That led me down a very deep and confusing path tracking ETFs, and to be honest, I probably won't be able to get a full picture for a bit. So I'll go ahead and do a quick follow up post now.
+
+Does T+35 still happen?
+
+Yes. They're not always easy to spot. 6/25 had 40,000 FTDs were most likely covered at 12:20 EST. 6/17 had a 90,000 volume candle which could have easily been the next three days worth of FTDs. Remember, there is nothing forcing them to wait until the last day. This is just what they HAVE been doing. After my post got some attention, I noticed a difference in the FTD behavior. Either they wait until the last possible minute, they cover in the first minute, they cover multiple days early, etc.
+
+Why is it 35 days? (technically, before the 35th day)
+
+The stock gets shorted and settles into an FTD in T+2. Normally, Rule 204 would require them to close the FTD within a day or two. But on the FTD day, they sell a put giving them the "deem to own" clause of Rule 204. When they are "deemed to own" a share, they are able to wait 35 days from the *transaction date*. This is why the 34 days starts on the FTD date, not the date it was shorted like you may think.
+
+If you want proof of this, there is a certain stock that reminds me of a leprechaun. It had a HUGE FTD day in early june. Next thing you know, Put OI sky rocketed. Check other less popular meme stocks and you will probably see the same thing.
+
+What about ETF FTDs?
+
+In my post I stated that ETF FTDs behave the same way as GME FTDs. This is only partially true. They DO get delayed 35 days. They DO NOT get covered on the 34th day following the FTD. There are details within Rule 204 that make the timing slightly different. I've spent the last couple of weeks figuring out all the nitty gritty details... but woah... it's a mess. I'd like to make a post sometime soon with my findings.
+
+Why do FTDs not do much anymore?
+
+It looks like they are shorting the ETFs when they have GME FTDs due and shorting GME when they have ETF FTDs due. You can see this by going 34 days from an ETF FTD. The ETF and other non meme stock in the ETF will rise from the cover but GME will stay flat. I plan on covering this more in my future ETF post. But damn, that spring is getting extremely coiled.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 Follow Up [some general thoughts]](https://preview.redd.it/tzjywmtg4m871.png?width=2242&format=png&auto=webp&s=3d1b425ba9041c37465618d6181449f8d8ab3d19)](https://preview.redd.it/tzjywmtg4m871.png?width=2242&format=png&auto=webp&s=3d1b425ba9041c37465618d6181449f8d8ab3d19)
+
+Heatmap of ETF FTDs (not weighted by %GME). Each ETF is colored individually so they are on their own scale.
+
+The top third is the heavier ETFs. Look at those cycles. Fun stuff.
+
+Why didn't the new 002 rule do anything?
+
+I tried leaving a few comments to explain this, but I'm sure a lot of people didn't see it. Remember they were *already* satisfying the requirements of the old monthly rules when the new rule came into effect. The deposit for the old monthly rule was already made. I don't see any reason why they suddenly would be over budget from a daily check. The effects of 002 probably won't be seen until the next GME run up.
+
+Do the FTDs even matter?
+
+GME FTDs, no... ETF FTDs, yes. The problems that were coming from the high numbers of GME FTDs have moved to the ETFs. Until the ETF FTDs hit a breaking point, GME will most likely stay flat and have an occasional spike like we saw on Wednesday. The way I see it, moving the problems to ETFs only delays everything at the cost of inflating the entire market.
+
+When is the next big T+35 day?
+
+Friday and Tuesday look decent. But history tells me it will be a spike and then settle again. They are putting in a lot of money to keep GME from taking off.
+
+What does that mean for me?
+
+Keep doing what you're doing. It's building up. It's coming, probably sooner than you think. Future posts will cover this.
+
+Want to see something fun? GME is repeating itself.
+
+The weeks after January are currently happening again at a higher floor. Why? I don't know. It might have to do with quarterly options that have been open for a while. But I wouldn't expect anything to happen for a week or two. ** not manipulated... I swear... hehe **
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 Follow Up [some general thoughts]](https://preview.redd.it/cb1m05dm5m871.png?width=1097&format=png&auto=webp&s=5605fd333b0ac1d9b31c6ad16a290acd15d9202a)](https://preview.redd.it/cb1m05dm5m871.png?width=1097&format=png&auto=webp&s=5605fd333b0ac1d9b31c6ad16a290acd15d9202a)
+
+What about T+21?
+
+I don't know. I'm still not sure T+21 is a thing. I think there are other factors in play that ended up giving GME spikes 21 days apart. Possibly two T+35 cycles at the same time. I have reason to believe the spike in May and the two in June came from ETFs. These are the same reasons I don't think there will be much longer to wait. A couple weeks... but more on that in another post.
+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Alright, that's about all I wanted to cover as a follow up. Sorry it isn't full of juicy content. I was waiting to post until I had real answers, but it's taking longer than expected. The ETFs are the key to the puzzle and they're hitting a boiling point.
+
+TL;DR:
+
+-   T+35 with GME FTDs still is a thing, but GME is being suppressed pretty hard right now.
+
+-   T+35 with ETF FTDs works, but it's not 35. It's 35 days from the puts being sold. I'll have a new post in the future with more details.
+
+-   The driving forces behind GME have moved into the ETFs.
+
+-   HFs are switching back and forth between shorting GME directly and shorting the ETFs to keep GME consistently down.
+
+-   I'll have a post about ETFs in the next 4-5 days.
+
+Also, I made a twitter account so I can post thoughts throughout the day without needing to write a full post. I don't know how much I'll use it. <https://twitter.com/dentisttft>
+
+I had to turn off most of my notifications. The best way to get a hold of me is by tagging me in a comment. It never notifies me of tags in posts... so make sure it's a comment. I try to respond to all tags.
+
+Alright, pce~~~
+
+- [u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/)

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-07-05-RCs-Tweets-are-Time-with-ETF-FTDs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+RC's tweets are timed with ETF FTDs
+===================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/user/dentisttft/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/oeahh2/rcs_tweets_are_timed_with_etf_ftds/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Possible DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Possible%20DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+*This post is for education purposes only. Not financial advice.*
+
+TL;DR: RC's tweets happen on days where large amounts of ETF FTDs are covered/delayed.
+
+Hi everyone,
+
+I've been diving into ETF FTDs for a while now and something finally clicked. *Almost every RC tweet happens on the same day a large amount of ETF FTDs are "cleared".* ETF FTDs are allowed to stack up for 3 days before needing to be handled. So when a specific ETF stacks up a decent chunk of FTD, puts are opened to delay 34 days, then RC tweets.
+
+To show what I mean, I weighted the ETF FTDs by GME's weight within the ETF. GME is in a lot of ETFs, but these are the ETFs with significant enough FTDs: IWM, XRT, XSVM, FTXD, BUZZ, XSMO, IWC, FNDX, IJR, SPSM, SFYF, PSCD, SLYV, VXF, IJT, GINN, and VB.
+
+Below is a heatmap of those ETFs. Each ETF is a different row, each trading day is a different column. The green color shows where a lot of FTDs are. The darker the green, the more ETFs. The blue marks a day where RC tweeted. If you look at a blue column and track it down, there is an ETF or two that had just cleared their stacked FTDs from the day earlier.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - RC's tweets are timed with ETF FTDs](https://preview.redd.it/q7fwa3kn1f971.png?width=1714&format=png&auto=webp&s=a82cf29f39b7996f3de3e34460ba6f615120d3e7)](https://preview.redd.it/q7fwa3kn1f971.png?width=1714&format=png&auto=webp&s=a82cf29f39b7996f3de3e34460ba6f615120d3e7)
+
+Tweets come the day FTDs are cleared - EDIT: outside of the fist emoji (DFV), flag (35 days before memorial day which had GME FTDS), job posting (35 days before June 2 runup), and one of the south park GIFs
+
+I have an old post from May that claims the Ted tweets are referencing Rule 204: Close-out requirements, the rule the that specifies the thirty-five day cover period.
+
+[RC Tweet Analysis: Part 1 [The Ted Tweets]](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/niui83/rc_tweet_analysis_part_1_the_ted_tweets/)
+
+So using [my T+35 theory](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o155a6/t35_is_the_one_true_cycle_evidence_to_back_my/), I marked every trading day that came 35 calendar days after a tweet on the 4H chart. You'll see that most tweets end up corresponding to a jump in GME's price. Gray lines are tweets, green lines are 35 days after a tweet.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - RC's tweets are timed with ETF FTDs](https://preview.redd.it/ngufchm54f971.png?width=1307&format=png&auto=webp&s=57ee666bc94c2f54ab09d22e72726e46178964bb)](https://preview.redd.it/ngufchm54f971.png?width=1307&format=png&auto=webp&s=57ee666bc94c2f54ab09d22e72726e46178964bb)
+
+GME 4H chart with new tweets marked in gray and T+35 of tweets marked in green.
+
+Not every tweet corresponds to a jump, but a lot do. The last few tweet's T+35 jump during after hours/premarket after the 35th day because technically they can be covered before 9:30 AM EST on the following day. Notice how a new tweet ends up being very close to the T+35 of an old tweet? To me this visually shows the process of kicking the can down the road. GME is getting suppressed pretty hard so let's mark 35 days after a tweet on SPY. You'll notice green days more consistently on SPY.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - RC's tweets are timed with ETF FTDs](https://preview.redd.it/ycd7osw34f971.png?width=1305&format=png&auto=webp&s=fa0047eb004c9c3ed00aed02493a7c785433135a)](https://preview.redd.it/ycd7osw34f971.png?width=1305&format=png&auto=webp&s=fa0047eb004c9c3ed00aed02493a7c785433135a)
+
+SPY 4H chart with T+35 of tweets marked in green.
+
+Why is that? Because if a lot of ETF FTDs are being covered on these days, then a lot of underlying stock are being bought to return the ETFs. If a lot of underlying stock rises in value, SPY should rise in value too. GME is being shorted on these days, so it doesn't move much. But they can't short the entire market. I believe the sheer number of ETF FTDs needing to be covered every week is leading to the market inflation that has been seen for the past few months.
+
+What does this mean for the future?
+
+I've highlighted days where I expect upward GME movement. But since GME is being held down so much lately, I would expect more upward movement from SPY.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - RC's tweets are timed with ETF FTDs](https://preview.redd.it/2u5qd8n53f971.png?width=1390&format=png&auto=webp&s=592a6eb2bd74c64efbae25ad3a5100789307701b)](https://preview.redd.it/2u5qd8n53f971.png?width=1390&format=png&auto=webp&s=592a6eb2bd74c64efbae25ad3a5100789307701b)
+
+Red boxes on dates of T+35 from ETF FTDs.
+
+That's all I got for today. I'm planning on dropping the ETF FTD DD tomorrow morning. It will go more in depth about the details surrounding this.
+
+pce~~
+
+- [u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/)
+
+PS. I made a twitter: <https://twitter.com/dentisttft>

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-07-07-Citadel-Has-Hostages.md

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+Citadel has hostages: explaining why the MOASS is taking so long, how the January spike was stopped, Robinhood's motives for the trading halt, and the mysterious silence of the SEC
+====================================================================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Bladeace](https://www.reddit.com/user/Bladeace/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ofdhkk/citadel_has_hostages_explaining_why_the_moass_is/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+TA;DR: The January MOASS is delayed because Citadel took hostages. They figured out how to ensure that others would be squeezed before they were. January 28th is the day Robinhood was required to deliver some of the GME shares Citadel owed to its customers, so they halted trading. They halted trading because their relationship with Citadel turned them into a hostage. The MOASS waits until new regulations ensure the hostages are safe...
+
+TL;DR: Citadel wasn't going to be squeezed in January, Robinhood was. Citadel took hostages and figured out how to ensure that others were squeezed before they were. Robinhood halted trading after GME was on the threshold list for 35 days. After 35 days of failures to deliver, a broker becomes responsible for delivering the security to their customer. The MOASS is taking so long because Citadel managed to figure out how to make their short position other people's problem. This is why Citadel seems to have so many people protecting it and willing to lie for it: they've spent six months figuring out how to ensure it's actually Citadel that gets squeezed. This is why there is an unusual cooperation between parties we wouldn't expect to be able to keep this secret for this long. Not even the SEC can address this directly, Citadel figured out how to take everyone hostage. The past six months have been a negotiation to figure out how to deliver our tendies.
+
+Theory: Robinhood halted trading the day they became liable for delivery of the GME shares Citadel sold to their customers
+
+I think Robinhood halted trading because they were required to purchase GME shares to deliver their customers' past orders. Look at this requirement from [SHO § 242.203 (b2)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/242.203):
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Citadel has hostages: explaining why the MOASS is taking so long, how the January spike was stopped, Robinhood's motives for the trading halt, and the mysterious silence of the SEC](https://preview.redd.it/el9inu75kq971.png?width=1066&format=png&auto=webp&s=950d9158e1ede602b68c834ec9da9552e464e3a3)](https://preview.redd.it/el9inu75kq971.png?width=1066&format=png&auto=webp&s=950d9158e1ede602b68c834ec9da9552e464e3a3)
+
+If a Robinhood customer buys shares that are cleared by Citadel Securities, their delivery is not a problem for Robinhood *unless it takes longer than 35 days*. Once a security has taken longer than 35 days to be delivered, Robinhood is responsible for delivering it to their customer. Citadel still has to deliver the security too, but they deliver to Robinhood. So, the chain of obligation goes like this:
+
+1.  Your broker/dealer owes you the security they sold you
+
+2.  The market maker owes your broker the security they sold to the broker
+
+3.  The seller of the security owes the market maker the security they sold to the market maker
+
+The key point is that *your broker is the one who owes you the shares you buy.* If someone else fails to deliver those shares, it's your broker's problem (although they have some ability to make this into your problem, there were too many GME shares owed to avoid their SHO obligations).
+
+*(Expanded explanation, boring - you should skip)*
+
+So, if I want to sell a share on the market (strictly hypothetical, I've never actually tried selling), then I do not owe the sold share directly to the buyer of that share. I send my sell order into the market via my broker and they send that off to the market center where the order is executed by a market maker. I sell my share to the market maker executing the trade. The market maker then sells that share to the broker of whichever ape has brought it and the broker then sells that share to the buyer. Assuming this goes smoothly, my share ends up in the account of the buyer. However, technically speaking, I do not owe the security to the buyer. I owe the security to the market maker, who owes it to the broker, who owes it to the buyer. So, if something goes wrong, and I fail to deliver that share, I have not defaulted on my sale to the buyer, I have defaulted on my sale to the market maker executing the trade. That market maker still owes the share to the buyer's broker, regardless of my failure.
+
+*(End of skippable content)*
+
+I suspect that Citadel had been failing to deliver GME shares to Robinhood for an extended period, which is why Robinhood halted buying. Their primary motive was not to help Citadel, but to protect themselves *from* Citadel. After 35 days of failure, Robinhood has to buy the shares they expected Citadel to deliver for their customers. Effectively, due to Citadel's failures to deliver, Robinhood had inherited Citadel's short position. Citadel owed Robinhood and Robinhood owed their customers. I should clarify that, in this scenario, Citadel still owes Robinhood the shares at some point, but Robinhood has to deliver them to their customers *now*. At first, Robinhood didn't care that Citadel owed shares to their customers, until it went on for too long and Robinhood was on the hook to deliver.
+
+Proof: the timing lines up
+
+For this to be true, you would expect there to be a relationship between when Robinhood halted trading and the 35 day threshold. If you look at my recent [post on the relationship between the threshold security list and the January price spike](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/oao9oo/the_nyse_threshold_list_collapsing_shorts_and/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) you'll see that GME was on the threshold list for 39 consecutive settlement days, from early December to early February. Robinhood halted trading on January 28, which is *day 35* of this 39 day streak. The trading halt aligns with when the obligation for Robinhood to deliver kicks in. As soon as the undelivered shares became Robinhood's problem, trading was halted. Frankly, I would have expected them to halt trading earlier than the final moment, day 35, but perhaps waiting until the last moment will allow them some legal defense in the court cases to come?
+
+Proof: the weird cost basis after transfer
+
+A number of users pointed out that their [purchase prices and dates were incorrectly reported when transferring from Robinhood to other brokers](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ncezct/so_robinhood_finally_sent_over_my_cost_basis_from/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3). I suspect this is because Robinhood initially sold their users the shares based on delivery promises made by Citadel that Citadel then failed to fulfil. So, after 35 days, Robinhood had to fulfil them instead. My guess is that this process was an absolute mess because it required Robinhood to at least appear to be purchasing GME shares from someone *other* than Citadel, which is rather awkward when Citadel is a designated market maker for GME on all major exchanges. The transaction dates and prices are wrong because the trade that was eventually settled for your GME shares *was not the same trade you sent to your broker* - that trade failed and Robinhood had to redo it after 35+ days.
+
+This might help explain why [my analysis of the 605 data](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nc1h4o/findings_from_my_analysis_of_605_data_huge_short/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) found that the proportion of GME order executions done through NASDAQ spikes in February, despite being almost non-existent prior to Feb 2021. If Robinhood needs to buy-up GME without going *directly* through Citadel, they'll need to get inventive and perhaps even use over the counter purchases. So, go to a market center that has very little history of executing GME orders - NASDAQ. It's possible that Robinhood borrowed/brought GME from a variety of places to cover for the clusterfuck Citadel dumped them with, and then allocated those GME shares that actually got delivered to customers that transferred. If you had a massive shambles of shares like this, it might manifest in an inaccurate and messy purchase history for your customers.
+
+Proof: others halted trading too
+
+Robinhood wasn't the only one that halted trading. It's difficult, but not impossible, for Citadel to have orchestrated this behind the scenes. It's much easier to explain this seemingly organized trading halt by pointing out that the brokers who halted trading *only halted trading when they themselves became obligated to deliver the shares in question.* This is why they halted trading *after* the price had already been spiking - my guess is that Citadel was putting on pressure behind the scenes too, but I don't think it's a coincidence that trading didn't actually halt until the time arrived that the brokers themselves were threatened with delivery obligations.
+
+Context and discussion: saving Citadel
+
+Notice that my theory does not do Robinhood any favors - this is not a defense of them or their actions. I suspect, as was claimed during the congressional hearings, the trading halt was the main reason the January spike ended. If my theory is correct, it's likely that the ending of the January spike saved Citadel. This claim is nothing new. What I think my theory adds to the discussion is a better explanation of why Robinhood and others did this. Remember, the buying halt was a disaster for Robinhood! They were dragged in front of congress, their reputation is in tatters, and they're bleeding customers. Halting buying was *not* a good play. My guess is that they knew it would be a disaster and did it anyway. I think that this is why they waited right up until day 35 of GME's run on the threshold list - they didn't help Citadel until the only other option was delivering the undeliverable. In January, those who halted trading were slated to be the first victims of the MOASS.
+
+Further implications: MOASS is so slow because Citadel has hostages
+
+I suspect that the implications of what almost happened to Robinhood in January are why we're seeing some of the recent regulation changes ('clarifications'). I think that it was *Robinhood and not Citadel that was squeezed in the January spike*. Citadel is a market maker with its own market center, it has privileges and exemptions that make it quite resilient (as we've found out over the past six months). Robinhood does not have the same level of protection from its exposures, once the 35 day settlement mark passed, they had to deliver shares. It was the brokers that needed to buy shares from the 28th onwards: Citadel's failures to deliver were, in the short term at least, the brokers' problem. For all we know, Citadel didn't cover any of the deliveries that finally got GME off the threshold list at the beginning of February and managed to force the brokers to do it for them. If they were willing to abuse the market enough, perhaps via abuse of NASDAQ in February as my previously linked post discusses, Citadel might have even used the brokers need to deliver as a way of *expanding* their short position substantially while 'technically' resolving the failures to deliver (kicking the can down the road to another day). I guess there is no better ally than one who has to pay your debt if you go under...
+
+So, if my theory is correct, January almost saw Citadel's failures result in *someone else* getting squeezed! Perhaps this is why the trading halt became the focus of the congressional hearings. Maybe this is why the DTCC has focused so many of their new regulations on clarifying what happens if positions need to be forcibly closed. January might have demonstrated that a market center, such as Citadel Securities, could contrive a scenario where they force *someone else to be squeezed by their short position!*
+
+In [my post examining the February gamma](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvvuhp/feb_2426_failed_launch_attempt_and_proof_the_dtcc/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3), I argue that the bizarre market activity near the end of February was a failed attempt to begin the MOASS. If my theory that Robinhood, not Citadel, was being forced to deliver in January is correct, I don't think it's any surprise that attempts to begin the MOASS have been prevented since January. The regulations required updating to prevent Citadel from forcing others to be squeezed before they were. If I am correct, Citadel was holding everyone hostage. The embodiment of too big to fail: not just because of the havoc their sudden demise would cause, but because *they wouldn't be squeezed until after the squeezing of all the smaller parties caught in the impossibly convoluted web of failures to deliver and rehypothecation that Citadel shat into the market.* Lots of entities were exposed to the squeeze, and Citadel was setup to be hit last.
+
+The MOASS can't launch until the hostages are safe. It needs to be Citadel that's squeezed. Otherwise, the squeeze might wreak havoc on the market with no guarantee that the one responsible dies too. There was no choice but to wait. Meanwhile, Citadel is a huge market center with substantial political clout and presence in the regulators themselves. So, setting up the regulations for the MOASS took time. It was urgent, but those involved were regulating against one of their own.
+
+I think this offers a compelling explanation for what we've been living through over the last six months because it attributes a strong motive to the parties involved to remain silent. Explaining why this debacle has lasted six months is very difficult. It's an absolute disaster and we haven't even heard anything from the SEC. What could justify this level of cooperation to keep lips tight, just to delay the inevitable? Why such slow action as the problem gets bigger? My guess is that Citadel has hostages and it's taking a lot of careful work behind the scenes to figure out how to be sure that Citadel is the one that takes the fall. With everyone's hands tied and the need for secrecy so high, the job takes time.
+
+As a disgusting parting thought, I should mention that, if I'm right, my theory predicts that those responsible will suffer only minimal punishment. I suspect it's taken six months because they've needed at least some cooperation from Citadel to sort this out. If this is true, my guess is that Citadel spent February trying to get out of their predicament and refused to cooperate with attempts to arrange the MOASS that will kill them. The February gamma might have been other parties preventing Citadel's efforts to make the situation worse and forcing Citadel to come to the negotiating table. During the early months we saw market activity that indicated whales were fighting each other. I think this was Citadel trying to escape their own trap and whales preventing them, knowing it was too dangerous to let Citadel make things worse while it held the system hostage. Notice that this explains why, relatively speaking, the GME activity calmed slightly as this dragged on: Citadel was forced to the negotiating table and has been helping plan and regulate its own destruction. I suspect the payment for this cooperation will be those involved getting off lightly, because the alternative would be to have the MOASS without them releasing the hostages. Unfortunately, if I'm right, we'll see those responsible living in Florida after this is over. Bankrupt and embarrassed, but more comfortable than the plebs.
+
+Obvious but crucial disclaimer: I am a random on the internet spinning yarns about a conspiracy theory. As I was posting this thread, I decided to literally wear a tinfoil hat. Anyone reading this should understand my tinfoil attire to mean that I am not competent enough to be offering any advice or taken seriously. Readers must carefully examine any claims made here independently and not regard my words as authoritative.
+
+Thank you to [u/RoutineYesterday267](https://www.reddit.com/u/RoutineYesterday267/) for a post that led to me writing this

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/2021-07-07-The-Whole-Stock-Market-is-Being-Propped-Up-by-the-RRP-Market.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.
+===============================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/titaniumoxide202](https://www.reddit.com/user/titaniumoxide202/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ofr285/the_whole_stock_market_is_being_propped_up_by_the/) | 
+
+---
+
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+I saw a wrinkly brained ape's youtube video (sorry I watch so much shit I can't find who made it) on how the dow jones, S&P, prime brokerages and big banks' (including international ones) stocks tank at around 10 am and then suddenly recover because they NEED the RRP market to post more collateral. I didn't believe it until I checked the charts today. These charts look IDENTICAL to each other. The price is not only wrong for GME but the entire global stock market price is wrong too. HOLY. FUCKING. MOLY. JACKED=TITs.
+
+Edit: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5J1pW1rVA8> here's the link. Thanks [u/The_Fake_King](https://www.reddit.com/u/The_Fake_King/)
+
+P.S They aren't even trying to be discrete anymore. They are DESPERATE.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/dy7erkoclu971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=33f90da5abc2f22e292676225f5e7d7ac247114b)](https://preview.redd.it/dy7erkoclu971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=33f90da5abc2f22e292676225f5e7d7ac247114b)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/0ajrqecxku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=ba15822bc72953300d9ffdb838d12a3915fa197b)](https://preview.redd.it/0ajrqecxku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=ba15822bc72953300d9ffdb838d12a3915fa197b)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/6jxs7ccxku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=8e4384605d0fd84000c9de41fb91bf3a644b9293)](https://preview.redd.it/6jxs7ccxku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=8e4384605d0fd84000c9de41fb91bf3a644b9293)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/n9dxpn3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c98442d7f3487e88f49aa65bc65125be00323da)](https://preview.redd.it/n9dxpn3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c98442d7f3487e88f49aa65bc65125be00323da)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/b2y4jz3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=7a214711c089e322f9bbab4d5206dd7588874fff)](https://preview.redd.it/b2y4jz3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=7a214711c089e322f9bbab4d5206dd7588874fff)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/vs1v0t3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=86a56c683e85961d8b485643cfd8657506111405)](https://preview.redd.it/vs1v0t3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=86a56c683e85961d8b485643cfd8657506111405)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/zrnf6m3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=3cf7085790430cc788d36832cf60f3e3d506cae5)](https://preview.redd.it/zrnf6m3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=3cf7085790430cc788d36832cf60f3e3d506cae5)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/sbfbnp3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=11958c4e60087c5a90836bbe5b6cb907f85d0143)](https://preview.redd.it/sbfbnp3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=11958c4e60087c5a90836bbe5b6cb907f85d0143)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/428koz3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=966b2ebec618ca1f77a7c7b6e22d1a92f0df389f)](https://preview.redd.it/428koz3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=966b2ebec618ca1f77a7c7b6e22d1a92f0df389f)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/34duc34kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=87817270edad52fdaa030912dd78df70d589532e)](https://preview.redd.it/34duc34kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=87817270edad52fdaa030912dd78df70d589532e)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/hgwpsc4kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=69d9e5e346aca7d1eba6def5855a29abeb88dd16)](https://preview.redd.it/hgwpsc4kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=69d9e5e346aca7d1eba6def5855a29abeb88dd16)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/9ht1o34kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=842bae394de413b9510f5d08c352857a68ef1541)](https://preview.redd.it/9ht1o34kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=842bae394de413b9510f5d08c352857a68ef1541)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/i98i0j3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=67caeb722a196092e2a1e67da20527d77e0d05e9)](https://preview.redd.it/i98i0j3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=67caeb722a196092e2a1e67da20527d77e0d05e9)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/6uj8sn3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=7497d256e507fa949de849b9da4dc90adc15d88a)](https://preview.redd.it/6uj8sn3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=7497d256e507fa949de849b9da4dc90adc15d88a)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/e944tz3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=fc4330182481ef3d07d2de1c382118804df8e3d2)](https://preview.redd.it/e944tz3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=fc4330182481ef3d07d2de1c382118804df8e3d2)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/y4um9l3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=b57870485f4e9a347ed111fb9818a2cd3b31d064)](https://preview.redd.it/y4um9l3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=b57870485f4e9a347ed111fb9818a2cd3b31d064)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/xtvl7h3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=7141d752ff4b045c31d55e7a6102f30065e4657d)](https://preview.redd.it/xtvl7h3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=7141d752ff4b045c31d55e7a6102f30065e4657d)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/ydb8fm3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=3d0d72944c9e3460130082225467e84bacdb0bcc)](https://preview.redd.it/ydb8fm3kku971.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=3d0d72944c9e3460130082225467e84bacdb0bcc)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/qwealf3kku971.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=9d00ae8ae35037eca09ea48368d9e668ac0b336e)](https://preview.redd.it/qwealf3kku971.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=9d00ae8ae35037eca09ea48368d9e668ac0b336e)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The whole stock market is being propped up by the RRP market and today I got confirmation bias.](https://preview.redd.it/7fa0xk3kku971.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=edcc8956475920c1f7a75638e49c5d42cc42594c)](https://preview.redd.it/7fa0xk3kku971.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=edcc8956475920c1f7a75638e49c5d42cc42594c)

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/All-the-Pieces-Theory-by-swede-child-of-mine/2021-04-08-All-the-Pieces-Part-I.md

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+Theory: ALL THE PIECES, pt. 1 -- The Anatomy of the Crime of Citadel
+===================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/swede_child_of_mine](https://www.reddit.com/user/swede_child_of_mine/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mn0q9q/theory_all_the_pieces_pt_1_the_anatomy_of_the/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+*"Behind every great fortune there is a crime" -- Balzac*
+
+This post is the collective narrative behind the plays on GME by large institutions. This will be a multi-part DD post gathered from excellent insights on this sub. As there have been no open confessions of these activities by the perpetrators (a la Bernie Madoff), or books that have yet been written, this will only exist as a theory with pieces of evidence to support where we can. It is designed to be high-level, approachable, supported by available sources where possible, and represent key players and interests as it relates to the events surrounding GME. It is incomplete. Where information cannot be confirmed, it will be marked as rumor or speculation and should be treated as such, but it should not be a rabbit-hole. It will be ongoing and require updating as well as contributions from you, outlined below:
+
+-   [] - request for link to relevant DD (DD posts or legitimate sources)
+
+-   /e?/ - expert insight requested (e.g. legal review -- I'll try to call out specific users that are known for their specialties on this sub)
+
+-   /R/ - further research requested
+
+(Setting expectations for the veteran readers of [r/GME](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/) and [r/SuperStonk](https://www.reddit.com/r/SuperStonk/): you will already be familiar with many of the terms, events, and points described in this first post. However, even if it is already familiar to you, I hope this post will still be a valuable summary and an easy introduction for anyone who wants to know more about the stock. Please feel free to contribute sources you might see are missing)
+
+* * * * *
+
+Part 1: The Crime of Citadel
+
+$GME
+
+The current price of GameStop stock is artificial. In simpler terms, the price of $GME is not determined by normal market dynamics - supply and demand. This is because Citadel and others have been illegally manufacturing fraudulent shares of GME, abusing their special designation as Market Maker to profit their firms. The more straightforward term for their activity is *share counterfeiting*. Citadel & others have been counterfeiting shares of GME, profiting from non-existent shares, dumping fraudulent stock to lower the price, and abusing system lapses to hide their activities. Their scheme that has grown wildly out of hand and now threatens to wipe out many more firms in the market due to their risky behaviors.
+
+An overview of the mechanics of this scheme:
+
+FTD (for Failure To Deliver) -- a key term to understand
+
+1\.  FTD is a standardized term for a delay in delivering a share that's been purchased. *In the context of Citadel, an FTD represents a counterfeit share.*
+
+-   In the US market, a share can be sold regardless of whether or not it actually exists. The financial system accepts the transaction at face value so that the buyer can continue trading.
+
+-   The delay in delivering a share is meant to be temporary...
+
+-   ...but for Citadel's case, they never had the share they sold; they abused their position to "sell" something they didn't have.
+
+-   Outright share counterfeiting is highly illegal, and one of the financial crimes that [carries prison sentences](https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/crime-penalties/federal/Securities-Fraud.htm)
+
+-   For Citadel to perpetrate this crime, they needed to hide it among their transactions and appear legitimate (FTD's can be legitimate, and enforcement is subjective "[*...will depend on the facts and circumstances of the particular activity*](https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mrfaqregsho1204.htm)")
+
+Citadel's Scheme, Part 1: Create a Share, Legitimately
+
+1\.  [Citadel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citadel_LLC)'s activities are recognized as a ["bona-fide" Market Maker](https://www.mmlawus.com/newsitem/alerts/larry-bergmann-addresses-regulation-sho-and-bona-fide-market-making/), an industry designation which allows them special authorities and responsibilities.
+
+-   One of their special authorities is to "create" shares in the marketplace as part of their role of providing liquidity. ("Liquidity" is finance speak for -- "keeping the shelves full with the stocks people want")
+
+-   Citadel is allowed to execute transactions without owning the share -- i.e. Market Makers can temporarily "create" a share from nothing -- with the understanding that it is illegal to manufacture shares for their own profit.
+
+-   This "temporarily created share" is recorded as a "short": designed to be sold to the marketplace then bought back within a brief period of time, to prevent an enduring non-existent share in the marketplace.
+
+-   "Shorting" is also a common practice of borrowing a share from someone else's account. The borrowed share is sold into the marketplace, and ideally bought back at a lower price and returned to the account (many financial companies do this legally, Citadel included).
+
+-   Both traditional shorting and "bona-fide" market maker shorting creates a "legitimate" non-existent share -- temporarily. Again, the non-existent share is meant to be a placeholder until a real share is delivered.
+
+-   If the share is out in the marketplace long enough without being repurchased, the share is flagged as an FTD -- failure to deliver -- since there was no *actual* share delivered. If it is never reconciled, it becomes counterfeit.
+
+Citadel's Scheme, Part 2: It's Only Illegal If You Get Caught
+
+1\.  The process of determining an FTD is technically complex. There are regulations for the amount of days which need to pass [before a share is declared an FTD](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/regsho.htm).
+
+-   Additionally, *AFTER* a share is delcared an FTD, there are additional times allowed for counterfeit shares to to be rebought, with even more time allotted for Market Makers to do so.
+
+-   But once the allotted time passes and the delivery is still failed, the party at fault is subject to enforcement measures.
+
+-   The enforcement measures are weak -- [small fines levvied far after the violation](https://financefeeds.com/citadel-securities-fined-275k-reporting-violations-700k-fine-2020/) (generally for less than the profit made from the activities)...
+
+-   ...and it is difficult to track. Individual shares may trade dozens or hundreds of times per day, and there is no way to follow the path -- or origin -- of each individual share.
+
+-   So the "counterfeit" share is logged against the overall pool of shares, not knowing which particular one is non-existent. But the contracts for the sale remains on the books of the parties involved.
+
+-   And while enforcement agencies are not interested in small volumes of counterfeit shares or low cost shares, Citadel has been manufacturing millions of fraduluent shares at a price of hundreds of dollars each, getting away with it under the guise of "bona-fide" Market Maker activities that have yet to be settled.
+
+-   However, any company with a "short" position on their books will retain the debt of the counterfeit share for the duration it is on the market...
+
+Citadel's Scheme, Part 3: Take the Money...
+
+1\.  Once the counterfeit share is sold and becomes an FTD, there are several options for addressing the FTD.
+
+-   Buying a share in the marketplace is the primary way of closing out an FTD. This also closes out the "short" position that is on the seller's books.
+
+-   A second way to close an FTD is when the price of the stock goes to $0, and the stock gets de-listed. This voids *all* of that company's stock, including the fraudulent shares. [] The FTD problem simply goes away with all of the other stock.
+
+-   For a party engaged in the criminal act of counterfeiting shares, their main interest is in avoiding consequences of FTDs - not getting caught. They intend to sell shares they never have and never pay for them.
+
+-   Paying for shares from the marketplace is undesirable to Citadel, not only because it increases costs ("the cost of legitimacy"), but also because the price of shares could go up and make the transaction a loss.
+
+-   Flooding the market with shares also has the added effect of dropping the price of the stock, because the market is overwhelmed with supply...
+
+-   ...and if the price goes so low that the stock gets de-listed, the "debt" of the shares on the seller's books becomes a writeoff, which they will enjoy a tax benefit from [].
+
+-   So bankrupting copmanies is the most desirable outcome from share counterfeiters. The targeted company is an unfortunate casualty, chosen for its ability to be shorted into bankruptcy.
+
+-   This is the first part of Citadel's scheme: target a company, flood the market with counterfeit shares, drop the price of the stock to $0, walk away with the profits from the counterfeit shares, and enjoy the tax writeoff.
+
+-   Note: Short positions are not publicly disclosed, and a company's banruptcy closes all positions, so tracing these activities to Citadel is extremely difficult. These activites can happen entirely behind closed doors and leave little evidence in the public marketplace. That is what this sub has been working with: trace evidence of counterfeiting activities in the marketplace.
+
+Citadel's Scheme, Part 4: ...and Run
+
+1\.  Profitably closing an FTD (either via bankrupcy or repurchase) requires one thing: the price of the target stock to go down.
+
+-   In this case, the $GME stock price went up during their scheme.
+
+-   This caused Citadel to find an alternative to closing the FTDs. So perhaps as a temporary stop-gap, or perhaps as a last resort, Citadel chose to perpetuate FTDs without closing them - they would keep the FTDs ongoing as long as they could, never getting caught, until circumstances let them exit their position. Hiding until they escape.
+
+-   Since FTDs are reported by *time*, Citadel figured they could reset the "timer" to avoid getting caught (very similar to floating credit card payments). They could do this two ways:
+
+-   First, they could short the traditional way -- borrow or acquire a batch of the shares from an exchange or *dark pool* (an off-exchange trading room), and then turn around and close their FTDs. Those new shorts would later become new FTDs, but it would give them a few days.
+
+-   Second, they could counterfeit additional shares. While it is uncertain if it was possible for Citadel to use counterfeit shares to close out FTDs [], their releasing more counterfeited shares into the marketplace let them easily borrow or buy the shares back, then turn around and close out the FTDs. Again, shorting gives a few more days until thes counterfeit shares became FTDs.
+
+-   Citadel could reset FTDs like this continuously, never running into the enforcement limits without being able to reset the FTD timer again.
+
+-   This would also keep the marketplace full of shares - normally a desirable outcome. But in the interest of their counterfeiting scheme, keeping an abundant supply of shares in the marketplace also keeps the stock price low, the availability of additional borrows high, and the interest on the borrowed shares low.
+
+-   And if Citadel was worried about availability, they could also re-borrow the share they just sold (i.e. borrow from A, sell to C, then borrow the same share from C -- a process known as "rehypothecation") -- a legal practice.
+
+Citadel's Scheme, Part 5: But at what cost?
+
+1\.  The cost of resetting the FTD timetable -- "kicking it down the road" -- is twofold:
+
+-   First, there is a daily interest paid on every shorted share Citadel has. The interest rate is decided by the lending organization, and is related to the price and availability of the share to be borrowed. []
+
+-   Second, for every short Citadel left open, the debt of that share remains on their books. As Citadel shorts more shares and as the price of the shares went up, their overall debt increases. If the debt gets too large, Citadel would potentially be "margin called" -- their debtors would force Citadel to pay up. [courtesy: [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/) - [Image of Citadel's 2020 "securities sold but not yet purchased"](https://preview.redd.it/83uepbgudqm61.png?width=829&format=png&auto=webp&s=7c8b1f1475be0cf61d55f87e29fd282c45833b3c)]
+
+-   It is unknown when or how large their debt must be before Citadel is margin called.[]
+
+-   Additionally, due to Citadel's activities it is difficult to know what a *legitimate* short term debt is on their books, from their legitimate activities, or what a fraudulent debt is from their counterfeiting activities.
+
+-   But by using a legitimate function to hide their scheme, they can achieve the illegal results -- selling shares which they don't have and never intend to deliver.
+
+-   Citadel's activities also pose an extreme cost to the system. Fraudulent shares circulating in the marketplace means investors may become unsure that their shares are legitimate. Or investors may become unsure that the price of the stock is a reflection of legitimate supply and demand, but is instead artificial -- lowered because of a surplus of fake shares.
+
+* * * * *
+
+Addtional reading: [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/) 's - ["Citadel has no clothes"](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m4c0p4/citadel_has_no_clothes/)
+
+[u/canhazreddit](https://www.reddit.com/u/canhazreddit/) 's - ["It's painfully obvious that when GME has a ton of FTDS, they're immediately reversing them with their hedgefuckery."](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mijfq9/its_painfully_obvious_that_when_gme_has_a_ton_of/)
+
+* * * * *
+
+TL; DR & Summary: Citadel has been perpetrating a crime -- illegally counterfeiting shares into the marketplace in order to profit. They are selling shares they don't have and never intended to deliver. Citadel has been using their designation as a Market Maker to cover their activities as well as continue to counterfeit shares. This poses an increasing risk to their own business and moreso the overall market.
+
+Edit: [u/Vipper_of_Vip99](https://www.reddit.com/u/Vipper_of_Vip99/) smartly recommended updating the bullets to numbers.
+
+* * * * *
+
+Final note: here is an excerpt on Bernie Madoff from the [Madoff Investment Scandal wiki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madoff_investment_scandal):
+
+> At one point, Madoff Securities was the largest buying-and-selling "market maker" at the NASDAQ.
+
+>
+
+> In 1992, The Wall Street Journal described him:
+
+>
+
+> *... one of the masters of the off-exchange "third market" and the bane of the New York Stock Exchange. He has built a highly profitable securities firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, which siphons a huge volume of stock trades away from the Big Board. The $740 million average daily volume of trades executed electronically by the Madoff firm off the exchange equals 9% of the New York exchange's. Mr. Madoff's firm can execute trades so quickly and cheaply that it actually pays other brokerage firms a penny a share to execute their customers' orders, --- Randall Smith, Wall Street Journal*
+
+And here is an excerpt from [Citadel's wiki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citadel_LLC#Citadel_Securities):
+
+> Citadel Securities automation has resulted in more reliable trading at lower costs and with tighter spreads. [...] Citadel Securities is the largest market maker in options in the U.S., executing about 25 percent of U.S.-listed equity options volume. According to the Wall Street Journal, about one-third of stock orders from individual investors is completed through Citadel, which accounts for about 10% of the firm's revenue. Citadel Securities also executes about 13 percent of U.S. consolidated volume in equities and 28 percent of U.S. retail equities volume.

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/All-the-Pieces-Theory-by-swede-child-of-mine/2021-04-16-All-the-Pieces-Part-II.md

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+Theory: ALL THE PIECES, pt. 2 -- The Deep End of the Pool
+========================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/swede_child_of_mine](https://www.reddit.com/user/swede_child_of_mine/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ms9z0n/theory_all_the_pieces_pt_2_the_deep_end_of_the/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+[*There was Jimmy, and Tommy, and Me. - Goodfellas*](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caCA0rUMR6U)
+
+This post is the collective narrative behind the plays on GME by large institutions. This will be a multi-part DD post gathered from excellent insights on this sub. As there have been no open confessions of these activities by the perpetrators (a la Bernie Madoff), or books that have yet been written, this will only exist as a theory with pieces of evidence to support where we can. It is designed to be high-level, approachable, supported by available sources where possible, and represent key players and interests as it relates to large players movements in GME. It is incomplete. Where information cannot be confirmed, it will be marked as rumor or speculation and should be treated as such, but it should not be a rabbit-hole. It will be ongoing and require updating as well as contributions from you, outlined below:
+
+-   [] - link to relevant DD requested (DD posts or legitimate sources)
+
+-   \ /e?/ - expert insight requested (e.g. legal review -- I'll try to call out specific users that are known for their specialties on this sub)
+
+-   \ /R/ - further research requested
+
+(Setting expectations for the veteran readers of [r/GME](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/) and [r/SuperStonk](https://www.reddit.com/r/SuperStonk/): you will already be familiar with many of the terms, events, and points described in this first post. However, even if it is already familiar to you, I hope this post will still be a valuable summary and an easy introduction for anyone who wants to know more about the stock. Please feel free to contribute sources you might see are missing)
+
+* * * * *
+
+Part 2: The Deep End of the Pool
+
+The price of $GME is artificial. The [previous post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mn0q9q/theory_all_the_pieces_pt_1_the_anatomy_of_the/) covered how Citadel was perpetrating a crime, illegally counterfeiting shares to change the price of GME for profit. It is not alone in this crime. Multiple organizations are coordinating the same illegal activities in a larger scheme. Their illegal enterprise engages in share counterfeiting, price fixing, and conspiracy. Some of their crimes leave public evidence, but some of the activity takes place discreetly in *Dark Pools* - off exchange rooms where trades happen with fewer regulations and less visibility. The end result is that each organization abuses their position to profit in an illegal enterprise which jeopardizes the larger market.
+
+Key Terms
+
+1.  Market Maker (or "MM") -- a special role in a stock exchanges around the world. An MM's primary role is to provide liquidity, or "to make sure there are shares available to buy if people want them" as well as "make sure there is a buyer if people want to sell." Liquidity makes for easy buying and selling.
+
+-   Liquidity is also important because some companies want their stock price to be related to their company performance (a.k.a. - valuation), and not related to whether or not their shares are available (a.k.a. - scarcity). [More here](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pricediscovery.asp)
+
+-   Since a Market Maker has control over the availability of shares -- which controls the price -- a Market Maker is required to remain "neutral" on its positions. They cannot put pressure on a stock on either the buy side or sell side. If they create a position on one side to meet demand, they must "hedge" on the other side by creating or owning an opposing position. This "neutralizes" their effects on the stock price, but still creates the liquidity.
+
+-   The designers of this framework presumed an honest Market Maker.
+
+Part 1: Recap -- The Shallow End
+
+1.  Citadel is the largest Market Maker for the NYSE. But Citadel has been using its powers as Market Maker to illegally counterfeit shares for profit.
+
+-   A Market Maker has the authority to temporarily create shares. Citadel has been abusing this to create *perpetual temporary shares* (or "naked shorts") by exploiting a reporting lapse in the system, so the *perpetual temporary shorts* aren't recognized as fraudulent.
+
+-   This is called a *naked short*, because there isn't a share "there", but the system shows it is and the system acts like it is.
+
+-   Citadel naked shorts both for profit and for tactical reasons. Tactically, when Citadel introduces more (counterfeit) shares into a limited supply, they can lower the price of the targeted stock by dilution...
+
+-   ...and if a stock becomes low enough, it gets de-listed. De-listing typically bankrupts the company and circumvents any consequences for the naked shorts. But the counterfeiter still profits -- at the expense of the company they bankrupted.
+
+-   However, with $GME, Citadel found itself unable to counterfeit enough shares to de-list the stock. Failure meant it needs to prevent the large amount of naked shorts from "Failing to Deliver" (or FTD) -- have their status realized as counterfeit by the regulators.
+
+-   Citadel needs to constantly close out and re-open ("refresh") the naked shorts it has flooded the market with, perpetuating the temporary shares.
+
+-   The cost to Citadel is twofold: daily interest on the legitimate shorts, and exposure to being *margin called* -- forced to pay for the fraudulent shares -- should the price of GME go high enough. Citadel is extremely motivated to prevent this from happening.
+
+Part 2: Marco
+
+1.  Citadel needs to abide by its responsibilities as a Market Maker when it creates a share; it needs to remain "neutral" on its MM positions.
+
+-   Creating a share is a "net short" position for a MM, meaning it creates downward pressure on the stock price. Even if they rent out the share for someone else to short it will still be a *net short* position.
+
+-   For a created share to be a sanctioned MM action, it must paired it with another, opposite position to make the entire action neutral.
+
+-   A MM can offset a short position by adding a "long" position -- which creates upward pressure on the stock price. A long position mostly means buying a share, buying call options, or selling put options.
+
+-   The long position plus the short position, mathematically balanced, equals a neutral position.
+
+-   An MM that illegally counterfeits shares is looking to minimize the costs of their neutral position. They will adopt the most cost-effective position possible.
+
+-   The most likely cost-effective counter to a "net short" position is to sell puts.
+
+-   And while Citadel is [no stranger to selling to itself](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/lnctgx/citadel_is_an_evil_corp_look_at_its_track_records/) (which is called a "wash sale"), the practice of being both the buyer and the seller attracts a regulator's attention. Which, is something Citadel likely doesn't want happening for its illegal shorting scheme. So it needs to sell the puts to an outside party.
+
+-   *This means Citadel needs another organization to collude with.*
+
+Part 3: Polo
+
+1.  If Citadel needs an accomplice, an easy target is a company that is already relying on Citadel in one way or another.
+
+-   Melvin lists Citadel as an investor[], and most likely depends on Citadel to be their Market Maker for securities orders.
+
+-   Melvin also embraces an aggressive shorting strategy[], which requires an abundance of shorts to execute.
+
+-   So the arrangement between Citadel and Melvin is thus:
+
+-   Citadel creates naked shares for Melvin to borrow or buy. Now Citadel is a "negative" position and they need to be a neutral position. Plus they are taking on risk by fabricating counterfeit shares...
+
+-   ...so Citadel writes ITM puts, and Melvin buys them - making Citadel net neutral. Pretend the premium on the puts is $5.
+
+-   Melvin immediately closes the position on the puts (a net $0 activity, and stems the risks to either party), and the transaction is complete.
+
+-   Melvin now has shorts to use, and Citadel nets $5 and remains neutral.
+
+-   The puts are merely a formality: they keep Citadel neutral and are a way to pay for the naked shorts.
+
+-   This is called a "married put" -- renting out a naked short tied to a put, for the price of the premium on the put.
+
+-   Afterwards, Melvin sells the naked shorts, profiting from the sale and also lowers the price of the stock closer to bankruptcy.
+
+-   And if things go badly for them, Citadel can compel Melvin to close out their shorts, or even intervene and close out the position themselves, while leveraging their powers as Market Maker.
+
+-   (*However, closing out seems unnecessary, doesn't it? Since they can always change a rising stock price with additional naked shorts...*)
+
+-   And if they want, Melvin and Citadel have additional means of concealing their activities:
+
+-   as part of the married put transaction, Melvin can turn and sell Citadel "out of the money" (OTM -- meaning, will expire worthless) calls as part of the transaction to make it look like standard activity.
+
+-   The combination of a put plus a call plus a share is called [a reverse conversion.](https://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/2007.10.09-J-Welborn-Married-Puts-and-Reverse-Conversions.pdf)
+
+-   It's unclear if either Citadel or Melvin initiated the scheme. Citadel needs constant demand for the counterfeit shares, while Melvin needed abundant shorts - it's rumored that Melvin is a "[hitman hedge fund](https://www.reddit.com/r/WallStreetbetsELITE/comments/lw0cky/either_melvin_lied_about_closing_position_ms_in/)".
+
+-   But both parties needed someone who is unconcerned with the *actual* status of the shares being shorted. So it's clear both are aware of the illegal nature of the shares they are leveraging.
+
+This sub has noticed records of strange banks of calls and puts, which represent probable evidence for the scheme described here.
+
+* * * * *
+
+Evidence [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m7xipv/whale_watching_the_sweeping_seas_318/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/lsnlte/ok_so_random_theory/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mhv22h/the_si_is_fake_i_found_44000000_million_shorts/)
+
+* * * * *
+
+Part 4: A Shiver (The Deacons)
+
+1.  However, in the highly competitive world of corporate finance, successful strategies like Melvin's and Citadel's are tracked, followed, copied, and mirrored.
+
+-   Naked shorting has been [around for awhile](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mexlpn/accidentally_released_and_incredibly_embarrassing/), and the payouts are obvious.
+
+-   Other hedge funds or investment banks likely copied Melvin's actions on the same targeted companies, [aiming to profit from their actions without needing to research the strategy too much](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mcwu5m/mystery_of_the_negative_beta_solved_hfs_are/)...
+
+-   ...which makes it likely that Citadel was also *fabricating shares for other hedge funds.*
+
+-   So it isn't only Citadel -- there are others involved in this crime.
+
+-   Additional players could also profit, and [assist](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m9bfp0/naked_short_selling_the_truth_is_much_worse_than/) either legally or illegally.
+
+-   Susquehanna SIG -- a major Market Maker for options, had [substantial interest](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mlf82b/the_missing_citadels_frenemies_pfof_michael/) in this scheme. Their strategic puts could apply price pressure to the distressed companies and allow SIG to profit from the options placements -- and from price manipulation.
+
+-   Other investment banks and options sellers have also joined in. Their profits could be legal, approved market activity of buying puts or selling shorts. Or the profits could be illegal, resulting from naked shorting and manipulating the price downward.
+
+-   A partial list of large companies that have taken positions against GME include: [Melvin Capital, Citadel Advisors, SIG, UBS Group AG, Group One Trading, Citigroup, Wolverine Capital, and Maplelane Capital](https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/lw0g1g/the_industry_players_again_gme/).
+
+-   Coordinating their efforts can achieve a multiplier on their returns. By adopting the same positions as the others, each company assumed a smaller portion of exposure while enjoying the multiplied pressure from their group efforts.
+
+-   The risk of loss is still real, but it is diminished, and marginal compared to the collective assets and rewards.
+
+Part 5: The Deep
+
+1.  As the conspirators coordinated their attacks, they needed a way to operate without gaining public attention.
+
+-   They were used to operating within the parameters of the enforcement agencies (SEC, FINRA)...
+
+-   ...and their activities would be recorded, regardless, on the public register.[]
+
+-   But off-exchange trading venues -- a.k.a. Dark Pools -- would be perfect for their needs.
+
+-   Dark Pools have delayed reporting. The transactions themselves are allowed more time to be recorded (10s -- an eternity in trading time)...
+
+-   ...and have the benefit of not being publicly reported by FINRA until [*WEEKS*](https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/form-ats-n-filings.htm) after the transactions had taken place.
+
+-   And Dark Pools intentionally keep transactions as anonymous as possible. Again, all transactions would be received by the register and would include the parties involved. But bids and asks that *didn't* end up transacting are never disclosed -- masking the real positions and intentions.
+
+-   But the most valuable part for the conspirators: unlike public exchanges, transactions that take place in Dark Pools do not affect the official national price -- the NBBO.
+
+-   Meaning, they could execute the trades that *negatively* affected the price in the public exchanges...
+
+-   ...and then execute the trades that *positively* affected the price in Dark Pools.
+
+-   So the price would only go down from their activities.
+
+-   And naturally, they could do so in just such a way that they could achieve their goals without attracting regulatory or public attention. (They were extremely familiar with toeing that line).
+
+-   While it is unclear if they *actively discussed* this scheme or coordinated each of their roles (institutional relationships can be tentative, or circumstantial - best described as "frenemies")...
+
+-   ...the transactions would act as tacit collaboration between the firms. They would be able to figure out who else was working with them, and what their position was.
+
+-   Collectively, they are very aware of their mutual positions, even without having explicitly discussed them. The volume, type, location, time, and other positional details would most likely give away what and who was transacting...
+
+-   ...while acting as a signal for others to respond to. Showing an opportunity to be siezed.
+
+Again, the contributors of these subs have noticed high levels of corresponding transactions of $GME occuring in Dark Pools.
+
+* * * * *
+
+Evidence [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mg5aui/hfs_traded_over_302_million_shares_of_gme_in_otc/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Wallstreetbetsnew/comments/llbz1m/mindboggling_dark_pool_network_may_have_traded/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/mnm8h0/gme_last_30_days_of_dark_pool_options_order_flow/)
+
+* * * * *
+
+Further reading on the overview: [u/boneywankenobi](https://www.reddit.com/u/boneywankenobi/) 's [deeper dive](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mjzx9w/full_analysis_of_current_gme_si_proof_from_the/)
+
+Further reading on married puts: [u/broccaaa](https://www.reddit.com/u/broccaaa/) 's fantastic research [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Wallstreetbetsnew/comments/mgof7q/the_naked_shorting_scam_revealed_lending_of/) and [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mh6lnz/the_naked_shorting_scam_update_selling_nude_like/)
+
+Further reading on Dark Pools: [u/NoseBurner](https://www.reddit.com/u/NoseBurner/) 's [excellent recap](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mpvm3a/into_the_heart_of_darkness_darkpools_and_fud/), which refers to [u/umu68](https://www.reddit.com/u/umu68/) 's [prolific work](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/movevb/dance_of_darkness_the_sec_and_dark_pools/)
+
+* * * * *
+
+TL;DR and Summary -- The speed, sophistication, and savvy of the firms illegally affecting the price of $GME and other stocks make it easy for them to collaborate. Each are playing their part -- naked shorting, writing options, providing legitimate cover, transacting in Dark Pools for effect -- according to their specialization. They are extremely financially incentivized to do so. Their familiarity with the regulations means they feel they are able to engage and even expand their scheme without legal consequences. And the tools they have at their disposal give them the means to execute their fraudulent enterprise at will. Some of the financial world's largest firms are complicit or are actively participating. They have assumed the public will not take notice, because the public had not taken notice. This line of reasoning is typically referred to as "Black Swan."
+
+* * * * *
+
+Calls to verify /e?/: [u/the_captain_slog](https://www.reddit.com/u/the_captain_slog/), [u/NoseBurner](https://www.reddit.com/u/NoseBurner/), [u/broccaaa](https://www.reddit.com/u/broccaaa/), [u/boneywankenobi](https://www.reddit.com/u/boneywankenobi/)
+
+Credit roll (in order of appearance): [u/krisoijn](https://www.reddit.com/u/krisoijn/), [u/G_KG](https://www.reddit.com/u/G_KG/), [u/ElevationAV](https://www.reddit.com/u/ElevationAV/), [u/dejf2](https://www.reddit.com/u/dejf2/), [u/DigitalSoldier1776](https://www.reddit.com/u/DigitalSoldier1776/), [u/bobfern37](https://www.reddit.com/u/bobfern37/), [u/animasoul](https://www.reddit.com/u/animasoul/), [u/VaseaPost](https://www.reddit.com/u/VaseaPost/), [u/pinkcatsonacid](https://www.reddit.com/u/pinkcatsonacid/), [u/skifunkster](https://www.reddit.com/u/skifunkster/), [u/bimnett](https://www.reddit.com/u/bimnett/), [u/StonkyFarts](https://www.reddit.com/u/StonkyFarts/), [u/DIY-Dude-123](https://www.reddit.com/u/DIY-Dude-123/)
+
+Special shout out to [u/GMEisLightandLove](https://www.reddit.com/u/GMEisLightandLove/), [u/beowulf77](https://www.reddit.com/u/beowulf77/)
+
+Final note - some relevant news this week: <https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/mqql1f/ap_source_ponzi_schemer_bernie_madoff_has_died_in/>

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/Married-Put-Forensic-Analysis-by-AlexanderHood/2021-04-18-Calculating-Potential-Short-Interst-from-Married-Put-Remnants-and-Share-Rehypothecation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+Calculating potential Short Interest from Married Put remnants and Share Rehypothecation
+
+========================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/AlexanderHood](https://www.reddit.com/user/AlexanderHood/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mtnohj/calculating_potential_short_interest_from_married/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+There have been a lot of posts floating around the subs postulating the real short interest.
+
+I wanted to take a stab at it using what we know for sure about the mechanism for how the FTD's are hidden, the latest put option open interest and why the new DTC rule about double-borrow shares was implemented.
+
+Assumptions
+
+1\.  Citadel and friends are using the Married Put method of hiding FTD's.
+
+2\.  Any Put for a strike of $20 or less for the rest of the year is an irrational option play no sane person would make.
+
+3\.  These apprently irrational puts are in fact part of a rational mechanism for hiding a FTD.
+
+4\.  The current outstanding number of irrational puts is correlated to the number of FTD's resulting from naked shorts.
+
+5\.  Basically all available shares to legally borrow have been legally borrowed.
+
+Shares in cash accounts should not be made available to borrow. (Note the use of the S-word) With much of retail on RH or other brokers who may not be able to resist the temptation to make free money, I'm going to assume the borrow is 100%. (See disc below. If you disagree, swap in your own number and recalculate.) Due to re-hypothecation where a share sold short can be borrowed again and sold short again, the shares borrow number *could* exceed 100%. The daily available shares available to borrow often taps the zero shares mark before magically finding more shares the next day.
+
+Let's math
+
+GME Shares outstanding: 70.03M
+
+GME Float: 45.99M
+
+Irrational Puts from now until Jan 2023:
+
+Apr 16 7,067
+
+Apr 30 6,124
+
+May 7 577
+
+May 14 135
+
+May 21 3,648
+
+May 28 150
+
+Jul 16 299,922
+
+Oct 15 14,736
+
+Nov 19 22,760
+
+Jan 22 220,355
+
+Jan 23 43,984
+
+Total puts: 619,458
+
+Shares equivaluent: 61,945,800
+
+Shares borrowed & rehypothecated for shorting: 45.99M (100% of the float)
+
+Shares failed to deliver: 61.95M (From Married Put remnants)
+
+Estaimted Short Interest: 107.94M total shares
+
+Estimated Short Interest: 234% using the proper industry-standard technique for calculating it
+
+Estimated Short Interest: 70% using the dumb new method S3 Partners invented of calculating it
+
+Discussion
+
+Through the magic of re-borrowing a share sold short, there could be an infinite number of shares rehypothecated but in practice if we assume all shares purchased and placed in a cash account by and honorable broker, only X% of shares could be borrowed back so we have a case of diminishing returns. No idea what X% is here, but if you are reading this post please please move your shares to a cash account or take some action to prevent them from being borrowed. *Small changes to this X percentage have a dramatic effect on the ability to do this type of re-borrowing.*
+
+Conjecture
+
+Personally, I think X% here is 50%, which after maximum re-borrowing works out to be equal to the entire float. i.e. Half the shares are not available to borrow but the ones that are have been re-borrowed. (0.5 + 0.25 + 0.125 + 0.0625 + 0.03125 ... = 0.99) This is why I made the assumption above that shares equal to 100% of the float have been borrowed.
+
+DTC Borrow Rule
+
+Yes, the new DTC rules would prohibit this type of re-borrowing because you cannot borrow a share that has alredy been borrowed. All the shares borrowed more than once would have to be covered, which is half the outstanding float if you subscribe to my 50% estimate.
+
+Very Conjectural
+
+From the latest Bloomberg dump, the Institutions own 122% of the float and from my math we own about 105%. This is actually the reason I did this specific calculation, because I wanted to know if retail owned enough shares to force a moass even if all the Institutions were ordered to paper-hand by the PTB. If Institutions paper-hand in exchange for a seat at the asset auction for Citadels corpse, the moass hits Millions per shares rather than Trillions per share.
+
+And at a minimum, 61.6M shares must be covered just to get back to a (legal) 100% Short Interest on the stock.
+
+Sources
+
+[What DFV knows](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mtftsq/i_think_i_figured_out_what_dfv_knows_and_its/)
+
+[Original Post on Married Puts](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgj0j1/the_naked_shorting_scam_revealed_lending_of/)
+
+[Finra](https://finra-markets.morningstar.com/MarketData/EquityOptions/detail.jsp?query=126%3A0P000002CH&sdkVersion=2.59.0)
+
+[Yahoo Finance](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GME/key-statistics?p=GME) [Stonk Tracker](https://gme.crazyawesomecompany.com/)
+
+---
+
+**Relevant Comment by [u/Soulsauce042689](https://www.reddit.com/user/Soulsauce042689/)**
+
+Just a quick couple of notes, on some common misunderstandings that DO NOT contradict OP's points, but do shore up some things:
+
+Real shares can not be double borrowed DTC has been tracking lent shares since 2008 if not longer. [Relevant filing: DTC-2021-05]
+
+"if that's the case, how does the SI% reach 226% then?" Best possible answer I can come with is naked shorting - illegal if entity is not a bonafide market maker.
+
+* * * * *
+
+Rehypothection is a lender (broker in this case) using collateralized assets as collateral to borrow from another lender. An example - your home is collateral for your mortgage, your mortgage lender may use your home to gain borrow from their lender.
+
+Relevant note on margin accounts - In margin accounts up to 140% of your equity can be used in rehypothection to borrow capital from another lender.
+
+* * * * *
+
+One big piece to watch this week (22/04) is if brokers have lent more shares than they have the ability to cover. I'm going to be keeping a close eye on borrowable shares and borrow rate. If a significant portion or brokers are over extended on lent shares we can see a massive recall resulting in shorts being (hopefully) forced to cover.

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/Married-Put-Forensic-Analysis-by-AlexanderHood/2021-05-11-Married-Put-Forensic-Analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+May Update on the Married-Put Forensic Analysis
+
+===============================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/AlexanderHood](https://www.reddit.com/user/AlexanderHood/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nacqtm/may_update_on_the_marriedput_forensic_analysis/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+About a month ago I did an analysis for the real short interest (SI) for GME using what know about the legal Married Put mechanism for creating naked shorts.
+
+I wanted to revisit what we know for sure about the mechanism for how the FTD's are hidden, the latest put option open interest and why the new DTC rule about double-borrow shares was implemented. Yes, I know some people don't think these remnants don't mean what we think they mean, but maybe they do.
+
+TLDR Married Puts continue to be used to create naked shorts. Short Interest is at least 152% and increasing by over 100,000 shares per week.
+
+Assumptions
+
+1\.  Citadel and friends are using the Married Put method of hiding FTD's.
+
+2\.  Any Put at a strike of $20 or less is an irrational option play no sane person would make.
+
+3\.  These apprently irrational puts are in fact part of a rational mechanism for hiding a FTD.
+
+4\.  The current outstanding number of irrational puts is correlated to the number of FTD's resulting from naked shorts.
+
+What does irrational mean? Betting GME will drop below $1 by the end of the year is bonkers.
+
+Let's math!
+
+GME Shares outstanding: 70.77M
+
+GME Float: 47.75M
+
+Irrational Puts from now until Jan 2023:
+
+| Option Expiry | Open Interest Apr 18 | Open Interest May 11 |
+
+| --- | --- | --- |
+
+| Apr 16 | 7,067 | 0 |
+
+| Apr 30 | 6,124 | 0 |
+
+| May 14 | 135 | 683 |
+
+| May 21 | 3,648 | 3,990 |
+
+| May 28 | 150 | 412 |
+
+| Jun 4 | 0 | 64 |
+
+| Jun 11 | 0 | 11 |
+
+| Jun 18 | 0 | 1,046 |
+
+| Jun 25 | 0 | 13 |
+
+| Jul 16 | 299,922 | 303,927 |
+
+| Oct 15 | 14,736 | 19,223 |
+
+| Nov 19 | 22,760 | 22,601 |
+
+| Jan 21, 2022 | 220,355 | 224,653 |
+
+| Jan 20, 2023 | 43,984 | 46,136 |
+
+| Total puts | 619, 458 | 622,769 |
+
+Shares short from Married Put remnants on April 18th: 61.9M
+
+Shares short from Married Put remnants on May 11th: 62.2M
+
+Ok, what is this?
+
+The number of naked short shares implied by Married Put remnants has increased by 331,100 shares in the last three weeks.
+
+-   Over 13k of irrational puts that expired worthless in the last three weeks but the total number of Irrational Puts continues to increase. Not only are they are continuing to utilize this method of shorting, but they are increasing in number as well by apx 100k per week.
+
+-   Ortex has 'exchange reported' Short Interest at 22.2%, or 10.6M shares.
+
+-   Combing the calculated naked short interest of 62.2M with the official short interest, we get 72.8M shares short or *152.5% SI*.
+
+-   On May 21st we have another 3,648 of irrational puts expiring, we'll see if they get 'rolled' over as well.
+
+-   The next BIG batch of Irrational Puts is set to expire in just 8 weeks, July 16th, over 300,000 or nearly HALF of them our there in fact. If we see a fresh batch of about 300,000 puts get created that day for an Op Ex six months in the future, I'll be on the phone to the SEC telling them they need to end this little charade. But do they need to get rolled? No. If apes keep buying, they need to short that number of shares, whatever the cost and by any means.
+
+Discussion
+
+Could the Short Interest be higher than this? ABSOLUTELY. This calculation does NOT include short shares created directly using legal Market Maker provisions and have not yet been covered by that Market Maker. This calculation does NOT include legal short shares created using the re-borrowing method. This calculation does not include shares shorted via the ETF's. (62 [ETF's](https://www.etf.com/stock/GME) hold 10.5M GME shares.) This calculation does not include any other means of shorting.
+
+The new DTCC rule SR-DTC-2021-005 would prohibit the re-borrowing of a borrowed share. Will that rule apply the NSCC Share Borrow Program as well? Let's hope so. They pulled the draft of this but I'm hoping to see it make a return soon. (See links below for more detail on 005.)
+
+Once the new DTCC rule prohibiting the re-borrowing of borrowed shares kicks in we should expect the borrowing costs to spike like crazy. It is the end, effectively, and will trigger squeezes everywhere. They pulled the first draft, probably becasuse the timing isn't right. Anxiously awaiting the re-release of 005 and the implementation timing. Aren't we all!
+
+Disposing of the Evidence
+
+When these expire, they're gone. Wiped off the books. Of course they are, these puts are worthless after all. Never intended to be exercised.
+
+~~HELP! If anyone has the options data from Jan 15th and Mar 16th, would like to see how many more of these puts expired on those dates. i.e. How much were they using this before GME went all baby-squeeze January 28th?~~ Edit: Got the data, stay tuned! Thanks to Full_Option_6067 for the info! There are more shorts!
+
+The advantage of picking options expiries with each quarter is that you get super-cost efficient strikes at like $0.50 but the big disadvantage is that the open interest SITS out there for months on end, waiting for some smooth-brained apes to figure out what it means.
+
+When are they going to end the Married-Put shanannigans? Who knows.
+
+Total Conjecture
+
+Why was 005 delayed? Officially, for "reformatting". Tin-foil hat time: After posting it they found out this loophole for legally naked shorting stocks is in widespread use by every Hedgie and on hundreds of other distressed stocks. It's not just AMC and GME. If they nerf it we could be looking at a crack-up boom in the market and dozens of bankrupt hedges. Why a crack-up boom?? I'll give you a few million reasons: [Because every FTD is a naked short](https://wherearetheshares.com/).
+
+The Great Halvening
+
+[Never forget this happened](https://www.reddit.com/user/RubinoffButtChug69/comments/lfdcv1/fintel_changed_their_short_volume_data_after_my/?context=3)
+
+I saw the Great Halvening happen with my own eyes, so I've just been multiplying all their SI numbers by 2 to figure out the in-adjusted SI. Where they hid the rest of the original '140%' short of GameStop ... remains a mystery.
+
+Sources
+
+[Original Post on Married Puts](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgj0j1/the_naked_shorting_scam_revealed_lending_of/)
+
+[DTC-005 Original Doc](https://zenodo.org/record/4718936/files/005%20-%20SEC%20SR-DTC-2021-005-2%20-%20submission%20of%20rule%20finding.pdf?download=1)
+
+[DTC-005 Analysis](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mi8mo9/legal_interpretation_of_the_proposed_srdtc2021005/)
+
+[Share Borrowing Program](https://smithonstocks.com/part-7-illegal-naked-shorting-dtcc-continuous-net-settlement-and-stock-borrowing-programs-have-loopholes-that-facilitate-illegal-naked-shorting/)
+
+[Yahoo Finance](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GME/key-statistics?p=GME)
+
+[Stonk Tracker](https://gme.crazyawesomecompany.com/)
+
+Edit: As requested 🚀🚀🚀

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/Married-Put-Forensic-Analysis-by-AlexanderHood/2021-05-19-Married-Put-Forensic-Analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+May 19th Update on the Married-Put Forensic Analysis
+====================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/AlexanderHood](https://www.reddit.com/user/AlexanderHood/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ngp969/may_19th_update_on_the_marriedput_forensic/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+If you're feeling blue cause of all the red, I have some confirmation for your bias right here. :)
+
+You shouldn't need it, cause the [004](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/occ.htm) news should have every part of your body totally jacked.
+
+Since we just had such a blood-red day I wanted to check the current option Open Interest to see how much of todays selling pressure was from Naked Shorting. Well, we know Apes certainly aren't selling, so its gotta be bare nekkid!
+
+This is an update to my previous post on Married-Put Remnant Forensics [here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nacqtm/may_update_on_the_marriedput_forensic_analysis/) If you haven't read that, read it first for the context of this post.
+
+TLDR Short Interest increased by another 5% last week to 155% of the float and there may be even more shorts hiding in short-term put options for an additional 17% short interest.
+
+No, seriously, go back and read that first one then come back.
+
+Let's go!
+
+Updated Calculated Short Interest from Married-Put Remnants
+
+GME Shares outstanding: 70.77M
+
+GME Float: 47.75M
+
+Irrational Puts from now until Jan 2023:
+
+| Option Expiry | Open Interest Apr 18 | Open Interest May 11 | Open Interest May 28 |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| Apr 16 | 7,067 | 0 | 0 |
+| Apr 30 | 6,124 | 0 | 0 |
+| May 14 | 135 | 683 | 0 |
+| May 21 | 3,648 | 3,990 | 0 |
+| May 28 | 150 | 412 | 484 |
+| Jun 4 | 0 | 64 | 211 |
+| Jun 11 | 0 | 11 | 108 |
+| Jun 18 | 0 | 1,046 | 1,458 |
+| Jun 25 | 0 | 13 | 28 |
+| Jul 16 | 299,922 | 303,927 | 303,679 |
+| Oct 15 | 14,736 | 19,223 | 19,285 |
+| Nov 19 | 22,760 | 22,601 | 22,527 |
+| Jan 21, 2022 | 220,355 | 224,653 | 226,991 |
+| Jan 20, 2023 | 43,984 | 46,136 | 45,859 |
+| Total puts | 619, 458 | 622,769 | 624,608 |
+| Shares short | 61.88M | 62.27M | 62.46M |
+
+Ok, what does fox say?
+
+The number of naked short shares implied by Married Put remnants has increased by the equivalent 184,900 shares in just the last week.
+
+-   Ortex has 'exchange reported' Short Interest at 11.82M shares.
+
+-   4,600 put contracts have expired since the previous post but there is still a net *increase* of 1,839 contracts.
+
+-   Combining the calculated Naked Short interest of 62.46M with the official 11.82M short interest, we get 74.28M shares short or *155.6% SI*.
+
+So, the Short Interest has *increased* by another ~5% over the last week while GME went from $146 to $168. (Wow. Apes are crushing!)
+
+The Great Put Embiggening
+
+Thanks to [u/Full_Option_8067](https://www.reddit.com/u/Full_Option_8067/) for digging up the options chain from January!
+
+Back on January 15th the open interest for sub $20 Jan 2022 Puts was 22,278 which today has over 223,653 puts. The March sub $20 Puts was 29,374 and today that has ballooned to 224,653 puts.
+
+Yup. No real suprise here, the baby-squeeze on Jan 28th sorta marked the beginning of the marry-them-puts shenannigans to drive the price action down down down.
+
+Could this indicate naked shorting was occuring back in Jan? Possibly and probably. Certainly not to the extent it is today or at least the means to short GME were not predominantly Married-Put naked shorting.
+
+The Wedding Planner
+
+Considering the Put part of a Married-Put trade is NEVER gonna be used, it makes sense to minimize the cost the these types of puts. If you look at the January 2022 put options, the $0.50 strike costs just 2 cents! Two freaking cents! I guess even hedgies don't like throwing money away if they don't have to.
+
+This explains why the pattern for these is densely clustered around just two Option dates a super-low-strikes. July 16th and Jan 21, 2022. These are the most cost-effective places to dump irrational puts. Only one problem, they stick out like a sore thumb. This got me thinking, where else can they hide shorts?
+
+When you make an Assumption ...
+
+When I wrote my original post on this topic I picked $20 as the cutoff strike price to delimit rational from irrational puts. I did that by eyeballing the double-distribution of puts across the Option Expiry dates and found a valley. Normal stocks don't have such exaggerated double humps and instead call/put action *generally* creates a nice camel hump pattern around the current stock price with the sporradic YOLO or fatfinger bet outliers.
+
+That was a bad assumption and the more correct way to do it would be to define irrational puts by their implied volatility or more directly by their cost-effectiveness, knowing that anything spent on the cost of that put option is totally written off.
+
+BUT, you can't just load up on *half a million* $0.01 put options in July at a $0.50 strike! That's gonna stand out like a big turd on the sidewalk, apes or somebody might notice that. You gotta spread those puts around a bit. So they grabbed 148k at $0.50 strike, 30k more at the $1.00 strike and well ... that's really not very well spread out. In thier defense, only the July 16 and Jan 21, 2022 Option Expiry dates have these ridiculous strikes so if there really wasn't a lot of other places to spread these turds out.
+
+Shotgun Weddings
+
+After snorting a few more crayons and reconsidering what an 'irrational put' is defined as, the next most obvious place to look was ANY puts that are really cost-effective with high-implied volality. (i.e. fat chance in hell of hitting that strike price.)
+
+Of course, SHORT TERM put options!
+
+Perfect place to hide more turds. You can get them cheap cause of the greeks, very often less than ten cents for the contract! Yeah, they expire within days, but there is a solution to that: Let them. Buy more next week.
+
+Let's look at the irrational puts for the next couple of months option expiry and filter for *ten cent* put options with 200%+ Implied Volatility:
+
+| Option Expiry | 10 cent puts, high IV |
+| --- | --- |
+| May 21 | *75,971* |
+| May 28 | 2,717 |
+| Jun 4 | 1,036 |
+| Jun 11 | 306 |
+| Jun 18 | 1,948 |
+| Jun 25 | 36 |
+| Total | 82,014 |
+
+Boom! This Friday, nearly 76 thousand *worthless* puts expiring. Go look at the put option chain yourself [here](https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/GME/options?expiration=2021-05-21-m&moneyness=allRows). Seriously, look at it. Does it make any sense? Dirt cheap puts with over 300% IV all the way up to a $80 strike. Who would buy an insane option like this? Anyone here think GME is going to drop by half in two days? Yeah, me either.
+
+That's potentially another 8.2M shares short, bringing our calculated Short Interest up to 82.5M shares short or 172.8% Shorted of the float.
+
+How can we confirm they are rolling short-term puts as part of married put trades? We should know Monday, cause the total open interest for irrational puts needs to be maintained in order for them to continue under the pretense of using this as a *legal* means of naked short selling. And this is a ton of open interest that's gotta get rolled. The OI for next week is a mere 2,717 contracts so if we see massive amounts of irrational puts Monday, there you go.
+
+Could the Short Interest be even higher?
+
+ABSOLUTELY.
+
+This calculation does NOT include short shares created directly using legal Market Maker provisions and have not yet been covered (T+21) by that Market Maker. This calculation does NOT include legal short shares created using the re-borrowing method. (See 005 below.) This calculation does not include shares shorted via the ETF's. (62 [ETF's](https://www.etf.com/stock/GME) hold 10.5M GME shares and that undoubtedly all been shorted.)
+
+Conclusion
+
+Hedgies r fuk. They're digging an even deeper hole with every passing day. Every time I look at it there are more shorts. Naked shorts, everywhere. And I don't think we've found them all. There could be millions more hidden using 005 re-borrowing and millions more in rolling FTD's. I will not be surprised, if it turns out the real number was closer to 1,000% SI.
+
+I do believe they are limiting themselves to only *legal* mechanisms for shorting the stock. Otherwise we would *not* see all the evidence they have left behind, like open puts, FTD reports, 13F's, etc. Which is probably a wise decision, when they get busted, none of them will actually go to jail.
+
+The rate the SI in increasing is clearly unsustainable. The DTCC needs to margin call them ASAP. Every day they delay increases the cost by ~21 thousand shares, or about $210 million a day if the moass geometric mean is $10k. *cough* or higher. ;)
+
+Sources
+
+[Citadel 13F - Fintel](https://fintel.io/i13f/citadel-advisors-llc/2021-03-31-0)
+
+[Original Post on Married Puts](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgj0j1/the_naked_shorting_scam_revealed_lending_of/)
+
+[DTC-005 Original Doc](https://zenodo.org/record/4718936/files/005%20-%20SEC%20SR-DTC-2021-005-2%20-%20submission%20of%20rule%20finding.pdf?download=1)
+
+[DTC-005 Analysis](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mi8mo9/legal_interpretation_of_the_proposed_srdtc2021005/)
+
+[Share Borrowing Program](https://smithonstocks.com/part-7-illegal-naked-shorting-dtcc-continuous-net-settlement-and-stock-borrowing-programs-have-loopholes-that-facilitate-illegal-naked-shorting/)
+
+[Barchart Options](https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/GME/options?expiration=2021-05-21-m&moneyness=allRows)
+
+[Stonk Tracker](https://gme.crazyawesomecompany.com/)
+
+Required
+
+🚀🚀🚀

Confirmation-Bias-and-Discussion/Married-Put-Forensic-Analysis-by-AlexanderHood/2021-05-26-Married-Put-Forensic-Analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+May 26th Update on the Married-Put Forensic Analysis - Shorts all the way down
+
+==============================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/AlexanderHood](https://www.reddit.com/user/AlexanderHood/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nl90c5/may_26th_update_on_the_marriedput_forensic/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+T'was the night before MOASS'mas and if you're too jacked to sleep, I have something to keep you jacked until Market Open.
+
+Following up to my post from last week, [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ngp969/may_19th_update_on_the_marriedput_forensic/).
+
+If you haven't already that, this business about Married-Put-Remnants and Irrational-Puts won't make much sense, so go catch up and then pop back here after, kthxbye!
+
+Last week, on Days of our Lives Buying and Hodling ...
+
+We saw about 75k Irrational Puts expire. Poof! Gone. Where did they go?
+
+What we did *not* see Monday morning was an additonal 75k Irrational Put options get opened up, that's for sure. What we *did* see yesterday and today, was a nice well-distributed build up of Irrational puts all across the board, spread out like sand on a beach. Totally innocuous.
+
+Pop quiz hot shot! It's 2:30pm on a Tuesday, GME is ripping faces and chewing bubble-gum, boosters firing from $180 to over $210! What do you do?
+
+*Buy put options at a $30 strike for this Friday.*
+
+What??? No. Why on earth would anyone buy that crap? It's worthless. *Irrational*, if you will. ;) But that's exactly what happened today. And a lot more of it.
+
+(Note: Some of todays largest put option trades were late afternoon, low-strike, low-cost and interestingly, not out of the *PHLX* exchange! Aha!)
+
+Naked Naked Naked ... Pop Pop Pop
+
+I've been watching the low-strike put options open interest to see how it changes day-to-day. Here is a comparison of today to yesterday, a snap-shot of some Irrational Puts popping into existence:
+
+Option Expiry Date: May 28th
+
+| Strike | OI May 24 | OI May 25 | Delta |
+
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+
+| $10.00 | 348 | 363 | 15 |
+
+| $20.00 | 137 | 205 | 68 |
+
+| $30.00 | 603 | 756 | 153 |
+
+| $40.00 | 501 | 647 | 146 |
+
+| $50.00 | 296 | 704 | 408 |
+
+| $60.00 | 457 | 404 | -53 |
+
+| $70.00 | 759 | 813 | 54 |
+
+| $80.00 | 327 | 395 | 68 |
+
+| $90.00 | 185 | 493 | 308 |
+
+| $100.00 | 3,006 | 3125 | 119 |
+
+| $110.00 | 1,027 | 954 | -73 |
+
+| $120.00 | 806 | 901 | 95 |
+
+| $130.00 | 560 | 973 | 413 |
+
+| Sum | 9012 | 10733 | +1,721 |
+
+With GME soaring, the cost of most of these low-strike options dropped to super-cheap levels. You could pick up puts at even a $130 stike for just $0.23 cents! Looking over the distribution of puts at strikes today, we saw widespread increases all the way up to about the $130 strike. So it would seem that whoever programmed the algo to distribute these evenly doesn't want to pay more than about $0.25 per contract.
+
+If the Hedgies have a budget of about $0.25 max for Married Put contract, let's take a look at the following week's Op Ex to see if we see the same pattern of evenly distributed puts added today for low-strike options.
+
+Option Expiry Date: Jun 4
+
+| Strike | May 24 | May 25 | Delta |
+
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+
+| $10.00 | 134 | 134 | 0 |
+
+| $20.00 | 83 | 92 | 9 |
+
+| $30.00 | 270 | 291 | 21 |
+
+| $40.00 | 186 | 233 | 47 |
+
+| $50.00 | 424 | 476 | 52 |
+
+| $60.00 | 262 | 278 | 16 |
+
+| $70.00 | 76 | 102 | 26 |
+
+| $80.00 | 58 | 62 | 4 |
+
+| $90.00 | 77 | 114 | 37 |
+
+| $100.00 | 361 | 466 | 105 |
+
+| $110.00 | 239 | 315 | 76 |
+
+| $120.00 | 260 | 389 | 129 |
+
+| $130.00 | 174 | 224 | 50 |
+
+| Sum | 2604 | 3176 | +572 |
+
+Yup.
+
+And we see even more of these Irrational Puts added to June 11th Op Ex contracts, more added into the Hedgie perennial favorite the July 16th contracts and a few more in the Jan 21, 2022 contracts. (Refer to previous post for the last analysis I did for these last two dates.)
+
+Every day we are seeing more and more of these Short-Term put options come into existence, about 4-5,000 per day representing about 400 to 500,000 shares.
+
+What does all this mean?
+
+Short Interest continues to be hidden in Long-Term Low-Strike Put options as well as low-cost Short-Term put options.
+
+In my previous post I did an analysis using a new criteria for what an Irrational Put is, a contract for $0.10 or less with high IV. Looking at today's newly minted put contracts, these are getting up to the $0.25 range on the high-end, although the *majority* remain clustered below $0.10 there are some few being added at even these higher ranges most likely due to some semi-random algo trying to hide these puts here without accidentally making it totally obvious that they have some specific allocaation.
+
+What about the puts that expired last week?
+
+Yes indeed. What about them.
+
+Nothing. They expired.
+
+After yesterday and today's powerful confirmation of the T+35, T+21 theory, I am inclined to think the Hedgies just stuck the Market Maker with them. Legally, the Married-Put is used to justify the creation of the Naked Short, the two allow the MM to remain 'neutral'. Ok, but what happen's when those Naked Shorts are still out there and the Put contract that was balancing them out expires? *The MM has to cover them.*
+
+Not straight away, the day after Op Ex (the following Monday) begins the T+35 part of the FTD cycle. They will cover those shares 35 days hence.
+
+The MM's are out there covering Naked Shorts on the 35th day, which would start spiking the price action so the SHF need to create *more* Married-Puts to create *more* Naked Shorts to again push GME down.
+
+Today, GME shot up 20% and the Short Interest *increased*! The MM's are buying to cover which is spiking the price and the SHF continue to drive it down with Married-Put Naked shorts. The SHF have *not* started covering, still just kicking the can another 35 days down the road.
+
+Implications for Short Interest
+
+I had previously estimated SI using Married Put remnants at 172%, but now that we are seeing Irrational Puts being created *daily*, that estimate is very, very low. There are way more Irrational Puts in existence, *including Short-Term puts and also expired puts* than I had accounted for. By the time I finish adding all of it together the Short Interest is going to be north of 340% at a minimum.
+
+Each week as these Short-Term Irrational puts expire, they are kicking off a batch of FTD's that need to get covered ~35 days later. Expired yeah, but the impact they had on the price action when they were first created persists, with GME trading sideways for weeks and weeks on end. Eventually they get covered (often at a lower price) and new Naked Shorts are created to replace them. In the meantime, every Monday a huge new batch of Naked Shorts is being created and *juggled* in a huge T+35 day loop.
+
+Last week the equivalent of over 7.5M shares worth of puts expired. That doesn't mean every week they have been creating millions of Naked Shorts, but if they want to keep the price action from rising, sufficient Naked Shorts need to be created equal to the total retail buying pressure. How much is that? We'd need to go count all the expired Irrational Puts since Jan to get an estimate. If we knew, we could better estimate the true SI and the MOASS peak & geometric mean. Data from Jan did indicate this practice of using Married-Puts increased by 10x after Jan 28th.
+
+I really hope Cohen just comes out and tells us how many shares are outstanding. That would be easier. :/
+
+Sources
+
+[Original Post on Married Puts](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgj0j1/the_naked_shorting_scam_revealed_lending_of/)
+
+[DTC-005 Original Doc](https://zenodo.org/record/4718936/files/005%20-%20SEC%20SR-DTC-2021-005-2%20-%20submission%20of%20rule%20finding.pdf?download=1)
+
+[Share Borrowing Program](https://smithonstocks.com/part-7-illegal-naked-shorting-dtcc-continuous-net-settlement-and-stock-borrowing-programs-have-loopholes-that-facilitate-illegal-naked-shorting/)
+
+[Barchart Options](https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/GME/options?expiration=2021-05-21-m&moneyness=allRows)
+
+[Stonk Tracker](https://gme.crazyawesomecompany.com/)
+
+Required
+
+🚀🚀🚀

DD/2021-04-21-Failed-Launch-Attemp-in-Late-February-and-Proof-that-the-DTCC-Must-be-the-Catalyst.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+Feb 24-26: failed launch attempt and proof the DTCC must be the catalyst?
+=========================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Bladeace](https://www.reddit.com/user/Bladeace/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvvuhp/feb_2426_failed_launch_attempt_and_proof_the_dtcc/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+TL;DR: This never should have gone on for this long, it's too dangerous for everyone involved. Whales tried to solve this themselves and attempted to launch the rocket in February with a gamma squeeze. This failed, so they have no choice except to fight a holding pattern until the DTCC and the feds step in. I hold because I think they are all working hard to bring me a very large bucket of tendies.
+
+I think the gamma squeeze in February was an attempt to launch the rocket and begin the squeeze. The shorts foiled the attempt by recklessly flooding the market with even more naked shorts. This terrified all involved and prompted the DTCC to begin the preparations required to step in. If my speculation is accurate, actors in the market cannot instigate the squeeze (they tried and failed). So, we wait for the DTCC.
+
+I wrote the below speculation because I am having a difficult time understanding why the financial institutions competing against the shorts haven't instigated the squeeze. I believe they have a clear motive to instigate the squeeze and should have done so before the situation got this far. Accordingly, I suspect the February gamma squeeze to be evidence they did make such an attempt but realized the situation was beyond their ability to resolve. I think that it is this failure that resulted in their decision to fight for a holding pattern until the cavalry arrives to put down the rogue element.
+
+The February gamma squeeze
+
+During February the amount of GME shares traded peaked at a mindboggling high of four times the float being traded in one day. [This](https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgecalhoun/2021/03/10/gamestop-the-second-surgeanatomy-of-a-gamma-swarm/?sh=662560a24225) article from Forbes summarizes the volume of trades:
+
+[Yeah, four times the float of a large company is fucking loads.](https://preview.redd.it/lo63uje4jmu61.png?width=972&format=png&auto=webp&s=db1f700de4a32bb02dc19c9fa61181a7e8bcac1d)
+
+Before this massive spike in volume, slightly more than the entire float is being traded daily. That's already ridiculous, so the trade volume is spiking from ridiculous to insane. The same article provides this chart to illustrate how sharply it rose:
+
+[What. The. Fuck.](https://preview.redd.it/lzezctvhkmu61.png?width=959&format=png&auto=webp&s=860b09112f8b610dc76e81bf579248f97f6b7475)
+
+Unsurprisingly, the price goes up by a lot during this period. The author of this chart argues that this is because of a gamma squeeze which is, basically, when options are used to drive price rises. The following chart supports their assertion:
+
+[Yep, that's a fuck ton of options alright!](https://preview.redd.it/bsyczqiflmu61.png?width=959&format=png&auto=webp&s=9bab12f029d2deba0b09529c6b326c8ae28eb683)
+
+I think the author makes a strong case for these claims. By using options, the volume of trades was driven way up very quickly. The price rose accordingly. However, the author goes on to argue that this was caused by reddit users coordinating options purchases. I'm not going to spend time discussing that claim here because I think it's absurd1.
+
+1: The author argues we can multiply the impact of our buying power on the volume by up to 50 times using this method. Even multiplied by 50 times, this is far too much money being spent in far too short a period to be reddit users. It's also notable that this level of coordination would require communication and I haven't seen any posts attempting to organize a huge coordinated purchase of options. Reddit did cause a similar volume in January, but doing so was *very* public. Our ability to move money is proportional to the visibility of our responsibility; if Feburary gamma was us, every user here would know that. The article in the link is excellent, but their claim regarding reddits behavior during the Feburary gamma is unfounded.
+
+The gamma squeeze as an attempt to launch the rocket
+
+So, there was a gamma squeeze. I suspect this gamma squeeze was an attempt to launch the short squeeze.
+
+Before I continue, I think it's important to note that the wash sales which, we suspect, are being used to artificially lower the price are distinct from the phenomenon being discussed here. In this case, the massive volume was causing rapid price rises. Unlike the wash sales, I think the volume during this gamma squeeze was caused by shares trading from one party to another *without the two parties coordinating on a desired direction of the price.* I think one party was trying to rise the price substantially while the other was trying to keep it low.
+
+It might help to remember what the price charts looked like during this period. You'll all probably remember this bizarre graph:
+
+[The graph my broker provides wasn't this dramatic but it still looked fucky](https://preview.redd.it/gb4sy55ynmu61.png?width=1669&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4ddece1f2c8cf16a85fd4e4dfb5804b50d32d55)
+
+I think what we're seeing during this period is two high frequency traders directly competing to change the price, one trying to drive the price up by buying all the shares and the other trying to drive the price down by selling enough shares that the other can't buy them all. One party is using options to flood the market with buy orders while the other is flooding it with sell orders. These orders change the price, the buys raise the price and the sells lower it. Given how quickly this happens it looks, on the graph, like there are some points in time with no price (the vertical lines); this is because there is a large range of prices being traded at during the moment that point on the graph represents. At least, that's my understanding of the graph. Someone in the comments may clarify further, or correct an error on my part, in which case I'll edit accordingly.
+
+The key point isn't actually what the graph shows anyway. What's important is that the large volume on these days is caused by two parties competing to alter the price. One party wants to raise it and one wants to lower it. The party that wants to raise the price does so by buying up a lot of shares and the party that wants to lower the price does so by selling a lot of shares. Unlike wash sales, the parties aren't cooperating so this volume isn't just the same shares going back and forth. This is why the price rises over this period - the price rise is the result of one of the parties buying shares and then not letting them back into the market.
+
+I think this period in February saw massive volume because a whale attempted to buy so many shares the price would rise high enough to launch the rocket. The only way for the shorts to stop this from happening was for them to sell enough shares at low enough prices. I think they failed because the shorts sold so many shares the price rise was minimized. Let me explain a little more to help clarify, if a friendly whale buys a million options to rise the price but the shorts sell enough shares to cover those options, the price isn't going to rise. Basically, if a friendly whale was sick of this situation and wanted to launch the rocket it could do so by buying a lot of shares to drive the price up, *unless* the shorts were willing to simply flood the market to match their buying spree.
+
+So, if I'm right about this, the February gamma squeeze was an attempt to launch the rocket by buying so many shares the price spiked. They tried so hard the entire float was traded nearly ten times in three days: this wasn't a small effort, they tried really hard to launch the rocket. They failed because the shorts were willing to sell as many shares as they could buy. Well, almost - they still rose the price significantly, just not enough to launch.
+
+This is significant because it demonstrates just how many shorted shares team short are capable of putting into the market. We already knew they could flood the market with a lot of these fraudulent shares. I think the February gamma squeeze showed our whales that team short would simply flood the market even more if they tried to launch the rocket. The result is stalemate, the shorts can't short enough to lower the price any further and the longs can't buy enough to launch the rocket. So, we trade sideways until something changes.
+
+During this stalemate the shorts wash shares to keep the price from rising and use various shenanigans to offset their failures to deliver the fabricated shares they've sold. I think this is why the volume remains high after the gamma squeeze and through March. The high volume is the shenanigans of the shorts. Over this period the DTCC puts new rules into place that incrementally clamp down on these shenanigans until, eventually, we get the low volume numbers we're seeing at the moment. I think the low volume reflects the increasingly weak position of team short.
+
+Notice that this would mean that the low volume indicates team long has another opportunity to launch the rocket. I believe that they have elected not to do so after seeing what team short was willing to do during their February attempt. I think team short flooding the market with a huge number of shorted shares terrified everyone involved. The more shorted shares team short releases, the worse the problem gets for every member of the NSCC/DTCC that has to help pick up the pieces when this thing goes off. So, team long decided to abandon any attempt to launch the rocket on their own and maintained a holding pattern while pressuring the DTCC to get their house in order. Another users post, [Why We're STILL trading sideways and Why We Haven't Launched](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mu9xed/why_were_still_trading_sideways_and_why_we_havent/), expands on why we are still waiting for launch. My addition to their commentary is that I think the Febuary gamma squeeze is what convinced team long to wait rather than attempt to launch the rocket on their own.
+
+This is a precarious situation for all involved. Every day this continues team short leaks more shorted shares into the market. Every day team long waits for the DTCC to prepare risks someone doing something unexpected, like leaking to the press. The only thing worse for the DTCC than MOASS is everyone learning about it before it begins. The longer this continues the more other members of the market will know about what's happening; eventually, someone will leak it to everyone. My guess is that everyone involved wants this finished with *asap*. I think the only reason it's still going is because of how recklessly the shorts fought during the February gamma squeeze.
+
+It's my suspicion that the new head of the SEC intends to resolve this *fast*. I think he knows his window to handle this his way is small. If he does this right, he can be the person who stepped in and protected everyone from a rogue element threatening an outright system failure. But, that only works if he comes in hard and gets it done quickly. The longer he waits, the more it looks like his failure rather than him stepping in to pick up his predecessors mess.
+
+Relating this to the wider context
+
+I think [A House of Cards - Part 1](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvk5dv/a_house_of_cards_part_1/) is correct, the system is overrun with phantom shares because the DTCC is essentially running a fractional reserve security market without the protections in place to ensure its fractional reserve, of any given security, doesn't all get called up at the same time. I suspect that, over time, its members have issued increasing numbers of shares which means the reserves have become less able to deliver on the sales when required. In January, one of its members was caught out by this and forced a trading halt to prevent disaster. Unfortunately, for them, this made the situation worse because retail traders didn't sell. During February they expanded their short position in an attempt to lower the price enough for them to close.
+
+The expansion of their short position in February and our unwillingness to sell forced the hands of other financial institutions who were not willing to watch the shorts make the problem even worse. So, they attempted to launch the rocket with a gamma squeeze. This would have hurt every member of the financial community, but it would have stopped the shorts from causing even more damage. This was an attempt to cut off the diseased limb.
+
+The shorts fought back and went further than the longs expected. To avoid launch, they flooded the market with even more shorted shares. This showed the other financial institutions that they couldn't launch the rocket and the diseased limb had gone so rogue it was willing to bring the entire system down rather than be amputated. This is why I think the February gamma squeeze is so important. I think it shows that longs *did* try to launch the rocket. Which is important, because I think they have had a motivation to do so this entire time and our theories need to take account of that motive.
+
+So, they turned to the DTCC and advised them they had to sort it out. For this reason, we get a growing raft of new regulations designed to prevent this from happening again and allowing them to resolve the mess. I believe the current low volume indicates team longs are now in a position to launch the rocket if they desire. I think they are waiting because the DTCC has shown they are taking action and the longs are willing to give them a little time to prepare.
+
+As this has all transpired, I think the wider financial community has begun to become aware of what is happening. I think the unusual bank activity is them preparing for this. If this is true, launch is likely imminent. I say this because no one involved wants this to make it into mainstream media before it begins. They can't stop people from knowing about it after it's begun, but they *really* don't want to give the public notice. My guess is that [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvoi4h/gme_closed_001_from_previous_day_close_this_has/) recent post is correct and we're currently looking at the final preparations in the market.
+
+Summary
+
+In January, the shorts were going to die so they broke the market. In February, I think the market tried to correct itself with the gamma squeeze. In March, I think the DTCC took over and began preparations to solve the situation. In April, I think the feds are in charge and the entire finance sector is preparing for the hammer to come down.
+
+(This is all *very* speculative and shouldn't be treated as financial advice! Please correct me on any errors and I will alter my claims accordingly. Thank you for reading my work.)

DD/2021-04-27-Method-for-Hiding-FTDs-using-Useless-Puts.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+A Method for Hiding FTD's That Uses the 1.09mil Useless Puts Discovered by /u/defj
+==================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/eastrod](https://www.reddit.com/user/eastrod/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mzgtvx/a_method_for_hiding_ftds_that_uses_the_109mil/) | 
+
+---
+
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Apes and apettes, I'm jacked to the tits!!!
+
+TL;DR the economic terrorists have given us clear evidence in my opinion that they are resetting FTD's for at least 109 million phantom shares per cycle using cheap OTM puts
+
+I think I may have finally stumbled upon something that can help us in our efforts to discover just how deep a hole the short hedge funds are in.
+
+Huge credit to [/u/dejf2](https://www.reddit.com/u/dejf2/) (sorry I spelled your name wrong in the title) who posted this earlier today:
+
+<https://reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mz7c7h/put_anomalies_pt1_were_127_million_synthetic/>
+
+He found 1.09 million useless cheap puts being traded and then closed before the end of the same trading day and it turned on a light bulb in my primate brain, taking me back to an article I read recently while digging into some other companies that were victims of naked short selling.
+
+<https://i.imgur.com/MSu2MOl.jpg>
+
+This is a screenshot highlighting a section taken from this letter to the SEC - it is a good read but the relevant portion is in the imgur link.
+
+Here is a link to the whole document if any other apes want to look into it:
+
+<https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-30-08/s73008-17.pdf>
+
+The method for creating phantom (naked) shares goes as follows:
+
+-   Hedge fund (Melvin) buys a put (or 1.09 million puts)
+
+-   Market Maker (Shitadel) sells that put and is legally entitled to create and sell 100 phantom shares (or 109 million phantom shares) to hedge the put(s) they just wrote to remain neutral on the trade
+
+-   Hedge fund then sells that put back to the Market Maker except the Market Maker doesn't buy back the phantom shares leaving them net short on the stock and having pocketed the cash for the phantom shares that they did not need a borrow for
+
+Now this is where I snorted a couple of the fat crayons and had a brand new wrinkle form inside my otherwise smooth brain:
+
+The market maker could be using the method above (selling puts and then buying them back for the same price) as an excuse to create new phantom shares and then selling them to the short hedge funds - the ones trying to hide fuck tons of FTD's. This makes the short hedge funds look like they bought shares to clear their FTD's and then the hedge funds sell the share right back to the MM for the same price to create a neutral (net $0) trade while resetting the FTD countdown, essentially kicking the can down the road a little further and hiding 109 million shares of their short position from being reported as FTD's.
+
+Where would a Market Maker and a short hedge fund likely conduct this trade? In a fucking dark pool where they aren't competing with retail for the shares of course; a potential explaination for the insane amount of dark pool trading occuring lately!
+
+Let me be clear for the smoothest of brains - *in absolutely no way does this method help the short hedge funds reduce their short position.* They are not closing any shorts unless they keep some of the phantom shares in which case they are simply increasing the short position of the Market Maker aka Shitadel. This method only allows them to appear as though they have cleared their current FTD's while resetting the countdown. They then have to do this all over again the next time the FTD timer comes knocking.
+
+This could be another valuable tell for just how big the short position is! Other methods are being used to reset FTD's, I'm sure, but this method, combined with [/u/dejf2](https://www.reddit.com/u/dejf2/)'s find of just how many of these useless puts were traded gives me a raging clue. This makes me believe that from this method alone, the shorts have created and bought back phantom shares to reset AT LEAST 109 million phantom shares worth of FTD's.
+
+I hope this catches the eyes of some of some of the more wrinkly brains out there who can read terminal data and helps us get a clearer picture of just how fucked the hedgies truely are. As for me, I am more confident than ever before that the MOASS is inevitable. The tendieman commeth.
+
+HODL 💎🙌🦍🚀🌝☄️✨🛸
+
+Edit: tagging [/u/augrr](https://www.reddit.com/u/augrr/), [/u/HomeDepotHank69](https://www.reddit.com/u/HomeDepotHank69/), [/u/broccaaa](https://www.reddit.com/u/broccaaa/) our local FTD guru's to see if this new info can be used in conjunction with their findings on FTD numbers and reset methods that they have written such great DD about already.
+
+Edit 2: Clarified my conclusion after seeing some good questions in the comments
+
+*None of the above is financial advice, I just like the stock.*

DD/2021-05-13-Fed-Reverse-Repos-are-Not-Tied-to-Margin-Calls.md

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+Counter DD: NY Fed $400 bln reverse repos is not tied to margin calls. It's worse.
+==================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/ZKShao](https://www.reddit.com/user/ZKShao/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nbt1sp/counter_dd_ny_fed_400_bln_reverse_repos_is_not/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Possible DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Possible%20DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Changed May 16th: Please see Update at bottom of post.
+
+Today there is hype about an Italian financial news site reporting that the New York Fed has lent 400 billion USD to 39 financial institutes over the past two days. It concludes that big Wall Street parties have been margin called and are panic borrowing from the Fed to make margin. Link: <https://www.money.it/Fed-repo-miliardi-Wall-Street>
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Counter DD: NY Fed $400 bln reverse repos is not tied to margin calls. It's worse.](https://preview.redd.it/x2vo22t7cyy61.png?width=697&format=png&auto=webp&s=8bdb221c2f8ba0330f3a9e5601463ce51a2b2c4b)](https://preview.redd.it/x2vo22t7cyy61.png?width=697&format=png&auto=webp&s=8bdb221c2f8ba0330f3a9e5601463ce51a2b2c4b)
+
+Google translated screenshot of the news article
+
+None of it is correct.
+
+TL;DR
+
+-   The numbers are about reverse repos, which mean that the Fed is the one borrowing cash and providing US Treasury bonds as collateral.
+
+-   The numbers are about overnight reverse repos (ON RRP) which have same day settlement. The cash makes a roundtrip in the same day so cannot be added together: there will be significant overlap between the numbers of subsequent days.
+
+-   ON RPP rate is currently 0%, which means the Fed borrows cash at 0% interest and provides US Treasury bonds as collateral. The incentive why someone would lend to the Fed at 0% interest rate is to hold the bond, perhaps for short term shorting.
+
+-   The Fed has on March 16 increased the maximum amount of cash they will borrow daily from a counterparty from 30 billion to 80 billion per counterparty. Reverse repo transactions have increased daily since.
+
+-   It's not financial institutes borrowing cash because they got margin called. It's the contrary: it's them depositing cash to profit from babysitting holding US Treasury bonds.
+
+    -   ~~which they perhaps use for nefarious purposes~~ ~~this is an understatement~~
+
+    -   Please see Update.
+
+Good day apes! This is my first attempt at a DD if you can call it that. I'm actually just formulating an in-depth reply to other daily trending posts:
+
+-   20k upvotes: <https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nb9pon/european_financial_news_is_reporting_major_margin/>
+
+-   11k upvotes: <https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nbg01m/regarding_recent_rumors_about_fed_bailing_out_hfs/>
+
+-   8.3k upvotes: <https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nbbrg6/margin_called_front_page_moneyit/>
+
+-   5.3k upvotes: <https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nbbg13/reverse_repo_loan_amounts_by_day_since_january/>
+
+If I'm wrong then shame be on me and I will delete this post or leave it up for posterity, whatever the people deem best. If I'm right, a lot of people are getting excited about some news site that is wrongly interpreting what it means when the Fed conducts reverse repo operations: it's the opposite. So here goes.
+
+WHERE ARE THE NUMBERS FROM?
+
+So first off, what is this $400 billion figure coming from? Again look at the shared news article: <https://www.money.it/Fed-repo-miliardi-Wall-Street>
+
+400 billion is the lazy sum of 209 billion and 181 billion (context: Italians call a billion a milliardi). Those numbers can be found on the NY Fed site here: <https://apps.newyorkfed.org/markets/autorates/tomo-results-display?SHOWMORE=TRUE&startDate=01/01/2000&enddate=01/01/2000>
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Counter DD: NY Fed $400 bln reverse repos is not tied to margin calls. It's worse.](https://preview.redd.it/phgs140fdyy61.png?width=1119&format=png&auto=webp&s=50cd1533a4e1000d7238f940ce59ad364e49fcdf)](https://preview.redd.it/phgs140fdyy61.png?width=1119&format=png&auto=webp&s=50cd1533a4e1000d7238f940ce59ad364e49fcdf)
+
+The numbers are from reverse repos
+
+Take note that the page contains daily summaries of repos and reverse repos. Nothing is happening in terms of repos (.000 abound), the numbers are about reverse repos.
+
+WHAT ARE REVERSE REPOS?
+
+I've only learned today what a repo or reverse repo is, but it's enough to conclude that the news site has it wrong. There seems to be some confusion today because of one definition on Investopedia, and another definition on the Fed site. But we are talking about numbers posted on the Fed site, so lets look at their FAQ.
+
+Here is what the NY Fed's FAQ says:
+
+"A reverse repurchase agreement conducted by the Desk, also called a "reverse repo" or "RRP," is a transaction in which the Desk sells a security to an eligible counterparty with an agreement to repurchase that same security at a specified price at a specific time in the future."
+
+Source: <https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/rrp_faq.html>
+
+"The Desk" refers to the Open Market Trading Desk which represents the Fed. So in a reverse repo (RRP) the Fed sells a security to gain cash, but has an agreement to buy the security back. That's where we can already conclude the 400 billion is not being lent to Wall Street at all, it's being borrowed from Wall Street. It has nothing to do with margin calls.
+
+If I'm wrong, correct me please, but here is a few more sources to back up this interpretation.
+
+-   <https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/overnight-reverse-repurchase-agreements.htm>"When the Federal Reserve conducts an overnight RRP, it sells a security to an eligible counterparty and simultaneously agrees to buy the security back the next day."
+
+-   <https://www.learningmarkets.com/the-federal-reserves-open-market-operations/>"When the Fed wants to extract money from the system, it sells Treasury securities to its primary dealers in a reverse repo."
+
+Moreover, the reverse repos involving the reported numbers are overnight reverse repos, meaning the transaction is inverted the next day. Therefore it's also incorrect to just sum up the numbers: the 209 billion of one day and the 181 billion of the day before probably have a lot of overlap. So scrap that 400 billion number altogether.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Counter DD: NY Fed $400 bln reverse repos is not tied to margin calls. It's worse.](https://preview.redd.it/ygb2nqbrbyy61.png?width=599&format=png&auto=webp&s=26645b6faf328e475ad1436b39d351ab745e9d82)](https://preview.redd.it/ygb2nqbrbyy61.png?width=599&format=png&auto=webp&s=26645b6faf328e475ad1436b39d351ab745e9d82)
+
+Numbers are from same-day settlement reverse repos, i.e. 'overnight'
+
+Until this part is just setting the record straight. I do have an alternative theory to propose.
+
+Reminder: My personal stance has changed, feel free to entertain the theory but please make sure to also read the update at the end of the post and the referenced counter perspectives.
+
+Remainder of the post is the original theory.
+
+SO WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON WITH THESE INCREASING NUMBERS?
+
+If you look at the data again on the NY Fed site, numbers have been increasing steadily every week day: 154, 161, 175, 181, 209 billion. That can be seen in this graph, which was made by [u/xpurplexamyx](https://www.reddit.com/u/xpurplexamyx/) today:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Counter DD: NY Fed $400 bln reverse repos is not tied to margin calls. It's worse.](https://preview.redd.it/wr801288eyy61.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=b4821e15abc01e14e0f4ea6401fe1cdbfe03daaa)](https://preview.redd.it/wr801288eyy61.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=b4821e15abc01e14e0f4ea6401fe1cdbfe03daaa)
+
+All credit to u/xpurplexamyx and her post at https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nbbg13/reverse_repo_loan_amounts_by_day_since_january/
+
+If you look at the graph, you can see the numbers start increasing rapidly after March 17. Well something very relevant happened on that day. Before March 17, any reverse repo (RRP) counter party could deposit up to 30 billion per day at the Fed. On March 17, this changed to 80 billion.
+
+Source: <https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/opolicy/operating_policy_210317> and <https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20210428a1.htm>
+
+Now assuming there is incentive for counterparties (that would be banks) to participate in the Fed's RRP program, it is to be expected that numbers would rise from that point on. Why did it increase gradually instead of immediately from March 17 onward? What is that spike on March 31? I don't know, hope someone can fill us in. Why did the Fed decide to raise the limit to 80 billion? I don't know either but it has something to do with that bRRR-man. I hope someone with knowledge of monetary policy can jump in here.
+
+Lets talk about incentives. Normally the incentive for counterparties to take part in the reverse repo program, i.e. deposit cash at the Fed is because they make interest on that deposit. Otherwise, why wouldn't they rather use that money to make money? So normally, the Fed offers some interest, but not more than other banks. The interest rate for reverse repos is tweaked by the Fed to act as a lower limit to what interest banks charge each other, the latter is called the federal funds rate.
+
+My crude attempt at summarizing this: the interest rate that the Fed pays in reverse repos can be decreased by the Fed to incentivize banks to borrow from each other, and increased to incentivize borrowing from the Fed. People that actually know economics can come shit over me now.
+
+What is interesting to me and a bit surprising is that the current interest rate for overnight reverse repos, the ON RRP rate, is currently 0.00%. Source: <https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20210428a1.htm>.
+
+Again, the interest rate that one would get for using the Fed as a daycare for their cash, is currently 0.00%. Yet participation in the ON RRP program is increasing daily, both in terms of money exchanged and number of counterparties participating as evidenced by those 181 billion, 209 billion and today 235 billion. The 400 billion number from the Italian site was summed up where summing isn't valid, but at this rate we will reach it soon on a single day!
+
+What's the incentive? Well perhaps you want the collateral that the Fed offers, which in the case of the reverse repos we are looking at are exclusively Treasury Bonds. The Fed gets to babysit your cash, you get to babysit some US treasury bonds.
+
+The incentive may be that when you park your cash at the Fed and get to hold on to US Treasury bonds, you can do stuff with those bonds for a day since you do own them until the Fed purchases them back the next day. Here are some things I can think of to do with these freely borrowed bonds:
+
+-   Lend them to short sellers for a borrow fee
+
+-   Use them yourself to short
+
+-   If anyone can come up with other reasons to deposit funds somewhere for 0% interest, receiving treasury bonds as collateral, please fill me in. I would like to know the least nefarious reason for someone to make use of this reverse repo program.
+
+I mean, look at what's been trending downwards:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Counter DD: NY Fed $400 bln reverse repos is not tied to margin calls. It's worse.](https://preview.redd.it/e2ply48ihyy61.png?width=853&format=png&auto=webp&s=85a103ff44d76ff96bec4f4498d2bf3878cd5bad)](https://preview.redd.it/e2ply48ihyy61.png?width=853&format=png&auto=webp&s=85a103ff44d76ff96bec4f4498d2bf3878cd5bad)
+
+Price of treasury bonds has been trending down
+
+For more juicy cooking recipes with treasury bonds, please refer to the Everything Short by [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/). I'm not saying the Everything Short and this here are the same argument, actually I need to reread it knowing everything I learned today. What I am saying is that treasury bonds are shiny.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Counter DD: NY Fed $400 bln reverse repos is not tied to margin calls. It's worse.](https://preview.redd.it/vb55e9krpyy61.jpg?width=650&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=028788f1a02e5299329a2d00b65f7ea253a5d148)](https://preview.redd.it/vb55e9krpyy61.jpg?width=650&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=028788f1a02e5299329a2d00b65f7ea253a5d148)
+
+And I don't even know what they look like!
+
+Since the value of treasury bonds is trending downward and these financial institutes can borrow treasury bonds from the Fed free of charge via reverse repos, that might explain why so many parties are participating in this reverse repo program and why daily cash deposited at the Fed is ever increasing. Although this mechanism was made by the Fed as a way to withhold money from the market, in effect they are lending out treasury bonds for free.
+
+They have quite the conundrum: the ON RPP rate is zero, which should be no incentive for banks to deposit cash at the Fed daily, yet they do. That means that babysitting treasury bonds is profitable and the ON RPP rate should be negative, which means institutes pays the Fed a fee to borrow those treasury bonds. But the ON RPP rate is also meant to be a lower limit for federal funds rate, which they don't want going negative.
+
+If I understand all of this correctly, the ability to short treasury bonds is like an exploit that makes the reverse repo program ripe for exploitation. Financial institutes can borrow treasury bonds for free, which can be turned into profit with a little creativity, and the Fed can't charge for it because that could unintentionally cause negative interest rates across the economy.
+
+Please let me know your thoughts. I do not have much confidence in this theory, but it's the only one I could come up with to explain things that otherwise don't make sense to me.
+
+Why did the Fed increase the daily limit for any RRP counterparty from 30 billion to 80 billion?
+
+Can the reverse repo program be used as an exploit to borrow treasury bonds for free and then short the bonds using them? If not, why are banks participating in the reverse repo program at 0.00% interest?
+
+Why is the ON RPP rate 0.00%, what's the objective? Does it make sense for the Fed to set it at 0.00% as opposed to negative?
+
+Update: Mostly harmless
+
+I asked for opposing perspectives to my tinfoil hat theory and received several. Please see [u/usefully_useless](https://www.reddit.com/u/usefully_useless/)'s [reply](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nbt1sp/counter_dd_ny_fed_400_bln_reverse_repos_is_not/gy7zdhr/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) for a counter perspective that this is just the money market working as intended. The fact that we're seeing record numbers in reverse repos day by day can be explained by record numbers of excess cash. Incentive to store at the cash at the Fed at 0% is due to the obligation of money market funds to lend (forbidden to hoard). Lending to other financial institutions is currently not as competitive as usual (overnight interest only 0.01% on average), so there are clear reasons to park excess cash at the Fed (low overhead, zero insolvency risk).
+
+On the other side of the equation, [u/jsmar18](https://www.reddit.com/u/jsmar18/) stressed the role of the Fed in their [reply](https://www.reddit.com/user/jsmar18/) and I would like to highlight that although I posed the question 'why would the Fed do x', I meant it as a general inquiry and not an accusation of suspicion. However read his summary of RRP history and Fed goals. Fed actions sus? No, in line with their monetary policy and their hyperfocus on controlling inflation.
+
+[u/HotBoyFF](https://www.reddit.com/u/HotBoyFF/) also remarked with his experience that it's likely not daily short selling, but it could be that the financial institutions desperately need treasury securities for something other, such as reporting reasons. [u/jsmar18](https://www.reddit.com/u/jsmar18/) in their reply also linked some good information on that. Treasuries are certainly used for 'window-dressing' (cooking books legally). I found this study on that subject if anyone is interested: <https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2018/preliminary/paper/KdB9i9QE>
+
+A popular question was: does this align with [u/atobitt](https://www.reddit.com/u/atobitt/)'s [Everything Short](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgucv2/the_everything_short/)? Now that I believe that it's mostly money market funds using the reverse repo program, who cannot directly in a legal way tunnel assets to hedge funds, I think it is more likely that hedge funds would just naked short over exploiting the reverse repo program. The original theory aligned with Everything Short, my updated stance just says: The NY Fed's reverse repo program is probably not an efficient way for hedgies to implement the Everything Short. Here is a little snack that does support the Everything Short, which is [JPow's Q&A from April 27-28](https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcpresconf20210428.htm) time 47:00. "As you know at the beginning of this recent crisis, there was such a demand for selling treasuries, including by foreign central banks, that really the dealers could not handle the volume." Insane demand so the dealers couldn't handle it, could that have included naked short selling? Likely.
+
+But while we should keep an eye on Citadel and any parties trying to short *attack* the US treasuries, I don't believe Citadel is overleveraged in naked shorting US treasuries because retail and whales catching a falling GME was the big surprise to them. In US treasuries, the 52wk high-low (for example TLT: 177 - 136) is much tighter than GME (483 - 3.77) and the market for treasuries is much more resilient. So US treasuries no squeeze potential in case you were considering it (and I know some of you apes did). The ball is still GME.

DD/2021-05-14-Findings-from-605-Data-Analysis-Huge-Short-Position-Opened-in-January-and-Expanded-in-February-and-March.md

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+Findings from my analysis of 605 data: Huge short position opened in January. Expanded in February and March. Has not been closed.
+==================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Bladeace](https://www.reddit.com/user/Bladeace/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nc1h4o/findings_from_my_analysis_of_605_data_huge_short/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+TA;DR: I looked at the 605 data - Citadel's short position is so huge it's distorted the order flow. It's so massive you can see it merely by looking at where the GME orders are being executed. It also shows they haven't closed.
+
+TL;DR: Opening a huge naked short position requires market maker shenanigans. Leaving it unclosed requires further market maker fucketry. Both of these should be reflected in the proportion of GME shares executed at various market centers. I looked, it is. A market maker closing a massive short position should be reflected too. I looked, it isn't.
+
+I have been examining the order execution data for market centers handling GME order executions, read on for my findings. Citadel appears to have taken a *massive* short position in Gamestop in January. It looks like they continued to expand this short position via NASDAQ during February and March. They do not seem to have closed this position.
+
+Opening a massive naked short position in a very short period of time requires abusing market maker privileges. Doing this would result in distorting the order flow. Market centers where the shorting is taking place would see a spike in the proportion of the shares they were executing for the security being shorted. A market maker closing a massive position would cause the opposite. So, if Citadel has opened a huge short position and not closed it we should see evidence of this in the order flow. I looked at the 605 reports and found exactly this.
+
+According to my analysis of the order flow, Citadel has opened a huge short position, very quickly, in January, expanded it since then, and hasn't closed it. Please read the following and come to your own conclusions on the quality of my analysis. This is not financial advice. I am an ape on a large dose of Ritalin.
+
+Important background information on the special privileges of market makers when shorting *(OK TO SKIP)*:
+
+When opening a short position in your capacity as a market maker you do so by covering a buy order with your own capital. So, an order comes in for a security and you cover it, which is a way of saying 'yes, I'll sell that stock at X price' even though you don't already have a seller lined up to sell the share at that price. This is not uncommon, it's definitely not illegal, and it's very helpful to the market. In fact, one of the reasons market makers exist is to sell shares they haven't yet lined up a seller for. This allows the market to flow smoothly as sales can happen quickly. It's expected that the market maker will line up a seller for the share you brought from them very soon afterwards (often within seconds). However, they are not required to do so. Instead of lining up a seller for the purchase you just made from them, the market maker can take on a short position for that share (they are 'short' the share they sold you, so you essentially have an IOU from them).
+
+When shorting in this manner, the market maker gets special privileges under regulation [SHO §§ 242.200 - 242.204](https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/part-242) which allow them to short in cases where others cannot. Regulation [242.203](https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/242.203) allows market makers to be exempt from some restrictions when engaging in market making activities and regulation [242.204](https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/242.204) allows some leniency for failures to deliver when the transaction was for market making purposes. Essentially, the regulations covering short sales provide some leeway for short selling while market making. This is good, in theory, because it keeps the market flowing smoothly.
+
+The SEC explains the importance of market makers shorting [here](https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/regsho.htm) where they explain "market makers must sell a security to a buyer even when there are temporary shortages of that security available in the market". See the SEC link for a further explanation, they do a fair job of explaining it in section II of that link. The key point is that naked short sales by market makers are not an accident, they are a feature of the market.
+
+The MOASS theory *(OK TO SKIP)*:
+
+Citadel has opened a *huge* short position in GameStop and hasn't closed it. The position was large in 2020, but expanded significantly in January of 2021 and continued to expand during February and March (I do not discuss any points after March as my data ends there). This short position is so large that it is multiple times the outstanding shares. Opening such a large short position, so quickly, requires that most of the short positions are naked.
+
+This is the theory I set out to test - has anyone opened a large naked short position during January and then expanded it during February and March?
+
+Order flow data *(OK TO SKIP)*:
+
+[SEC rule 605](https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/34-43590.htm) requires market centers to release data on the orders they execute. This data excludes most retail sales and multiple forms of conditional sales. However, it does include a substantial portion of the volume, enough to give us information on which market center is executing orders for a particular security during a given month. Crucially, for my purposes, it allows us to identify broad trends in the order flow between these market centers. In most cases, this data is not very helpful because it is missing most of the interesting information (for example, it won't distinguish between short and long sales). However, in my case it's perfect because I do not want to rely on any information except the volume - I don't want my findings to rely on Citadel accurately reporting anything else.
+
+It's worth stressing that *rule 605 data excludes most retail orders*. This is important for us because we already know Citadel is handling most GME retail orders. The short position Citadel has, supposedly, opened is so huge that the distortion in order flow caused would extend beyond retail orders, which makes 605 data the perfect place to look.
+
+Order flow data and the MOASS theory *(READ THIS)*:
+
+The MOASS theory isn't just about a short position, it's about a *huge* short position. So huge that it can only have been created by a market maker abusing their naked shorting privileges. This would require them to sell the security they are shorting for a cheaper price than other sellers on the market at a large scale. Accordingly, more of the orders for the security in question would be executed by the market maker doing the shorting.
+
+In most cases the proportion of orders being executed is going to remain fairly stable because the selling pressure is going to be widely dispersed. If a share is being sold for X price at one market center, it'll be sold at a similar enough price at the other market centers too. Sellers will gravitate towards the market center with the best price, so the prices remain almost identical. However, if one of the market center's is driving the selling pressure by selling for a cheaper price than everyone else, the other market centers won't be getting sell orders low enough to compete and they will lose out on the volume. Accordingly, if the number of short positions being opened at a particular market center spiked during January, we should see the proportion of orders being executed at that market center spike too.
+
+The same is true for closing a massive short position. If a market center is buying up a huge amount of shares, there will be a drop in the number of buy orders they execute (because they're buying the shares themselves rather than selling them to others). The market center will also be reaching out to other centers to buy from them, which will raise the proportion of volume to those centers.
+
+So, my prediction is simple: if a market maker is opening a massive amount of naked shorts very quickly, they will have a higher proportion of the order execution volume. Conversely, if a market maker is closing a massive amount of naked shorts very quickly, they will have a lower proportion of the order execution volume.
+
+How the data should look in the three possible cases:
+
+*Hypothesis 1* - Citadel shorted GME a lot in January and then continued to do so through February and March:
+
+1.  The proportion of orders being executed by Citadel will spike in January.
+
+2.  The proportion of orders being executed by Citadel will not go below the baseline in February or March.
+
+3.  The proportion of orders being executed by NADAQ or CBOE will spike in February and March (but probably not at both centers).
+
+4.  The NADAQ or CBOE spike, if it exists, will be accompanied by an anomalous number of their orders being executed outside of their venue (an artifact of an abrupt shift in order flow without adequate preparation by the market maker responsible).
+
+*Hypothesis 2* - Citadel opened a large short position in January and then closed it during February:
+
+1.  The proportion of orders being executed by Citadel will spike in January.
+
+2.  The proportion of orders being executed by Citadel will drop below the baseline in February.
+
+3.  The proportion of orders being executed by the other exchanges will all rise, with Citadel's lost share being shared approximately equally (as it buys up all it can).
+
+*Hypothesis 3* - Citadel opened a large short position in January and then closed it in January or they never opened a large short position at all:
+
+1.  The proportion of orders being executed by Citadel will remain at baseline levels.
+
+Notes on Citadel and NASDAQ/CBOE spikes or drops:
+
+MOASS theory implies that Citadel would have been absolutely hammered in January during the massive influx of buying pressure and the threat of Melvin being forced into closing their position and beginning a squeeze. Accordingly, they would have been drawing all of the order volume to them by shorting all the orders they could to mitigate the upwards price pressure. This would result in the proportion of orders executed at Citadel spiking during January.
+
+MOASS theory implies that Citadel would have been expanding their short position in February and March while also avoiding their delivery obligations for the shorts opened in January. Expanding their short positions and opening new short positions to defer existing short positions can be accomplished by utilising two market centers with Citadel operating as a market maker in both. Essentially, Citadel could use its own market center and its privileges as market maker (for GME) at a second market center to make a market for itself. This would allow it to continue opening short positions while also shuffling existing short positions through the market. This would result in the proportion of orders executed at CBOE or NASDAQ to spike during February and March. I suspect Citadel would use either CBOE or NASDAQ for this because they are a market maker at both. I do not think they would use the NYSE for this as that exchange allows its market makers less latitude (and makes them compete against one another to a greater extent). NASDAQ is the most likely candidate as, prior to 2020, it does not execute many GME orders which allows Citadel a freer reign over any such orders that suddenly begin coming through that center.
+
+MOASS theory implies that Citadel would not have been covering their short position throughout this period. Closing a huge short position would cause a drop in the orders being executed at that center (because the center is buying instead of selling and will buy from other centers too). Accordingly, we should not see Citadel's proportion of order execution drop below the baseline levels.
+
+Proportion of GME shares executed at market centers *(READ THIS)*:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Findings from my analysis of 605 data: Huge short position opened in January. Expanded in February and March. Has not been closed.](https://preview.redd.it/anepludcx0z61.png?width=713&format=png&auto=webp&s=0f8e55d6589f05bc2d9b1968d75e757f07a66c65)](https://preview.redd.it/anepludcx0z61.png?width=713&format=png&auto=webp&s=0f8e55d6589f05bc2d9b1968d75e757f07a66c65)
+
+As you can see, the proportion of shares being executed at Citadel's market center spikes in January, which is consistent with hypothesis 1 and inconsistent with hypothesis 3. The proportion of shares being executed at NASDAQ spikes in February and March which is also consistent with hypothesis 1. There is no drop below baseline in the proportion of shares executed at Citadel's market center, which is inconsistent with hypothesis 2.
+
+The proportion of GME shares being executed by the major market centers, as reported under rule 605 data, is consistent with what we would expect if a market center were opening a huge short position in January and then using their market maker status at a second market center to expand and obscure that short position during February and March.
+
+Related speculation:
+
+Notice the relationship between the drops/spikes in proportion of shares executed at Citadel and NASDAQ. This is consistent with Citadel being the market maker for GME at both. I suspect that the sharp changes in where these orders are being executed reflects Citadel's attempts to open, expand, and manage their short position. The best places for them to do this are their own market center and NASDAQ, which matches the changes in order flow. I am hoping to gain access to historical NASDAQ level 2 data for this period which may show which of their designated market makers is responsible for their GME executions during this time period. Unfortunately I do not have this data yet, but I have reached out to NASDAQ and others who may be able to provide me with this data soon.
+
+Proportion of covered shares executed at alternative venues *(OK TO SKIP):*
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Findings from my analysis of 605 data: Huge short position opened in January. Expanded in February and March. Has not been closed.](https://preview.redd.it/b1pefghhx0z61.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=af51e5492c62c779eb9882f8ebdae69ffb1ea147)](https://preview.redd.it/b1pefghhx0z61.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=af51e5492c62c779eb9882f8ebdae69ffb1ea147)
+
+As you can see, the spike of shares being executed at NASDAQ in February is accompanied by a spike in the proportion of orders being covered by NASDAQ but executed at another venue. This is consistent with hypothesis 1, it may indicate the orders being executed by a market maker abruptly moving their execution of a large number of trades from one center to another.
+
+Related speculation:
+
+This may be related to an attempt by Citadel to market make for themselves and push the price lower. Fighting back the February gamma may also be a factor.
+
+Proportion of shares reported under rule 605 compared to total volume *(OK TO SKIP)*:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Findings from my analysis of 605 data: Huge short position opened in January. Expanded in February and March. Has not been closed.](https://preview.redd.it/k7e578csx0z61.png?width=817&format=png&auto=webp&s=e9ee738f2c85938b38cc1dfccd39d05e662318c0)](https://preview.redd.it/k7e578csx0z61.png?width=817&format=png&auto=webp&s=e9ee738f2c85938b38cc1dfccd39d05e662318c0)
+
+I am using 605 data because I believe it to be the most reliable data we have access to. However, it is possible the 605 data could be misreported. Conveniently, we can check to see whether such misreporting is likely by comparing the number of shares being reported under the 605 data to the overall volume for the same period. If there were a sudden drop in the proportion of the GME volume reported under 605, it suggests there may be a reporting error. As you can see, I found no evidence of such an error. This doesn't mean there wasn't misreporting, but it allows me to continue regarding the 605 data as the most reliable we have access to.
+
+Thank you for reading
+
+Thank you for reading my analysis. As I mentioned above, I have more data coming. I have also reached out to relevant experts who might allow me to expand, clarify, or correct my findings. I will update this post accordingly. There may be a follow up post if I have additional findings worth sharing.
+
+*Please be aware that this is not financial advice and all conclusions I have given are tentative. My findings are limited by my own shortcomings, which are numerous.*

DD/2021-05-17-13F-Filings-Analysis-for-all-Major-Fund-Position-Changes-and-New-Short-Players-in-GME.md

@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+All New 13F filings: data visualised for all major fund position changes and the new short players in GME
+=========================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/broccaaa](https://www.reddit.com/user/broccaaa/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nev6po/all_new_13f_filings_data_visualised_for_all_major/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Edit: I posted this to make the data available to everyone and start discussions around the 13Fs. The reported numbers are a bit meh but I don't see this as being FUD. Despite some funds selling, price has been supported. SI% is still likely 200%+ but can't be seen in 13Fs. Shorts remain fukd.
+
+Edit2: Updated the figures to not use scientific notation for the numbers, now in millions of shares.
+
+Edit3: We now have data for Jane Street with massive increased put positions!! I also updated and improved clarity for all the figures.
+
+This post takes the most recent 13F filings that were finally submitted today and compares them with the previous reported positions. I mostly focus on looking at changes for funds with large short positions (predominantly puts) but also include data in the plots for the long whales.
+
+The new positions should be accurate up until March 31 2021 provided that the funds didn't fudge their filings expecting just a small 'cost of doing business' fine..[.](https://preview.redd.it/jbqrepkbwvz61.png?width=3364&format=png&auto=webp&s=16f28d7a1b11f318a520fb6221434451236ee9fa)
+
+I might have made some errors so let me know in the comments if I missed something.
+
+*Note: some funds have not yet filed their updated 13Fs*. I'll edit the post and figures once these filings become available.
+
+Intro and what we're looking for 'aka' show me the PUTs
+
+Many DD posts have looked into different tricks to create naked shares using options. I previously wrote [a post describing the married put naked short selling trick](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgj0j1/the_naked_shorting_scam_revealed_lending_of/) and [gathered as much data as I could to detect options fuckery in GME in 2021](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvdgf5/the_naked_shorting_scam_in_numbers_ai_detection/).
+
+The biggest evidence for naked short selling fuckery to my mind is the massive increase in open put interest at the end of Jan that coincides with decreases in reported short interest (SI%), FTDs and GME share price.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - All New 13F filings: data visualised for all major fund position changes and the new short players in GME](https://preview.redd.it/jy1dfqamkpz61.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=7dc9264c12190d89d469e4a237ff37376405e3d7)](https://preview.redd.it/jy1dfqamkpz61.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=7dc9264c12190d89d469e4a237ff37376405e3d7)
+
+SI% and FTDs decreased at the end of Jan 2021 as a massive increase on open interest occurred for GME puts. This is suggestive of naked short selling options fuckery.
+
+At the end of march open interest for GME puts was 1.29 Million contracts. This equals the equivalent of 129 Million shares. I checked this in 2 separate sources just to be sure. We should see close to 129 million shares in puts listed in the new 13Fs.
+
+*So who dun goofed and bought all those puts??*
+
+Major holdings for large short/long funds - Mar 31 2021
+
+Here I've selected any firm that has at least 500K shares or 300K worth of shares in put/call options in the new filings. Any fund that has a large short position in PUTs is labelled as potentially short although more digging would be required to confirm for some of the funds.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - All New 13F filings: data visualised for all major fund position changes and the new short players in GME](https://preview.redd.it/e5dkghleqvz61.png?width=5322&format=png&auto=webp&s=d420bb529bdbf39fcd7091c1270acf00a827d471)](https://preview.redd.it/e5dkghleqvz61.png?width=5322&format=png&auto=webp&s=d420bb529bdbf39fcd7091c1270acf00a827d471)
+
+Positions for Funds with large holdings in puts, calls or shares.
+
+A number of the large long position holders have sold their stake in GME over recent months. Blackrock and Vanguard still hold significant positions. On the short side we have a number of the usual suspects plus some new funds with large put positions.
+
+Total shares, put and call positions in recent 13F filings
+
+This is a simple sum of all the shares reported by funds in the last two 13F filings separated out into shares, put or call positions.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - All New 13F filings: data visualised for all major fund position changes and the new short players in GME](https://preview.redd.it/vxo08agjqvz61.png?width=2164&format=png&auto=webp&s=4daee5a1ba94eb1e1221e5eeb77358e437da5aac)](https://preview.redd.it/vxo08agjqvz61.png?width=2164&format=png&auto=webp&s=4daee5a1ba94eb1e1221e5eeb77358e437da5aac)
+
+Total summed positions across all funds in recent 13F filings.
+
+We only see 25 million shares in puts reported fo far in the 13F filings. *Where are the other 100 Million that we know were held due to the open interest on March 31 2021??!?*
+
+Large changes in positions from Dec 31 2020 to March 31 2021
+
+This first plot show the positions for any fund with at least 500k shares or more than 300k shares in puts or calls at either time point.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - All New 13F filings: data visualised for all major fund position changes and the new short players in GME](https://preview.redd.it/jbqrepkbwvz61.png?width=3364&format=png&auto=webp&s=16f28d7a1b11f318a520fb6221434451236ee9fa)](https://preview.redd.it/jbqrepkbwvz61.png?width=3364&format=png&auto=webp&s=16f28d7a1b11f318a520fb6221434451236ee9fa)
+
+13F large fund positions for GME for the last 2 quarters.
+
+We can see that some of the funds with medium to large holdings in GME shares have sold their positions in the last months. The big positions of Blackrock, Vanguard and RC Ventures remain the same. Changes and put/call positions can be seen easily from the lower 2 plots.
+
+Note that Fidelity (*Fmr llc*) probably didn't sell their position. [u/Rehypothecator](https://www.reddit.com/u/Rehypothecator/) pointed out that Fidelity likely still has a vast number of shares but moved them to their mutual funds meaning they are no longer reported in the 13Fs.
+
+The next figure shows all fund positions with a change of at least +/- 300k shares in either shares, puts or calls between time points.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - All New 13F filings: data visualised for all major fund position changes and the new short players in GME](https://preview.redd.it/1s0ps7utqvz61.png?width=4680&format=png&auto=webp&s=8d39021e5a0ecf950a6efac6078d40eeaeab664e)](https://preview.redd.it/1s0ps7utqvz61.png?width=4680&format=png&auto=webp&s=8d39021e5a0ecf950a6efac6078d40eeaeab664e)
+
+Position changes for all funds with a change of at least 300k shares in either of the position types.
+
+Observations from different funds
+
+Short funds
+
+*Citadel advisors llc* Increased their put position by more than 1 million shares this quarter. Less than we might have thought but as you'll see down below they seem to be coordinating with other funds (e.g. *Imc-chicago*). Citadel report selling off all their shares and increasing their put and call holdings.
+
+*Susquehanna international group llp* similar situation to Citadel with more than 1 million new shares in puts, some additional call options and all of the shares they previously owned now sold.
+
+*Melvin capital management lp* were the biggest GME losers in Jan. They reported 6 million shares in puts at the end of Dec 2020 suggesting a massive naked short position. Since then very little has been revealed about Melvin.
+
+Edit: Melvin requested special permission to not disclose some of their positions (from a useful comment below):
+
+> THIS FILING LISTS SECURITIES HOLDINGS REPORTED ON THE FORM 13F FILED ON FEBRUARY 16, 2021, PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND FOR WHICH CERTAIN HOLDINGS WERE VOLUNTARILY WITHDRAWN FROM THE CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST.
+>
+> <https://sec.report/Document/0000905718-21-000618/>
+>
+> Published: 2021-04-28 17:15:15
+
+*Maplelane capital llc* was the second biggest loser to GME in January. They had a massive short position of 2 million shares held in puts at the end of 2020. In their new 13F they report that they sold all of their puts and now have zero exposure to GME.
+
+*Imc-chicago llc* has a newly created options position with a massive 2 million shares in puts, 1 million shares in calls and zero actual GME shares. [*The designated market maker business of Imc-chicago llc is owned by Citadel after it was purchased at the end of 2020*](https://www.citadelsecurities.com/news/citadel-securities-expands-leading-dmm-business/). The change in position for this fund suggests that Citadel is using it as part of the naked shorting scam to hide FTDs and suppress price.
+
+*Wolverine trading llc* has a similar short position as before at the end of 2020 with almost 2 million shares in puts. Given the number of expiry dates with huge numbers of put open interest expiry it is very likely that *Wolverine trading llc* opened up new contracts to maintain their short position. The below quote if from Lucy Komisar:
+
+> In 2004, when new Reg SHO rules were being considered, *Wolverine trading llc* argued that market makers should not be required to cover shorts. It was adopted and known, after its author and prime proponent, as "The Madoff Exception."
+>
+> Later legal cases revealed that *Goldman Sachs* wrote to *Wolverine trading llc* saying, "[W]e will let you fail." We will let you fail violates SEC rules; it's illegal market manipulation. The email was obtained in discovery in 2011 in the Overstock legal case against conspiring broker-dealers. With the fraud impossible to refute, Goldman settled with Overstock for $20 million.
+
+*Goldman sachs group inc* have been involved in multiple naked short selling law suits. Their new 13F filing shows that they sold most of their GME puts and shares but acquired about 30k more shares covered by call contracts.
+
+*Jane street group llc* reports a massive 2.5 million shares in puts increase and 2 million shares in calls increase. Jane street reports that they hold more puts than Citadel.
+
+*Ubs group ag* have cut back from a position of 4 million shares in puts at the end of 2020 down to about 1 million at the end of March 2021. Their position was definitely suspicious before but it seems like they are reducing their exposure to GME quite significantly.
+
+*Citigroup inc* had a large position in GME calls/puts at the end of 2020 but appears to have reduced their GME exposure since.
+
+*TACONIC CAPITAL ADVISORS LP* now owns half a million shares in puts without holding any actual shares. [Senior management at the company have a number of strong ties with Citadel employees](https://relationshipscience.com/person/clay-calhoon-3905596).
+
+*PRELUDE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC* sold all of their 10k GME shares but is now short and owns 1.3 million shares in puts.
+
+*NOMURA HOLDINGS INC*, *BLUEFIN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC* and *CAPTION MANAGEMENT, LLC* have each newly acquired approx. 200k shares in puts and 200k shares in calls. None of these funds have any meaningful amount of real shares. Possible married-put/reverse conversions here.
+
+*GROUP ONE TRADING, L.P.* reduced their put position by approx. 1 million shares but remain short with 2.5 million shares in puts.
+
+*SESSA CAPITAL IM, L.P.* has opened a new 1.8 million share put position. The have no shares or call options.
+
+Long whales
+
+Here I'll just list the funds with with 200k shares or more. DFV whale kinda size or bigger.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - All New 13F filings: data visualised for all major fund position changes and the new short players in GME](https://preview.redd.it/cvg4d183zuz61.png?width=784&format=png&auto=webp&s=b8dadb242fc92b31c897e59666c7829827c267fb)](https://preview.redd.it/cvg4d183zuz61.png?width=784&format=png&auto=webp&s=b8dadb242fc92b31c897e59666c7829827c267fb)
+
+Shares held and change in position for all funds with at least 300k in GME shares on March 31st 2021.
+
+Conclusions
+
+Looking through the 13Fs has been kinda odd. There were 130 Million shares in puts open on March 31st but only 30 Million reported in the 13Fs. Who else could have that many contracts if not the large funds reporting to the SEC?
+
+Aside from that we did see a number of smaller long funds sell their GME stake in early 2021 but some others jumped in. Blockrock maintained their position. Vanguard added another 400k shares. [u/Rehypothecator](https://www.reddit.com/u/Rehypothecator/) pointed out that Fidelity likely still has a vast number of shares but moved them to their [mutual funds meaning they are no longer reported in the 13Fs](https://i.imgur.com/3MaFVXC.jpg).
+
+The number of short funds appears to have increased with some more players entering with big put positions. Melvin requested special confidential treatment for some of their positions to the SEC which could explain why we don't see anything for them. Jane Street bought more than 2.5 million more shares in puts. Prelude and Sessa have bought in with more than 1 million shares in puts a piece. Citadel and Susquehanna have very similar positions to before. However, the Citadel owned *Imc-chicago llc* has a newly created options position with a massive 2 million shares in puts and nothing else.
+
+Definitely some interesting details in these new 13Fs but no obvious smoking gun yet. *What happened to those extra 100 Million shares held in puts??*
+
+Shorts didn't cover in Jan. Apes own the float.

DD/2021-05-20-Go-No-Go-Launch-Checklist-Update.md

@@ -0,0 +1,421 @@
+UPDATE -- Go / No-Go For Launch - The checklist keeping GME on the launchpad.
+=============================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/nothingbuttherainsir](https://www.reddit.com/user/nothingbuttherainsir/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhh0f1/update_go_nogo_for_launch_the_checklist_keeping/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Possible DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Possible%20DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+*TL;DR:*\
+DTCC / OCC / ICC etc. & Wall St want key things in place before GME unwinds, and we're now looking at a list that's been mostly checked off. This rocket is just about cleared for launch.
+
+*Last updated: 2021-06-23* | [Original post from 2021-04-22](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvq6rs/go_nogo_for_launch_the_dtcc_checklist_keeping_gme/)
+
+Go / No-Go For Launch
+
+Opinion - Status: Hold ❌\
+*We're on a scheduled hold. Preliminary system checks are good enough to launch, and now we are being held for atmospheric conditions to be just right.*
+
+*GME ignition needs to appear from the outside to be organic, or it will be fairly obvious to the public that The System is built on lies, and run by liars, completely unfair, and this stock was just being flat out controlled for months. Even if Wall St survives financially by implementing all these rules, if they lose the public trust then it is literally "game stopped." They need plausible cover to launch now, the rest is in place.*
+
+1 - Rules of Engagement ✅
+
+2 - Funding ✅
+
+3 - Cover Story for Timing ❌
+
+4 - Avoiding Perception of Responsibility ✅
+
+--- *End TL;DR* ---
+
+Busy few weeks, eh Apes? Figured I'd give this a brush up and post it again since it was a month ago I posted the original. So here's the refreshed, reviewed, reassessed, reformatted, and return of the Go / No-Go Checklist. Freshness stamp at the top, changes by date at the bottom. Please comment with any additions and corrections as always.
+
+Official notice that this is not financial advice, etc etc. I have no idea if any of this is indeed why these things are happening, or if they are even what I think they are. I bought a handful of shares before DFV's Congressional hearing because something seemed fucky, and that was my first stock purchase EVER. If you make financial decisions off of this speculation, you probably do eat crayons like me. I am literally just some Ape on the internet mashing buttons and you're gonna have to explain to your wife's boyfriend why you took this as advice and then spent your whole allowance already this week.
+
+So this [post](https://reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mu9xed/why_were_still_trading_sideways_and_why_we_havent/) from [u/c-digs](https://www.reddit.com/u/c-digs/) is about as close as anyone has come to my personal theory that there is a literal checklist somewhere that is getting marked off before this is allowed to unravel. The DTCC and Wall St (and probably the SEC) definitely do not want this spring to unwind before they are ready, and certainly not in a way in which they don't feel they are in control. These players are Big Corporate dicks with Big Corporate mindsets, and its my bet that they don't do anything without a plan that at least addresses all eventualities.
+
+However, as it is now probably alarmingly clear to them this isn't just gonna go away on its own (cue Apes waving from the windows of the rocket sitting on the launchpad), the DTCC and pals are now scrambling to get the last things in place before somebody trips over the cord to the shredder at 3am and lands on the launch button.
+
+I think the list goes something like this, but am intending this to be a crowdsourced document because there is no way I can keep this all straight on my own, and the GME Investor community has done so so much great DD already. There is definitely more to add in terms of DTCC / OCC / NSCC / SEC rules, and please comment with additional items & sources and I'll try to keep up with editing them into the list. Compiling it here can possibly help determine just how close GME probably is to liftoff. It feels like we aren't that far from it now.
+
+1 - Rules of Engagement
+
+Opinon - Status: Go for Launch ✅\
+*The System would benefit most if new rules about payments in a member default situation are in effect prior to launch, and as far as we know at this point, all rules to cover that scenario that were filed are now in place. They can use remaining days to shore up a few more monetary rules, but there aren't any disaster-level rules still pending out there. My opinion is at 100% Go for rules being in place.*
+
+Let's cover some basics before getting into each specific rule.
+
+Whose rules cover what:
+
+DTCC stands for Depoisitory Trust and Clearing Corporation which is made up of 3 self-regulating bodies:
+
+-   [DTC](https://www.dtcc.com/about/businesses-and-subsidiaries/dtc) - The Depository Trust Company
+
+-   [NSCC](https://www.dtcc.com/about/businesses-and-subsidiaries/nscc) - National Securities Clearing Corporation
+
+-   [FICC](https://www.dtcc.com/about/businesses-and-subsidiaries/ficc) - Fixed Income Clearing Corporation
+
+and handles:
+
+-   Physical Stock Certificates and ownership records, big institutional trades (DTC)
+
+-   Securities trades, clearing, and settlement for nearly all transactions involving US based marketplaces (NSCC)
+
+-   Government Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities (FICC)
+
+[OCC](https://www.theocc.com/) - Options Clearing Coroporation handles:\
+Options (shocker, I know)
+
+[ICC](https://www.theice.com/clear-credit) - Intercontinental Exchance (ICE) Clear Credit handles:\
+Credit Default Swaps, or CDS for short.
+
+Naming Scheme (yes the whole thing is important)\
+example: SR-DTC-2021-005
+
+-   SR - Type of document filed, SR = Self Regulation
+
+-   DTC - Name of self regulated entity filing it
+
+-   2021 - Year regulation was filed
+
+-   005 - Sequence filed in (5th, so far)
+
+✅ = in effect now\
+❌ = pending review / revision
+
+Rules To Protect The System
+
+Stocks/Securities
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-003: Obligation to Reconcile Activity on a Regular Basis ✅\
+    *The "You're gonna report your risk daily now, you little shits" Rule.*\
+    Filed 2021-03-09\
+    Effective 2021-03-16\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/m793h7/new_dtcc_rule_just_passed_in_effect_immediatly/)
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-004: Amend the Recovery & Wind-down Plan ✅\
+    *The "We'll liquidate your asse(t)s if you default, then make your pals chip in, before we pay a dime ourselves" Rule.*\
+    Also stipulates what the DTCC is willing to cover when reconciling, as in only shares on the books, and why you (yes you Ape) should have a cash account and not a margin account.\
+    Filed 2021-03-29\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgs05i/analysis_of_srdtc2021004_dtcc_changing_the_game/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-005: Modify the DTC Settlement Service Guide and the Form of DTC Pledgee's Agreement ✅\
+    *The "We're tagging the shares you lend out so you can't do it more than once" Rule.*\
+    While this won't help prevent the current GME squeeze scenario, and would likely ignite the engines on its own, this will prevent a *GME-like* scenario from happening again in the future. [u/Leenixus](https://www.reddit.com/user/Leenixus/) has posted lots of info around DTC-2021-005 if you'd like to follow the saga.\
+    Filed 2021-04-01 [archived original](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o2nx3z/i_have_the_original_sec_srdtc2021005_before_it/)\
+    Removed for further review src-1\
+    Refiled 2021-06-15 src-2\
+    Effective Immediately upon re-filing\
+    [src-1](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mpmcyz/good_news_update_on_dtc2021005_according_to_john/), [src-2](https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rule-filings/2021/DTC/SR-DTC-2021-005.pdf)
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-006: Remove the Security Holder Tracking Service ✅\
+    *The "We're dropping the old way of tracking shares, cause it didn't work well, and DTC-2021-005 will do it better" Rule.*\
+    It was speculated in another post that the old system of tracking needed to be removed so there was no conflict in implementing DTC-2021-005 (I can't find that post here on reddit anymore, src needed!). It's likely that this could pave the way for 005 to be implemented. As if 2021-05-20 I am more inclined to think that it was removed to keep anyone from implementing share tracking prior to 005 being implemented. Filed 2021-04-22\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mwhyhw/sec_files_srdtc2021006_removing_the_old_and/) <- also my post
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-007: Update the DTC Corporate Actions Distributions Service Guide ✅\
+    *The "Stop bickering back and forth over the manual adjustments to your peer to peer trade records via the dumb APO method, and just use the GD computer validated Claim Connect system, please" Rule.*\
+    Way to make a super vague title DTC... This is mostly about borrowed shares and updating who pays how much when circumstances - like rates - change. The old system (APO) needed both parties to just agree on the adjustments and one side could only submit an adjustment at a time, so it was rarely agreed upon in one pass and the bad guys could likely stall with many back and forths. To me this reads as a please use this better thing now, because APO will go away on July 9th 2021 so you'll have to use Claim Connect by then anyways. Since the lender is likely incentivized to use the new system, it may get adopted in higher numbers sooner.\
+    Filed 2021-04-30\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    Mandatory 2021-07-09\
+    [src](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/dtc.htm#SR-DTC-2021-007), [Explainer post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n28jes/new_dtc_regulation_posted_srdtc2021007/)
+
+-   SR-DTC-2021-009: Provide Enhanced Clarity for Deadlines and Processing Times ✅\
+    *The "Don't assume we'll be keeping up with our own deadlines just because we have been in the past. We'll do what we want when we want. Also dont cry to us if our choices about deadlines, or someone else's rules about deadlines, kick you in the wallet. We're not chipping in for that." Rule.*\
+    This is basically a re-statement of an ongoing policy by the DTC that their precedent around deadlines/timetables that they themselves have control over should not be misunderstood as a guarantee of them adhering to those same deadlines/timetables in the future. This does not effect deadlines imposed by external regulations though. Further, the DTC stipulates that they are not liable for damages (monetary losses) that are incurred by members from the DTC's choices to act or not act in the same timeframes as they had before, or damages from the actions of anybody else's rules, (SEC, OCC, NSCC, etc).\
+    Filed 2021-06-08\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/dtc/2021/34-92198.pdf), [Explainer post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o1ds30/new_dtc_filing_srdtc2021009_notice_of_filing_and/), [more info](https://reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o63ev5/dtc2021009_implemented_tomorrow_saying_the_dtc/)
+
+-   SR-NSCC-2021-002: Amend the Supplemental Liquidity Deposit Requirements ✅\
+    *The "We'll margin call your ass if your new daily reports say you're overextended and make us feel scared" Rule.*\
+    Works in conjunction with DTC-2021-003. This rule now appears to be clear to be acted on by the SEC. NSCC filed a Partial Ammendment to this on June 17th for clarification.\
+    Possible insight on why this may have been strategically delayed, via [/u/yosaso](https://www.reddit.com/u/yosaso/) src-4\
+    NSCC-2021-801 Gave Advance Notice of this, and as of 2021-05-04 is cleared to be included with NSC-2021-002. src-2\
+    Filed 2021-03-05\
+    Comment Period Extended to 05-31 / Expected action on or before 2021-06-21 src-3\
+    Approved 2021-06-21 with partial ammendment src-4\
+    Effective 2021-06-23 src-5 [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mc0zfn/too_ape_didnt_read_summary_of_srnscc2021801/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf), [src-2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n51u5d/sec_has_no_objections_to_nscc801/), [src-3](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nscc/2021/34-91788.pdf), [src-4](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n67h63/the_reason_why_may_4th_was_important/), [src-4](https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nscc/2021/34-92213.pdf), [src-5](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o4z0jc/implementation_of_the_proposed_changes_to_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
+
+-   SR-NSCC-2021-004: Amend the Recovery & Wind-down Plan ✅\
+    *The "Just so we're clear about stocks specifically, we're really serious about us not paying for your fuckups unless we have to rule" Rule.*\
+    Works in conjunction with DTC-2021-004, but this is specific to securities and was filed first. src-1 This ALSO has language in it about clarifying the mass transfer of customer accounts from a failing member to a stable member. src-2\
+    Filed 2021-03-05\
+    Effective 2021-03-18\
+    [src-1](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mc0zfn/too_ape_didnt_read_summary_of_srnscc2021801/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf), [src-2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvybgf/sec_is_expecting_the_need_for_a_mass_emergency/)
+
+-   NSCC-2021-005: Increase the NSCC's Minimum Required Fund Deposit *pending* ❌\
+    *The "We're gonna up your minimum deposit with us from an hysterically low $10K each, to an almost certainly still not enough $250k each" Rule.*\
+    DTCC has submitted this to SEC, but SEC has not approved / published yet, so details may change. src-1\
+    Filed 2021-04-26\
+    Published: 2021-05-10\
+    Approved: Pending, expected action on or before 2021-06-24 (45 days after publication)\
+    Effective: Approval + 10 days max\
+    [src-1](https://www.dtcc.com/legal), [Explainer post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mz9gl6/nscc2021005_has_been_signed_today_implementation/)
+
+Options
+
+-   SR-OCC-2021-003: Increase Persistent Minimum Skin-In-The-Game / Waterfall ✅\
+    *The "You Market Makers are gonna give us more money now in case you fuck up with options later and owe someone more than you have" Rule.*\
+    This is the rule associated with the SR-OCC-2021-801 advanced notice, and SIG filed an opposition during the review period delaying the implementation. src-1 You can read that whiney rant here via this [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhh0f1/update_go_nogo_for_launch_the_checklist_keeping/gznui8r?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)\
+    OCC-2021-003 is now approved and both should be in effect no later than Tuesday 2021-06-01 10am Eastern (if SEC approval notice counts as the official written notice to OCC members). src-2\
+    Filed 2021-02-10\
+    Approved 2021-05-27\
+    Effective on or before 2021-06-01 10am EST\
+    [src-1](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mm8pnz/update_from_sec_on_srocc2021801_aka_srocc2021203/), [src-2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nmjbov/srocc2021003_approved_that_one_was_needed_for/gzqwqzc?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
+
+Credit Default Swaps
+
+-   SR-ICC-2021-005: Amend the ICC Recovery & Wind-down Plan ✅\
+    *The "Guys, DTC had a pretty good idea, lets also liquidate members first before touching our own cash." Rule.*\
+    Fairly straightforward with this nugget as described by [u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/Criand/):\
+    "Something really cool is they'll not only wipe out members who default on a certain security, they'll wipe out similar positions in that same security of all their other members IF it's high risk/stress to the market."\
+    Filed 2021-03-23\
+    Approved 2021-05-10\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nfl69o/new_icc_rules_summary_they_are_preparing_for/)
+
+-   SR-ICC-2021-007: Update the ICC's Treasury Operations Policies and Procedures ✅\
+    *The "Your capital balance sheet is looking a little shaggy there, we think you need a Collateral Haircut" Rule.*\
+    Tightens up what can and cant be considered as collateral, trimming off the stuff that is not deemed worthy, and reducing overall capital, which means you can handle less total risk and/or volatile CDS contracts.\
+    Filed 2021-03-29\
+    Approved 2021-05-13\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nfl69o/new_icc_rules_summary_they_are_preparing_for/)
+
+-   SR-ICC-2021-008: Update the ICC Risk Management Model Description ✅\
+    *The "We're gonna start using our best guesses on if the collateral for the loans these psuedo-insurance contracts are based on might go crazy in the near future, 'cause shit is getting weird out there" Rule.*\
+    This is about [Credit Default Swaps](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/creditdefaultswap.asp), which are a bit complex. Essentially this rule appears it primarily will help to reduce the chances of say, BofA failing because they agreed to get paid to take on some of the risk of a loan made by say JP Morgan, and then BofA got fucked over just because JP Morgain made the loan using a volatile stock as collateral and then that stock went bananas... a stock which everyone probably knew was volatile but somehow wasn't a big factor in making the agreement before this rule. The rule also limits the ICC maximum total losses/payout, and ups initial margin requirements.\
+    Filed 2021-03-31\
+    Approved 2021-05-18\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nfl69o/new_icc_rules_summary_they_are_preparing_for/)
+
+-   SR-ICC-2021-009: Update the ICC Risk Parameter Setting and Review Policy ✅\
+    *The "We're basing risk on day to day averages now instead of month to month averages" Rule.*\
+    When something strays too far outside of the acceptable baseline, it gets flagged. Now that baseline is automatically calculated day to day, instead of month to month, and manualy reviewed the old way at least monthly. It will result in faster response time to fast moving changes and real risks (safer), but also less shock from too few updates (smoother). All that so they can keep margin levels appropriate. Also cleans up some language to be more generic and descriptive like "Extreme Price Change Scenarios."\
+    Filed 2021-04-02\
+    Approved 2021-05-20\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhdw0f/rick_management_updates_just_went_from_monthly_to/)
+
+-   SR-ICC-2021-014: Update the ICC's Fee Schedules ✅\
+    *The "Huuuuuuuge discounts on swaps! Get 'em while they last!" Rule.*\
+    This cuts fees on CDS contracts about 25%, which sounds like they want to incentivize risk sharing even more. Program is for the 2nd half of 2021, and discounts start June 1st.\
+    Filed 2021-05-07\
+    Approved 2021-05-18\
+    Effective Immediately\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nfl69o/new_icc_rules_summary_they_are_preparing_for/)
+
+Rules to protect the value of the market in general as best as possible
+
+-   SR-OCC-2021-004: Revisions to OCC's Auction Participation Requirements ✅\
+    *The "Everyone can come to the feeding frenzy party when we liquidate one of you idiots" Rule.*\
+    Allows more firms that were traditionally excluded from an auction of this type to now join in, probably making the market wide bleeding end sooner, and retain more value overall.\
+    Filed 2021-03-19\
+    Effective 2021-05-19\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mnpzu5/srocc2021004_why_this_proposed_rule_change_is/)
+
+Non-regulation / Other Announcments
+
+-   Exchange Act Rule 15c3-3 Compliance Letter: Staff Statement on Fully Paid Lending ✅\
+    *The "We're making you keep full collateral on hand for your shit, you've got six months to get it together" letter.*\
+    Letter sent 2020-10-22\
+    Effective 2021-04-22\
+    [src](https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/staff-fully-paid-lending?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery)
+
+-   GOV-1085-21: DTCC / FICC White Paper Announcing WABR added as a Sponsored Member ✅\
+    WABR Cayman Limited is a firm specializing in helping Institutional Sales Traders in times of "thin markets". [u/stellarEVH](https://www.reddit.com/u/stellarEVH/) explains:\
+    *"When a company needs to quickly pay off their debts as in the case of a margin call, it can be challenging for them to gather all the money from their various investments. There are firms in place that are specialized in liquidating their portfolio in a manner to minimize market impact while they pay off their debt."*\
+    Announced 2021-04-23\
+    Effective 2021-04-29\
+    [src](https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/pdf/2021/4/23/GOV1085-21PDF.PDF), via [this post & comments](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/my1hio/friday_the_dtcc_approved_wabra_morgan_stanley/), linked from [It's Just a Bug, Bro Part 6 - Bug Spray Edition](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/myl37p/its_just_a_bug_bro_part_6_bug_spray_edition/)\
+    [Additional info on who WABR is](https://reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mz4oza/the_rabbit_hole_of_wabr_cayman_company_limited/) 👀 *Spidey senses are tingling*\
+    *I love this community*
+
+-   MBS978-21: FICC Notice on MBSD Intraday Mark-to-Market Charge - Timing of Intraday Collection ✅\
+    *We've been lenient for the past year cause shit was wack, but we're going back on that regular hourly assesment for margins.* "Starting on May 3, 2021, the fixed time of 1:00PM will be eliminated and the MBSD Intraday Mark-to-Market Charge will return to an hourly assessment." This combined with other things will tighten the screws.\
+    [/u/stellarEVH](https://www.reddit.com/u/stellarEVH/) bringing that good good again: *"For example, it'll be much harder to short GameStop and/or trade in dark pools when you're expected to cover your margin every hour. For the last year, they've only needed to prove they were covered at 1pm."*\
+    Notice Date 2021-04-21\
+    Effective 2021-05-03\
+    [src post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n3m0qu/the_mandatory_dtcc_common_stock_reallocation_for/), [explainer comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n3m0qu/the_mandatory_dtcc_common_stock_reallocation_for/gwr8n2a?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
+
+-   OCC Notice 48718: TEMPORARY INCREASE TO CLEARING FUND SIZE ✅\
+    *Yeah if you could give us some more of your money for a bit, that would be great.*\
+    Yeah they used all caps, and gave 2 days notice before they would just go into members bank accounts to get that money. Must've needed it bad for the 19th, because it normally is just increased monthly on the 1st. Total increase was $588,378,155.\
+    Notice Date 2021-05-17\
+    Deposit by Date 2021-05-19 [by 9am](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nfz9xa/huge_crypto_dump_currently_things_are_hotting_up/).\
+    [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nftyg4/occ_has_issued_a_statement_to_all_clearing/)
+
+*(please help me fill in other important rules via comments)*
+
+2 - Funding
+
+Opinion - Status: Go for Launch ✅
+
+To pay out for shares of GME
+
+-   [SHF Pulling money from crypt0](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-doge-ethereum-ripple-price-monday-19-april-crypto-latest-081427050.html)
+
+-   SHF Pump and Dump on other stocks
+
+-   SHF Liquidate other Assets Under Management (market-wide dive on 2021-04-22?) [Citadel Sell-off?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n0fwx2/kenny_might_be_in_a_bit_of_a_pickle_right_now/)
+
+-   Wind Down and Recovery Strategies (SR-DTC-2021-004, SR-ICC-2021-005)
+
+-   *(other suggestions w/ sources wanted)*
+
+Secure cash to buy up liquidated assets to prevent total market collapse
+
+-   [Big Banks do a Bond Sales](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mu8a5m/6_out_of_the_7_top_listed_us_banks_have_made/), [Citigroup: "Me Too!"](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mzvcli/citigroup_borrowing_55_billion_in_latest_bank/)
+
+    -   Need plausible reasons for making those sales such as earnings report, or LIBOR to SOFR switch, or *insert wildcard like $50 Bil Football League*, etc ...
+
+-   Banks Re-Structuring / Netting [src](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mur8bz/srdtc2021004_the_dtcc_and_jp_morgan_theyre/)
+
+-   [Wells Fargo to liquidate two of its trusts](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nh5ed7/wells_fargo_to_liquidate_two_of_its_trusts/)
+
+-   Rule SR-OCC-2021-004 allowing more players at the auction of the defaulting member's assets.
+
+3 - Cover for Timing of Launch
+
+Opinion - Status: No-Go for Launch ❌\
+*This will likely be the very last one, and we'll only know what they will use as an excuse once it's started. I think all the other pieces would need to be in place* (Narrator: They are.) *for them to feel most confident to light the fuse. This will be more oportunistic in nature, I think.*
+
+I'm splitting this into 2 objectives: why GME is going up, and why the market in general is tanking.
+
+GME Go BRRRRRRRRRRRR! Cover
+
+Ideally a plausible Corporate or Market Event that the stock price "should" respond to in order to initiate upward price movement without the timing looking SUS AF and destabilizing the broader market due to fear of systemic problems and/or loss of public trust. These events are mostly out of the control of The System, and one will likely be the ignition.
+
+-   Corporate: ~~AGM Voting Proxy Release~~
+
+-   Corporate: ~~Quarterly Earnings (Q1 2021)~~
+
+-   Corporate: ~~CEO Announced~~
+
+-   Corporate: ~~AGM Vote Count + Board Elections~~
+
+-   Corporate: ~~RC Appointed as Chairman Official News~~
+
+-   Corporate: ~~New Cash Reserves from ATM Stock Offer~~
+
+-   Corporate: Dividend Issue / Stock Split
+
+-   Corporate: Major Partner Announcement
+
+-   Corporate: Possible NFT Announcement 2021-07-14?
+
+-   Market: Broader Retail Gains
+
+-   Market: $GME moves from Russell 2000 to Russell 1000 after close on 2021-06-25
+
+-   TBD / Unkown
+
+Markets Go clank! Cover
+
+Major policy announcements, world politics, regularly scheduled economic reports released... Pick your favorite here, cause they will and already have. This cover will justify why the markets are hemorhaging to hide the fact that positions are being liquidated to start paying for buying-back all those GME shares.
+
+-   Market: Global Supply Chain Issue
+
+-   Market: Liquidity Stress Tests
+
+    -   [April 26th, 2021](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mww2ah/dtcc_planning_liquidity_risk_testing_on_26th/)
+
+    -   [May 13th, 2021](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n763vq/dtcc_members_are_having_a_liquidity_check_may_13th/)
+
+    -   Note: As far as I can tell, these happened yearly, typically in April/May, but only once... 2 back to back?
+
+-   Government: ~[POTUS joint address to Congress](https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-nancy-pelosi-coronavirus-pandemic-267e753a5d1ab7a72d3274728b25f63c)\
+    Green New Deal? Capital Gains Announcement: [similar to BS on 2021-04-22?](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-22/biden-to-propose-capital-gains-tax-as-high-as-43-4-for-wealthy)
+
+-   Government: [2021-05-06 Congressional Hearing with SEC / Gensler, DTCC / Bodson, FINRA / Cook.](https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=407762)
+
+-   Government: [2021-05-26+27 Congressional Hearing with Big Banks](https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=407740)
+
+-   Government: Monthly [Consumer Price Index numbers released](https://www.bls.gov/schedule/news_release/cpi.htm), next is June 13th
+
+-   Government: [US Treasury Stability Council Meeting June 11th](https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-treasury-stability-idUSL2N2N638S)\
+    Possible platform for policy announcement? Typically hold 6 +/- a year, but this would be first of 2021 and was postponed from May 21st.
+
+-   Government: [US 2022 Fiscal Year Budget Proposal](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-propose-6-trillion-us-budget-2022-fiscal-year-nyt-2021-05-27/)
+
+-   *(other suggestions wanted)*
+
+4 - Fallguy, and the Lack of Prevention
+
+Opinion - Status: Go for Launch ✅\
+*While they will likely have a fallguy decided upon prior to launch, I don't see it as a necessity that would delay it, certainly not like the Rules of Engagement or Funding would. I also think that nothing would keep them from changing the story if something else influences the narrative in an acceptable way shortly after liftoff.*
+
+Blame!
+
+After the market pain is significant enough that the public wants answers, why not lay all the blame on bad actors, and defer attention from the system to try to avoid additional exterior regulation.
+
+-   SHFs (now liquidated) as overly greedy and got what they deserved
+
+-   Retail (as Anarchists, or greedy and oportunistic)
+
+    -   [Forbes article on January Gamma Squeeze](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvf7r3/forbes_reminder_as_we_hodl_towards_the_moass_gme/gvc5c8f/?context=3)
+
+-   Foreign Actors trying to destabilize the US Markets
+
+-   *(other suggestions w/ sources wanted)*
+
+Control Public Image of the System via PR
+
+-   DTCC: ["We're doing a great job! Take our word for it!"](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvozps/dtcc_trying_to_get_ahead_of_the_story_the_most/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
+
+-   DTCC: "We're announcing our plan to keep working on a plan to kind of band-aid a problem that's pretty bad and we've known about for awhile, and like we have definitely been talking about it and stuff, but now we're like really gonna talk about it using words like "in-depth analysis" cause up to now we were mostly just talking about it like how you tell that one friend *"yeah, we should totally hang out soon"* and then you never do, but not now cause we're serious now, and it's definitely not because we've gotta talk to the US Congress this week or anything. Like, honestly." AKA the announcement of [the DTCC's T+1 Settlement Plan.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n5b91j/dtcc_rolls_out_plan_and_faq_for_a_new_t1/)
+
+* * * * *
+
+...Meanwhile, at the SEC
+
+"Let's at least *look* like we aren't asleep at the wheel here, lads"
+
+-   [Whistleblower Awards](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mrfxvg/secgov_sec_awards_over_50_million_to_joint/)
+
+    -   [47.4% of the Amount of all SEC Whistleblower Awards Ever Given Have Been Awarded in the Last 12 Months (Out of 105 Months of Program Activity)](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nf3n64/474_of_the_amount_of_all_sec_whistleblower_awards/)
+
+-   [Closed door meetings](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mihiv9/another_sec_closed_door_meeting_scheduled_for_48/)
+
+-   [2021-05-27 Sunshine Act Meeting - Scheduled](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhgh3i/sunshine_meeting_rescheduled_may_27/)
+
+    -   These have been cancelled 4 out of 7 times... so far!
+
+-   Speech by SEC Commissioner Peirce inlcuding the line that the SEC is *"working on a report about the events related to meme stock trading earlier this year, and some regulatory initiatives may come out of that work."* and a few other statements about how the SEC shouldn't be concerned with firms loosing money... aka Tough Titties Archegos, et al.\
+    [src post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n2ax63/something_apes_missed_read_this/)
+
+-   [SEC sues HF, filed 5/19/21- states NAKED SHORT SELLING is ILLEGAL and ask FOR a JULY TRIAL!!!](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/nhmaxw/sec_sues_hf_filed_51921_states_naked_short/)
+
+Any and all additions you think may belong on this list, feel free to put in the comments, and I'll try to update and give credit where possible. If I got any of these wrong, or you've found better links that explain the rules, let me know in the comments and I'll make those edits.
+
+Contributions noted where possible, and initial start from previous work on Recent Filings by [/u/Antioch_Orontes](https://www.reddit.com/u/Antioch_Orontes/) [here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/msh5mt/a_brief_overview_of_recent_filings_from_the_dtc/)
+
+Looking for the TL;DR? It's at the top.
+
+* * * * *
+
+Buy. Hodl. Buckle Up.
+
+... and make history.
+
+🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
+
+Edit 2021-05-22:\
+Typos, add expected effective timeframe for DTC-2021-005. May 27th SEC Meeting Scheduled. SEC Lawsuit. Restructured the 3rd/Cover section to clarify for some comments and feedback about why I think cover is important. Also by now I've got plenty of reddit points/currency, so spend new money on GME!
+
+Edit 2021-05-28:\
+SR-OCC-2021-003 approved. Add CPI release as market drop cover, US Treasury meeting, US Budget Proposal.
+
+Edit 2021-06-21:\
+SR-DTC-005 approved and in effect, SR-NSCC-2021-002 / 801 approved. SR-DTC-2021-009 added. Updated expected timeline for SR-NSCC-2021-005
+
+Edit 2021-06-23:\
+SR-DTC-2021-009 updated with additional info. Added move to Russell 1000 as possible cover story (thanks [u/godkyle11](https://reddit.com/user/godkyle11/) for the prompt). Updated section 3 to better illustrate corporate events now in the past.

DD/2021-05-21-Hank-Returns-from-the-Dead-and-Takes-a-Dump.md

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump
+===========================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/HomeDepotHank69](https://www.reddit.com/user/HomeDepotHank69/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nhs1wy/hank_returns_from_the_dead_and_takes_a_dump/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+********* I am not a financial advisor, this is not financial advice **********
+
+Good morning apes, I'm back.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/zab5b8c2oe071.png?width=648&format=png&auto=webp&s=d180afc080ba02d1d170f5b2344372b9ccaadbdc)](https://preview.redd.it/zab5b8c2oe071.png?width=648&format=png&auto=webp&s=d180afc080ba02d1d170f5b2344372b9ccaadbdc)
+
+BEFORE YOU SAY IT: Ik this technically makes me Kenny's son; however, as per the laws of nature, a human cannot birth a retarded ape.
+
+Boy is it good to be back, apes. I've missed you all. I've been gone for a while but have not left the cause. I've been lurking in the shadows, jacking off to DD, and huffing WD40. When I was just a child (a boy in Bulgaria), my father said he was going to the store to get cigarettes... I think he's still there, must've been a long line for those Marlboros. Well apes, unlike my dad, I am returning to you.
+
+Seriously though, thanks for all the messages and comments asking where I was. I fucking love this community. This has been an extremely busy week for me so I was not able to post any updates. My schedule is still pretty busy but it seems that the worst part is over, so I will hopefully be back more regularly to feed you that sweet confirmation bias. As many of you know, I have posted a few meme dumps. Well apes, today I will be taking another dump... A FUCKING DD DUMP (very sexual). So, this post will not be like the usual ones where it has one long theory, instead, it's gonna be a few theories and ideas.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/o15bfun4be071.png?width=922&format=png&auto=webp&s=ee145f5b13d10dd67ac639b287283af7fc49079c)](https://preview.redd.it/o15bfun4be071.png?width=922&format=png&auto=webp&s=ee145f5b13d10dd67ac639b287283af7fc49079c)
+
+Covid-19, Jerome Powell, and January Squeezes
+
+I think that everyone (us and Wallstreet included) has kind of brushed off just how crazy the end of January was. Five stocks squeezed to over double in value... all in the same week (BB, KOSS, EXPR, NOK, AMC)... oh yeah and this one stock had a mega-boner-super-asstastic-squeeze (GME). Short squeezes of those magnitudes are rare. But all of these stocks simultaneously squeezing is not weird... it's unprecedented. For a squeeze to happen, a stock must be heavily shorted and a rapid price movement must cause the shorts to be squeezed out of their positions, which adds more buying pressure. So you're telling me that all of these smaller, struggling companies had insanely high short interest and were squeezed at the same time and are not related? Yeah, I don't buy it. Below I will explain why.
+
+Major short squeezes happen every few years. Little short squeezes may happen every so often, but the big ones happen very rarely. Why are they rare? Shorting is at the core of many HF strategies. It can be extremely profitable. When a fund decides to go short what do they do? They always announce it on CNBC, make a report, stir up news, and hope that others go in with them (they usually do). They only short companies that are overextended or are on the brink of bankruptcy, so it's usually a pretty sure thing. But sometimes, they're wrong. Sometimes they're wrong BIG.
+
+Why do some of these monster squeezes happen? They usually happen because HFs overly short a stock and get hit by some bombshell news piece that squeezes them out of their position. Again, this does not happen often. Remember, HFs are run by very smart people with extensive resources and experience. When they make a bet, it's usually pretty well thought out.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/br3vblz3le071.png?width=828&format=png&auto=webp&s=69291c102a2e1a485be8f83c7297d484bd5da18f)](https://preview.redd.it/br3vblz3le071.png?width=828&format=png&auto=webp&s=69291c102a2e1a485be8f83c7297d484bd5da18f)
+
+Enter Covid-19. Covid essentially opened the flood gates to shorting. Why? Because Covid promised to shut down the in-person economy for at least a year and promised to obliterate the stock market. Covid-19 created a unique financial situation. Obviously, it led to mass unemployment and a crushed stock market, but what was strange about Covid was that it crushed an extremely strong economy by prolonging and increasing unemployment and decreasing business activity without an actual economic disaster (i.e. most recessions happen because of a system or economic problem, this happened because of a virus, not a systemic economic problem). So, the general idea was that the economy, though strong, would be extremely slow for at least a year because of covid. What a perfect storm? The economy is in ruins, struggling brick and mortars will likely go bankrupt, you won't make any money going long on stocks because the market will be bad, we won't get a vaccine for at least a year, and the general economy will suck (these were their assumptions). So what did they do? They shorted.... a lot. Here is a chart of the volume and short volume of SPY:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/kv85w7ns0h071.png?width=1214&format=png&auto=webp&s=d4338a41854ee42b8c9e6c98cd3fb32b0ee1eab7)](https://preview.redd.it/kv85w7ns0h071.png?width=1214&format=png&auto=webp&s=d4338a41854ee42b8c9e6c98cd3fb32b0ee1eab7)
+
+Obviously, this does not give a full picture of the market, but it gives the general picture that shorting increased dramatically during the covid crash. So yeah, they shorted. They shorted a lot, and it makes sense, it was rational. Remember when I said that certain struggling companies would be pushed to the brink of bankruptcy? Wow, another great shorting opportunity. So, they shorted BB, KOSS, EXPR, NOK, AMC, and GME extensively because of the premise that the economy would be shit for a while and that already struggling companies would go bankrupt (especially ones relying on in-person sales). How could you not profit on that? It's a slam dunk, right? RIGHT?
+
+Well, they got two premises wrong. First, the vaccine came out way quicker than anyone expected. Second:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/gs1iomezxd071.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=c29f5f22da63d376f0fe408282355e9ac6587187)](https://preview.redd.it/gs1iomezxd071.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=c29f5f22da63d376f0fe408282355e9ac6587187)
+
+JPow turned on the money machines an unprecedented amount:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/gqaopf35yd071.png?width=676&format=png&auto=webp&s=a5bd411020e4e236e73548fde85908a028ab6cb6)](https://preview.redd.it/gqaopf35yd071.png?width=676&format=png&auto=webp&s=a5bd411020e4e236e73548fde85908a028ab6cb6)
+
+Now one saw that coming. I mean people don't take the time to realize that the market is literally $100 higher now than it was precovid and we haven't even fully reopened. No one could've predicted that.
+
+So they were wrong - the market recovered WAYYYY quicker. What were the consequences of that? Well, basically every single stock rose significantly and must faster than expected and the market made a full 180. Now obviously, they weren't short on everything in the market and still made tons of money on the 180 turn. However, I think that they over shorted the previously mentioned stocks because they thought they could hit the bankruptcy jackpot, which is why they all squoze together.
+
+BUT, they wrong the worst with GME and that's why it squoze the most. Out of all the stocks, GME had the most positive news in 2020. On top of that, because of GME's debt and financials, they shorted it the most (we all know the famous 138%). That's why GME squoze the most, it's because the best things happened to the most shorted stock. That's why we're in this situation now.
+
+Finally, I want to reemphasize how weird this all is. Please tell me how it is normal that 6 stocks, all formerly on the verge of bankruptcy traded in nearly identical patterns for the past year. Seriously look it up for yourself. They all squeeze at the end of January, shoot back up on February 24th, have a huge rise and fall on March 10th and are all trading significantly above their book value. HOW THE FUCK CAN YOU DENY THAT NOTHING IS GOING ON HERE? Do you really think that all of these stocks would trade in identical patterns like this? Yes, stocks trade in similar patterns all the time, but those are usually stocks that follow the SPX in an upward trend. I challenge you to find stocks that trade in such an obscure pattern so identically close to each other as these do. Seriously, does it make any sense that GME is trading at 5x what analysts say it should be? Same for AMC. It makes even less sense that all 6 of these stocks trade in an identical obscure pattern.
+
+So why does that matter?
+
+IMO, this observation highlights an absolutely terrifying market situation. We all know that naked/abusive shorting has been around for a while. However, it appears that because of low-interest rates and an ease of restrictions, it probably increased more during covid. There has been great reporting in this sub about the repo market, which demonstrates liquidity issues (for wrinkle brains, liquidity issues happen when you've borrowed too much and/or don't have many liquid assets (cash) and is how literally every financial crisis happens because overleveraging creates a house of cards that eventually crashes). Liquidity issues are insanely dangerous in today's market conditions. The FED has been aggressively pursuing quantitative easing (QE) policies where it buys bonds and other assets to help stabilize prices. This helps to push up the economy, along with low-interest rates. Well, when there's a liquidity crisis, the FED literally cannot purchase the bonds and could lose control of the economy. What could be even worse is if we see inflation happen. We are already seeing it happen but according to JPow iTs tRaNsiToRy... yeah I bet that ages well. If inflation happens, then the FED will probably have to raise rates to slow down the economy, which will also hurt the market.
+
+This terrifies me because it means that institutions are overleveraged because of the easy money interest rates and we are nearing a liquidity crisis AND inflation could force the fed to hike rates. What happens when all of these things meet? The house of cards falls. So, let's say that there's an economic downturn (not a collapse, not a recession, not a depression, but a significant correction). That will lead to margin calls. If you get margin called and you have a significant short stake in, oh I don't know, a formerly struggling brick and mortar gaming retailer that just so happened to tongue punch the fart box of the entire market, that makes you........ FUCKED. Now let me make this clear, we should not be praying on the economy to collapse, that's idiotic. A collapsing economy means people lose their jobs, pensions, and people die. However, we need to be cognizant that we may have found a way to profit off of an impending correction.
+
+GME and SPY
+
+My DDs have also been laced with comparisons of SPY, VIX, and GME. As we know, GME has a negative beta so it is usually inversely proportional to SPY, which is extremely abnormal. GME seems to be directly proportional to the VIX. The VIX spikes during market volatility, which usually comes with margin calls. You put the rest together.
+
+However, I found something very, very interesting. According to my chart, it seems that GME is consolidating to earnings and the annual meeting. Obviously, this could be broken at any time or I could be completely wrong. It could also do what I said it's doing in my last DD and just keep forming new consolidations. Here's what I drew for GME:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/r0wws7b78e071.png?width=1882&format=png&auto=webp&s=880c42035e34628a43a14f1d18c000f50b2a1585)](https://preview.redd.it/r0wws7b78e071.png?width=1882&format=png&auto=webp&s=880c42035e34628a43a14f1d18c000f50b2a1585)
+
+It seems that they line up right around the blue question mark, which is earnings. The annual meeting is the very next day 6/9 (lmao nice). For those of you who just popped a quarter chub because you saw the yellow lines, yes those are my FTD cycle lines. The next one is sometime next week. Refer to [u/criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/criand/)'s DD because I am crowning him FTDaddy.
+
+It would make sense for GME to consolidate up to this point. Last earnings we saw a big move (not in our fucking favor though). This earnings, however, comes before the meeting, which is significant. As many of you have pointed out, this meeting could expose the massive number of synthetic shares through voting numbers. I have also noticed that there has been absolutely no news relating to GME for the past few weeks, which is very strange considering the barrage we've been getting the last few months. Could this mean they are saving something(s) up for the annual meeting? This is all speculation but it would make sense to me.
+
+So, remember that date, 6/9 (lmao)? Well, look at SPY:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/33ede0v39e071.png?width=1818&format=png&auto=webp&s=6d2564167f462ae8cdbb28ed41328d569b0936a9)](https://preview.redd.it/33ede0v39e071.png?width=1818&format=png&auto=webp&s=6d2564167f462ae8cdbb28ed41328d569b0936a9)
+
+I call the red line the death line because it's where I call BS on this absolutely crazy pricing based on historical pricing TA (this is a week chart btw). See that apex, guess what day it converges? 6/9. Coincidence? Yeah probably. Something to give you hope and help you sleep at night? Of course. Just to give you a little more confirmation bias, check out RIS (again one week chart), last time we were this oversold, the market literally died. Considering what I said above about liquidity, we could be seeing some major, major shit happen soon. AGAIN, this is just absolute speculation and conjecture and is probably not related...
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/xxrtd1os9e071.jpg?width=1804&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c50f0c0d9652d570b14bb3bbc6414fde12a073d1)](https://preview.redd.it/xxrtd1os9e071.jpg?width=1804&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c50f0c0d9652d570b14bb3bbc6414fde12a073d1)
+
+The point of this is that SPY cannot keep these prices up forever especially considering the likelihood of inflation, the possible liquidity crisis, and the overleveraging we are seeing. GME, moreover, should not be behaving like it is without something fucky going on underneath. Something's gonna give soon, apes.
+
+The Fucking midday volume spikes
+
+The stuff above was mostly my theories and opinions, this is probably the best actual new DD that I have in this post. I have said in many of my DDs that there are these random midday positive volume spikes. I always noticed them, as I'm sure many of you have, but never took the time to document them or to do anything with them, until now. Below is a table of these spikes from the past few weeks:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/pxhieq516e071.png?width=1284&format=png&auto=webp&s=e40f6d81c2f5761ca021f1f6721e595ee81030ad)](https://preview.redd.it/pxhieq516e071.png?width=1284&format=png&auto=webp&s=e40f6d81c2f5761ca021f1f6721e595ee81030ad)
+
+EDIT: This is what the volume spikes look like (don't mind the blue and yellow lines, just look at that giant green dildo in the middle of the day:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/cfqnjxjr5h071.png?width=850&format=png&auto=webp&s=60194d4a42674e06cdeceaff0f3f110d69942e12)](https://preview.redd.it/cfqnjxjr5h071.png?width=850&format=png&auto=webp&s=60194d4a42674e06cdeceaff0f3f110d69942e12)
+
+The commonalities in all of these are: they are positive volume (i.e. price goes higher), they are the highest candle in their given day BY A MILE, they happen between 11 am-2 pm, they happen on absolutely no news. This is only from a few trading days, so it is by no means exhaustive. However, I went through and looked and this has been happening for a very long time now and it is consistent and common. Seriously check it out for yourself. Go on a 1-minute time frame on any given week and you'll find at least one of these random spikes. I also looked at AMC... same exact thing happens with that stock (goes back to my theory about them being related). So what does this mean? Quite honestly I have no clue. It's strange that it happens in the same time period, is the highest volume in the day, and is positive. Could it be a short covering? That's what I'm guessing. However, I need more data to make that conclusion. My next DD will probably be about uncovering more to this. Note that I did not cherry-pick the above data, this is just the most recent data from the past few weeks, this trend is extremely persistent and I intend to look into it more and invite other apes to do the same. IMO, this probably has something to do with a smaller time frame FTD cycle because of how common and persistent it is. So, expect my next DD to be something about this. Sorry I couldn't do a full DD on this right now, again don't have the time currently, so this is just a little cock tease, but expect something about this in the future.
+
+With that in mind, just wanna give a shoutout to [u/criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/criand/) for being an absolute god. This guy pumps out DD I like I pump out turds after Chipotle. His recent DD on the FTD cycle is the best FTD cycle DD on this sub by far and he basically cracked the FTD cycle code.
+
+Closing Thots
+
+Apes, I'll say it again, none of what is happening with GME is normal. I could make a laundry list of the abnormalities - the price being 5x analyst predictions but not budging, OTC trading, random volume spikes, FTD cycle, difficulty to borrow, relatedness to other shorted stocks, consolidation patterns, gigantic drops, etc. etc. etc. The point is, something's going on and something's gotta give. What do all of these abnormalities make me?
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Hank returns from the dead and takes a dump](https://preview.redd.it/6adccfbabe071.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=f17c0be2c20907e258334ba516103fadfb4fc868)](https://preview.redd.it/6adccfbabe071.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=f17c0be2c20907e258334ba516103fadfb4fc868)
+
+HARDER THAN EVER
+
+Thanks again for understanding why I was gone for a little bit, I really appreciate it. Idk when I'll be coming back because the next few weeks are not super predictable for me and could be busy... but I will be here... watching.... reading.... jacking off. As always, stay strong apes.
+
+TL;DR
+
+Hank is back. Thanks for your patience. Look closer at the January squeeze. Group of stocks moving in unison. Not a coincidence. Covid created perfect storm for all of this. Economy could correct/crash. Inflation/leveraging/liquidity bad. SPY too big. GME might benefit from this. Midday volume spikes exist. I am curious. I will investigate more. I have a half chub.
+
+********* I am not a financial advisor, this is not financial advice **********

DD/2021-05-25-Here-is-What-Will-Happen-After-the-Reverse-Repo-Limit-Reaches-Its-Maxiumum.md

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+Here's what will happen after the Reverse Repo Limit Reaches Its Maximum (Spoilers: Very much NOT good for Citadel and friends)
+
+===============================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/AcedVector](https://www.reddit.com/user/AcedVector/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nkgqje/heres_what_will_happen_after_the_reverse_repo/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+I recently saw a post from [r/DDIntoGME](https://www.reddit.com/r/DDIntoGME/) which had said that essentially, if the overnight reverse repo lending that's been going on keeps going in the same pattern it has been, it is going to start reaching its "maximum" amount of lending(500 BIllion) around Friday.
+
+I wanted to piggyback off of that post because it brought to my mind the question, "What would genuinely happen once it reached its maximum? Would the whole system go kaboom?" Well, to answer that question, let's try to understand the context here a bit first.
+
+In these reverse repo agreements, the FED is selling bonds to banks (which are presumably lent to HFs) which takes AWAY liquidity(cash money) from the market as the banks are paying cash for the bonds. This isn't necessarily a bad thing given the amount of liquidity that was added TO the market from stimulus checks and overall money supply being at all time highs.
+
+EDIT: Clarified on the liquidity part as it wasn't as clear
+
+What's causing the proverbial wrench in the gears here are that these hedgies are overleverged to the tits from not only shorting the treasuries bond market, but also having shit for mortgage backed securities in the housing market, and naked shorting a whole bunch of other stocks with unlimited leverage, with the pure intention of driving multiple companies to bankruptcy.
+
+Here's where it gets really bad: these banks and hedgefunds absolutely NEED these bonds as collateral because they have overleveraged so hard there aren't enough bonds to go around, most likely multiple times over; the FED is in possession of a lot of these bonds so by temporarily allowing banks to come into possession of them they can kick the can down the road, but what happens when the maximum amount of lending is reached?
+
+Let's walk through the process:
+
+1\.  As time goes on, theoretically either more counterparties would need bonds as collateral or the existing counterparties would need MORE bonds to post as collateral to keep kicking the can down the road and prevent being margin called.
+
+2\.  Someone gets margin called as they can't post enough collateral (theoretically bonds lent by the FED), causing a cascade of margin calls across the bonds market leading to a short squeeze of treasury bonds from liquidation.
+
+3\.  The liquidation of various securities (such as stock postions) coupled with the spike in treasuries bond price would lead to a stock market crash, leading to even MORE margin calls from overleveraged short positions(some even within the same firms that got margin called before, this is probably where Citadel would be in this scenario as they shorted both the treasury bonds market and meme stocks)
+
+4\.  Short squeeze of all meme stocks from forced liquidation as the tendieman cometh.
+
+(This part is edited as of edit 3) How soon would this be able to happen? Well, this still remains more of a theoretical unfortunately. Since after some kind redditors corrected me and I found out the 500 billion limit was for repo agreements only and that the reverse repo agreement is limited to 80 billion per counterparty (as of right now there is an estimated 7.2 billion per counterparty, read edit 3 to see why), it would seem there's a while before it gets to that point, IF it gets to that point. I doubt the FED would accept lending 80 billion per counterparty (there's 54 counterparties as of the most current agreement), so in my opinion I feel like the only way we see this happen is if someone gets margin called, or the FED stops accepting to lend as many bonds to counterparties. The more likely option, believe it or not is that someone (maybe a certain hedgie Citadel 😉) gets margin called. The FED doesn't really have enough of a reason to say "hey you look fucked and giving you bonds doesn't look like it'll help", so that would leave the margin call option. Given the other catalysts Citadel and co have to watch out for in the near future (T + 21 today, gamestop earnings, the shareholder meetings, how fucked they are in the housing market, the list goes on), I wouldn't be surprised if we see a margin call happen soon that would trip some wires in the bonds market and cause a short squeeze that leads to the MOASS.
+
+Hope this jumbled mess made some sense to you all, as I'm writing this now its about midnight so I wouldn't be surprised if I happened to make a couple of mistakes when writing this out. If anything, I'll hang out in the comments and make some edits along the way. :)
+
+Edit: people were asking about the source post I pulled the limit from so I've linked it below. Give that OP some love!
+
+Edit 2: I've seen some questions asking if cash can just be used as collateral instead for treasury bonds. Now, this may be wrong so take this answer with a grain of salt, but as far as I understand, you need treasury bonds as collateral to prevent being margin called from shorting treasury bonds. These are government bonds, which people have invested in with the idea that their money is safe and sound. If at any point they need to take money out of, say a 10 year bond, but all of a sudden the bond disappeared, thats ALL of their money gone.. and I doubt the US wants THAT to happen because of what it means for the US economy.
+
+Edit 3(Edited once again): There's some talk about the 500 billion cap being for repo agreements only and not reverse repo agreements, after researching more and some friendly redditors correcting me in the comments about it I saw that it seems like this is the case as the reverse repo cap had been virtually removed in 2013. The only type of cap I see is that there is a maximum of 80 billion per counterparty when it comes to reverse repo overnight agreements. Given there are currently 54 counterparties as of the latest agreement of 394 billion, there's an average of 7.2 billion per counterparty as of right now. However, I genuinely doubt the FED would accept lending 54 counterparties 80 BILLION each. That would be over 4 trillion used daily in bonds lent out. A margin call by other means would be more likely to happen in my opinion.
+
+Edit 4: I've seen a lot of questions asking if the FED would just raise the limit to try to kick the can down the road, and I don't think they would do that for a couple of reasons. The first is that I presume they have the foresight (unlike the greedy hedgefunds) to see that many people's finances are being put at risk so they would rather have this end sooner than later. That, and they stand to gain a lot from squeezing hedgefunds and liquidating. The main argument that comes to my mind is that when the MOASS happens and everyone gets their tendies they are going to be able to get some nice tax money off of that (a lot of rich people hide their wealth in offshore accounts so they don't have to pay as many taxes, so its good for some of this money to be in the hands of retail).
+
+Source post I got the upper limit from:
+
+<https://www.reddit.com/r/DDintoGME/comments/nk9979/reverse_repo_overnight_lending_will_hit_the_upper/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share>
+
+FED links about the reverse repo/ repo agreements: <https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/domestic-market-operations/monetary-policy-implementation/repo-reverse-repo-agreements/repurchase-agreement-operational-details>
+
+<https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/rrp_faq>

DD/2021-05-26-How-Would-a-Crypto-Dividend-Work.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+Posting this for anyone who was wondering how a "Crypto Dividend" would work 💎🙌🚀
+===================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/pezza31](https://www.reddit.com/user/pezza31/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nlfcha/posting_this_for_anyone_who_was_wondering_how_a/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Discussion 🦍](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Discussion%20%F0%9F%A6%8D%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Posting this for anyone who was wondering how a "Crypto Dividend" would work 💎🙌🚀](https://preview.redd.it/hu2fq4ejgg171.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=ea086baf339df230b3352464fa350176f76c64df)](https://i.redd.it/hu2fq4ejgg171.jpg)

DD/2021-05-26-Reverse-Repos-Showing-Possible-Evidence-of-Forced-Liquidations.md

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+Reverse Repos Showing Possible Evidence of Forced Liquidations
+==============================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/AcedVector](https://www.reddit.com/user/AcedVector/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nlxom6/reverse_repos_showing_possible_evidence_of_forced/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Pre-DD Message:
+
+Hello you beautiful apes! Before I get into this DD I just wanted to say that I am so proud of everyone for holding against these wall street crooks. We're finally starting to see some change happen and more and more people are starting to catch on to how fucked of a position the hedgies are really in right now, and it genuinely makes me happy that we've come from just some stupid retail investors looking for a quick buck to an educated mastermind of apes who scour the sub for DD and knowledge. With all that said, let's get into the DD!
+
+The Good Stuff:
+
+As I myself was scouring this sub for info I had come across an interesting [post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nlu3wb/coincidental_link_in_decreasing_parties_for/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) by [u/qwert4the1](https://www.reddit.com/user/qwert4the1/) (show them some love!) who had found a connection between the price surges in GME and the amount of counterparties within the reverse repo agreements. Specifically, they had mentioned that on days when there was a significant price increase compared to the norm (today, May 26th, would be a good example), the amount of counterparties who were accepted in the reverse repo agreements the day of or the day after had *decreased*. Now, why is this incredibly important if this connection holds true and how can it point to some interesting conclusions? To understand that, we have to understand the main prerequisite to these repo reverse agreements, which is according to the Fed FAQ page:
+
+[An 80 billion max per counterparty, hm?](https://preview.redd.it/pv3jripp9k171.png?width=465&format=png&auto=webp&s=9f6e860076f899e8ad04354d7b02514dad450106)
+
+We also have to understand that in these overnight reverse repo agreements, the Desk (The Open Market Trading Desk the Fed uses for these transactions) sells treasury securities that it holds in the System Open Market Account (SOMA) to these eligible counterparties. What that means is that the aggregate counterparty amount of treasury securities that can be lended overnight is limited by the amount that is held in SOMA. As of May 19th, here are these amounts:
+
+[Take note of the 4 TRILLION that it has in Treasury Notes and Bonds.](https://preview.redd.it/1lp15o74dk171.png?width=962&format=png&auto=webp&s=6fce3b40c66599b746de3b854f70768facf85ea3)
+
+So in other words, there are 2 limitations to take note of for overnight RRP agreements:
+
+1.  80 billion max per counterparty
+
+2.  4 trillion held in SOMA
+
+Why are these limitations important to take note of? Well, because the logical conclusion to draw is that the Fed uses these limitations to some extent in order determine whether they should accept or reject a counterparty in the agreement. This leads into why I feel the connection between the counterparties and the price surges in GME are important, because in my mind there's only a couple of explanations as to why the amount of counterparties in the ON RRP agreement would *decrease* as the price in GME *surges*:
+
+1.  The aggregate amount treasury securities lent to the counterparties in these agreements are reaching an uncomfortable amount so they are choosing their counterparties more carefully.
+
+2.  Marge is calling some of the counterparties that could potentially have the treasury bonds be used as collateral for short positions in some certain stocks ( perhaps GME? ;) )and are forcefully liquidating them, thus they don't need to be part of the agreement. Side note: (If some of the counterparties are banks, then the hedge funds that banks are potentially lending these treasury bonds/notes to for collateral could be margin called and forcefully liquidated, thus the bank having no reason to ask for the bonds does not take part in the agreement.)
+
+3.  A mix of the two
+
+Conclusion:
+
+Here's why I think we might be seeing both *forced liquidations* as well as *more selectivity from the Desk* in lending treasury securities, given that the connection between the counterparties and price surges in GME is correct:
+
+-   The 1st point alone wouldn't be enough of a reason to necessarily be more selective in choosing counterparties, as the current amount being lent (450 billion as of today) is about less than a quarter of the amount of the treasury notes/bonds in SOMA, and there are more than FOURTY counterparties as of the latest agreement.
+
+-   If there are forceful liquidations happening among the counterparties(which are most likely banks), it serves as a threefold hit:
+
+1.  Less counterparties would be needed in these agreements, lowering the counterparty amount but raising the average amount of treasury bonds/notes lent per counterparty.
+
+2.  With the average amount lent per existing counterparty increasing, the Fed has to take more into account what the counterparties are using these treasury bonds/notes for.
+
+3.  If most of the existing counterparties are banks, who lend these treasury bonds/notes to hedge funds for collateral in a short position, and they learn the banks they have lent to beforehand but not anymore (from hedgies being forcefully liquidated) are being connected to margin calls and forced liquidations, the Fed would be less inclined to lend these bonds/notes to the banks currently in the agreement as time goes on as it would become more risky to do so.
+
+-   These three points working in tandem with each other would lead to the Fed having a strong enough reason to be more selective to counterparties in future agreements, while also serving as a explanation for liquidations being a partial cause to the decrease in the amount of counterparties as as result of a GME price surge.
+
+Sources:
+
+[FAQs: Overnight Reverse Repurchase Agreement Operational Exercise - FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK (newyorkfed.org)](https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/rrp_faq)
+
+[Repo and Reverse Repo Agreements - FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK (newyorkfed.org)](https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/domestic-market-operations/monetary-policy-implementation/repo-reverse-repo-agreements)
+
+[Repo and Reverse Repo Operations - Federal Reserve Bank of New York (newyorkfed.org)](https://apps.newyorkfed.org/markets/autorates/tomo-results-display?SHOWMORE=TRUE&startDate=01/01/2000&enddate=01/01/2000)
+
+[System Open Market Account Holdings of Domestic Securities - FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK (newyorkfed.org)](https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/soma-holdings)
+
+As always, thank you for reading my DDs you guys. I will try to hang in the comments for edits as well if anything. :)
+
+Edit: 1.8k likes!! Holy mackerel thank you guys I appreciate your support very much. 🤠🙏
+
+Edit 2: WOW you guys are blowing this post out of the water! Thanks for 7k likes everybody! :)
+
+Edit 3: I would like to point out some amazing counterpoints to this DD in the comments, as I feel it is always important to address both sides of the argument. No DD is perfect(mine certainly isn't) so I would like to thank you guys for bringing these points up:
+
+1.  Why use bonds/notes as collateral when they can just use cash when it comes to short positions in stocks?
+
+2.  If the Fed has been more selective in ON RRP agreements, wouldn't it be showing in their acceptance rate (which has always been 100%)
+
+3.  Correlation does not equal causation, the GME price surge doesn't necessarily have to 100% be connected to a decrease in the counterparties.
+
+I'll admit, I don't have much of a rebuttal to these as they are solid points, and I appreciate you guys bringing it up because it helps me keep more things in mind to create stronger, more effective DD in the future.
+
+Edit 4: A fellow ape in the comments gave a link to the list of eligible counterparties for RRP agreements:
+
+<https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/rrp_counterparties>
+
+Most if not all of these counterparties are banks, so it lends credence to the idea that banks would be lending these treasury bonds to hedgefunds, as well as the banks themselves needing bonds as well (since there is a lot of cash but not collateral in the bonds market at the moment)

DD/2021-05-27-Guaranteed-Short-Squeeze-Trigger-The-NFT-Crypto-or-Digital-Dividend.md

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+The guaranteed short squeeze trigger: The NFT/Crypto/Digital Dividend
+=====================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/integ3r_p0sitron](https://www.reddit.com/user/integ3r_p0sitron/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nmd7cr/the_guaranteed_short_squeeze_trigger_the/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Others have pointed this out, but it seems there's still a lack of awareness or realization of how serious this is.
+
+The crypto dividend is NOT a joke.
+
+There is one PROVEN way to trigger the short squeeze and it was done by Overstock last year. In 8. march 2020 OSTK traded at around $3 per share. After the crypto dividend was released the stock soared to $120. While the crypto dividend itself, which you received 10 per share soared to over 8 dollars per tZero.
+
+Why it works:
+
+When a hedgie shorts a stock, he borrows it through the broker from its real owner and sells it. Because the one who purchases it believes he is also an owner, a single share has 2 owners. When a company then pays a dividend. Both owners expect a dividend, yet the company only pays dividend to one owner because the broker only holds 1 real share. The dividend for the fake share is paid out of the shorters pocket to make the whole system function.
+
+If gamestop pays a Crypto / NFT / Digital dividend, then in order for the system to continue, the shorter will have to find and acquire this NFT dividend and give it to the guy he borrowed the GME share from. However, this is literally impossible. NFTs are non-fungible. There is simply no way for him to acquire it or something equivalent because only holders of GME will get it. This means the broker will have no choice but to force all the shorts to exit their positions before the Ex. Dividend, triggering the short squeeze.
+
+TL;DR:
+
+All that is necessary to trigger the squeeze, is for the gamestop NFT team to make a meme ape or diamond hands or rocket NFT artwork and hand it out as a property dividend to shareholders. This will automatically trigger the squeeze. So please meme the NFT dividend into reality.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - The guaranteed short squeeze trigger: The NFT/Crypto/Digital Dividend](https://preview.redd.it/q67cuc42ep171.png?width=1016&format=png&auto=webp&s=04e6b6031037d7976e242b8a50d129a68f6a2cea)](https://preview.redd.it/q67cuc42ep171.png?width=1016&format=png&auto=webp&s=04e6b6031037d7976e242b8a50d129a68f6a2cea)
+
+EDIT: Thanks for all the awards and attention. It falls to you to to keep the dream alive of the digital dividend. Some common questions I've seen:
+
+How will I get the dividend? How will it work?
+
+There are many ways to skin a cat here, so the simple answer is don't worry about it until it is actually going to happen. I've seen someone say that for overstock their broker held it until they transferred it to their own account on a tradable exchange (since the broker didn't deal with cryptocurrencies). The logistics aren't complicated. Here is one hypothetical way: You hold the stonk until the ex. dividend date, that means you will receive the dividend. GME issues dividend to stockbrokers who are holding the share on your behalf, this means the broker will have to create cryptowallets to hold the payout (this is not a complicated process, don't worry), it is then the brokers responsibility to make sure you can get it from them and you will need your own wallet (again not complicated). **"***What about gas fees?"* Yes, this is a problem right now but there are ways around it. They could use a layer 2 solution, or they could use a different blockchain, basically if there's a will here there's a way.
+
+WTF? An NFT can't be a dividend.
+
+Yes it can. Pretty much anything can be a dividend. It is called a property dividend.
+
+Nuance between an NFT dividend and a Crypto dividend
+
+If gamestop minted a GME token that is essentially a GMECoin which you use as a currency, then it is fungible as opposed to an NFT which is non-fungible. It will trigger the squeeze but will be less effective each time they pay out such a dividend because once it is in circulation, hedgies can buy it off the market to maintain a short position. If you got an NFT artwork however, you would get a personal artwork with a unique ID that signifies it as the specific artwork you received as a dividend for the stock you held. It cannot really be exchanged for any other and each time the company pays such a dividend it would be unique so a hedgie can't buy one of the older NFT artworks and pay it to you as a dividend to stay in a short position. *"**But these artworks that we receive will all pretty much have the same value so TECHNICALLY they'll be fungible"* This is entirely subjective. Lets say you received a Rare Pepe artwork as an NFT dividend and you could use that rare pepe in a video game, then that rare pepe will be the specific rare pepe that you personally used to beat the game, win a tournament or whatever. That would make it non-fungible in the eyes of some. If you like the NFT that you got, well then it's non-fungible. If you wouldn't trade your NFT for someone elses even though they are mostly the same, well then they're still not fungible. Wouldn't you want the NFT that DFV received as his digital dividend? It can't be any other. Also, each time there's a dividend payment, It can be a different NFT set, which means hedgies will NEVER be able to get them on the market before it is paid out meaning shorts can be squeezed for ever, again and again.
+
+What happens if the broker refuses to margin call the shorts and refuses to give you the divvy?
+
+I would imagine that they could be sued. If you own the share, that entitles you to the divvy.
+
+Can they weasel out of this somehow?
+
+The brilliance of the crypto divvy is that it is a checkmate move. There are no tricks they can pull at the DTCC or the OCC or whatever, no accounting games they can pull, no fake shares or NFTs they can pull out of thin air to stay in a short position. When you're checkmated, the game is over. The crypto divvy bypasses ALL of the institutions. If the institutions are the chess pieces protecting the hedgie king, the crypto divvy is the orbital strike on the king directly. The divvy is also genius because it encourages people to hold. You want the divvy right? Well then you gotta hold.
+
+Ok so hedgie has to close before ex. dividend, can't he short the top after the squeeze and manipulate the stock down again?
+
+Gamestop can simply promise to release another NFT dividend and hedgie will have to buy all the memes all over again. And again, and again until he learns his lesson.

DD/2021-05-28-Clearing-up-the-Fed-Reverse-Repos-and-What-it-Could-Indicate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+Clearing up the Fed Reverse Repos and What it Could Indicate
+============================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/c-digs](https://www.reddit.com/user/c-digs/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nmxmri/clearing_up_the_fed_reverse_repos_and_what_it/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Possible DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Possible%20DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+EDIT: [u/CalamariAce](https://www.reddit.com/u/CalamariAce/) shared a great video which summarizes a similar conclusion that does a great job of explaining it: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMgUlW7zSzg#t=950>
+
+First and foremost, more than ever, before you read the rest of this post:
+
+I am not a financial advisor and do not interpret anything written below as financial advice.
+
+I think that nearly every post on the Fed RRP and the increasing amounts has been interpreting this data incorrectly and understanding why it is happening could be very important in understanding the events in the upcoming days/weeks/months.
+
+The lightbulb moment happened for me when I read [u/HODLTheLineMyFriend](https://www.reddit.com/user/HODLTheLineMyFriend/) 's post: [Reverse Repo Overnight Lending Chart](https://www.reddit.com/r/DDintoGME/comments/nmcn1e/reverse_repo_overnight_lending_chart_update_for/) post from yesterday.
+
+User [u/wehadmagnets](https://www.reddit.com/u/wehadmagnets/) posted snippets and a reference to [a Financial Times article](https://www.ft.com/content/cdec7f2e-6129-412c-b118-8906a2a0f92f) that drew my attention.
+
+I post the TL;DR points of interest below and highlight the key points:
+
+-   Today's Reverse Repo was the largest ever
+
+-   "Investors" (more than just banks) are seeking places to park cash, as other 'safe' places are drying up and/or having zero or negative rates
+
+-   "It is also not over yet." -- analyst at Oxford Economics
+
+-   Cash reserves ballooning due to "the Fed's purchases of $120bn of Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities each month"
+
+-   Money-market funds are getting swamped with people's cash (<speculation>flight from equities?</speculation>)
+
+-   Fed is trying to avoid negative rates in money market
+
+-   No one thinks it's over
+
+-   Fed may have to raise interest rates on RRP or reserve balances in member banks to keep the federal funds rates from going lower (at 0.06 on target of 0.0-0.25)
+
+This is when it clicked for me and my subsequent discussion with [u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/Criand/) helped clarify why I think the RRPs are increasing.
+
+Understanding assets versus liabilities for a commercial bank
+
+A few weeks back, I was watching Gary Gensler's MIT series on Blockchain.
+
+*(Aside: if you have any interest in currency, economics, finance, technology, or banking, I strongly recommend the series because Gensler breaks down complex topics into a very easy to digest format. The series is highly recommended because it will give you a whole new perspective on currency, fiat currency, the gold standard, etc.****)*
+
+In [the second lecture](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5auv_xrvoJk), I remembered he said something that caught my attention:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Clearing up the Fed Reverse Repos and What it Could Indicate](https://preview.redd.it/flr1sh3j8v171.png?width=778&format=png&auto=webp&s=e5847fc0983eb936712fab9768967e9378a9b2ff)](https://preview.redd.it/flr1sh3j8v171.png?width=778&format=png&auto=webp&s=e5847fc0983eb936712fab9768967e9378a9b2ff)
+
+A recommended video if you are at all curious to really understand the gold standard, fiat currency, economics, ledgers, banking, and finance
+
+[At 51:42](https://youtu.be/5auv_xrvoJk?t=3102), he starts a discussion about fiat currency and ledgers. Of currency, he states:
+
+> It represents central bank liabilities and that's important. It's a liability of a central bank it's not an asset. It's their liability side...There's also a second form of money and that's when you make a deposit in a bank that's a liability of a commercial bank.
+
+[At 54:22 he says](https://youtu.be/5auv_xrvoJk?t=3262):
+
+> But it is a liability on the books and records. so it is a matter of accounting in double-entry bookkeeping.
+
+The entire discussion starting from 51:42 is fantastic and I strongly urge everyone to take the time to watch it.
+
+On the other hand, government securities are considered an asset and not a liability. [This article does a great job of breaking it down](https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-macroeconomics/chapter/banking-profits-and-losses-name/):
+
+> For a bank, the assets are the financial instruments that either the bank is holding (its reserves) or those instruments where other parties owe money to the bank---like loans made by the bank and U.S. government securities, such as U.S. Treasury bonds purchased by the bank.
+>
+> When bank customers deposit money into a checking account, savings account, or a certificate of deposit, the bank views these deposits as liabilities. After all, the bank owes these deposits to its customers, and are obligated to return the funds when the customers wish to withdraw their money. In the example shown in Figure 1, the Safe and Secure Bank holds $10 million in deposits.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Clearing up the Fed Reverse Repos and What it Could Indicate](https://preview.redd.it/eq8mzoenzu171.jpg?width=757&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1c69c7eca4829a6ec4ab98371ce1b3193e223f82)](https://preview.redd.it/eq8mzoenzu171.jpg?width=757&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1c69c7eca4829a6ec4ab98371ce1b3193e223f82)
+
+Notice the assets on the left include US Government securities and the liabilities on the right represent deposits or customer cash.
+
+So why would a bank want to purchase Treasuries?
+
+This is the fundamental question and the answer is really simple and where the dots finally connected for me: every single night, they are accumulating more and more customer deposits in cash or cash equivalent accounts relative to the assets on their balance sheet and this is throwing their bookkeeping out of whack.
+
+To make up for this, every single day they need to wipe these liabilities off of their books and to do this, they use the RRPs to exchange them for assets in the form of Treasuries because it's "free" at the moment. The amount they are swapping does not represent the amount of cash deposits they have, but rather the amount needed to balance their liabilities to their assets (and it may not be a 1:1 ratio; may be some other ratio that they need to adhere to).
+
+[u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/Criand/) asked a very important question in our discussion:
+
+Why overnight notes and not longer term?
+
+Because they need the cash back the next day for operations. If a customer withdraws the cash or uses the cash to enter into another transaction, they need to have it in their ledger.
+
+So every night, the banks are wiping this liability off of their books by converting them into assets in the form of Treasuries. Then the very next day, they swap it back for cash because they need the cash for normal operations.
+
+Rinse and repeat each day until the cash deposits start to decrease relative to their assets(hold this thought).
+
+What does this mean for apes?
+
+I'm going to repeat this again: I am not a financial advisor and not a single one of you should construe this as financial advice.
+
+About three weeks ago, I moved all of my wife's 403b and my kids' 529s into cash. This means I parked the gains in money market accounts *and now it's a liability for my bank*. (Again, I am not implying that any of you should do this, only providing background for how I connected the dots.)
+
+This is where bullet 5 up above turned the lightbulb on for me: what if there is a huge wave of capital flight from equities into money market accounts? What if this is what is throwing off the ledgers of these banks? What if all of the wealthy and those "in the know" already know what is coming and are converting their assets into liabilities on the ledgers of the banks by moving their accounts to cash in the form of money market accounts?
+
+The capital flight from equities has started and this is what we are seeing reflected with the Fed RRP. This could be the clearest signal that there is anticipation of a big downward crash. The reason this continues unabated and grows is because this is all by the books and precisely what this mechanism is designed to do: soak up liability on the books of the commercial banks. It's just that in this case, those liabilities are customer deposits which are accumulating in money market accounts.
+
+But the market has been green?
+
+This is speculation at this point, but I think it's really simple.
+
+Two weeks ago, I finally started to dump the remaining securities I was holding as I converted everything to cash. I only had F, GM, and GE left. Then this week, all three have had absolutely stellar returns(all the more reason you should not take any of this as financial advice because I left thousands in gains on the table by paperhanding F, GM, and GE). What gives? I am guessing that there is a market-wide pump and dump happening right now where banks are basically finding new bagholders before everything dives.
+
+The preceding two weeks of red in the market had three purposes:
+
+1.  Banks needed to capture some gains and liquidity
+
+2.  Create the illusion of a pullback and "value" to find new bagholders
+
+3.  Driving up the price of equities is also a mechanism for increasing their asset to liability ratio at least temporarily
+
+The above is purely speculation and do not manage your portfolio and your life savings based on any of my bullshit speculation; do your own DD and come to your own conclusions. I emphasize again that there are two ways for them to fix their ledgers: swap cash deposits for Treasuries or somehow increase the value of their assets. If it's the latter, we could see the start of another bull run and I could be completely wrong; I literally have no idea.
+
+Is it really that simple?
+
+Look, I'm a big fan of Occam's Razor. It's really that simple.
+
+1.  Bank customers are converting their investments to cash or the value of the assets they are holding are decreasing relative to the deposits
+
+2.  Cash deposits are a liability on the books of commercial banks
+
+3.  Every day, they need to balance their liabilities with their assets
+
+4.  As the cash builds up, they need a mechanism to convert them to an asset
+
+5.  But they also need to be able to easily convert it back to cash for normal operations the next day; they need an asset that is highly liquid
+
+6.  The Fed RRP operation is a free way to do this and balance their books
+
+7.  Every single one of the counterparties is now carrying an excess of cash because customers are pulling out of equities OR the value of their assets are decreasing (loans and CMBS are both "assets" for a bank)
+
+I am firmly in the camp that there is nothing nefarious going on with the Fed RRPs; it's really as simple as the banks wiping the liabilities off of their books at night and getting back the cash the next day.
+
+What one *should* be concerned about and start pondering is *why* they are in a state of having excess deposits *relative to their assets*.
+
+Remember that thought I asked you to hold: the linchpin is that they must balance their assets and liabilities on their ledgers. So this Fed RRP ballooning indicates that there is a severe imbalance which they are correcting with the RRP. Either their cash deposits are surging, their assets (like loans and CMBS) are dropping, or a bit of both is happening.
+
+What about the previous periods of high activity in 2014-2017?
+
+If you look at the charts, this has occurred previously as well. Notably in 2014 - 2017. But I think that this is relatively easy to understand.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Clearing up the Fed Reverse Repos and What it Could Indicate](https://preview.redd.it/c99f25db4v171.png?width=528&format=png&auto=webp&s=e3673edb823f072a73e8d1adaccfebc83c610d7f)](https://preview.redd.it/c99f25db4v171.png?width=528&format=png&auto=webp&s=e3673edb823f072a73e8d1adaccfebc83c610d7f)
+
+Yellow and blue text are mine. There is a high volume of customer deposits on the ledgers of the banks entering and exiting the 2016 election cycle. Then we've had a tremendous run in equities since 2017 so banks have had less cash to balance.
+
+What is unique is that this buildup right now is so massive and does not correspond to typical times when a bank would need to balance their ledger.
+
+This daily increasing amount means that every single day, more and more of their customers are moving their deposits to cash or their assets are losing value or some mix of both.
+
+TA;DR analogy to [u/rocketseeker](https://www.reddit.com/u/rocketseeker/)
+
+Let's say you're running drugs and you obviously deal with a lot of cash.
+
+Holding onto all of this cash is a *liability* because it's easy for someone to steal it from you (for example) or what if you get caught by the po-po with all this cash? You need something that's as good as cash without the downsides.
+
+So ideally, you have some way to change your paper cash (a *liability*) to something that's harder to steal (an *asset*) and less risky if some police officer shakes you down. You need something that has three qualities:
+
+1.  It should be stable so if you put in $1, you get back $1
+
+2.  It should be easy to convert it back to cash any time (be highly liquid)
+
+3.  It should have a pretty stable supply
+
+Property and real estate? Too difficult to flip it back into cash when you need it. Cars? Bitcoin? Gold chains? Same problems and very volatile; convert $1 and you may not get back $1 tomorrow.
+
+I don't know the right equivalent for a drug lord because there are very few real-world equivalents to government debt like Treasuries, [but maybe you convert it into Tide laundry detergent](https://nymag.com/news/features/tide-detergent-drugs-2013-1/) because 1) it's hard to steal and 2) there's always demand for Tide; you just go to the local laundromats and sell it to them to get cash back, 3) if the police discover your stash of Tide, what are they gonna do 🤣? You've just found a way to convert *a liability* into *an asset.*
+
+Now whenever you have an abundance of cash, you convert it to Tide. When you need your cash, you sell the Tide and get your cash back.
+
+That's what's happening with the banks and the Fed. The banks have a lot of customer cash depositsOR their assets have lost value and cannot balance their books. So they exchange their cash for Tide (Treasuries) so that they have less liabilities relative to their assets. And they are doing this every single day with increasing frequency because they are holding onto more customer deposits in cash/cash equivalent OR their assets are losing value relative to the amount of cash deposits they have.

DD/2021-05-28-GME-Ownership-Analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+GME Ownership Analysis 5/28- Hedgies R FuQ
+==========================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/H3RB28](https://www.reddit.com/user/H3RB28/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nneevk/gme_ownership_analysis_528_hedgies_r_fuq/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Hello fellow Apes,
+
+Obligatory Disclaimer: I am not a Financial Advisor, and this is not Financial Advice. Always do your own homework. That being said.. lets get started.
+
+TL,DR: Hedies R FuQ. I used data from FTSE Russell's own Database 'Mergent Online' to calculate the current ownership numbers for GME... and my TITS ARE JACKED.
+
+I found some very interesting ownership numbers for GME today. I am using Mergent Online as my data source, which is produced by FTSE Russell.. yes the same FTSE Russell that runs the Russell 2000 Index, which GME is *currently* a part of. I have access to Mergent through the university I am currently at while finishing my bachelors in Finance in a few months.
+
+Now before we get fully started on a simple ownership analysis.. I'm going to take us on a trip back to middle school math class and the dreaded topic of Algebra. Proportions and Cross Multiplying are a pretty simple topic and go something like this:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Ownership Analysis 5/28- Hedgies R FuQ](https://preview.redd.it/mz00tbfuwy171.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8b5901da8109b43c71e29b3807a9a5637e8fb716)](https://preview.redd.it/mz00tbfuwy171.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8b5901da8109b43c71e29b3807a9a5637e8fb716)
+
+Proportions and Cross Multiplication
+
+For making Ownership calculations we need a base to go off of. Mergent Online (once again information reported by the index that GME is a part of) reports the ownership of GME at the following:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Ownership Analysis 5/28- Hedgies R FuQ](https://preview.redd.it/6io407b6yy171.jpg?width=3634&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ea4aaabfb669429f115e1adb79cfdfbb65828caa)](https://preview.redd.it/6io407b6yy171.jpg?width=3634&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ea4aaabfb669429f115e1adb79cfdfbb65828caa)
+
+GME Ownership
+
+Mergent Online has GME Shares Outstanding as 69,936,000. We need to keep in mind that this is a number reported as of 1/30/2021. Since then, GME has made a secondary offering of 3,500,000 shares. This gives us an Issuer-Stated Total Shares Outstanding of 73,436,000 or 73.436 Million shares.
+
+Now that we know how many shares there are *supposed* to be, lets check out the Insider Ownership.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Ownership Analysis 5/28- Hedgies R FuQ](https://preview.redd.it/9haw4oug0z171.jpg?width=3622&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14a97865a44e6a912bf5246a906f1219fde92345)](https://preview.redd.it/9haw4oug0z171.jpg?width=3622&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14a97865a44e6a912bf5246a906f1219fde92345)
+
+GME Insider Ownership
+
+We can see that the Insider Ownership is broken into two distinct categories: Direct and Indirect Ownership. Direct Ownership is when the shares are listed *directly* in your name, and not say.. in shelter company like RC Ventures. We will do two different calculations in order to display the situation correctly.
+
+Mergent lists the Direct Ownership at 8,057,864 shares totaling 11.52% ownership pie (we all like pies). This leaves 88.48% left over.. *but how many shares is that wrinkly brained ape?* Lets put our trusty friend Algebra to the test.
+
+(11.52/8,057,864) = (88.46/X)
+
+11.52X=712,798,649.44 .. now to find X we divide each side by 11.52.
+
+X=61,874,882.76
+
+Now to check our math we add the 88.46% to the 11.52% to get a total ownership number.
+
+Previously stated ownership: 69,936,000
+
+8,057,864 + 61,874,882.76= 69,932,746.76
+
+To me.. being around 4,000 shares within the "Stated Shares Outstanding" checks out enough to me. To calculate the Free Float I added in the extra 3.5 million shares that were a part of the secondary offering (total shares outstanding 73,436,000)
+
+This would put GME at a Free Float of 65,378,136 shares.
+
+BUT APE NO INCLUDE TENDIE MASTER!! I know, we are getting there.
+
+*RC Ventures WAS NOT listed on the "Direct Ownership" list. The Indirect Ownership is stated at 15,760,670 shares.
+
+Adding the two 'Insider Ownerships' together gives us the following:
+
+8,057,864 + 15,760,670 = 23,818,534 for insider ownership
+
+This new number would give us a Free Float of 49,617,466 or 49 Million shares.
+
+*Up until this point this is all stuff that we have basically already known.. its about to get a little more spicy.* Next we will cover the Institutional Ownership side. Now the Institutional numbers have always been wacky for GME, but I believe these next calculations provide insight into just how big of a hole hedgies have dug themselves.
+
+GME Institutional Ownership- As Stated by Mergent FTSE Russell:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Ownership Analysis 5/28- Hedgies R FuQ](https://preview.redd.it/z3kg7s9q5z171.jpg?width=3647&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dcd3b4b6e56200b41888ca0102fd80528de62b8e)](https://preview.redd.it/z3kg7s9q5z171.jpg?width=3647&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dcd3b4b6e56200b41888ca0102fd80528de62b8e)
+
+Hedgies R FuQ
+
+Two things IMMEDIATELY stand out to me: #1 Institutions own 56,158,356 shares.... AT 28.87% ownership.. WHAT?!? This statistic is what is *REPORTED* to the index, these numbers definitely could be fudged.. but most likely to the downside and not the upside.
+
+*So smart Ape.. if Institutions own 28.87% of GME with 56M shares.. how many shares does everyone else (aka Insiders and Retail) own at 71.13%?* Once again, our friend Algebra comes into play.
+
+(28.87/56,158,356) = (71.13/X)
+
+28.87X = 3,994,543,862.28 (now we divide each side by 28.87)
+
+X= 138,363,140.36 or 138.36M shares.. GO APES!
+
+If we then subtract out the higher Insider Ownership number (Direct + Indirect) this gives us a *Retail Control* of 114,544,606.36 shares or 114 MILLION SHARES.
+
+*What the Fuq did hedgies get themselves into?!?*
+
+Now according to the "Institutional Ownership" numbers I wanted to see around about how many Naked Shorts the firms had rehypothecated. To get the Total Shares Outstanding we would then add Institutional Ownership with Retail and Insider Ownership stats:
+
+56,158,356 + 138,363,140 = 194,521,496 shares.. 194 million fuqing shares.
+
+So with the institutional numbers and the Issuer stated numbers I came to the conclusion that:
+
+194,521,496 - 73,436,000 = 121,085,496 or 121 MILLION SHARES NAKED
+
+What did Kenny get himself into.. well covering 121 MILLION shares he can't get his hands on because 114 MILLION are in the hands of Apes.
+
+*Please keep in mind these are the reported numbers.. they could truly be MUCH higher.*
+
+I am always open to criticisms and questions/discussion.
+
+Be Excellent and Rock on Fellow Apes.
+
+- H3RB
+
+Edit: Here is the screen shot from above with the dates highlighted for the base calculations:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Ownership Analysis 5/28- Hedgies R FuQ](https://preview.redd.it/tr50evybjz171.jpg?width=3354&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8e1f8f284ff23268916cabf08369388a8b1947bd)](https://preview.redd.it/tr50evybjz171.jpg?width=3354&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8e1f8f284ff23268916cabf08369388a8b1947bd)
+
+Edit 2: Full Screen Shots of Institutional Ownership Stats:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Ownership Analysis 5/28- Hedgies R FuQ](https://preview.redd.it/nwicrfepoz171.png?width=3693&format=png&auto=webp&s=473fcf5d17515aa04e6c6cc8150696426c04bba5)](https://preview.redd.it/nwicrfepoz171.png?width=3693&format=png&auto=webp&s=473fcf5d17515aa04e6c6cc8150696426c04bba5)
+
+Institutional Ownership 1
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Ownership Analysis 5/28- Hedgies R FuQ](https://preview.redd.it/dia9iacsoz171.png?width=3644&format=png&auto=webp&s=364688f6593f56bf6726ec2a440c2cc0b41877f5)](https://preview.redd.it/dia9iacsoz171.png?width=3644&format=png&auto=webp&s=364688f6593f56bf6726ec2a440c2cc0b41877f5)
+
+Institutional Ownership 2
+
+Edit 3: Direct vs. Indirect Insider Ownership RC Listed as Indirect
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Ownership Analysis 5/28- Hedgies R FuQ](https://preview.redd.it/oz019rwsxz171.jpg?width=3668&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=861b89415e9b82028514b010ad6e0be7189705e1)](https://preview.redd.it/oz019rwsxz171.jpg?width=3668&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=861b89415e9b82028514b010ad6e0be7189705e1)
+
+RC Listed as Indirect
+
+EDIT 4 (5/29 afternoon): I am doing a more comprehensive review of ownership comparing the numbers reported by Mergent and FTSE Russell to those of: GameStop Proxy, Yahoo Finance Premium, FinteliO, Whale Wisdom, Koyfin, Fidelity Research, Nasdaq, CNNMoney, and MarketBeat (I think I named them all.. may be more I'll update as needed). I am trying to match numbers to see if I can find any discrepancies in data reported.
+
+I have also contacted Mergent & FTSE Russell to try and see if I can get any information on *how* they source their information. On their website it states they have a dedicated data team that updates the data live daily from multiple market sources. I am not sure how true this is, but in the data columns it did say "as of 5/28/21". I will updated on any information about data sources that I receive.

DD/2021-05-28-Why-I-am-Ecstatic-GME-is-Taking-a-Dump-and-the-Possible-Correlation-with-AMC-and-Crypto.md

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Why I am Ecstatic GME is Taking a Dump, and the Possible Correlation with AMC and Crypto
+========================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/C2theC](https://www.reddit.com/user/C2theC/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nn370o/why_i_am_ecstatic_gme_is_taking_a_dump_and_the/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Possible DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Possible%20DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Apes, lend me your ears.
+
+I am pumped that GME took a fat dive from $268.80 down to below $235.00 as of this post. Why? Because it means we've figured out the *modus operandi* of the shorts, and HFs are fuk.
+
+TL;DR HODL, because GME is going to the moon. 🚀
+
+T+35/T+21 Cycles
+
+This is real, and the juiciest part of this post. As I noted in my [Cyclical Patterns in Failure-To-Deliver (FTD) and Short Interest Reporting](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nezp94/cyclical_patterns_in_failuretodeliver_ftd_and/), written upon the DD of those before me, the T+35/T+21 cycles are consistent, empirical, measurable, and now, *predictable*. Read the DD of [I've estimated the current SI% based on the SI Report Cycle and Deep ITM CALL purchases.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nc1lny/ive_estimated_the_current_si_based_on_the_si/) by [u/Criand](https://www.reddit.com/u/Criand/) for more details.
+
+In the chart below, we can see that each T+21 cycle (there are around five, which I've noted above the GME chart ), in every twenty-one trading sessions, GME has a regular spike. The mechanics of this are likely to be kicking-the-can-down-the-road for the FTD cycles, and even if there might be doubters about the underlying cause, you cannot doubt the observable data that this happens exactly every twenty-one days on schedule. If the sun rises every twenty-four hours, who cares if the Earth rotates around the Sun or the Sun rotates around the Earth (shout-out to Galileo Galilei who stood up to the shills of his day)---the sun still rises every twenty-four hours.
+
+Additionally, I am tracking possible cycles for dips in the yellow lines below the chart. Though I am not sure if there is a definite pattern yet, it is human nature (actually the nature of every system due to entropy) to do the same thing over and over on a repeating basis, such as the timing of morning/night routines of showering and brushing your teeth, aka personal hygiene.
+
+The one pattern I have seen is that on each Short Interest Reporting Settlement Date, marked by "SIR," GME takes a dump. *Especially* after a run such as the one this week. If the pattern as depicted by the yellow lines holds true, watch out for another dump on the first day of trading next Tuesday.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Why I am Ecstatic GME is Taking a Dump, and the Possible Correlation with AMC and Crypto](https://preview.redd.it/k6g14efb6w171.png?width=2433&format=png&auto=webp&s=a63cec898848e621d7b3325722b59dbe130afd24)](https://preview.redd.it/k6g14efb6w171.png?width=2433&format=png&auto=webp&s=a63cec898848e621d7b3325722b59dbe130afd24)
+
+A cyclical pattern emerges
+
+AMC Correlation
+
+If you were a HF that was deep in the red shorting GME, consider this strategy:
+
+1.  Buy OTM AMC calls
+
+2.  Spend money to keep the GME price down, let AMC rocket, and let retail FOMO set in
+
+3.  Entice people to paper-hand GME, then sell those AMC calls to them
+
+4.  Buy OTM GME puts
+
+5.  Take the cash generated and drive down the GME price
+
+6.  Sell now-ITM GME puts and pay yourself back
+
+By doing the above, you can end up spending very little or breaking even on your capital and achieve:
+
+-   Pushing down both the price of GME and AMC at no cost to you!
+
+-   Deflate the morale of GME apes that we missed out on AMC riches
+
+-   Deflate the morale of AMC ape-cousins that they didn't sell at the peak or bought at the top
+
+-   Give a story to Main Stream Media (MSM) to report that the MoASS is over, and that AMC is now -30%, from the peak, never mentioning the +120% from last Friday
+
+AMC Price Action
+
+What drove the price action for AMC this week? This section is all speculative, and there are multiple possibilities, some or all or none of which may be true:
+
+1.  There is no news, and there are no sellers, so the only driver for the price action are the shorts themselves
+
+2.  It is not even 2p EST and the volume on AMC is 522M, and the average 20-day volume is 165M. How is a 3× average volume possible on no news, and yesterday was 5×, unless institutions were involved?
+
+3.  Funds are getting margin called and need to cover or provide more cash
+
+4.  Shorts would let AMC go in order have ammo to suppress the price for GME, which is far more detrimental to the shorts
+
+5.  MSM needs a piece to talk about how much AMC came down, to "encourage" GME hodlers to paper-hand and sell, if not now, then build it into the psyche for the MoASS
+
+Crypto Crash
+
+The market is a zero-sum game. Due to the amount of losses in crypto, to the tune billions, it is not possible that it was all retail. Institutional investors were the whales that cashed out. The money had to go somewhere. It is likely a good portion went to the manipulation of GME and AMC, as well as the possible covering of margin calls. At the very least, it is still held as cash. This is why the general market hasn't tanked, because shorts haven't had to sell any of their beloved shares in the S&P 500 to cover for GME/AMC.
+
+Conclusion
+
+Jacked to the tits!
+
+__________
+
+Edit: *modus operandi* not *operus modi -* thanks [u/Mufragnosky](https://www.reddit.com/u/Mufragnosky/)

DD/2021-06-11-GME-Russell-1000-Rebalance-Day.md

@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+GME Russell 1000 Rebalance Day and T+21 and T+35: One Of The Highest Volume Days Of The Year. Every time any of the indices add or delete a stock, the funds must also buy or sell the stock.
+=============================================================================================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/vierzehnter](https://www.reddit.com/user/vierzehnter/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nxjvpg/gme_russell_1000_rebalance_day_and_t21_and_t35/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+*Edit 1: Coincidence or not, CNBC wants us to sell our shares in 2 weeks, a few days before rebalancing day:* [*If you're thinking of riding the next meme stock mania, be sure to sell in about 2 weeks*](https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/09/if-youre-thinking-of-riding-the-next-meme-stock-mania-be-sure-to-sell-in-about-2-weeks.html)
+
+~~*Edit 2: As far as I remember, a T+21 cycle finishes on June 24th right? Can somebody help me there?*~~
+
+*Edit 3: Added information*
+
+*Edit 4:* *T+21 falls on June 24. T+35 falls on June 28. Thanks to* [r/Throcked](https://www.reddit.com/r/Throcked/)
+
+EDIT 5: I just learned that you can not change the title. ~~and T+21 and T+35~~
+
+*Edit 6: This is my first time I put so much time in a post for this community. One thing I learned from this one is that I should only write about things that I can source, not things that I merely remember.* *I am very sorry for the confusion!*
+
+*Edit 7: Added Information on stocks being added to the Russell 1000*
+
+*Edit 8:* [*720B reverse repo might be due at the same time*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nxtguc/bottom_of_page_4_seems_to_say_theres_720b_worth/)*, it's all adding up to the same date. See Edit 1. What is going to happen?*
+
+*.*
+
+.
+
+.
+
+*We have seen a lot of posts about the highly possible migration of GameStop into the Russell 1000 Index.*
+
+*I did my small DD and I wanted to share a bit of information with you. Please don't expect too much from this post, it's my first DD if you can call it that; maybe rather a compilation of free information I found on the internet. Please tell me if I make mistakes or if I should add something!*
+
+Introduction: What is the Russell 1000?
+
+The term Russell 1000 Index refers to a stock market index that is used as a benchmark by investors. It is a subset of the larger Russell 3000 Index and represents the 1000 top companies by market capitalization in the United States. The Russell 1000 is owned and operated by FTSE Russell Group, which is based in the United Kingdom. The Russell 1000 is considered a bellwether index for large-cap investing. [[1]](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/russell_1000index.asp)
+
+FTSE Russell provides float-adjusted, market capitalization--weighted indexes for a precise picture of the market. Today, $9.1 trillion in assets are benchmarked to the Russell US indexes. [[2]](https://research.ftserussell.com/products/downloads/Russell-US-indexes.pdf)
+
+What does this have to do with GameStop?
+
+*You may have heard: your favorite company GameStop will probably be moved into the Russell 1000. As of now, GameStop is in the Russell 2000 Index* [[3]](https://content.ftserussell.com/sites/default/files/ru2000_membershiplist_20200629.pdf)*.*
+
+An existing Russell 2000 index member would have had to have a total market cap exceeding $7.3 billion in order to move into the Russell 1000 index, she said.
+
+Going by that, [...] GameStop and its $11.97 billion market cap would make it. [[4]](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tell-whether-amc-gamestop-russell-120012129.html)
+
+*As this PDF* [[5]](https://content.ftserussell.com/sites/default/files/russell_microcap_deletions_-_2021.pdf) *shows, GameStop will be preliminary deleted from the Russell Microcap Index* [[6]](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/russell-microcap-index.asp).
+
+2021 Index Reconstitution
+
+Each year in May and June, the Russell Indexes release an updated list [[7]](https://www.ftserussell.com/resources/russell-reconstitution) of the constituents for their various indexes, notably the Russell 2000 and Russell 1000. Many exchange-traded funds and mutual funds are constructed to track these indexes, so official index rebalances force these funds to transact large volumes of stocks that move in or out of the index. This drives major changes in demand for stocks, generating significant volatility. [[8]](https://www.investopedia.com/articles/stock-analysis/062516/russell-rebalance-study-what-you-need-know.asp) [...]
+
+*Check* [this](https://www.ftserussell.com/research-insights/russell-reconstitution/reconstitution-frequently-asked-questions) *page for frequently asked questions about the reconstruction.*
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Russell 1000 Rebalance Day and T+21 and T+35: One Of The Highest Volume Days Of The Year. Every time any of the indices add or delete a stock, the funds must also buy or sell the stock.](https://preview.redd.it/dwvv41zzhn471.jpg?width=943&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=59d53dc221aa6deb5808f69f671b531c99d84707)](https://preview.redd.it/dwvv41zzhn471.jpg?width=943&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=59d53dc221aa6deb5808f69f671b531c99d84707)
+
+2021 Reconstitution calendar for the Russell US Indexes [7]
+
+*Today, June 11th, the mentioned preliminary lists was updated.*
+
+What happens with stocks when they get added to indices?
+
+*Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM):* How Zoom zoomed into the Russell 1000 [[9]](https://www.ftserussell.com/blogs/how-zoom-zoomed-russell-1000)[...] After its IPO in April 2019, Zoom was evaluated for inclusion in Russell US Indexes during our June 2019 annual Russell reconstitution. The company met some Russell 1000 eligibility requirements---including a market cap in excess of $20 billion--- but fell short of the minimum voting rights hurdle. [...]
+
+When Zoom eligibility was revisited in June 2020, it was a changed world in many respects---and very much a changed Zoom. The company's market cap had more than doubled to $46.8 billion, placing it well into Russell 1000 Index eligibility. [...]
+
+Zoom's June 2020 addition to the Russell 1000 meant that it leapfrogged the Russell 2000, bypassing the initial step of many companies that later grow to become eligible for the Russell 1000. [...] And since its inclusion in the Russell 1000, Zoom's growth trajectory has continued. As shown below, as of September 30, 2020, the company's market cap has reached $132.5 billion and is now larger than the broader Russell 1000 dollar-weighted median market cap.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Russell 1000 Rebalance Day and T+21 and T+35: One Of The Highest Volume Days Of The Year. Every time any of the indices add or delete a stock, the funds must also buy or sell the stock.](https://preview.redd.it/ir0jmjofzs471.png?width=619&format=png&auto=webp&s=bfaa044b083da8503cd0594292397c465617ede2)](https://preview.redd.it/ir0jmjofzs471.png?width=619&format=png&auto=webp&s=bfaa044b083da8503cd0594292397c465617ede2)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Russell 1000 Rebalance Day and T+21 and T+35: One Of The Highest Volume Days Of The Year. Every time any of the indices add or delete a stock, the funds must also buy or sell the stock.](https://preview.redd.it/xtt848ej0t471.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0e44c91c7546310c2b86f6e4c418f596607b1dff)](https://preview.redd.it/xtt848ej0t471.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0e44c91c7546310c2b86f6e4c418f596607b1dff)
+
+ZM prices before and after Reconstruction Day 07/29/20
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Russell 1000 Rebalance Day and T+21 and T+35: One Of The Highest Volume Days Of The Year. Every time any of the indices add or delete a stock, the funds must also buy or sell the stock.](https://preview.redd.it/706rlrcykp471.jpg?width=855&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=05b120a9d84af12b1cadc38c68802ad47b23c104)](https://preview.redd.it/706rlrcykp471.jpg?width=855&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=05b120a9d84af12b1cadc38c68802ad47b23c104)
+
+u/onlyhereforthelmaos research on companies that moved from R2k to R1k [10,11]
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Russell 1000 Rebalance Day and T+21 and T+35: One Of The Highest Volume Days Of The Year. Every time any of the indices add or delete a stock, the funds must also buy or sell the stock.](https://preview.redd.it/i5kkcl2v8o471.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b2de67bab2cba3ecd798bce50c27e2832b42a1ec)](https://preview.redd.it/i5kkcl2v8o471.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b2de67bab2cba3ecd798bce50c27e2832b42a1ec)
+
+TSLA price when it was added to S&P 500 12/21/20
+
+.
+
+*(May 2020)* Tech stocks are expected to claim a greater presence in large-cap growth and value indexes, while industrials will shift to value from growth across market caps. [...]
+
+For investors, the run-up to the rebalancing presents an opportunity to get ahead of some of the fund flows into and out of stocks that are joining or leaving the indexes.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Russell 1000 Rebalance Day and T+21 and T+35: One Of The Highest Volume Days Of The Year. Every time any of the indices add or delete a stock, the funds must also buy or sell the stock.](https://preview.redd.it/lvyz7qob2t471.jpg?width=633&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a873a825572c753196ba14447a18b9c5fe03deee)](https://preview.redd.it/lvyz7qob2t471.jpg?width=633&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a873a825572c753196ba14447a18b9c5fe03deee)
+
+Buying and selling pressure of companies added/ leaving the Index
+
+Private-equity firm KKR (ticker: KKR), for example, has cited Russell index inclusion in 2020 as a strategic priority. If added to the Russell 1000, KKR shares could see $644 million worth of buying pressure from exchange-traded funds and passive investors, equal to almost seven trading days of average volume for the stock, estimates Jefferies equity strategist Steven DeSanctis.
+
+That is a lot of extra demand, but nowhere near what some thinly traded small-caps entering the Russell 2000 could see. DeSanctis points to ATCX, SWKH, and AUBN as among the shares that could have hundreds of times greater buying pressure than their average daily volumes.
+
+Traders and hedge funds approach the rebalancing several months before with multiple strategies. The simplest is to buy the stocks that could get a boost from buying by ETFs and other passive investors, thanks to being reclassified into a more-popular index or having their relative weight increase. Ditto for shorting shares moving in the opposite direction. [[12]](https://www.barrons.com/articles/how-investors-can-play-the-rebalancing-of-the-russell-indexes-51590158778)
+
+.
+
+*Nobody fully knows what will happen with GME. But as* [u/dlauer](https://www.reddit.com/u/dlauer/) *states* [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nvnslz/have_we_downplayed_the_importance_of_gme_entering/h15susc/?context=3)*, "the announcement is usually bullish because it adds buying pressure."*
+
+[![r/Superstonk - GME Russell 1000 Rebalance Day and T+21 and T+35: One Of The Highest Volume Days Of The Year. Every time any of the indices add or delete a stock, the funds must also buy or sell the stock.](https://preview.redd.it/l7hu03ruin471.jpg?width=712&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3f3957884f89ee1679388ad9bfbb05d82792e08a)](https://preview.redd.it/l7hu03ruin471.jpg?width=712&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3f3957884f89ee1679388ad9bfbb05d82792e08a)
+
+u/dlauer on Russell Rebalance Day
+
+The annual reconstitution is one of the most significant drivers of short-term shifts in supply and demand for US equities, often leading to sizable price movements and volatility in individual company names or industry sectors. The final day of the reconstitution is typically one of the highest trading-volume days of the year in US equity markets.
+
+[...] Similarly, it can create opportunities for investors seeking to benefit from the price moves which may be created from the reconstitution.
+
+Countless ETFs, mutual funds, and managed asset programs mirror the composition of the Russell US Indexes in their investment funds, structured products, and index-based derivatives. With close to 70% of actively-managed institutional US equity assets currently benchmarked to a Russell Index, changes to index composition are apt to reverberate widely across the market. [[13]](https://www.cmegroup.com/education/articles-and-reports/the-russell-2000-index-reconstitution-2020.html)
+
+Index funds make up a substantial percentage of the daily trading in the stock market. The S&P 500 ETF [...] trade billions of dollars each day, and every time any of the indices add or delete a stock, the funds must also buy or sell the stock. This can create some large moves for the stocks involved and can be an interesting source of volatility for traders.
+
+At the close on June 25, 2021, the Russell indices will be rebalanced. [...] Thousands of stocks are impacted by what Russell calls its 'reconstitution.' Typically the day on which the reconstitution is down is one of the highest volume days of the year as a slew of huge blocks are transferred to various index funds. [[14]](https://realmoney.thestreet.com/investing/trading-the-russell-indices-rebalancing-15677149)
+
+.
+
+[Here](https://www.etfchannel.com/type/most-shorted-etfs/) *you can see the most heavily shorted ETFs. 0.44% of IWM is GME; it's #6 with 43.48% Short Interest.* [*[15]*](https://www.etfchannel.com/type/most-shorted-etfs/) 
+
+*As far as I understand, FTSE Russell shared on May 7th already that GME would move into the Russell 1000, but eversince then, we have seen posts of shorties heavily shorting some ETFs, yesterday and today.*
+
+.
+
+*Shoutout to* [u/gooseears](https://www.reddit.com/u/gooseears/):
+
+I think people are confusing what can force someone to cover their shorts. No one can directly make anyone cover their shorts directly. As long as they have their margin requirements covered, they can keep those positions open. In fact, the lenders want those positions open as long as possible to make dat interest off it.
+
+BUT, when the ETFs rebalance and there is a load of volatility, this COULD cause GME to skyrocket in price due to the potential buying pressure, which COULD lead to margin calls which COULD lead to force liquidations to cover open short positions.
+
+Notice the word "could" each time. This is a series of possible events that could lead to the squeeze. But don't think this is a certain date. As always, no dates. Anything could happen on that day. [[16]](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nx3abo/udlauer_knows_twothree_things_more_listen_to_what/h1cldzw/?context=3)
+
+*TL;DR:*
+
+*GME is very likely to move from the Russell 2000 to the Russell 1000 Index. Rebalancing is happening right now,* *the newly reconstituted indexes take effect after the market close on June 25, data will be published on Monday, June 28 when the Russell Reconstitution takes effect and the newly reconstituted indexes begin to operate.*
+
+*One can not say what will happen with the GME price. Typically, index rebalancing day one of the highest volume days of the year.* W*hat we do know is that someone big is going to have to buy shares, and they will likely have some impact on the trading.*
+
+~~*Fun fact: As you have read in the title, T+21 and T+35 both land on the same day, two days before the Russell indices rebalance.*~~
+
+.
+
+.
+
+.
+
+[[1] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/russell_1000index.asp](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/russell_1000index.asp)
+
+[[2] https://research.ftserussell.com/products/downloads/Russell-US-indexes.pdf](https://research.ftserussell.com/products/downloads/Russell-US-indexes.pdf)
+
+[[3] https://content.ftserussell.com/sites/default/files/ru2000_membershiplist_20200629.pdf](https://content.ftserussell.com/sites/default/files/ru2000_membershiplist_20200629.pdf)
+
+[[4] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tell-whether-amc-gamestop-russell-120012129.html](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tell-whether-amc-gamestop-russell-120012129.html)
+
+[[5] https://content.ftserussell.com/sites/default/files/russell_microcap_deletions_-_2021.pdf](https://content.ftserussell.com/sites/default/files/russell_microcap_deletions_-_2021.pdf)
+
+[[6] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/russell-microcap-index.asp](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/russell-microcap-index.asp)
+
+[[7] https://www.ftserussell.com/resources/russell-reconstitution](https://www.ftserussell.com/resources/russell-reconstitution)
+
+[[8] https://www.investopedia.com/articles/stock-analysis/062516/russell-rebalance-study-what-you-need-know.asp](https://www.investopedia.com/articles/stock-analysis/062516/russell-rebalance-study-what-you-need-know.asp)
+
+[[9] https://www.ftserussell.com/blogs/how-zoom-zoomed-russell-1000](https://www.ftserussell.com/blogs/how-zoom-zoomed-russell-1000)
+
+[[10] 'Gen Z' comes to Russell 1000 Index as Russell Rebalance nears (2019)](https://www.ftserussell.com/blogs/gen-z-comes-russell-1000-index-russell-rebalance-nears)
+
+[[11] Stocks in the Russell 1000 Index](https://stockmarketmba.com/stocksintherussell1000.php)
+
+[[12] ](https://www.barrons.com/articles/how-investors-can-play-the-rebalancing-of-the-russell-indexes-51590158778)<https://www.barrons.com/articles/how-investors-can-play-the-rebalancing-of-the-russell-indexes-51590158778>
+
+[[13] https://www.cmegroup.com/education/articles-and-reports/the-russell-2000-index-reconstitution-2020.html](https://www.cmegroup.com/education/articles-and-reports/the-russell-2000-index-reconstitution-2020.html)
+
+[[14] https://realmoney.thestreet.com/investing/trading-the-russell-indices-rebalancing-15677149](https://realmoney.thestreet.com/investing/trading-the-russell-indices-rebalancing-15677149)
+
+[[15] https://www.etfchannel.com/type/most-shorted-etfs/](https://www.etfchannel.com/type/most-shorted-etfs/)
+
+[[16] https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nx3abo/udlauer_knows_twothree_things_more_listen_to_what/h1cldzw/?context=3](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nx3abo/udlauer_knows_twothree_things_more_listen_to_what/h1cldzw/?context=3)
+
+.
+
+.
+
+.
+
+*HERE ARE SOME GREAT FOLLOW UP LINKS:*
+
+[No matter what the price is, Gamestop should be upgraded to the Russell 1000 index on June 28th](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nwvyfg/no_matter_what_the_price_is_gamestop_should_be/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
+
+[FTSE Russell begins 33rd annual Russell US Indexes Reconstitution](https://www.ftserussell.com/press/ftse-russell-begins-33rd-annual-russell-us-indexes-reconstitution)
+
+[Russell 1000: Many poorly researched or purely speculative DD today about this. Here is the actual DATA and explanation of what impact the reconstitution is likely to have.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nu91kx/russell_1000_many_poorly_researched_or_purely/)
+
+[S&P 500 index inclusion (follow-up to my Russell 1000 DD yesterday): A potential CATALYST that is surprisingly *very* close...and which SHFs are powerless to prevent!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nv3n42/sp_500_index_inclusion_followup_to_my_russell/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
+
+[Ape Andy shares about GME into Russel 1000 from Russell 2000](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCxZpkfW-P8)
+
+- *He explains that end of June when there is a rebalancing that all shorted Russel 200 ETFs containing GME need to be closed, meaning there will be buying pressure. Andy also mentions that the Russel 2000 ETFs are shorted 500%.*
+
+*.*
+
+.
+
+.
+
+*and... just putting this here:* [*https://www.gmefloor.com/*](https://www.gmefloor.com/)
+
+.
+
+.
+
+.
+
+*I am not a financial advisor. I am just compiling some information I found on the internet. But please let me give you one advice: Buckle the f*ck up.*
+
+*I love you.*

DD/2021-06-13-Correlation-between-Rising-Reverse-Repo-Rates-Gamestop-and-Crypto.md

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+I found a correlation in why REVERSE REPO RATES are exponentially growing, Gamestop & crypto and its in NSCC 802
+================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/con101smd](https://www.reddit.com/user/con101smd/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nz0fsz/i_found_a_correlation_in_why_reverse_repo_rates/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+A very tiny bit about my backround.
+
+I worked in private banking and savings and investments for a big bank in the UK and then moved to a competitor in which I worked in ISA investments for some time.
+
+I have always been entrepenuerial and have for the last few years been out on my own having had enough of banking I ended up getting into GPU mining and running passive incomes through PoW mining and then PoS mining (this is relevent bare with me)
+
+So currently I mine crypto into my ewallet portfolio and then I run my stocks and shares portfolio.
+
+In crypto you have 2 ways to create it.
+
+1: PoW - Proof of work mining.
+
+This is the physical eletric consuming hardware route. You use this method to unlock the next block in the blockchain (the B coin and the E coin)
+
+2\. PoS - Proof of stake (Staking)
+
+(now this is important)
+
+This is DeFi - Decentralized Finance.
+
+This is a non physical way of creating crypto and it is based around the fundamentals that if you stake your asset, you add your funds to a giant liquidity pool in which the more funds in it, the easier the flow of transactions in and out to bounce off other curriences against it. In short you get paid handsomely to be an automatic market maker through whats called 'smart contracts'
+
+In return for staking your money in these liquidity pools you are paid a live constantly rolling interest payment that works out on average maybe 100% per annum. These interest payments can be capitalized and compounded in your intial investment.
+
+In other words, whilst you buy and hold a crypto, you are earning a constant high yielding dividend payment on it and still have the ability to move funds in and out without any hinderence or clauses.
+
+there are several DeFi platforms that are popular like:
+
+PANCAKE SWAP <https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/pancakeswap/>
+
+and
+
+UNI SWAP <https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/uniswap/>
+
+SO YOURE WONDERING RIGHT NOW WHY IN THE FUCK AM I TALKING CRYPTO ON SUPERSTONK?
+
+[![r/Superstonk - I found a correlation in why REVERSE REPO RATES are exponentially growing, Gamestop & crypto and its in NSCC 802](https://preview.redd.it/0xii24b9a2571.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=7cac90e8e601f9391df0ba1196ba5bc6612dd120)](https://preview.redd.it/0xii24b9a2571.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=7cac90e8e601f9391df0ba1196ba5bc6612dd120)
+
+I see what your at Kenny, I se ya buddy
+
+When the filing: SR-NSCC-2021-802 was posted I can remember at the time hearing grumblings about crypto not being accepted as liquidity on balance books but had never considered its ramifications.
+
+please find below some of my findings.
+
+on page 14 of SR-NSCC-2021-802 April 29, 2021
+
+[![r/Superstonk - I found a correlation in why REVERSE REPO RATES are exponentially growing, Gamestop & crypto and its in NSCC 802](https://preview.redd.it/se13ie46a2571.png?width=746&format=png&auto=webp&s=9912fa13f4fdcffd7b0d65a1529d41a9bb15f4f0)](https://preview.redd.it/se13ie46a2571.png?width=746&format=png&auto=webp&s=9912fa13f4fdcffd7b0d65a1529d41a9bb15f4f0)
+
+https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nscc-an/2021/34-91720.pdf PG 14
+
+[![r/Superstonk - I found a correlation in why REVERSE REPO RATES are exponentially growing, Gamestop & crypto and its in NSCC 802](https://preview.redd.it/ooadzkjz92571.png?width=742&format=png&auto=webp&s=b63eabf13080da8d41024afd8320cff7edda69f3)](https://preview.redd.it/ooadzkjz92571.png?width=742&format=png&auto=webp&s=b63eabf13080da8d41024afd8320cff7edda69f3)
+
+https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nscc-an/2021/34-91720.pdf PG 14
+
+So in the NSCC filing it defines that the only acceptable form of 'qualifying liquid resources' to include, among other things, lines of credit without material adverse change provisions, that are readily available and convertible into cash.
+
+Now this filing was on april 29th and had 5 business days to be enacted.
+
+This takes us to May 4th.
+
+Remember me randomly talking about DeFi UNI SWAP AND PANCAKE SWAP?
+
+Well have a look at this.........
+
+[![r/Superstonk - I found a correlation in why REVERSE REPO RATES are exponentially growing, Gamestop & crypto and its in NSCC 802](https://preview.redd.it/knp62xbl92571.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=b6fbf88630618801c8eff7634e4c7937e996f961)](https://preview.redd.it/knp62xbl92571.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=b6fbf88630618801c8eff7634e4c7937e996f961)
+
+https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/pancakeswap/
+
+[![r/Superstonk - I found a correlation in why REVERSE REPO RATES are exponentially growing, Gamestop & crypto and its in NSCC 802](https://preview.redd.it/9qjsb3vn92571.png?width=963&format=png&auto=webp&s=52a252ca5d1e66ca6b25a64d0a3a5fa2d54eca21)](https://preview.redd.it/9qjsb3vn92571.png?width=963&format=png&auto=webp&s=52a252ca5d1e66ca6b25a64d0a3a5fa2d54eca21)
+
+https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/uniswap/
+
+you can see volume increases similar to short sold volume on GME : every spike in volume relates to a movement in GME
+
+They were parking their money in places where the daily returns were better than the daily interest costs to borrow the shares
+
+Nearly all the PoS cryptos peaked on May 3rd evening time rolling into May 4th
+
+So when did our reverse repo rates kick off, oh go on lets have a wee lookie look and see.........
+
+Looks like the exponential rocket ignited some time between may 3rd overnight and oh my god May the forth be with you right before Cinco De Buyo day happened.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - I found a correlation in why REVERSE REPO RATES are exponentially growing, Gamestop & crypto and its in NSCC 802](https://preview.redd.it/ou630ghi92571.png?width=1168&format=png&auto=webp&s=601fcb2809df51fa1d478744ff8be45e474ff3d1)](https://preview.redd.it/ou630ghi92571.png?width=1168&format=png&auto=webp&s=601fcb2809df51fa1d478744ff8be45e474ff3d1)
+
+https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RRPONTSYD#
+
+I believe that prior to the NSCC filing being passed and enacted, the SHF have been using DeFi Proof of stake coins to hide a lot of the cash that had been amassed from having sold short soo many shares across the field, not only in GME.
+
+If you look at the correlation of when the Reverse Repo Rates ignited, it is the same time of this filing, the same time crypto PoS tanks, and the same time that the NSCC enacts the filing to prevent crypto being used as liquid.
+
+I believe that prior to May 4th, these coins have been the primary location for hiding funds gathered through naked short selling, and prior to may 4th these coins were considered liquid assets on the bank balance sheets. Post May 4th, they are no longer considered liquid but rather assets and so we then saw the overall down turn of the crypto markets.
+
+I cannot find the specific document but from memory I believe there was further information late apr/early may that procluded that Crypto due to reclassification as an asset rather than liquid would be eligibl for different tax status (commodities/equities taxes i have no idea about sorry)
+
+EDIT: Timeline added from comments courtesy of [u/Taimpeng](https://www.reddit.com/u/Taimpeng/) tyvm kind ape, you rock
+
+End of Q1/March: DTC/creditors realize this is not going away.
+
+[April 1st, SR-DTC-2021-005 announced for review](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mi3xdt/dtcc_new_proposed_rule_change_dtc2021005/) - The nuclear option ("MAD"). Would blow up GME shorts and also everyone else in the market running similar scams.
+
+[April 8th, SR-NSCC-2021-802 announced for review, comments, etc.](https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rule-filings/2021/NSCC/SR-NSCC-2021-802.pdf) - A tactical nuke revealed. By removing the ability to leverage crypto markets *simultaneously for revenue and collateral reqs*, the short position will be unsustainable.
+
+[April 12th, SR-DTC-2021-005 PULLED (INDEFINITELY) FOR "REFORMATTING"](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mpmcyz/good_news_update_on_dtc2021005_according_to_john/) - With the tactical nuke in place, no need to keep full-scale Armageddon on the table, right?
+
+[May 4th, SR-NSCC-2021-802 takes effect](https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rule-filings/2021/NSCC/SR-NSCC-2021-802-Approval-Notice.pdf) - Tactical nuke detonation.
+
+[May 5th+ Overnight repos explode](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RRPONTSYD#). Many DDs suggest the ON RRP is "a liquidity problem framed as a collateral problem". It's both because the tactical nuke hit both.
+
+TL:DR:
+
+SHF used proof of stake crypto to churn profits from their large lumps of cash from naked short selling. the SEC said no, not happening. SHF now all of a sudden have all these tendies and no where to park them that they can get safety or high yield profits so they are parking their tendies with the fed.
+
+Now remember the way I mentioned several dates:
+
+April 26th: this was the cut off point for NSCC 802 to be contested. It was not contested.
+
+R C tweeted on apr 26th that everything was on track
+
+April 29th was the date that NSCC 802 would start to be initated to be completed by 4th May
+
+R C tweeted on Apr 29th a meme of Mr Hanky
+
+APE NOT A FINANCIAL ADVISOR
+
+BUY, HODL, BUCKLE UP
+
+All of those charts, all those repo spike tendies, all that money across the board is bubbling out of every seem and the ony place it can go is into our pockets!
+
+CANTSTOP. WONTSTOP. GAMESTOP.

DD/2021-06-13-Learn-From-the-Past-When-They-Did-Not-Care-to-Hide.md

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+Learn from the past, when they didn't care to hide.
+==================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/JustBeingPunny](https://www.reddit.com/user/JustBeingPunny/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nyxs1f/learn_from_the_past_when_they_didnt_care_to_hide/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Have you heard of Max-D? No, nor had I. I searched for 'naked short selling' through EDGAR (SEC's public database' and amongst all of the filings, I stumbled upon their wonderful little company.
+
+What makes them so special? Why even bother with a post? Well, they were subjected to manipulative stock trading that was driving their share price into the ground, much like the attempt on GameStop. However, like overstock, this company fought back hard. The went public to expose the naked short selling with figures and number to prove just how bad it was.
+
+Rather than a long TL;DR at the end, I'll be posting recap summaries throughout. You should be able to follow the entire post reading these summaries... I hope. The whole thing is a good read, I promise!
+
+*As always, if any information or interpretation is incorrect, help me correct it! I'm happy to edit accordingly!*
+
+_______________________________________________________________________________
+
+Background --
+
+June 14, 2018 -- 19.09pm ET
+
+*Max Sound Corporation (OTC:MAXD) and its Shareholders are being continuously victimized by Manipulative Trading Practices and Abusive Naked Short Selling orchestrated by Knight/Virtu (NITE), Cantor Fitzgerald (CANT), Canaccord Genuity (CSTI),* *Citadel* *(CDEL) and eTrade/G1 (ETRF) for the past three years with the objective to systematically lower the MAXD share price by selling billions of counterfeit shares that generate enormous free money for the market makers who have no intention of ever covering a short position. In fact, they have paid bashers that spew lies and libel wherever legitimate shareholders congregate.*
+
+*Yesterday the Company reported that it had engaged a leading provider of Regulation SHO compliance monitoring, short sale trading statistics and market integrity surveillance related to substantial naked short selling of its stock.*
+
+*Max Sound has now registered complaints related to these activities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).* *The Company encourages MAXD investors and shareholders who believe they have been harmed, to file complaints as well. Remember, the value is being stolen from your investment, only because well-organized criminals are able to operate with absolute power, unmonitored inside the industry that handles, manages, trades and ultimately steals the total value of your asset.*
+
+This is a direct statement. The gigantic titanium swingers these mofos have. I guess I'm not surprised Citadel are in there. Though things continue to get REALLY interesting...
+
+June 14, 2018 -- Earlier the same morning -- 08.49 ET
+
+*Max Sound Corporation has engaged a leading provider of Regulation SHO compliance monitoring, short sale trading statistics and market integrity surveillance related to substantial short selling of its stock. Regulation SHO requires bona-fide market-making activities to include making purchases and sales in roughly comparable amounts.*
+
+So you're being naked shorted right into the ground. You feel helpless and have nowhere to go. What do you do? You bring in the experts and that is exactly what they did.
+
+*The Securities and Exchange Commission has stated that bona-fide market-making DOES NOT include activity that is related to speculative selling strategies for investment purposes of the broker-dealer and is disproportionate to the usual market making patterns or practices of the broker-dealer in that security. Likewise, where a market maker posts continually at or near the best offer, but does not also post at or near the best bid, the market maker's activities do not qualify as bona-fide market making. Moreover, a market maker that continually executes short sales away from its posted quotes is not considered to be engaged in bona-fide market making*
+
+Ape talk -- The SEC has stated market-making can't be genuine if they're 'shorting away from its' posted quotes', missing bids from the buy side every now and then, whilst the sell side ALWAYS has something there, or diverts away from its' regular market making patterns. (Sound familiar?) *This is my interpretation. My knowledge on market making is little, so if anyone can add a better easy explanation, I'll be happy to add.*
+
+So let's take a break here and recap.
+
+MAXD are a company that were fully aware that they were being shorted (also naked) into the ground. They hired some experts in the field to take a look into the trading and market making activities for compliance. What they found was....
+
+_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+Did they comply?
+
+*MAXD market makers have been monitored daily for compliance with Reg SHO and Fair Market-Making Requirements.* *Here is a trading analysis of MAXD.*
+
+*BuyVol = real buyers at offer.*
+
+*SellVol = real sellers at bid.*
+
+*ShortVolume = short sale trade identifiers for both EXEMPT (market makers)*
+
+*NON-EXEMPT (everyone else) shorts sales.*
+
+*The short selling as a percentage of daily trading volume in MAXD by your firm is abnormally high; the market-making math related thereto does not reconcile and is not at all compliant with Federal Securities Laws***.**
+
+*As is common during these orchestrated short selling campaigns, bad actors with no real interest in MAXD's success, or any small public company for that matter,* *has consistently engaged in false accusations and libel on the Company's stock chat boards in attempts to scare and demoralize MAXD's legitimate shareholders**. It is noteworthy that as soon as Max Sound sent this report to the market makers perpetrating the naked short sales on the company, the bad actors disappeared at least for the time being..*
+
+Acknowledging the shills, reporting the shills and then telling the shorts that they know. I'm beginning to love these people more and more.
+
+Recap -- The experts took a peek behind the curtain and did the math on the market making activity. They concluded that there was absolutely no way that they could be complying with federal securities law. They also found shills in their message boards and compiled a report highlighting all of this. This forced the shorts to back off for a small while.
+
+__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+The data
+
+This is the thick of it. MAX-D just didn't publicly state all of this was happening. They posted clear numbers detailing how and WHO. *I'll continue to quote their statement and break it down further. Buckle up.*
+
+*We have analyzed the last year of daily short volume data and correlated it to recent market making activity in MAXD.* *In 27 of the past 31 trading days, 87% of the time, the combined selling and short selling in MAXD has far exceeded the amount of buying (See NetNet column below).* *Market makers, by definition, are required to PROVIDE LIQUIDITY not extract or remove liquidity**. The math provided below demonstrates that instead of matching orders, market makers, Knight/Virtu, Cantor Fitzgerald, Canaccord Genuity, Citadel, eTrade/G1 are heavily shorting MAXD stock BOTH on the offer and on the bid, which by definition means they have a "speculative short selling strategy" running on MAXD. They are carrying net short positions overnight and continuing to claim the market maker's exemption, which is in VIOLATION of the Fair Market Making Requirements of Regulation SHO.* *We are able to mathematically prove this because there is not enough BuyVol (buy volume) to match the amount of selling and short selling. The chart below identifies the top 5 market makers, in MAXD for May 2018 (highlighted below) accounting for 2,257,870,595 shares of trading, or 88.22% of total trading volume in May.*
+
+Ape talk/Recap -- There was lots and lots of short selling from many market makers. They continually claimed their exemption to naked short sell, which is a violation of regulation SHO. Better yet, they could mathematically prove it...
+
+*Total Volume* *Name*
+
+*(Last Month)*
+
+*643,662,180* *Knight/Virtu,*
+
+*154,447,100* *Cantor Fitzgerald,*
+
+*203,762,081* *Canaccord Genuity,*
+
+*769,731,954* *Citadel, - These fuckers yet again*
+
+*247,276,817* *Trade/G1*
+
+*Highlighting these Market Makers abusive activities in-concert with each other for just the one month of May, allows regulators, the SEC, FINRA, the U.S. Attorney as well as the media to easily identify the manipulative trading activity and counterfeiting of MAXD shares engaged in by their traders for the past year and well beyond. When overlaid for the entire year (back to June 1, 2017) the math is shocking. 8,117,878,650 total shares have been shorted representing in excess of 40% of MAXD's total trading volume and it demonstrates that these market makers have knowingly participated in manipulative trading practices and counterfeiting of MAXD shares.*
+
+We provide the following data in this report:
+
+DAILY TOTAL SHARES SHORTED (volume and price), which includes all shares shorted even by exempt institutions such as market makers.
+
+FAILURES TO DELIVER (naked shorts).
+
+MARKET MAKER SHARE VOLUME (exposing exactly how many shares are being traded and the name of the market making firm traded through).
+
+MARKET MAKER DATA (showing whether or not a fair market is being made in each trading day).
+
+CUMULATIVE TOTAL SHARES SHORTED data showing large short positions and the volume weighted average price that a short squeeze will start.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Learn from the past, when they didn't care to hide.](https://preview.redd.it/xlb7iptlo1571.png?width=568&format=png&auto=webp&s=4f83254f4d02b5f4996ab05191a6937bc1cc1b73)](https://preview.redd.it/xlb7iptlo1571.png?width=568&format=png&auto=webp&s=4f83254f4d02b5f4996ab05191a6937bc1cc1b73)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Learn from the past, when they didn't care to hide.](https://preview.redd.it/kdft08vmo1571.png?width=555&format=png&auto=webp&s=ec83f53d39b609f687ef86a37103320504121f3e)](https://preview.redd.it/kdft08vmo1571.png?width=555&format=png&auto=webp&s=ec83f53d39b609f687ef86a37103320504121f3e)
+
+Recap -- They proved mathematically that the game was rigged and that Kenny boy (Citadel) was the biggest culprit. The first image shows the potential squeeze value. The second image shows just how bad the market making activity was. Just look at that buy volume vs sell volume.
+
+________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+The final comment
+
+*MAXD is making this report available to the investment world to create a substantial short squeeze opportunity with the goal to return to its shareholders the massive amount of equity stolen by unscrupulous market makers.*
+
+They openly advocated for people to invest to start a short squeeze. There was no hidden riddle. It was there in black and white.
+
+TL;DR -- MAX-D are a company that were being shorted into the ground. Market makers were using their liquidity exemptions to naked short, further driving the price. MAX-D brought in the experts and found the market making activity was fraudulent and in breach of Federal securities law, as it was mathematically impossible they were doing everything 'by the book'.
+
+_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
+Bonus round -- Citadel and the inadvertent 'mini bomb'
+
+Let's look at the chart. Citadel were the biggest shorts for the company? Looks like Kenny had to cover some of them other shorts positions.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - Learn from the past, when they didn't care to hide.](https://preview.redd.it/b2sv9zxto1571.png?width=672&format=png&auto=webp&s=7e5bf6e1aecffc9b61ab9dcad35a16d87246a691)](https://preview.redd.it/b2sv9zxto1571.png?width=672&format=png&auto=webp&s=7e5bf6e1aecffc9b61ab9dcad35a16d87246a691)

DD/2021-06-16-T+35-is-the-One-True-Cycle.md

@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]
+=====================================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/user/dentisttft/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o155a6/t35_is_the_one_true_cycle_evidence_to_back_my/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+*This post is for educational purposes only. Do your own research and make your own decisions before acting on them. Just because this information is correct now, doesn't mean it will be correct every other day. HFs have a lot of tricks. No one knows what will come next...*
+
+EDIT10 (6/21): It is more clear to me now that ETF FTD's do not behave the same as the GME FTDs that I use as examples. The ETF FTDs are a work in progress. The ETF FTDs should be weighted as well. If you find a pattern in the ETF FTDs, I'm open to hearing it!
+
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+TL;DR:
+
+-   Every spike that is seen can be traced back to T+35.
+
+-   I show 1 min spikes to back this claim up
+
+-   I provide a guide on how to setup this data yourself.
+
+Preface
+
+Almost 2 weeks ago, I posted some DD about T+35.
+
+[T+21 is NOT actually a thing! [Counter DD]](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nsady3/t21_is_not_actually_a_thing_counter_dd/)
+
+I claim that T+35 is the only T+X that is important, and other T+X "cycles" are actually just from T+35. This concept goes against the general consensus, so as expected... I got mixed reviews. Since then I have seen a different T+X, T+Y, T+Z theory every day, but there is always a catch or some sort of guessing applied. Or the cycle is T+21 one month, but T+19 the other month. As you may imagine, this has gotten frustrating for me. There is no shade being thrown at other DD writers. I just want everyone to realize how simple this is so we can all be on the same page.
+
+My T+35 theory doesn't have guess work. It works every time and it's based on free data that anyone can get. In this post, I will show you how. (I know this is starting to sound like an infomercial, but stick with me)
+
+Where my T+35 theory comes from...
+
+Reg SHO Rule 204 (<https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/242.204>) states HFs need to cover their FTDs "before regular trading hours on the 35th day after the FTD date". My T+35 theory shows they wait until the last possible day to cover, so the 34th day after the FTD date (this is why our third column formula was "=A1 + 34"). If the 34th day lands on a weekend or holiday, bump it forward to the next business day.
+
+Reg SHO states that you cannot short a stock if you have FTDs open. Once the FTDs get covered on that day, GME's price will not return to that point.
+
+That's it. That's all you need.
+
+It's as simple as...
+
+1.  Get the FTD data
+
+2.  Count 34 calendar days (FTDs need to be covered BEFORE the 35th day)
+
+3.  Those FTDs will be bought all at once on that trading day.
+
+Oh, you want to see an example?
+
+Okay, sure.
+
+I have picked out days from April because the FTDs are large and the volume was small. It is very easy to pick them out.
+
+How about... April 21. 32,220 FTDs need to be covered. The day's volume was low, but there was a 1m volume spike at 12:23 EST of 39,000. GME's price never came back afterward.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/c82wf7csqm571.png?width=451&format=png&auto=webp&s=ca4a553ffb37e4eb7ef574f3bdd7efc21bbcd413)](https://preview.redd.it/c82wf7csqm571.png?width=451&format=png&auto=webp&s=ca4a553ffb37e4eb7ef574f3bdd7efc21bbcd413)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/stvi493tqm571.png?width=760&format=png&auto=webp&s=c63c88a3ef43b64a79c124bf49fc0aaff0057ec9)](https://preview.redd.it/stvi493tqm571.png?width=760&format=png&auto=webp&s=c63c88a3ef43b64a79c124bf49fc0aaff0057ec9)
+
+April 19. 140,554 FTDs need to be covered. GME was rising quite fast on it's own. Remember, they can't short a stock when they have FTDs that need to be covered. So at 10:25 EST, There was a big jump in volume up to 160k and then the price dropped for the rest of the day.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/lb5q8rbvqm571.png?width=449&format=png&auto=webp&s=6fa055c19c2cf90d9cd6c8bddd1c201c5d5d1543)](https://preview.redd.it/lb5q8rbvqm571.png?width=449&format=png&auto=webp&s=6fa055c19c2cf90d9cd6c8bddd1c201c5d5d1543)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/px47llyvqm571.png?width=805&format=png&auto=webp&s=e344df65f5219edef1d3f7708357a728c5793130)](https://preview.redd.it/px47llyvqm571.png?width=805&format=png&auto=webp&s=e344df65f5219edef1d3f7708357a728c5793130)
+
+You see? It's that easy!
+
+Meh... this seems like a coincidence
+
+Okay, fine... I'll keep going.
+
+April 16 - 46,344 FTDs
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/cmrtpjd1rm571.png?width=449&format=png&auto=webp&s=feaf916cbd63dffe35c043ca34ffeebfb81ee19d)](https://preview.redd.it/cmrtpjd1rm571.png?width=449&format=png&auto=webp&s=feaf916cbd63dffe35c043ca34ffeebfb81ee19d)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/3f8jcft1rm571.png?width=805&format=png&auto=webp&s=89bad926ace29cb36dfb23cfed018e78e642e653)](https://preview.redd.it/3f8jcft1rm571.png?width=805&format=png&auto=webp&s=89bad926ace29cb36dfb23cfed018e78e642e653)
+
+April 15 - 155,658 FTDs
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/n75at1i4rm571.png?width=448&format=png&auto=webp&s=5b314710aa16ba499713776eccf36306c5826688)](https://preview.redd.it/n75at1i4rm571.png?width=448&format=png&auto=webp&s=5b314710aa16ba499713776eccf36306c5826688)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/rjz3cpw4rm571.png?width=758&format=png&auto=webp&s=a027c39558f072760bb8c02bc2601580da764abc)](https://preview.redd.it/rjz3cpw4rm571.png?width=758&format=png&auto=webp&s=a027c39558f072760bb8c02bc2601580da764abc)
+
+April 1 - Two days needed to be covered this day because 4/4 was a weekend. At 1:25, there was an 83k volume spike followed by a couple 100k-150k volume candles.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/dtcgi377rm571.png?width=449&format=png&auto=webp&s=04879f53d128e51679420c3c9acd23be166d06dc)](https://preview.redd.it/dtcgi377rm571.png?width=449&format=png&auto=webp&s=04879f53d128e51679420c3c9acd23be166d06dc)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/hjktf658rm571.png?width=763&format=png&auto=webp&s=eb96ccede1210db6c24950eeb0f689db122b6f99)](https://preview.redd.it/hjktf658rm571.png?width=763&format=png&auto=webp&s=eb96ccede1210db6c24950eeb0f689db122b6f99)
+
+April 30 - 86,859 FTDs. This one got split between two minutes on my chart. The average 1m volume was between 30k-40k shares. And then there are two 70k-80k volume candles at 9:50-9:51 am.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/vezj8zkarm571.png?width=453&format=png&auto=webp&s=06957bcdbaeeaa47ba59f34382e1811182c2b07a)](https://preview.redd.it/vezj8zkarm571.png?width=453&format=png&auto=webp&s=06957bcdbaeeaa47ba59f34382e1811182c2b07a)
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/fb1lqpyarm571.png?width=855&format=png&auto=webp&s=238276a529cc1e48c34e06e58e9bce7b3a817843)](https://preview.redd.it/fb1lqpyarm571.png?width=855&format=png&auto=webp&s=238276a529cc1e48c34e06e58e9bce7b3a817843)
+
+I can keep going. These are the easy ones to spot *just* in April.
+
+So what about ETF FTDs?
+
+Days with large ETF FTDs also see spikes like this. But it doesn't convert well enough to show. For instance, 1.9 million ETF FTDs might convert to a 120,000 share GME spike. If someone wants to continue this research and find a way to convert the ETF FTD count into GME shares, go ahead.
+
+Why do some days lead to large gains and some days drop immediately after the FTD cover?
+
+I wrote about that in my last DD:
+
+[SLD DD [A predictable monthly pinch on capital leading to GME gains]](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nz7mwl/sld_dd_a_predictable_monthly_pinch_on_capital/)
+
+But here's what you need to know if you can't read two DDs in a row:
+
+-   There is a period that starts on Wednesday before monthly options expiration and extends to 9 days after monthly options expiration where the 30 largest financial companies need to make large deposits to the NSCC.
+
+-   During those days, they have less money and need to be careful not to spend more or they will get liquidity called.
+
+-   Meaning T+35's with large FTD days that fall in the SLD period will increase GME's price a lot more than large FTD days that fall out of the SLD period. Once the price of GME rises within the SLD period, it does not come back down until 2 days before the end of SLD.
+
+I even mapped out the SLD periods:
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/ys4ovwzurm571.png?width=1246&format=png&auto=webp&s=16a4fcd208abfca25a479f87f5f54fc590b2af06)](https://preview.redd.it/ys4ovwzurm571.png?width=1246&format=png&auto=webp&s=16a4fcd208abfca25a479f87f5f54fc590b2af06)
+
+March 5-10 is the biggest spike outside of SLD. Those can be associated with ETF FTDs.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/enpanyhxrm571.png?width=448&format=png&auto=webp&s=3c9b8bb8bb070fe3283ecdb7874e7e94eb283339)](https://preview.redd.it/enpanyhxrm571.png?width=448&format=png&auto=webp&s=3c9b8bb8bb070fe3283ecdb7874e7e94eb283339)
+
+How do I see this for myself?
+
+Download the FTD data from the SEC: <https://www.sec.gov/data/foiadocsfailsdatahtm> and pull out every line with GME and every line of the ETFs GME are in. But that's a lot of work. Luckily, a lovely ape by the name of [u/nequin](https://www.reddit.com/u/nequin/) made a website to do this all for you.
+
+Get the FTD data:
+
+1.  Go to <https://failedtodeliver.com/?symbols=GME>
+
+2.  Make a spreadsheet.
+
+    1.  Column A is the FTD date.
+
+    2.  Column B is "=A1+34" and fill down.
+
+    3.  Column C is the number of GME FTDs
+
+    4.  Column D is the number of ETF FTDs
+
+ETFs with GME
+
+<https://failedtodeliver.com/?symbols=GAMR,XRT,RETL,XSVM,VIOV,RWJ,VIOO,PSCD,VIOG,VTWV,IUSS,VCR,VTWO,SFYF,IWC,EWSC,SYLD,PRF,RALS,FNDX,FNDB,VBR,IJS,XJR,NUSC,SLYV,IJR,SPSM,SLY,FLQS,IJT,GSSC,SLYG,VXF,NVQ,IWN,ESML,VB,SAA,DMRS,BBSC,OMFS,FDIS,STSB,SSLY,IWM,SCHA,PBSM,UWM,VTHR,URTY,VTI,TILT,VLU,HDG,AVUS,MMTM,DSI,SPTM,IWV,SCHB,ITOT,DFAU>
+
+EDIT 7: I posted my dataset for the people who want to compare. <https://www.reddit.com/user/dentisttft/comments/o1k5s4/t35_dataset/>
+
+EDIT 9: There were some issues brought up in the data. But they shouldn't be issues. Trust the files or [failedtodeliver.com](https://failedtodeliver.com/), they are the same.
+
+~~EDIT 6: IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION THAT THE WEBSITE IS OFF BY ONE DAY STARTING IN APRIL. PROBABLY BECAUSE OF THE HOLIDAY. I HAVE TAGGED THE PERSON WHO CREATED IT. SO MAKE SURE YOU DOUBLE CHECK SOME DAYS WITH THE FILES UNTIL ITS FIXED.~~
+
+~~EDIT 8: APPARENTLY THE WEBSITE USES THE FILES, SO EDIT 6 IS NOT COMPLETELY CORRECT. THERE IS A DISCREPENCY BETWEEN THE FILES/FAILEDTODELIVER.COM AND THE SEC'S FTD GRAPH.~~ [~~https://sec.report/fails.php?tc=gme~~](https://sec.report/fails.php?tc=gme)
+
+~~THE FILES SKIP APRIL 21 (WHICH IN MY OPINION MEANS ZERO) AND HAVE APRIL 30, THE GRAPH WEBSITE HAS APRIL 21 AND SKIPS APRIL 30. SO I THINK THE GRAPH WEBSITE MIGHT BE INCORRECT.~~
+
+Important Notes:
+
+-   Column A is the settlement date when the share officially becomes an FTD.
+
+-   Column B is the last possible day to cover the FTD
+
+Your spreadsheet looks like this...
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/ox473wz4sm571.png?width=451&format=png&auto=webp&s=0efc2bda56da1c16e3ab3ea4887db568cdbf43b8)](https://preview.redd.it/ox473wz4sm571.png?width=451&format=png&auto=webp&s=0efc2bda56da1c16e3ab3ea4887db568cdbf43b8)
+
+Now what?
+
+1.  Google search "what is today's date"
+
+2.  Find that date in column 2 (the +34 day)
+
+3.  Follow this flow chart.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/4ag11hd7sm571.png?width=292&format=png&auto=webp&s=7fc674526dbcd541c60490e9661581559fadade3)](https://preview.redd.it/4ag11hd7sm571.png?width=292&format=png&auto=webp&s=7fc674526dbcd541c60490e9661581559fadade3)
+
+In my experience, a "large number of FTDs" is 70,000+ for GME FTDs or 1-1.5 million FTDs for ETFs.
+
+Again, this is not guaranteed. This is just based on patterns I've seen. There are plenty of tricks that probably have not been shown. Don't do something stupid based on this data, its for education purposes only.
+
+Should my tits be jacked!?
+
+Here's the new data for this next week... Use your new knowledge from this post and you decide!
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/6a5dvr1jxn571.png?width=597&format=png&auto=webp&s=cc76d854e680a88d218b11774b70e0b805276687)](https://preview.redd.it/6a5dvr1jxn571.png?width=597&format=png&auto=webp&s=cc76d854e680a88d218b11774b70e0b805276687)
+
+EDIT5: Fixed the hightlighted section. Accidentally had June 15th in there when it shouldn't be.
+
+FAQ
+
+New FTD data just came out yesterday. So what about June?
+
+The ETF FTDs are quite large for the next 5-7 trading days. Combine that with SLD starting on June 16 ~~17~~, things look good.
+
+EDIT5: Accidentally had the wrong date typed here and the wrong dates highlighted in the photo.
+
+Why do the last two days of SLD not behave the same as the other days?
+
+Not sure. My guess is that HFs have 2 days to pay a liquidity call. So there's no point in liquidity calling them when they are about to get their money back. It also usually is at the end of the week when option premiums get extremely high, less calls are bought, and gamma ramp slows down.
+
+How long does it take before GME/ETFs show up as FTDs?
+
+They become FTDs when the trade settles. So for GME FTDs, its T+2. For ETF's, its T+6. (shoutout to [u/karasuuchiha](https://www.reddit.com/u/karasuuchiha/) for pointing out the ETF settlement time to me)
+
+What causes GME FTDs?
+
+This is where the idea of "cycles" comes from. When FTDs fall in SLD and GME spikes, it creates a lot of ITM call options. When those call options are exercised on Friday, they become FTDs upon settling (T+2 settlement). *Note: Buying and selling option contracts settle in T+1, but exercising contracts is T+2*. This causes a lot of new FTDs that need to be covered in 34 more days. Thus creating an obsession with "cycles" and why other "T+X cycle" theories fall short. It's literally just ITM options from the last SLD + FTD spike price increase will create new FTDs on Tuesday (or Wednesday with a holiday).
+
+What causes ETF FTDs?
+
+SSR!!! Remember all those days when SSR didn't stop GME from going down? It's because GME is shorted through the ETFs causing ETF FTDs 6 days later when they settle. It did something, it's just not immediately seen.
+
+I'm still not buying it. There are definitely spikes every 21 days!
+
+Well, I tried. Erase what you know about T+21 cycles and try to understand and apply this post. And maybe you will eventually see what I see.
+
+What about Net Capital?
+
+I don't know. I avoid FINRA things because in the end... it's just FINRA. This is based off of NSCC rules. I've found enough correlation in only using FTDs and SLD that I didn't think I needed to look into Net Capital too much. They could definitely both be happening, but in the end, I don't think it's too important. I'm open to someone changing my mind on this if you can show me the data (not the rules) to support that Net Capital has more correlation than SLD.
+
+What else should I know?
+
+Rule 204 says the 35 day exception applies when you have a long position on the stock. If they're shorting, how do they get to say they have a long position? I have a theory, but nothing concrete.
+
+TL;DR: The TL;DR is at the top of the post you sweet, tender, smooth-brained ape.
+
+Now that I have more eyes on my posts, I'm hoping this theory sticks better than the first time. In my opinion, getting distracted on other types of cycles is diluting focus.
+
+pce~~
+
+[u/dentisttft](https://www.reddit.com/u/dentisttft/)
+
+----------------------------------------
+
+Shoutout to [u/wJFq6aE7-zv44wa__gHq](https://www.reddit.com/u/wJFq6aE7-zv44wa__gHq/) for letting me bounce ideas off of them!
+
+EDIT1-3: formatting fixes
+
+EDIT4: Added "Should my tits be jacked!?" section
+
+EDIT5: Fixed the dates on my new section. I rushed it and highlighted June 15 on accident.
+
+Bonus Round!
+
+I posted my SLD DD on June 13th at 6:23 PM EST. 6 hours later at 12:02, Elon Musk posted this on Twitter.
+
+[![r/Superstonk - T+35 is the one true "cycle" [Evidence to back my theory up plus a step-by-step guide on how to follow along at home]](https://preview.redd.it/83o4bvpgsm571.png?width=616&format=png&auto=webp&s=4527094e5aa1d136adabc4dd554778ac29b5590c)](https://preview.redd.it/83o4bvpgsm571.png?width=616&format=png&auto=webp&s=4527094e5aa1d136adabc4dd554778ac29b5590c)
+
+Is it about my DD? No idea, probably not. But it's fun to think about. If any of the RC Tweet analyzers can find a definite connection, that would make my day.

DD/2021-06-21-Friendly-Reminder-that-Shorts-Never-Covered.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+A friendly reminder that shorts never covered: 3 images that clearly reveal the short fuckery 🚨📈🚀🚀🚀🚀
+==========================================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/broccaaa](https://www.reddit.com/user/broccaaa/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o4ps1c/a_friendly_reminder_that_shorts_never_covered_3/) | 
+
+---
+
+[Education 👨‍🏫 | Data 🔢](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22Education%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8F%AB%20%7C%20Data%20%F0%9F%94%A2%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+![1. Enough Put contracts to hide 200M shares -  3-times all outstanding shares - were opened over 3 days in January!!! Short interest and Fails to Deliver immediately dropped after.](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/122753272-02c39e80-d260-11eb-9830-6deace0a0c9a.png)
+
+[Source](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvdgf5/the_naked_shorting_scam_in_numbers_ai_detection/)
+
+![2. Deep in the money (ITM) calls were bought and exercised the same day in huge numbers in January. Up to 150M phantom shares.](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/122753335-1ff86d00-d260-11eb-8c48-3edd7a2132a9.png)
+
+[Source](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mvdgf5/the_naked_shorting_scam_in_numbers_ai_detection/)
+
+![3. Authorised market participants can break up and repackage ETFs to short the underlying (GME). After January a huge number of FTDs shifted to GME containing ETFs.](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82035192/122753447-47e7d080-d260-11eb-8ce8-f89758609b14.png)
+
+[Source](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/n1vgbb/the_naked_shorting_scam_using_etfs_mass_shifting/)

DD/2021-06-28-Infinity-Pool-How-GME-Will-Breaks-the-Laws-of-Supply-and-Demand.md

@@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
+Infinity Pool: How GME Will Break the Laws of Supply and Demand and Enable the Money Glitch
+===========================================================================================
+
+| Author       | Source       | 
+| :-------------: |:-------------:|
+|  [u/Hemoglobin_trotter](https://www.reddit.com/user/Hemoglobin_trotter/) | [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o9ifjx/infinity_pool_how_gme_will_break_the_laws_of/) | 
+
+---
+
+[DD 👨‍🔬](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/search?q=flair_name%3A%22DD%20%F0%9F%91%A8%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%94%AC%22&restrict_sr=1)
+
+Introduction
+
+*Welcome to Theoretical Microeconomics for Apes.*
+
+This post will discuss the interactions of fundamental microeconomic principles of supply, demand, price, and quantity during the MOASS, pose a theoretical example based on a hypothetical Short Interest, and discuss the possible impact of an Infinity Pool depending on its size. One of many reasons that GME will be studied for centuries is because it will stretch fundamentals of supply and demand to their theoretical limits. There are a handful of terms used repetitively throughout this post, so put your wrinkle-caps on and do some word learnin'. Fortunately, there is no quiz or attendance record.
+
+-   Section 1: Microeconomic Principles
+
+-   Section 2: Microeconomic Principles Applied to the MOASS
+
+-   Section 3: Key Takeaways
+
+*Disclaimer: I am by no means an expert, nor am I giving advice. My goal here is to understand and discuss theoretical microeconomic principles in relation to the MOASS due to my interest in the underlying mechanics of supply and demand at play. Please refute any incorrect assumptions in the comments and I will amend the post as necessary.*
+
+ta;dr: GME is a fascinating experiment of Supply and Demand. Diamond-handed Ape names price for banana
+
+* * * * *
+
+SECTION 1: MICROECONOMIC PRINCIPLES
+
+I will provide a brief overview of each concept, with links. It is worthwhile to read the entirety of each article if you are interested in the topic(s).
+
+If you are already familiar with these principles, you can skip to the next section.
+
+* * * * *
+
+1.1 Theory of Price - [Link to Article](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/theory-of-price.asp#:~:text=Understanding%20the%20Theory%20of%20Price,a%20given%20good%20or%20service.&text=The%20concept%20of%20price%20theory,adjustments%20as%20market%20conditions%20change.)
+
+> The theory of price---also referred to as "price theory"---is a microeconomic principle that uses the concept of supply and demand to determine the appropriate price point for a given good or service [or in the case of GME, a security].
+
+> The goal is to achieve the equilibrium where the quantity of the goods or services provided matches the demand of the corresponding market and its ability to acquire the good or service. The concept of price theory allows for price adjustments as market conditions change.
+
+Ape Speak: In general, price will go up when demand exceeds supply. When supply = demand, price stay same. When supply exceeds demand, price go down.
+
+* * * * *
+
+1.2 The Laws of Supply and Demand
+
+*Law of Supply* - [Link to Article](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/lawofsupply.asp)
+
+> The law of supply is the microeconomic law that states that, all other factors being equal, as the price of a good or service increases, the quantity of goods or services that suppliers offer will increase, and vice versa. The law of supply says that as the price of an item goes up, suppliers will attempt to maximize their profits by increasing the quantity offered for sale.
+
+> SUPPLY CURVE: Supply in a market can be depicted as an upward sloping supply curve *that shows how the quantity supplied will respond to various prices over a period of time.*
+
+Ape Speak: higher prices gradually convince more Apes to sell over time.
+
+*Law of Demand* - [Link to Article](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/lawofdemand.asp)
+
+> The law of demand states that quantity purchased varies inversely with price. In other words, the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded.
+
+> DEMAND CURVE: A market demand curve expresses the sum of quantity demanded at each price across all consumers in the market.
+
+> Changes in price can be reflected in movement along a demand curve, but do not by themselves increase or decrease demand.
+
+Ape Speak: [Typically, higher prices make people buy fewer of something.](https://imgur.com/a/WlR7tGv)
+
+* * * * *
+
+1.3 Supply and Demand Curves - [Link to Article](https://open.lib.umn.edu/principleseconomics/chapter/3-3-demand-supply-and-equilibrium/)
+
+[Pic#1: Example Supply and Demand Curves plotted together.](https://imgur.com/a/xVsyDnh)
+
+> The demand curve shows the quantities of a particular good or service that buyers will be willing and able to purchase at each price during a specified period. The supply curve shows the quantities that sellers will offer for sale at each price during that same period. By putting the two curves together, we should be able to find a price at which the quantity buyers are willing and able to purchase equals the quantity sellers will offer for sale.
+
+Any individual point along the Supply or Demand Curve identifies the quantity that will be supplied or demanded at a particular price (i.e., *Quantity Supplied & Quantity Demanded*). When supply exceeds demand, there is a *surplus*. When demand exceeds supply, there is a *shortage*.
+
+Ape Speak: Typically, demand and supply move in opposite directions in relation to price. When you put the two lines on a graph, they intersect at a specific price and quantity - these graphs are useful for analyzing prices.
+
+* * * * *
+
+1.4 Equilibrium - [Link to Article](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/equilibrium.asp#:~:text=The%20equilibrium%20price%20is%20where,in%20a%20state%20of%20equilibrium.)
+
+Equilibrium (artificial or otherwise) is something GME users have come to know intimately over the last month. During the MOASS, the price of GME will begin moving wildly towards a new market equilibrium (extreme rising and dipping), after which prices will stabilize and return to earth.
+
+> Equilibrium is the state in which market supply and demand balance each other, and as a result prices become stable. Generally, an over-supply of goods or services causes prices to go down, which results in higher demand---while an under-supply or shortage causes prices to go up resulting in less demand. The balancing effect of supply and demand results in a state of equilibrium.
+
+Because Equilibrium is a singular point on a standard graph where two curves intersect, it produces an Equilibrium Price (the Y axis), and an Equilibrium Quantity (the X axis).
+
+> A market in equilibrium demonstrates three characteristics: the behavior of agents is consistent, there are no incentives for agents to change behavior, and a dynamic process governs equilibrium outcome.
+
+*This is where Apes combined with astronomical Short Interest throw a wrench into the market machinery and stretch the mechanics of supply and demand to the limit.*
+
+Ape Speak: Equilibrium is reached when quantity supplied = quantity demanded. Equilibrium produces a measurable *Equilibrium Price* and *Equilibrium Quantity*. Equilibrium = market harmony.
+
+* * * * *
+
+1.5 Price Elasticity of Supply and Price Elasticity of Demand
+
+[Elasticity vs. Inelasticity](https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/012915/what-difference-between-inelasticity-and-elasticity-demand.asp) - [Perfect Elasticity and Zero Elasticity](https://opentextbc.ca/principlesofeconomics/chapter/5-2-polar-cases-of-elasticity-and-constant-elasticity/) - [Inelastic Supply Explained](https://www.economicshelp.org/concepts/inelastic-supply/)
+
+*Elasticity:* In this context, elasticity is another way of saying "rate of change" of a curve. Both Supply and Demand Curves have their own elasticity, [which determines exactly how steep the curve is on the graph](https://imgur.com/a/xVsyDnh). See Pic#1. Determining the elasticity of each curve is helpful for understanding where the curves might intersect to create market equilibrium price and quantity.
+
+Elasticity, expressed mathematically, is: E = (% Change in Quantity (Supplied or Demanded) / % Change in Price). It expresses the relationship of how many units become available from sellers or are demanded by buyers in response to changes in price. In theory, Demand and Supply Curves can reach extremes of elasticity - either perfect elasticity, or zero elasticity. It is important to note that elasticity is subject to market conditions, and changes over time - this means that Supply and Demand Curves can have different slopes at different quantities/prices. (Hint: supply being held by a diamond-handed Ape is a market condition that impacts elasticity of supply!)
+
+-   Perfect elasticity means that your Supply or Demand Curve is completely flat, and that Quantity Supplied or Demanded changes by an infinite amount in response to any change in price. (We don't really care about this in the context of GME, except to the extent that it helps us understand the flip-side, zero elasticity).
+
+-   Zero elasticity (E = 0), which is what we care about in our GME example, refers to extreme cases where a % change in price, no matter how large, results in zero change in Quantity Supplied or Demanded. When elasticity is zero, supply and demand are irresponsive to any change in price, no matter how large.
+
+Ape Speak: Elasticity determines the slope of the Supply and Demand Curves. Low *Elasticity of Supply* means that a big change in price has a small impact on the quantity of shares supplied to the market. Low/zero *Elasticity of Demand* means that a big change in price does not impact demand (in this case, the requirement to close a fixed quantity of short positions).
+
+* * * * *
+
+SECTION 2: MICROECONOMIC PRINCIPLES APPLIED TO THE MOASS
+
+*Disclaimer: This is the point of the post at which my understanding of the material presented above collides with my understanding of the last few months of DD. In other words, the proceeding sections could be most accurately classified as an opinion or educated guess.*
+
+[We're gonna hypothetical them hedgies' clavicles!](https://imgur.com/a/09lARpM)
+
+Here, I will apply the above-reference microeconomic principles to a MOASS that uses hypothetical numbers. Short Interest is critical here because it represents the number of shares at which the QUANTITY DEMANDED WILL BE FIXED. (Note: this is not a discussion about the possible short interest. I personally believe that the real SI is much higher than in the example I am about to pose.)
+
+[Pic#2: Money Glitch Activated: A Hypothetical GME MOASS Supply & Demand Curve](https://imgur.com/a/xVsyDnh)
+
+Important Numbers for this example:
+
+-   Short Interest: ~400% (280m shares)
+
+-   Float: 25m (for ease of calculation)
+
+-   Float repurchases to cover shorted shares: 11.2 float repurchases (the last ~25m shares - the final whole float repurchase - is important later on)
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.1. GME Demand Curve and Price Elasticity of Demand - Fixed Demand Enables Infinite Losses
+
+*GME Demand Curve*
+
+-   When shorts must cover and close their positions, they will require a fixed quantity of shares to do so.
+
+-   This fixed *Quantity Demanded* means that shorts must cover at any price until the *Quantity Supplied* reaches the *Quantity Demanded*.
+
+*GME Price Elasticity of Demand*
+
+-   Because *Quantity Demanded* is fixed, *Price Elasticity of Demand* is ZERO - the *Demand Curve* is VERTICAL.
+
+-   *Quantity Demanded* will not change NO MATTER THE CHANGE IN PRICE.
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.2. GME Supply Curve and Price Elasticity of Supply - The Ceiling is Your Imagination
+
+*GME Supply Curve*
+
+-   The GME *Supply Curve* is the single most important factor for determining the "price ceiling" of the MOASS.
+
+-   Because the *Demand Curve* is a vertical line, *Equilibrium Price* is determined by whatever point the *Supply Curve* intersects the *Demand Curve* (in other terms, when *Quantity Supplied* equals *Quantity Demanded*).
+
+-   The steeper the slope of the *Supply Curve*, the higher the "price ceiling" of the MOASS
+
+*GME Price Elasticity of Supply (PES)*
+
+-   In practice, GME *PES* (the slope of the *Supply Curve*) will change over time and according to market conditions.
+
+-   Paperhands lead to higher *PES* and flatter *Supply Curves*, whereas Diamond hands lead to near-zero *PES* and more vertical *Supply Curves* (Remember when I said that having diamond hands is a market condition?)
+
+-   When PES is high, more shares will trade between trading halts. When *PES* is low, fewer shares will be exchanged between trading halts. (Theoretically, as little as a single share could be traded between trading halts).
+
+-   At the beginning of the MOASS, *PES* will be higher as paperhands are tempted to sell in the 3-6 figure range. (Smaller changes in price will cause higher quantities to become available)
+
+-   The real squeeze begins when Diamond hands begin setting/lowering the *PES*, enabling share prices to exceed 7 figures. (Larger changes in price cause very low quantities to become available)
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.3. GME Theory of Price and Equilibrium - Ape Names Price
+
+Bringing it back to this graphic: [Pic#2: Hypothetical GME MOASS Supply & Demand Curve](https://imgur.com/a/xVsyDnh), you can see that a hypothetical *Equilibrium Price* has been established.
+
+*Disclaimer: This example does not account for the fact that some amount of the final ~25m shares (the final float once rehypothecated shares are gone) will be re-circulated and change the Price Elasticity of Supply as the Supply Curve approaches the Demand Curve. In other words, the Supply Curve could begin to flatten once Quantity Supplied is one whole float away from Quantity Demanded.*
+
+-   In this example, a price somewhere between $10m-$100m is sufficient to convince Diamond-Handed Apes to provide enough supply of shares to meet the demand created by Marge's call and create the required liquidity to close all of the outstanding short positions.
+
+-   When the short positions are closed, *Equilibrium* has been achieved, *Quantity Supplied* equals *Quantity Demanded*, and the price begins to stabilize (crash). This does not imply that the peak occurs exactly at the moment that the last short position is closed. I believe that the peak will occur sometime shortly after the first of the real shares enter the market, and liquidity begins to normalize.
+
+* * * * *
+
+2.4. GME MOASS, Infinity Pool Edition - The Forever Shorts
+
+*But what happens if the Quantity Supplied never reaches the Quantity Demanded?*
+
+It would look something like this: [Pic#3: GME MOASS Supply & Demand Curve: INFINITY POOL EDITION](https://imgur.com/a/xVsyDnh)
+
+-   An Infinity Pool of any size will reduce *Price Elasticity of Supply*, thus maintaining a more vertical *Supply Curve* even as real shares enter the market for re-circulation.
+
+-   If there is an Infinity Pool that equals or exceeds one whole float (~25m shares +1 share), then the *Price Elasticity of Supply* becomes ZERO, the *Supply Curve* becomes COMPLETELY VERTICAL and never intersects the *Demand Curve*, and Apes can truly name whatever price their broker allows them to enter at the time. There is an absolute *Shortage* of shares.
+
+* * * * *
+
+SECTION 3: KEY TAKEAWAYS
+
+*I believe these key takeaways are reasonable given the information already known and presented here, but these are best classified as opinions/ educated guesses*:
+
+-   Current State of Relative Equilibrium: Currently, so long as shorts create artificial equilibrium by meeting demand with artificial supply, the market will remain in a state of pseudo-equilibrium. When the downward price pressure of artificial supply inverts itself into upward price pressure from buying to cover, a wormhole opens. (This is nothing new, but I have yet to hear it expressed in these terms)
+
+-   Real-time Supply & Demand Curve: Monitoring activity on the bid/ask spread and volume between trading halts during the MOASS will provide insight into the current state of *Price Elasticity of Supply*. At times, the bid/ask spread will be as wide as brokerage maximum-price limits allow.
+
+-   When is the Infinity Squeeze phase of the MOASS truly getting started? When the *Price Elasticity of Supply* is stupidly low and getting lower. Assuming that Diamond Handed Apes own the float, the real squeeze hasn't started until GME is trading over 7-8 digits. Apes will be some of the last sellers to get in line, so any price action prior to Apes getting in line to name their price is only a buildup to the Infinity Squeeze.
+
+-   Utility of Volume During MOASS as a Predictor of a Potential Peak: In all likelihood, total volume is not a reliable indicator of a squeeze peak. You would have to possess a relatively accurate idea of the true size of the short position (a.k.a. *Quantity Demanded*), know that there is no additional volume being created by new short positions that open during the MOASS, and know the impact of real shares beginning to re-circulate.
+
+-   Infinity Pool Can Create a True Infinity Squeeze: Suppose that Apes own the float two-times over. If each Ape placed half of their shares into the Infinity Pool, then the final ~25m shares will be inaccessible by the market, and the short positions can't be closed until other sources of liquidity become available. In that scenario, Apes can name their price for the half of their shares that do not go into the Infinity Pool. I cannot personally fathom what would happen to the price if the entire current float could not re-enter circulation - perhaps institutional sellers would provide liquidity to stabilize the price later-on, but I do not know the details of how or how long it would take.
+
+-   Dips on the way up: No matter how far the price crashes down on the way up, I will not be convinced that the squeeze has started until the price is rocketing past $100k-$1m and very few shares are exchanging hands between the trading halts. IMO, any dip between $1m-$10m cannot be the true peak, because by that point it is clear that Apes are diamond handing enough shares to allow Apes to name their own price if they continue to hold.
+
+-   Closing the Last Short Position vs. Timing of the Peak: When the short positions are closed, *Equilibrium* has been momentarily achieved, *Quantity Supplied* equals *Quantity Demanded*, and the price begins to move towards a new *Equilibrium* with different market conditions. This does not imply that the peak or crash occurs exactly at the moment that the last short position is closed. I believe that the peak will occur sometime shortly after the first of the real shares enter the market, but IDK though.
+
+-   USE LIMIT ORDERS: How can an Ape name their price if they let the market name the price for them?
+
+* * * * *
+
+As many have said, if everyone waits until backside of the MOASS to sell, there will be no backside.
+
+My personal opinion on the matter, which is obviously not financial advice, is that holding all but 1 share would be the optimal way to assure an Infinity Pool is achieved!
+
+* * * * *
+
+ta;dr: GME is a fascinating experiment of Supply and Demand. Diamond-handed Ape names price for banana
+
+[Pic #1: Ordinary Supply and Demand Curves](https://imgur.com/a/xVsyDnh)
+
+[Pic #2: Money Glitch Activated: A Hypothetical GME MOASS Supply & Demand Curve](https://imgur.com/a/xVsyDnh)
+
+[Pic #3: GME MOASS Supply & Demand Curve: INFINITY POOL EDITION](https://imgur.com/a/xVsyDnh)
+
+* * * * *
+
+This is a repost of my content from a month ago. [Further reading on Infinity Pool concept by [/u/bluprince](https://www.reddit.com/u/bluprince/) can be found here.] (<https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mpvx9n/the_infinity_pool_naming_a_theoretical_posit_for>). This is a case of two people independently arriving at the same conclusion using different methodologies, which ought to jack your tits that much more.